Regulations or Anonymity

[Nggedebus]

Anonymity is the idea behind cryptocurrency, i think keep it that way would the the best thing to do. But in case on fixing the scam project that keep on appearing, a regulation is totally needed.

[bountylayomi]

I will prefer the regulation over the anonymity because when regulation is involve the rate at which people are being scammed will reduce drastically.
Thanks.

[Babayan]

If we want to prevent the scam project we should move into the regulative sphere of this market, otherwise our money will be in danger.

[Little Mouse]

Regulations may increase the adoption in cryptocurrency while anonymity will have a resistant. But I am still thinking that anonymity is the best because we people don't want to be forced by our governments.

[SinLinJim]

Regulations may increase the adoption in cryptocurrency while anonymity will have a resistant. But I am still thinking that anonymity is the best because we people don't want to be forced by our governments.

I would not mind partially giving up anonymity if it helped the development of the cryptocurrency and saved us from most of the scams, because otherwise nothing good will come out

[m.rifki]

Regulations may increase the adoption in cryptocurrency while anonymity will have a resistant. But I am still thinking that anonymity is the best because we people don't want to be forced by our governments.

you are right, not many of us care about anonymity. maybe if there is regulation it can make crypto enthusiasts more, but there are also possibilities, there will be many who are afraid of this regulation.

[hrunya102]

We now have a lot of different projects, do not need to choose one thing, if I need anonymity, I will go one way, if the regulation is another.

[awawo]

These two have been topics of debates for quite some time. Some want Anonymity, while others want Regulation. Either of these two will work best for us.
It will get to a time that we just have to choose between Regulations and Anonymity.

In my opinion:
If blockchain  is redesigned without privacy, everything will work fine. Full KYC will make scams impossible.
What is your take on this?

Anonymity and regulations are two coins with different faces because the two can not work together you can have anonymity and at the same time be regulated because you can regulate what you can't control. And in my own opinion let the blockchain remain anonymous because even the KYC and the rest of them can not prevent scam from happening.

[chits]

It is important to note that fraud should in no way come from the team, so they first of all need KYS, even if this is contrary to the rules of the crypto community. The investor must be confident and calm

[Script]

That anonymity is the key to rampant fraudsters in the ICO. If we take as a rule the obligation of KYC for the team, then everything will become easier. Of course, this is not a panacea and KYC can also be circumvented, but it is more difficult and not everyone will want to do it, but that is another question.

[Adriano2010]

I think over time most of countries will put regulation on crypto and some of them will put tax on profit only, but also some people maybe want anonimity and yes i think they can buy bitcoin and hold on their wallet, and no one know who belongs that wallet, and tax will be put only when sell a coin and get a profit over year.

[mrdeposit]

I think over time most of countries will put regulation on crypto and some of them will put tax on profit only, but also some people maybe want anonimity and yes i think they can buy bitcoin and hold on their wallet, and no one know who belongs that wallet, and tax will be put only when sell a coin and get a profit over year.

I guess most of us will choose anonymity. But, if we develop in regulation issue, it is doubtful that anonymity will go far. As time goes on, the anonymity will be taken. Unmanaged world means ruin.