THEYMOS ITS ENOUGH !!!!!!!!!

[itomarketing]

Keep defending.But if you don't accept him you can tagg the other hundred accounts which are using the same word as my alts.
What are you waiting for ?

You're confused. You've been tagged for being an alt of Thule, not for using a certain word. There was a lot more than just one word that led to it and even more surfaced afterwards. So you can try to deflect all you want but unless you can show me another user who...

- Misspells words the same way as you do. And I mean "words" not "word".
- Puts spaces around punctuation the same way you do.
- Formats paragraphs the same way you do.
- Has a grudge against the same users.

...you're not getting anywhere. New and edited posts don't count - I feel like I need to mention this given your tenuous relationship with the truth. And I mean ALL OF THE ABOVE. The totality of it makes you an alt of Thule.

Are these your evidences LOL
Just same random claims and nothing more ?Thats it ?Show us please the evidence.You claim the same way but i see no examples from you.
Just your poor claims avoiding any serious proofing.
You could show me wrong so quickly by posting evidences.
WHERE ARE THEY?

[1715685391]

1715685391

[1715685391]

1715685391

[1715685391]

1715685391

[1715685391]

1715685391

[actmyname]

Are these your evidences LOL
Just same random claims and nothing more ?Thats it ?Show us please the evidence.You claim the same way but i see no examples from you.
Just your poor claims avoiding any serious proofing.
You could show me wrong so quickly by posting evidences.
WHERE ARE THEY?

A p-value of <0.05 is statistically significant.
A p-value of <0.001 is extremely statistically significant.

Let M := number of bct members = 2,000,000
M^-1 = 0.0000005

[itomarketing]

Are these your evidences LOL
Just same random claims and nothing more ?Thats it ?Show us please the evidence.You claim the same way but i see no examples from you.
Just your poor claims avoiding any serious proofing.
You could show me wrong so quickly by posting evidences.
WHERE ARE THEY?

A p-value of <0.05 is statistically significant.
A p-value of <0.001 is extremely statistically significant.

Let M := number of bct members = 2,000,000
M^-1 = 0.0000005

Haven't seen a bigger bullshit.What kind of math did you closed?Highschool only ?

[actmyname]

Haven't seen a bigger bullshit.

I can change that.

Here are the possible outcomes:

You are Thule.
You are a troll.
You are a scammer.
You are a friend of Thule.
None of the above.

4/5 is 80%, I think suchmoon is probably right.

[TMAN]

Haven't seen a bigger bullshit.

I can change that.

Here are the possible outcomes:

You are Thule.
You are a troll.
You are a scammer.
You are a friend of Thule.
None of the above.

4/5 is 80%, I think suchmoon is probably right.

100% thule - only fool who used ITO over ICO in meta

[itomarketing]

You just proofed again what kind of manipulator you are.
giving only 20% of possibility that i'm none of the mentioned people suggest to people i'm one of them.


Now here comes my math for you based on your logic


you are an asshole
you are an imbecile
you are a degenrated human
you are a scammer
you are a massiv abuser
you are a parasite
you are an alt of lauda
you are a criminal
you are a broke scamming loser
you are none of them

So the chance that your enemies are right is 90%.
Isn't that evidence enough to ban you

100% thule - only fool who used ITO over ICO in meta

I guess also unable to use google  ?

[TMAN]

100% thule - only fool who used ITO over ICO in meta

I guess also unable to use google heh ?

Now it comes better have a read about their new plans to force project manager and ITO's to follow their created rules or else they will be defamed as corrupt.

SHH princess.

[actmyname]

You just proofed again what kind of manipulator you are.
giving only 20% of possibility that i'm none of the mentioned people suggest to people i'm one of them.

I thought it was an obvious joke. I even put the emoji out there and prefaced with the fact that I would bullshit harder.

I'm still waiting for your answer to my question, by the way:

I even saw 2 people being red tagged for making a deal both agreed on just because it was a paypal exchange deal.
I mean why are you punks to decide for me if i'm allowed to make with somebody an exchange or not ?Its none of your business what kind of risk i take.

You are acting worse than any plan business.

Who are these users? If it's based purely on the method of transaction, then that doesn't seem like it deserves a tag to me.

If you identify these users then I would be glad to counter the rating. I just hope that you're not making false statements.

[itomarketing]

Somebody posting ICO must be a non crypto.There are now only ITO's or STO's

[TMAN]

Somebody posting ICO must be a non crypto.There are now only ITO's or STO's

not here sunshine! ICO is the more prevalent term. take a look about

[itomarketing]

not here sunshine! ICO is the more prevalent term. take a look about

I'm very aware of that that you are not up to date

Maybe if you would talk more with project owners you would see noone is using the term ICO anymore.
Only noobs like you are

[TMAN]

not here sunshine! ICO is the more prevalent term. take a look about

I'm very aware of that that you are not up to date

Maybe if you would talk more with project owners you would see noone is using the term ICO anymore.
Only noobs like you are

maybe for the retards you talk to - no one is buying ETH tokens any more!

