cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers

[marlboroza]

Stop spamming your sig and stalking me and my posts. Using them as an excuse to spam your sig is annoying.

I accidentally mistype my forum nick on one strange unknown search engine which I can't remember which one it was and I was pointed to this post:

Can't wait for suchmoon and malborozo to have theirs done too....

...so thank you for inviting me to this valuable and sensible discussion which moved from "cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers" to "tag Lauda!" and "Lauda stuck it in TP's ass "
This is what you should do. Copy this post and send it directly to theymos because lost of shit is going on at the moment:
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=theymos


Don't forget to tell him to remove merits he has sent me because it is wrong to receive merits from top 200 merit receivers.

[1714944052]

1714944052

[1714944052]

1714944052

[1714944052]

1714944052

[1714944052]

1714944052

[cryptohunter]

@suchmoon
nothing of substance

@malborozo

Describing disturbing fantasies of his own and pretending to quote me when I never said that at all.

Please stop pretending you are just accidentally browsing random search engines and not stalking down my every thread. I would never invite you to spam your sig whilst pretending to make worthwhile comment.

You really go searching for your own username in search engines with the exact same mispelling as mine.... sounds like a usual excuses I hear in meta.

You must get out more.

[suchmoon]

Describing disturbing fantasies of his own and pretending to quote me when I never said that at all.

You do realize that one can click on the quote and go to the post where you actually said that?

[o_e_l_e_o]

stalking down my every thread

I will post where I like and when I like

the top 0.13% not only benefit from their own cycling of merit ... they also gain merit from merit seeking ass kissers who hang out in meta and give them some back.

I will merit whom I please

See also: hypocrisy, double standards, do as I say and not as I do, pot calling the kettle black

It seems we all agree there are some good posts and good posters who go unnoticed and therefore unmerited. It also seems we all agree that people are free to send merit to whomever they like, for whatever content they like, in whatever quantities they like, and in whatever timeframe they like. With that in mind, if you are serious about rectifying this situation, I would suggest your time and energy would be better spent either hunting down these unmerited good posts for the sources' collective attention, or reporting bad posts to help clean up the Altcoin boards.

[cryptohunter]

Describing disturbing fantasies of his own and pretending to quote me when I never said that at all.

You do realize that one can click on the quote and go to the post where you actually said that?

Point me there

@oieoie

Is that the exact same post I already replied too before? Please read the other thread.

[o_e_l_e_o]

@oieoie

A truly impressive misspelling of a word that only has 3 letters.

@craptobanter

In the other thread you said you were done with this topic and wanted to move on and to discuss something new. Once again, I would urge you to take your own advice.

[suchmoon]

Describing disturbing fantasies of his own and pretending to quote me when I never said that at all.

You do realize that one can click on the quote and go to the post where you actually said that?

Point me there

Edited 2020-11-30 to fix a broken image

[cryptohunter]

Stop spamming your sig and stalking me and my posts. Using them as an excuse to spam your sig is annoying.

I accidentally mistype my forum nick on one strange unknown search engine which I can't remember which one it was and I was pointed to this post:

Can't wait for suchmoon and malborozo to have theirs done too....

...so thank you for inviting me to this valuable and sensible discussion which moved from "cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers" to "tag Lauda!" and "Lauda stuck it in TP's ass "
This is what you should do. Copy this post and send it directly to theymos because lost of shit is going on at the moment:
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=theymos


Don't forget to tell him to remove merits he has sent me because it is wrong to receive merits from top 200 merit receivers.

misquoting me and trying to silence me about him probably being number 1 on the reduction list after smallest subset of givers are removed.
this is dishonest

[cryptohunter]

@oieoie

A truly impressive misspelling of a word that only has 3 letters.

@craptobanter

In the other thread you said you were done with this topic and wanted to move on and to discuss something new. Once again, I would urge you to take your own advice.

1. how do you suggest I do this when they keep making new threads about it and specifically about me?
However yes you are correct I have said I am happy not to discuss it further about 5 or 6x already 2 complete thread before this one.. to the same people that first keep asking me things and creating new threads then saying I am spamming about it???

2. You are double posting on different threads which people get banned for and also I answered this clearly already?

Did you arrive here by searching your misspelled name on an obscure search engine or are you following every post I make?

Stop being upset about factual presentation of stats and read my reply to your identical post on the other thread before following me everywhere asking the same thing.

