seattletu
|
|
March 17, 2014, 08:40:34 PM |
|
Wow nice job scryptographer
|
|
|
|
duazo
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
March 17, 2014, 08:40:46 PM |
|
ALL: I believe I have found a few issues - thank you for sending me the error log! The block IS being solved. As I said before there was no way to tell this without the error logs.
I am working on a fix (several), we will need to fork within 24 hours of its release and I will need to coordinate with all pools and BTER.
Few things I need to work out as to the exact cause, but I should have a fix tonight, with a work by tomorrow later in the day/night (central time).
Good stuff. What's the exact nature of the issue?
|
BTC: 141svhv9AsMLgsXDjhvZwWagRUpGWYptRE DRK: XrnVid6U2kvTP77EifHtgxe3tEovUFK45B IFC: iHEo7CrpQhLaTKeBxHaSvfVLTvQq1M5UcW
|
|
|
organizer
|
|
March 17, 2014, 08:42:01 PM |
|
ALL: I believe I have found a few issues - thank you for sending me the error log! The block IS being solved. As I said before there was no way to tell this without the error logs.
I am working on a fix (several), we will need to fork within 24 hours of its release and I will need to coordinate with all pools and BTER.
Few things I need to work out as to the exact cause, but I should have a fix tonight, with a work by tomorrow later in the day/night (central time).
Good news... we only post b/c we care.
|
|
|
|
rusty_coin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
March 17, 2014, 08:44:22 PM |
|
ALL: I believe I have found a few issues - thank you for sending me the error log! The block IS being solved. As I said before there was no way to tell this without the error logs.
I am working on a fix (several), we will need to fork within 24 hours of its release and I will need to coordinate with all pools and BTER.
Few things I need to work out as to the exact cause, but I should have a fix tonight, with a work by tomorrow later in the day/night (central time).
Awesome, thanks for the hard work thekidcoin.
|
|
|
|
thekidcoin (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
FlutterCoin Developer
|
|
March 17, 2014, 08:54:18 PM |
|
So, I have spent a little time browsing through blocks on the block chain to see if there was any patterns in the blocks that are "stuck", and there is. I can with some confidence say that block 11649 will have the following characteristics The coinbase transaction will have 2 output transactions of equal size The coinbase sig will be 26-28 characters long, and the last 14 characters of the sig will be 062f503253482f The block will not be found by either of the pools mention in OP (Crunchharder, Bitember, Miningwithus or Cloudminers) March 17, 2014, 08:47:45 - Found after 1h 29m Block 11352 Coinbase 02582c02700d062f503253482f 2x 545.5 output FAvrAQn2cpYFaowSwYiJvuQrwT7PSGp4Rc FTkUQFwLKW8mWbdks6j2p6UxDdHY49qhkx
March 17, 2014, 06:42:02 - Found after 6h 14m Block 11303 Coinbase 02272c03fe9a00062f503253482f 2x 1340 output F6jNAcmpdPVP4CCZWRUZXmocbj5zcjowyN FNG4aSWm5x6Wa8tsz8hK3XJy2itQeB8fTJ
March 16, 2014, 23:09:08 - Found after 2h 3m Block 11214 Coinbase 02cf2b0349ae00062f503253482f 2x 2051 output FDrYFMuhDgRJjRu72EQ7aK6rsYdZMg3L94 F88MAHkFJFX1yEKnB5faMXp11EQJj1rHL5
March 16, 2014, 20:06:49 - Found after 47m Block 11171 Coinbase 02a32b02f034062f503253482f 2x 4632 output FQCPgk19Ayax4wg8Sjv3jeMgrmZeQYB7jD FHPhyaH5FcN3c3csNRGxc7KYS4NQUUxUxE
March 16, 2014, 17:20:48 - Found after 1h 27m Block 11079 Coinbase 02472b02cf3c062f503253482f 2x 1319.5 output FBU7EV9RacSCAKmiMnsuem4WHP2u2u82nq F79mS72WxdQjHQLpZXm2EC5hrrLc24grH3
March 16, 2014, 09:33:52 - Found after 2h 58m Block 10870 Coinbase 02762a02737d062f503253482f 2x 2487.5 output FBU7EV9RacSCAKmiMnsuem4WHP2u2u82nq FJ9ihcwZ7Lcf2JuwKZ6cmoUDc3YFYxc9UC
March 15, 2014, 19:00:29 - Found after 1h 9m Block 10436 Coinbase 02c428027e66062f503253482f 2x 2054 output FDrYFMuhDgRJjRu72EQ7aK6rsYdZMg3L94 FJ9ihcwZ7Lcf2JuwKZ6cmoUDc3YFYxc9UC
March 15, 2014, 17:37:15 - Found after 1h 33m Block 10406 Coinbase 02a6280390af00062f503253482f 2x 4104 output FMf3Y9hLxsSuotSUsYqeCQyu4FQZENkGyp FQCXJjAjEhwKgwLHyG9DxKCgLaPPz3hVAt
Coinbase sig for the latest block found by each of the pools for comparison: 11648 02802d062f503253482f04f910275308100004840f0000000d2f7374726174756d506f6f6c2f Cruncharder 11647 027f2d062f503253482f04a310275308980178fa150000000d2f7374726174756d506f6f6c2f Bitember 11646 027e2d062f503253482f041410275308f8003861490000000d2f7374726174756d506f6f6c2f Miningwithus 11644 027c2d062f503253482f04790f275308f800368fa50000000d2f7374726174756d506f6f6c2f Cloudminers