[suchmoon]

Are these your evidences LOL
Just same random claims and nothing more ?Thats it ?Show us please the evidence.You claim the same way but i see no examples from you.
Just your poor claims avoiding any serious proofing.
You could show me wrong so quickly by posting evidences.
WHERE ARE THEY?

The "evidences" are in your OP, in many of your other posts, and in Thule's post history. Do you really want me to start highlighting where you put a space before "?" and no space after it? The google search query already highlights words like "belive" and "hughe" and "negativ" used by exactly one user on this forum, you're just too stubborn to give up.

Here is another offer and it's very simple so you really have no reason to refuse: PM me from your Legendary account. If it's not red-trusted I'll remove your red trust and publicly apologize. I will not disclose any details about that account regardless of the outcome. It's as simple as it gets. If you don't trust me we could probably find another mutually acceptable trusted member to adjudicate this but first you must agree that you would need to prove that you own a Legendary account that is not red-trusted and is obviously not Thule.

That still wouldn't prove you're not Thule's alt (you could technically have multiple accounts; you could even hire a straw Legendary to fake this) but let's call it a compromise based on this statement:

THEYMOS I AM A LEGENADARY ON THIS BOARD AND I FUCKING NEED TO USE A SECOND ACCOUNT TO PROTECT MYSELF AGAINST THEIR NEGATIV TRUST ABUSE BECAUSE THATS WHAT THEY DO TO DESTROY SOMEBODY AND MAKE HIM SILENT

[itomarketing]

yes and i will show other members doing the same and you are going to explain us why i'm exectly thule and not one of the other members

Also checking all his trust ratings and post maybe you can explain to me since i thought about it and don't understand even when it were true that i'm thule and this is another account of thule which rule would he have broke to get the neg reg ?

Based on forum rules

18. Having multiple accounts and account sales are allowed, but account sales are discouraged.

Its not saying a word about having multiple accounts are discouraged .
So lets assume i even were thule what rule did he broke for the negative tagg ?

[TMAN]

yes and i will show other members doing the same and you are going to explain us why i'm exectly thule and not one of the other members

posting in meta? with terribad english? with a hardon for Lauda and me? with a fucking deranged attitude?

its Thule - we know, nada you can do to change our mindz....

[The Sceptical Chymist]

18. Having multiple accounts and account sales are allowed, but account sales are discouraged.

Its not saying a word about having multiple accounts are discouraged .
So lets assume i even were thule what rule did he broke for the negative tagg ?

Nice deflection of suchmoon's offer. 

Account selling isn't prohibited by bitcointalk rules, but doing so is extremely bad for the forum--much like scamming, which also isn't prohibited by the rules.  I've written out all the reasons why account sales are bad and am not going to do so again here.  Members ought to be aware by now that if they buy or sell accounts, they're going to get tagged by DT members.  That's part of the community policing itself.

[actmyname]

Based on forum rules

18. Having multiple accounts and account sales are allowed, but account sales are discouraged.

Its not saying a word about having multiple accounts are discouraged .
So lets assume i even were thule what rule did he broke for the negative tagg ?

Let's cite some one more.

Hey, look! It's right under the one that you quoted!

19. Possible (or real) scams and Trust ratings are not moderated (to prevent moderation abuse).

What rule did all those scammers break?

[marlboroza]

I even saw tule trying to fight them ?What happened to him ?Did he just left the board thinking its not worth his time anymore ?I would love to support him with my real account but what would that mean?It would mean my legendary account would be also instantly destroyed by that group.So everyone is sitting silent and just watching what is happening.
I also read tules postings and calling a guy who warned and proofed scam coins and who is involved in some very successfull projects seems for me the board is out of control.I didn't saw any intervention from you to stop that.I also do not see that you have a problem that legit high involved crypto people get defamed.

Theymos should probably read this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100359.msg49353898#msg49353898

But somehow I think he doesn't have time to deal with delusional people, his time is better spent elsewhere.

[itomarketing]

Nice deflection of suchmoon's offer. 

Account selling isn't prohibited by bitcointalk rules, but doing so is extremely bad for the forum--much like scamming, which also isn't prohibited by the rules.  I've written out all the reasons why account sales are bad and am not going to do so again here.  Members ought to be aware by now that if they buy or sell accounts, they're going to get tagged by DT members.  That's part of the community policing itself.

Stop changing facts.I didn't said a single word about selling account but owning multiple accounts.
Selling accounts is officaly discouraged where owning multiple accounts which are not bought is not

What rule did all those scammers break?

Since you called him a scammer please show me who he scammed and which amount

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Stop changing facts.I didn't said a single word about selling account but owning multiple accounts.
Selling accounts is officaly discouraged where owning multiple accounts which are not bought is not

You're so dense that I can't tell if you just don't understand English or are trolling.  You asked what rule Thule broke and why he deserves a neg, and I'm explaining why I left him a neg--it was for account dealing. 

On ignore you go.  Have fun trolling.