If you find my last answer does not answer your questions (false assumptions) in full say what parts you are needing further clarification on in detail like a sensible reasonable person. I can not believe you even read the reply because i clearly say every can merit who they like for what they like .... it is then the meaning they attribute to the merit scores which that needs to be clear. Start reading and stop creating straw men that only exist in your mind.

Try this again https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5084723.msg48730620#msg48730620

are you saying you already read this and need to now search for me again here to ask the same thing?

[suchmoon]

You are double posting

I feel like we'll soon need a bingo for stuff cryptohunter projects onto others.

[cryptohunter]

You are double posting

I feel like we'll soon need a bingo for stuff cryptohunter projects onto others.

1. can you be banned for repeated posting of your own posts in different threads?
not that I am going to report it because i;m not into all that for a one off things that seem to be reasonble if he did not see the first time around

2. it is not 100% the same but it is quoting the same things he quoted before I already addressed. ?

or exactly the same questions and exact things I just answered him on.

"Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on 17-12-2018, 23:15:05
Quote from: cryptohunter on 17-12-2018, 22:51:37
I will merit whom I please

Exactly! People are free to merit whomever the please. If this rule applies to you, why does it not apply to the top 200 merit receivers/senders/sources or the Meta board, against which you seem to have some sort of personal vendetta?"

How is it you  happen to be here again so soon?

Actually now i review your video why are you highlighting that part where it says

looking foward to such and marlboroz having theirs done?

What specifically is the reason to highlight that line in particular?

Explain the video step by step... what are you trying to demonstrate? because now I watch it again it seems strange to highlight that line at all.

[suchmoon]

You are double posting

I feel like we'll soon need a bingo for stuff cryptohunter projects onto others.

1. can you be banned for repeated posting of your own posts in different threads?

Depends on the content of those posts. But you can surely get banned if you make consecutive posts in the same thread, like you just did. And you know it because recently you complained about someone else doing it and that person got a temp ban, so it's quite puzzling why you're deliberately breaking the rules now.

Actually now i review your video why are you highlighting that part where it says

looking foward to such and marlboroz having theirs done?

What specifically is the reason to highlight that line in particular?

Explain the video step by step... what are you trying to demonstrate?

I'm showing that the actual quotes (ones within quote tags) lead to actual things you said.

That was before I realized you misinterpreted the double quotation marks, not the quote tags, since you never said which part you considered misquoted.

[cryptohunter]

You are double posting

I feel like we'll soon need a bingo for stuff cryptohunter projects onto others.

1. can you be banned for repeated posting of your own posts in different threads?

Depends on the content of those posts. But you can surely get banned if you make consecutive posts in the same thread, like you just did. And you know that because recently you complained about someone else doing it and that person got a temp ban so it's quite puzzling why you're deliberately breaking the rules now.

Actually now i review your video why are you highlighting that part where it says

looking foward to such and marlboroz having theirs done?

What specifically is the reason to highlight that line in particular?

Explain the video step by step... what are you trying to demonstrate?

I'm showing that the actual quotes (ones within quote tags) lead to actual things you said.

That was before I realized you misinterpreted the double quotation marks, not the quote tags, since you never said which part you considered misquoted.

I did not misinterpret as is obvious ... he quoted my first remark then quoted something like my second remark which was no way attributed to anything anyone else said on the thread since nobody did say anything like that.

Are you saying he said the thread descended into something i said and then something nobody said at all??? and put it in quotes along with my statement for some reason?  and then gives me red trust for natural sensible assumption he is misquoting me.

Then instead of explaining he is actually quoting nobody for some reason he give me red trust for it.

LOL this is foolish and a clear abuse of trust here. I find it impossible anyone can see it any other way.

That along with the statement about .....I was browsing some search engine I cant remember which one and I mispelled my name just exactly as cryptohunter had just previously???

This is a clearly trumped up fantastical nonsense .... he did not want his top 10 meriters removed simple as that and was sore for having the most merits from the smallest group. LOL that's not my problem I never called for removal of top 50 that was loyce. Sorry malboroza

Honestly I am not kidding I will seriously have you investigated for this fantastical story of nonsense to protect and enable such trust abuse if you continue creating these nonsense stories. You seriously stating this as reality or credible explanation demonstrates you need to be looked at in depth for being part of this.

I am being deadly serious when I say  this is flagrant and observable abuse by him and also you are enabling and claiming he is correct in his actions in the face of all evidence that is there for all to see.