I have no idea how to interpret the information above as I have very little technical insight to the inner workings of crypto coins and how blocks are generated. But, assuming some of the information for the next block is known to the entire network (besides transactions), may guess is there could be some parameter or information in the upcoming block that the pools are unable to process correctly, and thus we have to wait for a non-pool miner to solve the block. Edit: Of course thekidcoin found the problem while I was typing all this up thanks for the info, good stuff Bitember actually found the block... Without their log data I had no real leg to stand on. Its something being interpreted wrong causing the block to be rejected (nice info too thanks I just added so many printf's to my test binary I nearly filled up my drive LOL)... Which means likely that someone else needs to solve it. OK OK I can't post anymore need to work on this LOL
|
1MYL967PR52xiNtqSP9WphRvPzKZDjBdxn
|
|
|
bullus
|
|
March 17, 2014, 08:54:40 PM |
|
Very good kidcoin.
|
btc 16LWhms487bzCxQWq5oeW8SMDPmU2rvQjf
|
|
|
thekidcoin (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
FlutterCoin Developer
|
|
March 17, 2014, 08:59:43 PM |
|
ALL: I believe I have found a few issues - thank you for sending me the error log! The block IS being solved. As I said before there was no way to tell this without the error logs.
I am working on a fix (several), we will need to fork within 24 hours of its release and I will need to coordinate with all pools and BTER.
Few things I need to work out as to the exact cause, but I should have a fix tonight, with a work by tomorrow later in the day/night (central time).
Good stuff. What's the exact nature of the issue? its something with how POB/POT checking is being interpreted by the pools. Remember, before BTER most mining was solo-mining. I had no clue it could be this because no one provided any error logs or stated their pool was seeing errors - so then we just assume its some other issue - how could anyone know without seeing the mining daemon's logs (I stated numerous times that without logs or rejects mining the chain is fine). Trying still determine the calculation that is off, then I will get a fix built today sometime and binaries released. Its not POB/POT itself, but the block checking thats screwing up somehow.
|
1MYL967PR52xiNtqSP9WphRvPzKZDjBdxn
|
|
|
organizer
|
|
March 17, 2014, 09:10:56 PM |
|
ALL: I believe I have found a few issues - thank you for sending me the error log! The block IS being solved. As I said before there was no way to tell this without the error logs.
I am working on a fix (several), we will need to fork within 24 hours of its release and I will need to coordinate with all pools and BTER.
Few things I need to work out as to the exact cause, but I should have a fix tonight, with a work by tomorrow later in the day/night (central time).
Good stuff. What's the exact nature of the issue? its something with how POB/POT checking is being interpreted by the pools. Remember, before BTER most mining was solo-mining. I had no clue it could be this because no one provided any error logs or stated their pool was seeing errors - so then we just assume its some other issue - how could anyone know without seeing the mining daemon's logs (I stated numerous times that without logs or rejects mining the chain is fine). Trying still determine the calculation that is off, then I will get a fix built today sometime and binaries released. Its not POB/POT itself, but the block checking thats screwing up somehow. I know i'm not a programmer, but I will say I did think the problem was in some of the innovations! Anyways, some pre-fork questions: - To get the coin moving again, should we throw hash power on pools that aren't Bitember to re-solve it? - What will happen to coins in mid transfer.... I have a transaction in progress...what happens if the fork comes before all necessary confirms?
|
|
|
|
bullus
|
|
March 17, 2014, 09:11:28 PM |
|
Will the net-hashrate also be right again, after the fix or was it already right?
|
btc 16LWhms487bzCxQWq5oeW8SMDPmU2rvQjf
|
|
|
moonpool
|
|
March 17, 2014, 09:12:06 PM |
|
ALL: I believe I have found a few issues - thank you for sending me the error log! The block IS being solved. As I said before there was no way to tell this without the error logs.
