Skirmant
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Such is life in crypto paradise
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 23, 2014, 08:49:37 PM |
|
Block explorer is online: http://maza.vicenet.euInvalid link on coinmarketcap will be updated shortly
|
|
|
|
|
whatthefugg
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 24, 2014, 02:17:33 AM |
|
cool, thanks. Well this is a good start. I hope payu keeps active in that threas and keepsvus updated on a semi regular basis. That alone, I imagine, would be a great yhing for the future of mzc.
|
|
|
|
CryptoLogo
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 656
Merit: 251
www.fintropy.io
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 24, 2014, 06:42:27 AM |
|
Mazacoin I remember this coin. I just feel pity for those who bought it all the way down. It never went up again. Oh dear. BUT it might have a future who knows I have no hypothesis nor am I prepared to say anything lightly. Those terms are ignorant in Crypto. You guys will build up again Im sure it was a good cause and I still hear odd to tom drum of promo so active is good ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
|
mmm01
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 973
Merit: 1053
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 24, 2014, 08:30:22 PM |
|
cool, thanks. Well this is a good start. I hope payu keeps active in that threas and keepsvus updated on a semi regular basis. That alone, I imagine, would be a great yhing for the future of mzc. If payu gives up, that will probably mark the complete death of the coin. As long as he stands by it there is a chance of it seeing the light of day. I'm holding on to a bit of maza in case it makes a recovery.
|
|
|
|
empowering
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1441
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2014, 08:34:01 AM |
|
no news is........
|
"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
|
|
|
WalkerIVIV
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2014, 11:25:32 AM |
|
no news is........
wait little bit more need more time for process all things around
|
|
|
|
stompix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2996
Merit: 6552
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2014, 12:54:53 PM |
|
no news is........
wait little bit more need more time for process all things around All things? There is nothing to process , nothing has been done and there is nothing , no scratch from which to start just an entire mess and lots of bagholders clinging to straws. You just have to do the things that were supposed to be done , and it's easy to publish a schedule for it. Your silence and the silence in this topic tell a lot about what's not happening there. At least yo could have quoted "the things" that are being processed.
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
WalkerIVIV
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2014, 05:11:48 PM |
|
no news is........
wait little bit more need more time for process all things around All things? There is nothing to process , nothing has been done and there is nothing , no scratch from which to start just an entire mess and lots of bagholders clinging to straws. You just have to do the things that were supposed to be done , and it's easy to publish a schedule for it. Your silence and the silence in this topic tell a lot about what's not happening there. At least yo could have quoted "the things" that are being processed. actually new website is doing / twitter / fork / new updates in protocol..... coin was fucked by AP from beginning working on kick him out
|
|
|
|
Skirmant
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Such is life in crypto paradise
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2014, 06:03:28 PM Last edit: May 26, 2014, 06:49:20 PM by Skirmant |
|
All things? There is nothing to process , nothing has been done and there is nothing , no scratch from which to start just an entire mess and lots of bagholders clinging to straws.
You just have to do the things that were supposed to be done , and it's easy to publish a schedule for it.
Your silence and the silence in this topic tell a lot about what's not happening there.
At least yo could have quoted "the things" that are being processed. Please be patient, there is a lot of work being done in the background. By the end of the month we'll fix the sync issues and release a working android wallet.
|
|
|
|
Mathgamain
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2014, 07:01:59 PM |
|
I am also working on a Promotional Video for mzc, so hold on to ur hats ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
- Freedom - Dreamcoin.fi -
|
|
|
whatthefugg
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2014, 04:34:53 PM |
|
holy shit! mazacoin currently ranked #148 in coin marketcap and in the low volume section....yikes!
|
|
|
|
Mathgamain
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2014, 05:10:14 PM |
|
Maza coin hell coin, show ur power if u are strong
|
- Freedom - Dreamcoin.fi -
|
|
|
WalkerIVIV
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2014, 05:52:26 PM |
|
holy shit! mazacoin currently ranked #148 in coin marketcap and in the low volume section....yikes!
really? look again :-)
|
|
|
|
whatthefugg
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2014, 07:03:17 PM |
|
holy shit! mazacoin currently ranked #148 in coin marketcap and in the low volume section....yikes!
really? look again :-) yup back up to normal now, phew. Mustve been an error on coinmarketcap.
|
|
|
|
guruvan
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2014, 08:42:05 PM |
|
I've discussed this several times with my team.
We support any forks that have the support of Payu and team. We do not support any further involvement in code development by AnonymousPirate (not that he's doing anything, anyhow), but nor do we support the mining and trading community forking the coin to suit their desires. We do see a need to start another repository, not in the control of AP.
In general we don't support a fork of maza that will simply reduce the mining reward. This alone will do little to address the real issue facing mazacoin right now: Lack of Hashrate.
It's our opinion that the proper way to address the hashrate is to implement mergemining. We are also of the opinion that this will go a long way to increasing the numbers of mazacoin holders, and reduce the overall sell pressure in the market.