Nobody should be in any doubt after looking at the thread that this is disgraceful  that you are pushing for this red trust to stick.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I'd just like to let it be known that at no time has anything been inserted into any of my orifices by any member of bitcointalk.  Specifically, I have never been penetrated by Lauda as I believe I read somewhere in this thread.  Never even had any decent offers, and I'm a pretty high-class hoe in great demand, too.

I didn't figure cryptohunter would get negged for all of his blabbering as of late, but I probably should have expected it.  Same thing happened to mixan a while back when he went off the deep end and started taking the forum hostage with his raving lunacy.  There comes a point where if you spout enough nonsense and attack too many people, it's not going to be taken kindly to anymore.  I'm a bit puzzled as to why cryptohunter suddenly appeared on the Meta/Reputation scene and started making such a fuss about all of these things.  His account is much older than mine, and even I've been here long enough to know how abrasive the culture is around here--and even aside from that, he ought to know this isn't a battle he's likely to win.  I haven't even read many posts indicating that there are any members in his corner on all of this stuff about merits and trust abuse and so forth. 

I think marlboroza's feedback is somewhat harsh given his DT status, but I know where he's coming from.  Lauda has a genuine beef with cryptohunter, so I can understand that.  Either way, cryptohunter thinks everything he's writing is completely logical but that isn't true.  It's not a big stretch for someone to say that it would be hard to trust someone who consistently demonstrates that he can't think straight. 

In any case, red trust is not a means to silence anyone--giving someone a ban is.  And since cryptohunter states that he doesn't trade here, what's the problem?

[cryptohunter]

I'd just like to let it be known that at no time has anything been inserted into any of my orifices by any member of bitcointalk.  Specifically, I have never been penetrated by Lauda as I believe I read somewhere in this thread.  Never even had any decent offers, and I'm a pretty high-class hoe in great demand, too.

I didn't figure cryptohunter would get negged for all of his blabbering as of late, but I probably should have expected it.  Same thing happened to mixan a while back when he went off the deep end and started taking the forum hostage with his raving lunacy.  There comes a point where if you spout enough nonsense and attack too many people, it's not going to be taken kindly to anymore.  I'm a bit puzzled as to why cryptohunter suddenly appeared on the Meta/Reputation scene and started making such a fuss about all of these things.  His account is much older than mine, and even I've been here long enough to know how abrasive the culture is around here--and even aside from that, he ought to know this isn't a battle he's likely to win.  I haven't even read many posts indicating that there are any members in his corner on all of this stuff about merits and trust abuse and so forth.  

I think marlboroza's feedback is somewhat harsh given his DT status, but I know where he's coming from.  Lauda has a genuine beef with cryptohunter, so I can understand that.  Either way, cryptohunter thinks everything he's writing is completely logical but that isn't true.  It's not a big stretch for someone to say that it would be hard to trust someone who consistently demonstrates that he can't think straight.  

In any case, red trust is not a means to silence anyone--giving someone a ban is.  And since cryptohunter states that he doesn't trade here, what's the problem?

Prove any of your points... that anything I have said you can prove is incorrect. Go for it now.

I will tell you exactly why I came here because you pulled a DT abuse on someone and I will bring it here now for everyone else to examine in light of the fact you based in on your false assumption and even needed others of DT who are not abusers to rectify the damage you tried to pull on this person.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5063753.msg47613204#msg47613204
Examine this entire thread it is another case of provably incorrect assumption from DT and not backing down under scrutiny again.

However luckily there are some DT people who are open to being objective.

I though I would see what all this DT was about and what is going on with this board and a bunch of hitlers talking down to everyone and acting all superior whilst having very dubious moral compasses. I will not be getting DT neg trust for anything I have said that you can not demonstrate is wrong or untrue.



Prove anything I have written is not true NOW. Bring your evidence or you are too compounding the abuse with lies. Substantiate you claims or be next in line for trust abuse.

I am waiting. If you do not produce evidence of these allegations of

" Either way, cryptohunter thinks everything he's writing is completely logical but that isn't true.  It's not a big stretch for someone to say that it would be hard to trust someone who consistently demonstrates that he can't think straight.  "

Not that is even apparently the reason so this is again false apparently I am red for saying he misquoted me as he clearly did.

So stop conflating issues and interfering with what you can not understand.