I am working on a fix (several), we will need to fork within 24 hours of its release and I will need to coordinate with all pools and BTER.
Few things I need to work out as to the exact cause, but I should have a fix tonight, with a work by tomorrow later in the day/night (central time).
Good stuff. What's the exact nature of the issue? its something with how POB/POT checking is being interpreted by the pools. Remember, before BTER most mining was solo-mining. I had no clue it could be this because no one provided any error logs or stated their pool was seeing errors - so then we just assume its some other issue - how could anyone know without seeing the mining daemon's logs (I stated numerous times that without logs or rejects mining the chain is fine). Trying still determine the calculation that is off, then I will get a fix built today sometime and binaries released. Its not POB/POT itself, but the block checking thats screwing up somehow. The error that keeps happening on my pool over at flutter.miningwith.us : ThreadRPCServer method=submitblock ERROR: CheckCoinbaseTx() : calculated coinbase, desination, or address do not match the actual block at height 11649 InvalidChainFound: invalid block=0000000001afdd00a420 height=11649 trust=155052 blocktrust=124 date=03/17/14 21:02:49 InvalidChainFound: current best=00000000022bebb5fd28 height=11648 trust=154928 blocktrust=123 date=03/17/14 15:12:57 ERROR: SetBestChain() : SetBestChainInner failed ERROR: AcceptBlock() : AddToBlockIndex failed ERROR: ProcessBlock() : AcceptBlock FAILED
|
|
|
|
CrunchHarder
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
March 17, 2014, 09:42:07 PM |
|
OP, just sent you a message re: checking the logs, please confirm I've checked the correct ones, drop me a PM and let me know. https://flt.crunchharder.nethttps://crunchharder.net/images/logo-sm.jpgPeace of mind FlutterCoin mining with CrunchHarder:*UK-Based Pool *High End Dedicated Servers *Fully Redundant, Fault-Tolerant Architecture *Automatic Backup of Wallets and Databases *Technical Support from Experienced Coin Devs and Pool Owners *Dedicated Support Ticketing System *4096 Bit SSL Security with SHA256https://flt.crunchharder.net
|
|
|
|
seattletu
|
|
March 17, 2014, 10:11:46 PM |
|
Well done crunchharder.net and miningwith.us for providing the log info.
|
|
|
|
Trujillo
|
|
March 17, 2014, 11:45:56 PM |
|
Thank you Fluttercoin community for collaborating to help solve this issue! If any of you are interested in joining the FLT Community Development Team please contact me by DM if you have not already. We already have completed some of our first few projects and next is our website, Fluttercoin.info which should be releasing quite soon.
|
|
|
|
niothor
|
|
March 17, 2014, 11:49:06 PM |
|
So, I have spent a little time browsing through blocks on the block chain to see if there was any patterns in the blocks that are "stuck", and there is. I can with some confidence say that block 11649 will have the following characteristics The coinbase transaction will have 2 output transactions of equal size The coinbase sig will be 26-28 characters long, and the last 14 characters of the sig will be 062f503253482f The block will not be found by either of the pools mention in OP (Crunchharder, Bitember, Miningwithus or Cloudminers) March 17, 2014, 08:47:45 - Found after 1h 29m Block 11352 Coinbase 02582c02700d062f503253482f 2x 545.5 output FAvrAQn2cpYFaowSwYiJvuQrwT7PSGp4Rc FTkUQFwLKW8mWbdks6j2p6UxDdHY49qhkx
March 17, 2014, 06:42:02 - Found after 6h 14m Block 11303 Coinbase 02272c03fe9a00062f503253482f 2x 1340 output F6jNAcmpdPVP4CCZWRUZXmocbj5zcjowyN FNG4aSWm5x6Wa8tsz8hK3XJy2itQeB8fTJ
March 16, 2014, 23:09:08 - Found after 2h 3m Block 11214 Coinbase 02cf2b0349ae00062f503253482f 2x 2051 output FDrYFMuhDgRJjRu72EQ7aK6rsYdZMg3L94 F88MAHkFJFX1yEKnB5faMXp11EQJj1rHL5
