TMAN's thread for bitching about my tags.

[Foxpup]

Approaching somebody to ask them why they distrust you in private, rather than making a song and dance about it is something you consider backdoor shenanigans? You either misinterpret the situation or are extremely paranoid.

It sounds suspiciously like you're trying to quietly gather information on how to get included on more people's trust lists. I don't believe I'm extremely paranoid; just slightly-above-averagely paranoid.

I'm just wondering why someone I have never talked to or given any reason to distrust me would distrust me. It's not something I care about in any meaningful capacity, but I am interested in a reason if you'll provide one.

Excluding you from my trust list does not (necessarily) mean that I distrust you, or that I harbour any resentment or ill-will toward you. It simply means that I believe you are a sufficiently poor judge of character that your own trust list and feedback are meaningless to me, and therefore to be excluded. This is not a moral judgement, but a pragmatic one. Due to my aforementioned paranoia, I will not be more specific than that.

[1714176236]

1714176236

[1714176236]

1714176236

[1714176236]

1714176236

[1714176236]

1714176236

[bill gator]

It sounds suspiciously like you're trying to quietly gather information on how to get included on more people's trust lists. I don't believe I'm extremely paranoid; just slightly-above-averagely paranoid.

Nothing wrong with being a little more paranoid than average. I’m the same way given the proper circumstance. I understand why you might perceive it that way. For what it is worth, that is not my intention. My goal is to hear some criticism of myself that I may be blind to so that I can make improvements. I respect the opinion of these people and we are a community.

Excluding you from my trust list does not (necessarily) mean that I distrust you, or that I harbour any resentment or ill-will toward you. It simply means that I believe you are a sufficiently poor judge of character that your own trust list and feedback are meaningless to me, and therefore to be excluded. This is not a moral judgement, but a pragmatic one. Due to my aforementioned paranoia, I will not be more specific than that.

I’ll take that into consideration. Thanks for the clarification.

[TMAN]

(bitch)

You got that bit right, So I didn't even know who you are till someone mentioned you in a slack group (I haven't been that active in collectibles over the last few months due to ongoing projects) and I noticed that you had swallowed a thesaurus and had the annoying habit of  posting 321 words when only 4 would suffice - now not saying you are a shitposting Pajeet - but it was pretty close to it. IIRC I called you out on it once, that was enough for me to think that you do not deserve to be on DT and it seems to me that some other members also think along those lines.

Now I am in a situation where you sent me a PM (and other members who had excluded you) and come in this thread acting like the fat bird I drunkenly shagged once and keep pestering me for more of the TMAN D, It has to be said you are a little creepy dude, coming across as FAR too keen to be on DT. That being said, its not as if I believe you are a scammer or that I am 100% correct in my judgement although threatening a retaliatory exclusion is rather pathetic, so ill reference the fat bird in a bar and tell you to go home and have a strum and I may come back to have a little action in the future, but please stop banging on about it.

Don't take it personally, chill out and lets see what happens.

[bill gator]

I do love that TMAN D.

I have no desire to be on DT. There is no intention of retaliatiory exclusion(s). All I am meaning to do is request an explanation to see if there could be something learned from the event. No offense has been taken, but I appreciate you giving me your side of things. Helps me to see things more clearly. Have a good one TMAN