It does seem that the defensiveness with which the above was met by AP on twitter when I spoke to him suggests to me that he is heavily mining maza, and doesn't want to increase the numbers of miners, or hashrate. His insistence on "exclusive control" of open source, majority consensus software is laughable, at best. It seems that AP is the largest impediment to any further growth of maza.
We do continue to hold a significant position in mazacoin, and would like to see this succeed, but we don't see the need to radically alter the economic structure to do so.
|
|
|
|
dragonseer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2014, 09:22:45 PM Last edit: May 27, 2014, 09:38:43 PM by dragonseer |
|
I've discussed this several times with my team.
We support any forks that have the support of Payu and team. We do not support any further involvement in code development by AnonymousPirate (not that he's doing anything, anyhow), but nor do we support the mining and trading community forking the coin to suit their desires. We do see a need to start another repository, not in the control of AP.
In general we don't support a fork of maza that will simply reduce the mining reward. This alone will do little to address the real issue facing mazacoin right now: Lack of Hashrate.
It's our opinion that the proper way to address the hashrate is to implement mergemining. We are also of the opinion that this will go a long way to increasing the numbers of mazacoin holders, and reduce the overall sell pressure in the market.
It does seem that the defensiveness with which the above was met by AP on twitter when I spoke to him suggests to me that he is heavily mining maza, and doesn't want to increase the numbers of miners, or hashrate. His insistence on "exclusive control" of open source, majority consensus software is laughable, at best. It seems that AP is the largest impediment to any further growth of maza.
We do continue to hold a significant position in mazacoin, and would like to see this succeed, but we don't see the need to radically alter the economic structure to do so.
Merge mine with what coin? Bitcoin? Zetacoin? I guess the question is, can you merge mine to a coin sharing the same algo, without their extending some kind of recognition to you? If it was merge mined with Bitcoin, wouldn't this just lead to more dumping if you leave the reward system and/or supply targets as is? To be clear, I was just supporting an idea to merge mine Quark with Bitcoin, but most of Quark has already been mined and Quark gains the advantage of added network hashing power and security. But, if people already mining Bitcoin for example are now getting free Mazacoin on the side while retaining this 'economic structure' as you put it, then that would be even worse for the price??
|
|
|
|
guruvan
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2014, 10:04:54 PM |
|
I would suggest that it only be merge mined with bitcoin, but I'd be open. This was the initial intention with mazacoin, but was never implemented in the code.
If maza were mergemined with bitcoin, the hashrate would likely bring the difficulty into the 200+million range, or more. Look at other merge mined coins, like namecoin, ixcoin, devcoin. With difficulties at those levels, it would be much more difficult for a small miner to acquire a large percentage of the day's production for instant dumping.
Would that stop miners from selling maza as soon as they get it? No,. But it would reduce the concentration of maza in the few hands that are seeing it now. I do think that this itself would raise the value of mazacoin considerably.
To be fair, reducing the reward would have a similar effect, but it would change the longer term economics of the coin to benefit the short term desires of traders and miners. It's not clear how changing the long term economics benefits the intended users of maza (the Lakota, and other tribes, remember?)
It is also possible that large pools could mergemine maza, and NOT pay out maza rewards to their miners. This would have the opposite effect that I would intend. I do not expect that this is the majority case - I suspect that pools would attract miners with the additional payout (again putting mazas into a larger number of hands....thus decreasing the amount of pressure that any one miner can exert on the market)
It is, however, clear that increasing the hashrate will secure the blockchain against the current shennanigans going on. It is clear that in order for maza to be accepted widely as currency, the blockchain must be secured.
By providing worthless maza to miners, we only provide the incentive to dump it, rather than hold it or spend it. By allowing smart miners the ability to increase their income, we move maza into a greater number of hands, with each pair of hands making different decisions about how to use, spend, hold, sell their mazas. Mergemining doesn't provide free coins. It provides security.
In no way does it make sense to continue to allow maza to concentrate into the hands a few miners, most of whom have no long term commitment to the success of mazacoin.
|
|
|
|
dragonseer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2014, 10:49:18 PM |
|
If you look at what Potcoin just did via a hard fork, they just decided to half their reward and continue to scale it down over a period of time. Most people would regard this as a sensible move, and in no way does this 'impair the mission' of this coin as it attempts to be a standard means of exchange for a legal cannabis industry. I don't see why you can't merge mine AND impose a block halving, but hey, doing something is better than the current situation, that's for sure
|
|
|
|
WalkerIVIV
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 27, 2014, 11:25:11 PM |
|
DO YOU WANT HELP TO DEV TEAM PLEASE ADD ME TO SKYPE : arthur7762 THERE IS PAYU ONLINE AND REST OF US -BAGHOLDERS, DEVS- WE CAN CHANGE EVERYTHINK PLEASE CONNECT US ALL ;-)
Thanks, George
|
|
|
|
|