Will STO survive?

[Absolutep]

Though STO looks good and look like is coming to change the face of crypto,we even thought that it will help investors regain their confidence in crypto but withe strict government regulations that them covered, imagine a project that has got a lot of applause from people like DESICO is been tag a scam just because of some regulations which they claim that is not permitting them to pay bounty hunters.My question is,do you think STO will survival? with these strict regulations because many are afraid already.

[nlaara12]

STO to me is not a bad idea but it has got a lot to improve on if it will survive, it is too early to be having such case like that of DESICO,I feel is not yet a finish product.

[damberg]

STO (Security token offering) is in my opinion a new trend for following years giving more confidence for investors who didn't participate in 2017/2018 crypto rush.

[fly99]

STO to me is not a bad idea but it has got a lot to improve on if it will survive, it is too early to be having such case like that of DESICO,I feel is not yet a finish product.

Yes, it may be too early. ICO is currently facing death threats, but this form of mobilization will still exist. This may be a long time or even not happen. The 2019 cryptocurrency market is also not optimistic.

[OluwaTosin10]

STO to me is just an upgraded ico stuff
And it will all end up just like ico did

Until a stop is out to lying deceit and other rash behavior from dev of projects
Survival is entirely scarce

[Awesomus Maximus]

Security token is nothing more than a normal token with additional regulations. If regulations are added to a normal token it is proclaimed to be a security token. As such, the security token is regulated by the government bodies and should be compliant with the various SEC regulations. It can also be penalized by the government bodies for not complying. So a STO is more or less the same as the ICO with added regulation to it. Because of the increased security and because of the improved credibility, this is good for the investors but it doesn't imply that the STO will always be successful. The buyer has to be responsible for his decisions and capable to access the quality of the STO he is about to invest in or otherwise he may lose his investment.

[clonely]

Though STO looks good and look like is coming to change the face of crypto,we even thought that it will help investors regain their confidence in crypto but withe strict government regulations that them covered, imagine a project that has got a lot of applause from people like DESICO is been tag a scam just because of some regulations which they claim that is not permitting them to pay bounty hunters.My question is,do you think STO will survival? with these strict regulations because many are afraid already.

ICOs have now led to a loss of confidence, but we cannot say that STOs provide this confidence. I think we have ebough token/coin anymore... I am not sure that we need more token

[batang_bitcoin]

We haven't seen it yet and we don't know if we will not give it a try for its run maybe for a year or two.

[kiwoh123]

I have never joined or invested in an STO so I don't have any answers,
but thanks for this thread, I just knew that DESICO is a scam project and doesn't pay us.

[Saisher]

Though STO looks good and look like is coming to change the face of crypto,we even thought that it will help investors regain their confidence in crypto but withe strict government regulations that them covered, imagine a project that has got a lot of applause from people like DESICO is been tag a scam just because of some regulations which they claim that is not permitting them to pay bounty hunters.My question is,do you think STO will survival? with these strict regulations because many are afraid already.

If they are not allowed to hire bounty hunters anymore, this could lessen the works of bounty hunters because many projects will incline to do STO than ICO to guaranty success, but we'll have to see this 2019 if this is going to be the trend.

[xkatarinax]

I think that Security token offering partially will replace ICO. It is more attractive for investors. It will be more popular in the future.

[Lantind]

depending on the STO if they want to survive, then they will be able to do it, government policy is indeed very heavy because in the world of crypto there is no benefit for the government except taxes for those who set up their exchanger and it is very small.

[indrakusumaindra]

STO (Security token offering) is in my opinion a new trend for following years giving more confidence for investors who didn't participate in 2017/2018 crypto rush.

Yes its a new trends and with a proper regulations by SEC i believe it would be a great way to fund money like ICO.

I think that Security token offering partially will replace ICO. It is more attractive for investors. It will be more popular in the future.

Sure it will be and STO will become bigger and i believe in this year 2019 we will see so many STO and BTW ICO already death right now cause of regulations.

[keepandhold]

Though STO looks good and look like is coming to change the face of crypto,we even thought that it will help investors regain their confidence in crypto but withe strict government regulations that them covered, imagine a project that has got a lot of applause from people like DESICO is been tag a scam just because of some regulations which they claim that is not permitting them to pay bounty hunters.My question is,do you think STO will survival? with these strict regulations because many are afraid already.

Desico is a bad example, the regulator has forbidden them to pay security tokens, but they could pay bounty hunters with ethereum, but greed did not allow them to do so.

[S[m]OKE]

Yes, at first they all announced that they needed to go through KYC to get what they had earned, and then they simply said that no one would get anything

[Lagduf]

Though STO looks good and look like is coming to change the face of crypto,we even thought that it will help investors regain their confidence in crypto but withe strict government regulations that them covered, imagine a project that has got a lot of applause from people like DESICO is been tag a scam just because of some regulations which they claim that is not permitting them to pay bounty hunters.My question is,do you think STO will survival? with these strict regulations because many are afraid already.

Have you seen polymath? and the polymath team has paid the bounty hunters. Bounty just a way to create a massive promotion to the STO/ICO or even IPO. Desico is such a garbage STO.
STO will not survive, whatever you called that as ICO/TGE/STO or IPO as long as it was filling all of the regulations and it will be fine.

[LbtalkL]

Maybe yes but it really depends on the use case of the project, STO is just the same with ICO with more security, Upgraded version of ICO, They are just replacing the name but it is more attractive to investor, KYC for both investor and the team feel much safer.

[DaMut]

Though STO looks good and look like is coming to change the face of crypto,we even thought that it will help investors regain their confidence in crypto but withe strict government regulations that them covered, imagine a project that has got a lot of applause from people like DESICO is been tag a scam just because of some regulations which they claim that is not permitting them to pay bounty hunters.My question is,do you think STO will survival? with these strict regulations because many are afraid already.

Desico is a bad example, the regulator has forbidden them to pay security tokens, but they could pay bounty hunters with ethereum, but greed did not allow them to do so.

Nope, the regulator did not forbid them to pay their bounty hunter but instead it was an excuse. And every country has a different perspective about STO(security token).
let's back to the topic.
based on what we were seeing, they failed to meet up their desired level of funding. That was why they did not want to pay their bounty hunter.
and yes, they could pay the participant with ETH. but they did not want to, because of the greed and expenses.

P.s : do not forget that Desico is a scam project, they did not use their own personal data.

[Olatunjex]

There is actually no difference between STO and ICO i use to think there is difference an example of that is DESICO claiming to offer security token, they are selling ico in the name of sto also they didn't register under any regulatory body.
The truth is STO and ICO is the same the difference is just change of name.

[Amberum]

Clarifying the concept of a security token https://tokenmarket.net/news/security-tokens/what-are-security-tokens/

There is no such financial instrument as a security token..
Tokenising an investment deal does not make the investment itself more attractive. .