TMAN's thread for bitching about my tags.

[TMAN]

Already getting loads of messages, this is self-modded so I can delete anything that cryptocunt posts, I will also keep this place clean of other generally annoying posts. So.. if I have tagged you and you have proof that it is unfair/unreasonable/unwarranted please start a discussion here - DO NOT PM ME. 

I will also state that I am under no illusion that I am always right far from it if you ask the Mrs, but I only want input here from other members who's opinions I value, you will either know who you are or your posts will be deleted and you will know you aren't a chosen one.

so peeps who get tagged by TMAN - present your case, Please do be aware that there is a chance that others on DT will back my decisions, then it is highly likely that more red will rain down.

[1714894205]

1714894205

[1714894205]

1714894205

[petestheman]

Thank you for creating a thread here and try to address my issue.

To let you know I was not trying to support the peoples who's profiles I posted in anyway. I was just trying to explain and answers the OP that the solution he suggested is not worth it and it has some flaws. But I got a red trust for it which just does not seem right.

Please try reading my post again about it I was in no way trying to prove that the profiles I tagged are good posters or contribute to the forum. I just said they are crypto collector as I saw some of there previous posts in collectable section.

[TMAN]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5097573.msg49241769#msg49241769

thread in question, I invite others to read and see if they have the same interpretation as me - what are your views people, should this user who identifies shitposting bounty hunting pajeets as "Decent" be highlighted as a sub par manager by a tag or not?

[suchmoon]

I think you're being too harsh on pete. I think anyone should be able to profess love to any spammer without getting tagged. Put a neutral on him perhaps...

It does seem like a purchased/hacked account but absent hard proof that's also not a crime.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I just said they are crypto collector as I saw some of there previous posts in collectable section.

I stopped right here, looking at the posts of the user you said was under-merited:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=732010.  The first few pages of his post history are just his name in Games & Rounds, and that goes back to at least November.  Any other "posts" he made are just stupid thank you's or other garbage.  I'm assuming that's one of your alt accounts, because no one in their right mind would think that account's posts are merit-worthy.

Having said that, I don't think you ought to have gotten a neg for it.  That's between TMAN and you, however.  I would suggest to TMAN that Theymos doesn't want shitposters tagged anymore and although this is somewhat of a different situation, it's in the same ballpark.  

[eddie13]

Is he getting paid by petestheman's bounty for his signature and posts nothing but free raffle claims?
Then maybe yes..

If it is not petestheman's bounty he is in or isn't getting paid by that sig for those posts then probably no..  
Someone would really pay for that signature on his posts? If it is paid then that manager needs some correction..
Who runs this blocknode bounty he is wearing a sig for?

But only for petestheman saying not to ban him I don't think so..

[TMAN]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5097573.msg49244997#msg49244997

In that post Pete highlights 2 users who are making “good” posts who haven’t achieved 1 merit in 200+ posts. In my view that should exclude him as a bounty manager. Or am I way off here peeps?

Also @pete, why won’t you sign a message from the stakes address that Lauda posted?

[petestheman]

I just said they are crypto collector as I saw some of there previous posts in collectable section.

I stopped right here, looking at the posts of the user you said was under-merited:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=732010.  The first few pages of his post history are just his name in Games & Rounds, and that goes back to at least November.  Any other "posts" he made are just stupid thank you's or other garbage.  I'm assuming that's one of your alt accounts, because no one in their right mind would think that account's posts are merit-worthy.

Thank you for your opinion here.

As you said some of his posts are in games and round section but some of them are also in collectable section.

That's is defiantly not my alt as I just found some random profiles from the collectable section and posted it there to let the OP know that there are some people who don't deserved to be banned from posting. I never said they are worthy of merits.

Also @pete, why won’t you sign a message from the stakes address that Lauda posted?

As I already said I took some break after that period I posted the address and also I usually just try to exchange my crypto to fiat and don't intend to store much of it on a single address and private keys.

[eddie13]

are you paying this guy?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1781960;sa=showPosts

in your spreadsheet
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bq0ZPWIMEksvfa6ZuCWkBkjFReqZLx-D5ts_eJIk4Fg/edit#gid=1284949262

[petestheman]

are you paying this guy?
bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1781960;sa=showPosts

in your spreadsheet
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bq0ZPWIMEksvfa6ZuCWkBkjFReqZLx-D5ts_eJIk4Fg/edit#gid=1284949262

I see he has applied now to one of my campaign, he is not accepted yet and I also do not intend to accept him as his post history says that he is not a worth poster and most of his posts are in bounties section which does not qualify for a signature campaign.

Edit: if you are pointing to Facebook campaign in which he also registered. I am willing to accept him in Facebook as he has 750+ friends is eligible by rules.

[The Cryptovator]

What I believe petestheman misunderstand the question, and he continually argue with that. Question was regarding decent poster, but he had mentioned worst poster. In my opinion he don't know the meaning of decent and he just looking who have posted much and didn't received merit. His post is proving that he doesn't know what is decent is really or he just underestimate decent word.

Neutral feedback appropriate in my opinion also.


