What do you think about Post-ICO Bounty?

[NavI_027]

Uptill now i have seen only a handful of post ico bounties and to be honest all of them have been launched with a very low budget and bounty hunters have not shown interest in such campaigns due to small expected reward so to make post ico bounty successful and viral budget should be increased to decent levels.

I agree because the greater the reward, the more interesting in the eyes of the participants. More participants means nore effective form of advertising. However, there still a hindrance; a large portion of the applicants may not still become interested because they knew that the payment would be in token thus the profits they can earn depends on how fast they pump and dump or in the future of the token given. As a solution, there should be a btc bonus or the alike aside from the token reward in order to keep them interested.

PS: I am not sure if this is a good idea for others. Just my opinion. 

[Little Mouse]

That will be a good idea to keep alive the project since most of the projects are died after ico complete. I have seen some projects to do so. You can budget a bounty fund and use it for the post ico promotion so that more people know about the project and get interested to invest in the project.

[libert19]

It's good since after raising funds there would be guarantee that bounty hunters will get paid unlike bounties which promote to raise funds first.

[tanvir232]

Good think. Projects need advertisement after the ICO for attracting more investors and let people know about the development. I support this technique to give hype the project.

[Kulitha]

I believe this will be better to promote project only before raising funds. With that I believe trading will focus on those project at least. rather than waiting to die of project post ICOs can be used to survive projects. 

[hdclover]

I started a thread here last Month, November https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5070456.msg47962086#msg47962086

One of our major strength will be the Post-ICO Bounty system.



How it will work:

The project can still continue to pay in Token or in cash even after the official Bounty has been completed. This will make it possible for project owners to promote their project easily using the same method in which funds were raised.


 


We will like to hear from you!

After raising funds via ICO, you would just prefer to advertise your project or would you still love to promote your project using the Bounty method?

I think its a good idea to participate in post ICO bounty even though the rewards are small. Why? Coz participants can earn for sure without worrying much about the value of the token. Its like a peace of mind. There are also less chances for scam.

[jvper]

Post-ICO bounties usually pay very little because the company usually goes full power for the ICO, not after it.

[capableuwa1]

I think this are the best type of Bounty to Participate in presently. Irrespective of the fact that we are still in bear market. Post-ICO's Bounty usually pay but the reward is also low but there is guarantee that they will pay irrespective of the time it will take.

[OluwaTosin10]

The post ico bounties are good for project devs
The token is developing and trading has commenced while product is in constructions

But it is not profitable for bounty hunters at all
We are all at risk regarding value

[Wolfwar]

I think this are the best type of Bounty to Participate in presently. Irrespective of the fact that we are still in bear market. Post-ICO's Bounty usually pay but the reward is also low but there is guarantee that they will pay irrespective of the time it will take.

Today, of all the bounty companies in which I participated, almost half paid for my work. In addition, yes, half of the coins that I have in my wallets do not have their value, too, most of them. K units only are traded on exchanges.

[GunsLair]

I think this is a good strategy for projects and an indicator of the attitude of the team to their product. Since after the ICO, the project also need to support, and spread the word about it, in order to attract attention and potential customers to the product. And a bounty campaign is the best option.

[Firefoxx]

I do not have a project that I would like to promote but as a bounty hunter, I have to admit that post ICO bounties is what my wet dreams are made of, I would love to participate in one.

[nikola22]

I like post-ICO bounties because they are conducted by projects that already raised money and will grow. so you have a chance to get a part of such project.

[zhengqi]

I think that may well be the case. Bounty hunters will be happy if they continue to pay, and for the project this method of advertising will also be better. However, it all depends on the amount that the project will allocate for this.

[Denreal]

Bounty campaign is a very important when it comes to promoting crypto projects.
Had it been it is not that important, then so many projects would not have demanded for it.
Then some have now come up with the habit of not appreciating bounty participants, by paying them their due tokens at the expected time.
When such happens, bounty hunters have now come up with the understanding on how to mare or cause the failure of the project.

[trobbert]

For me it is better way to participate in bounties, because in post bounty they pay listed tokens and as for me it is something valuable.
There aren't risk in such bounty.

[Alohadance]

I think that it won't be interesting for ICOs. Why do they all like bounties? Because it doesn't take any funds in the first time. You can save a lot of money on marketing while you are starting ICO. After collecting funds, the don't need anymore in promotion.

[crenfrosck]

There are teams doing so? Why haven´t I seen a single one  ? Bounties are always connected with a great risk of your effort not being appreciated at all. However, this kind of bounty would be less risky for participants and they would be highly preferable by many bounty hunters (including me!).  On the other hand, it  would not make sense to do so if you are not a pretty well-known company who do not need a help during the crowdfunding. Of course, you can promote your coin after fulfilling your goals this way, but would it be productive? There would be several exceptions, but I doubt that more than a dozen of them would apply this concept while they would not be contraproductive. In conclusion, I would love to see many projects to use this model, but for a majority of them it would be illogical to do so right after the successful completion of the fundraising.

[Anatolich]

The model that is now there is the most convenient, and there is no need to add something new to it. Although a year ago it would have been supported, in such a chaos.

[thunderbitz2717]

This is great! Some bounty campaigns have already tokens out in the exchanges. So, when they pay their participants, sure the tokens are ready for trading. Some projects do these for the reason of promotional strategy. Some sort of exposure. This is indeed a great news!