If you can understand then produce now. With evidence. Or retract.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Prove any of your points that anything I have said is raving lunacy.

There is no point in arguing with you or trying to prove anything you've said is false, because that's a conversation that will last forever.  You will rebut every point with something else that has to be debunked, ad infinitum.

I will tell you exactly why I came here because you pulled a DT abuse on someone and I will bring it here now for everyone else to examine in light of the fact you based in on your false assumption and even needed others of DT who are not abusers to rectify the damage you tried to pull on this person.

Rambotnic, right?  Go right ahead and bring it here now, just don't expect me to argue any further about it.  Sometimes DT members disagree with each other and leave counter feedback.  That's something I might have done with marlboroza's trust he left for you, but there's no way in satan's kingdom I'm leaving you a positive trust.

[cryptohunter]

Prove any of your points that anything I have said is raving lunacy.

There is no point in arguing with you or trying to prove anything you've said is false, because that's a conversation that will last forever.  You will rebut every point with something else that has to be debunked, ad infinitum.

I will tell you exactly why I came here because you pulled a DT abuse on someone and I will bring it here now for everyone else to examine in light of the fact you based in on your false assumption and even needed others of DT who are not abusers to rectify the damage you tried to pull on this person.

Rambotnic, right?  Go right ahead and bring it here now, just don't expect me to argue any further about it.  Sometimes DT members disagree with each other and leave counter feedback.  That's something I might have done with marlboroza's trust he left for you, but there's no way in satan's kingdom I'm leaving you a positive trust.

LOL you refuse to back up your false claims???

I think you deserve red trust then. It stands to reason it.... you are saying false nonsense or you could prove what you are saying is true.

Produce or retract or come under the same scrutiny I am going to bring every single abuser under even if I get 100 false red trust for examining observable events in public.

Bring proof now or retract your lies.

I do not want it balanced I want it removed for being put their under false terms in the first place.

If you stay out of my way then you would not need to go through this public and totally observable process of getting called on lies you make up about me. Proof or retract.

[suchmoon]

you are pushing for this red trust to stick.

Actually it's quite the opposite - I was trying to figure out if the misunderstanding about the quotes can be reconciled. However your incessant lying is getting in the way. It's between you and marlboroza. Good luck.

[cryptohunter]

you are pushing for this red trust to stick.

Actually it's quite the opposite - I was trying to figure out if the misunderstanding about the quotes can be reconciled. However your incessant lying is getting in the way. It's between you and marlboroza. Good luck.

Bring the lying proof. NOW. Where are these lies?

I can't believe honestly the corruption and collusion between people this forum is beinbg entrusted too. It is a sickening state and I am just starting to realise the extent of what they think they can get away with here and the crazy shit they can try and force people to believe.

I would invite a very close and detailed (do not rush) of all threads on meta involving me and this bunch and this thread here and the one I quoted with TP trying to even ban someone under false assumptions and lies.

Let's scrap anyone on DT who acts like this and ban them. These are hunting down 5 year old copy and paste and banning people and then abusing this board and anyone that questions anything they do with false charges and fantastical stories that we are expected to believe??

Also it has not gone unnoticed by me that these people call everyone else financially motivated and look down on them for this and then all refuse to remove their sigs if i do it aswell... for a year or even more to prove we are not here for the money and that we are enthusiasts.

How have these people infested this level of power here? kick them out and leave only the honest objective people that can justify and substantiate what they claim.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

LOL you refuse to back up your false claims???

Actually, I did a few posts back when I tried to nicely explain to you that I'm not some die-hard Dash supporter, nor did I support Lauda in that scam accusation against him/her.  I explained that I questioned the forked coins issue and also admitted that I don't fully understand what the whole transaction was about, who was involved, and what all the details are.  That was a very contentious thread with lots of people on both sides, and I decided to just stay out of it.  

Those are just two examples of untruths you've told, and I do believe other members have been pointing out other ones as this and the other threads you're involved with progress.  You're not going to agree with any of our reasoning, so it's futile.  

In addition, I've written maybe a handful of posts saying I liked Dash--but I've also said the same thing about doge, and for the same reasons, i.e., low fees and quick confirmations.  I never tried to pump either coin up for financial gain and have never had more than a few hundred bucks' worth of either in my lifetime.  You also criticized Lauda for ceasing to support Dash?  You implied that Lauda did this as a pump & dump scheme.  I don't recall this, and it's not something you've provided proof for either.