Edit : Look like account handover on multiple hand.

 

[Lauda]

I just said they are crypto collector as I saw some of there previous posts in collectable section.

I stopped right here, looking at the posts of the user you said was under-merited:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=732010.  The first few pages of his post history are just his name in Games & Rounds, and that goes back to at least November.  Any other "posts" he made are just stupid thank you's or other garbage.  I'm assuming that's one of your alt accounts, because no one in their right mind would think that account's posts are merit-worthy.

Having said that, I don't think you ought to have gotten a neg for it.  That's between TMAN and you, however.  I would suggest to TMAN that Theymos doesn't want shitposters tagged anymore and although this is somewhat of a different situation, it's in the same ballpark.  

Disagreed. Take a look at what this so called I'm-not-hacked user advertises himself as in his "bounty management" thread. Combine those with what he think is a decent poster --> basically, a fraud using a stolen/hacked account.

It does seem like a purchased/hacked account but absent hard proof that's also not a crime.

Proving otherwise is trivial, and this wouldn't be the first case that someone got tagged for this.

[mu_enrico]

I stumbled upon this thread as I saw @petestheman bounty thread and interested in one of those. Since I don't want to join account buyer campaign, could you provide some proof? Maybe post something like bitcoin meme on your Tumblr account?

my tumblr blog

ourcrazyreality.tumblr.com

Maybe you really lost access to your bitcoin address

1JywwXphRygZ42KPvP7qtQYccXM2L8hpTu

because it's been inactive since 2015.

I'll keep my eyes on this thread. Thanks!

[Lauda]

I stumbled upon this thread as I saw @petestheman bounty thread and interested in one of those. Since I don't want to join account buyer campaign, could you provide some proof? Maybe post something like bitcoin meme on your Tumblr account?

my tumblr blog

ourcrazyreality.tumblr.com

Let me guess, he will say that it was only temporary like everything else posted in 2014 and prior.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Disagreed. Take a look at what this so called I'm-not-hacked user advertises himself as in his "bounty management" thread. Combine those with what he think is a decent poster --> basically, a fraud using a stolen/hacked account.

Then I would think that TMAN's feedback ought to say something different instead of how it reads now.  Hell, if he's using a hacked account I'll tag him myself, but that's not the reason TMAN gave.

[petestheman]

Let me guess, he will say that it was only temporary like everything else posted in 2014 and prior.

Yes, you are right it was just use by me for my sis to get loose from this stuff. Still better I do not explain it here.

[suchmoon]

It does seem like a purchased/hacked account but absent hard proof that's also not a crime.

Proving otherwise is trivial, and this wouldn't be the first case that someone got tagged for this.

Based on posting style and gaps the account may have changed hands twice between 2014 and 1018. Whoever used it in 2017 was putting spaces before commas and periods, and there are large gaps before and after that stretch. The content of posts/topics also differs between those three periods. So at best the current pete is the 3rd pete. That's probably a good enough reason for someone to tag him but I still think tagging for saying things about spammers is not. Please don't kick me out of the cult almighty Lauda for disagreeing with TMAN

[Lauda]

It does seem like a purchased/hacked account but absent hard proof that's also not a crime.

Proving otherwise is trivial, and this wouldn't be the first case that someone got tagged for this.

Based on posting style and gaps the account may have changed hands twice between 2014 and 1018. Whoever used it in 2017 was putting spaces before commas and periods, and there are large gaps before and after that stretch. The content of posts/topics also differs between those three periods. So at best the current pete is the 3rd pete. That's probably a good enough reason for someone to tag him but I still think tagging for saying things about spammers is not.

I have written and applied a proper tag.

Please don't kick me out of the cult almighty Lauda for disagreeing with TMAN

There's a reason why I'm the master; TMAN has lots to learn. Don't worry my child, I will keep you safe.

[TMAN]

So consensus is TMAN wrong for reason but right for tag? I’ll change it shortly.

Suchmoon you can’t be chucked out, you know that already. Stop making Lauda big headed with power

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Oh yeah, I think that account has definitely changed hands.  He used to post in perfect English in 2014 with stuff like this:

Hey you guys. I honestly have very little understanding in what mining BTC is I know it evolves your gpu solving equations which will break blocks and in return will get you btc.

I was wondering what the best method for mining is if you don't have a strong CPU (I have a mac book air Processor 1.8 GHz intel core i5, Memory 4gb)? What are anti miners and other usb plugins? Is it easier to just invest in one of those shares sites?

Any other info you feel is important would help also.

And then this in Oct. 2014:

I would really like my account deleted for personal reasons. As if I never even posted. Not a permanent ban but a deleted account.

....followed by a huge posting gap that ended in Dec. 2016 with this post:

Yobit contacted for exchange?

After that, English is broken as all hell, as demonstrated by this post:

You are banned for parallelism and it is totally not encouraged on bitcointalk so you have very fewer chances of recovering your account.


Using an alt to post in section aside of meta by a permanently banned person is also prohibited and is against the forum rules so try not avoiding it.

Will tag the account now.