March 16, 2014, 20:06:49 - Found after 47m Block 11171 Coinbase 02a32b02f034062f503253482f 2x 4632 output FQCPgk19Ayax4wg8Sjv3jeMgrmZeQYB7jD FHPhyaH5FcN3c3csNRGxc7KYS4NQUUxUxE
March 16, 2014, 17:20:48 - Found after 1h 27m Block 11079 Coinbase 02472b02cf3c062f503253482f 2x 1319.5 output FBU7EV9RacSCAKmiMnsuem4WHP2u2u82nq F79mS72WxdQjHQLpZXm2EC5hrrLc24grH3
March 16, 2014, 09:33:52 - Found after 2h 58m Block 10870 Coinbase 02762a02737d062f503253482f 2x 2487.5 output FBU7EV9RacSCAKmiMnsuem4WHP2u2u82nq FJ9ihcwZ7Lcf2JuwKZ6cmoUDc3YFYxc9UC
March 15, 2014, 19:00:29 - Found after 1h 9m Block 10436 Coinbase 02c428027e66062f503253482f 2x 2054 output FDrYFMuhDgRJjRu72EQ7aK6rsYdZMg3L94 FJ9ihcwZ7Lcf2JuwKZ6cmoUDc3YFYxc9UC
March 15, 2014, 17:37:15 - Found after 1h 33m Block 10406 Coinbase 02a6280390af00062f503253482f 2x 4104 output FMf3Y9hLxsSuotSUsYqeCQyu4FQZENkGyp FQCXJjAjEhwKgwLHyG9DxKCgLaPPz3hVAt
Coinbase sig for the latest block found by each of the pools for comparison: 11648 02802d062f503253482f04f910275308100004840f0000000d2f7374726174756d506f6f6c2f Cruncharder 11647 027f2d062f503253482f04a310275308980178fa150000000d2f7374726174756d506f6f6c2f Bitember 11646 027e2d062f503253482f041410275308f8003861490000000d2f7374726174756d506f6f6c2f Miningwithus 11644 027c2d062f503253482f04790f275308f800368fa50000000d2f7374726174756d506f6f6c2f Cloudminers
I have no idea how to interpret the information above as I have very little technical insight to the inner workings of crypto coins and how blocks are generated. But, assuming some of the information for the next block is known to the entire network (besides transactions), may guess is there could be some parameter or information in the upcoming block that the pools are unable to process correctly, and thus we have to wait for a non-pool miner to solve the block. Edit: Of course thekidcoin found the problem while I was typing all this up Well , you did put some work in it , it deserves to be praised.
|
|
|
|
thekidcoin (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
FlutterCoin Developer
|
|
March 17, 2014, 11:51:44 PM |
|
lol that was loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong
|
1MYL967PR52xiNtqSP9WphRvPzKZDjBdxn
|
|
|
seattletu
|
|
March 17, 2014, 11:55:56 PM |
|
And now the blocks will start mining really fast.
Kidcoin is there any hint as to what finally gets the next block to start going again?
|
|
|
|
thekidcoin (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
FlutterCoin Developer
|
|
March 18, 2014, 12:06:14 AM |
|
And now the blocks will start mining really fast.
Kidcoin is there any hint as to what finally gets the next block to start going again?
Exactly? no generally? yes. They are passing the block checking routine while the others aren't. Why is a great question. few pools reported it, but provided no actual found block data. I know how to stop it, but there will need to later updates following to finalize some things when there is more data gathered. Getting ready with final testing then will start to build binaries and contact bter (will track down pools too some already know to look out) anyone know WHO found the block??
|
1MYL967PR52xiNtqSP9WphRvPzKZDjBdxn
|
|
|
thekidcoin (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
FlutterCoin Developer
|
|
March 18, 2014, 12:07:41 AM |
|
also FYI this block will be stuck too LOL how long is anyone's guess
|
1MYL967PR52xiNtqSP9WphRvPzKZDjBdxn
|
|
|
organizer
|
|
March 18, 2014, 12:22:07 AM |
|
If you fork the coin, can you explain what might happen to transactions that are still in progress?
|
|
|
|
seattletu
|
|
March 18, 2014, 12:41:11 AM |
|
also FYI this block will be stuck too LOL how long is anyone's guess
That one was fast
|
|
|
|
|