|
S_Therapist
|
|
November 20, 2018, 01:17:43 PM |
|
Earlier the post was in reputation, now you have moved it to meta? Wasn't reputation the correct board? Why have you moved it here, btw? I don't see any reason to move it.
|
|
|
|
Luchinono
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 12
|
|
November 20, 2018, 01:31:03 PM |
|
Probably OP didn't get any replies over there,qnd thought,hey "it'll definitely get attention over here" Now sadly I really think he has to move it back.. The report looks like a blatant merit abuse to me though
|
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
|
November 20, 2018, 01:38:12 PM Last edit: November 20, 2018, 01:51:02 PM by cryptohunter |
|
Well this is the merit board so of course it can be discussed here. I see 50% of threads here are about merit or greater. So one more is of course welcomed and fully at home.
The entire merit system is a circle jerking backslapping club in meta so don't worry too much about it. Just enjoy posting here and make posts that you know are good and make a difference.
The entire system is abused if you consider a small actually tiny tiny tiny majority of posters circling it around to each other for simply aligning with their ideology of how the board should be.
A lot of the top merit holders here pass merit amongst themselves on a small sub board for discussing how much merit they have.
So long as merit is holding off new bot and scammers from the alt discussion board it's doing it's job and that is all you can say about it.
Good for highlighting it though.
Merit is to stop spammers, account farmers, ico pumpers - it has no other real value than that. I
Having said that legends passing it all around to other legends is not so bad as legends obviously powering up puppet accounts or merit buyers. We don't want that.
Get that legend reduced back to senior at max take all his merit away.
|
|
|
|
cryptofarid10 (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 532
Merit: 15
Trader
|
|
November 20, 2018, 01:40:34 PM |
|
Earlier the post was in reputation, now you have moved it to meta? Wasn't reputation the correct board? Why have you moved it here, btw? I don't see any reason to move it.
I did not get any reply on this post. So, to show the members of the DT power, I move my post to meta thread.
|
MEXC Português | Trade Anywhere with the MEXC App █▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ MEXC.com ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
|
November 20, 2018, 02:47:36 PM |
|
Earlier the post was in reputation, now you have moved it to meta? Wasn't reputation the correct board? Why have you moved it here, btw? I don't see any reason to move it.
I did not get any reply on this post. So, to show the members of the DT power, I move my post to meta thread. Very interesting report. I await to see what happens about it all. 50 merits for one post is quite insane ... even a great poster on the alt discussion will never likely attain such merit in years. Demonstrating merit is gamed hard here very valuable.
|
|
|
|
FleurTunisienne
Member
Offline
Activity: 265
Merit: 14
Nina
|
|
November 20, 2018, 02:49:36 PM |
|
I don't really think that the merited posts merite 50 points, this is a clear abuse.
Some thoughts: Even confirming that the sender is an abuser, it will require more proofs to confirm the connection between the accounts; means no determined proofs of clear abuse against receivers (at most cases, posts can be reported if meaningless or shitposts). The problems of merit system abuse can be reduced by adding a demerit option (already suggested by DT members) available for mods and DT members in abuse cases.
The topic has no Meta content, it's a matter of profile's reputation.. i think this is the appropriate board.
|
Call me "SAW"
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
|
November 20, 2018, 02:56:55 PM Last edit: November 20, 2018, 03:22:03 PM by cryptohunter |
|
I don't really think that the merited posts merite 50 points, this is a clear abuse.
Some thoughts: Even confirming that the sender is an abuser, it will require more proofs to confirm the connection between the accounts; means no determined proofs of clear abuse against receivers (at most cases, posts can be reported if meaningless or shitposts). The problems of merit system abuse can be reduced by adding a demerit option (already suggested by DT members) available for mods and DT members in abuse cases.
The topic has no Meta content, it's a matter of profile's reputation.. i think this is the appropriate board.
LOL how recognised are you at bitcointalk is that not a profiles reputation? get that one moved first then. This is the merit board. Get with the program. LOL no thanks DT members should not have this power. Mods only. You can't really ruin a board with 2 or 3 being accountable because they can not gain enough momentum it easily becomes observable as a dictatorship and since the only real fear is a ban people will just leave. However start opening it up to a clique of 40+ and there associated pets and you will make things far more risky and dark here. Demerit for mods only with clear criteria. This guy deserves some merit for spotting abuse.
|
|
|
|
Yeahpro
Member
Offline
Activity: 72
Merit: 12
|
|
November 20, 2018, 03:55:35 PM |
|
It looks like a case of merits being awarded excessively to a post that doesn't deserve that much. I would not call it an without concrete evidence that it's an alt or the merits were bought.
There are many cases of merits being awarded to maybe underserving posts and replies but it's an unregulated system and smerit holders can do as they please with it. I came across a post where a merit source (was a source at the time, not sure about now) gave 30 merits to those who commented under his/her post, as a sort of giveaway.
|
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
|
November 20, 2018, 04:40:30 PM |
|
Earlier the post was in reputation, now you have moved it to meta? Wasn't reputation the correct board? Why have you moved it here, btw? I don't see any reason to move it.
I did not get any reply on this post. So, to show the members of the DT power, I move my post to meta thread. How come removed it back to this section again?
|
|
|
|
morvillz7z
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2096
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
|
November 20, 2018, 05:46:18 PM |
|
lybship53 account was just banned for plagiarism. A grand total of 150 merits down the drain. There was an additional 50 merit transaction between lyka and lybship53 an hour ago; https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2876700.msg48024508#msg48024508
Edit: @Veleor nice findings. Since both accounts belong to the same guy, it might be worth checking lyka for plagiarism too. See if can get 2/2 lol
|
|
|
|
|
cryptofarid10 (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 532
Merit: 15
Trader
|
|
November 21, 2018, 03:01:54 AM |
|
lyka again give 50 merit yesterday to lybship53He/She Has given 200 merit 6 times, to 2 profiles He/She Send 150 merit 5 time to lybship53And Send 50 merit 1 time to temcolabsI think they ar Same person. or, Lyka Merit is selling. Merited Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2876700.msg48024508#msg48024508Merited Profile: lybship53Waiting For DT
|
MEXC Português | Trade Anywhere with the MEXC App █▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ MEXC.com ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█
|
|
|
|
|
|