🔥 EarnBet.io | No KYC Casino | 62.5% Rakeback • Highest Rebate 💎

[hd49728]

Argentina vs Cape Verde and Colombia vs Ghana are played on 4 July. That's why it's not part of the promo of other matches played on 3 July. Argentina is, of course, a big favorite to win and the team has been very efficient so far in the tournament. If it becomes difficult, FIFA will do everything possible to help Messi and co to go through. He brings in views and that brings in money. They will give a hand to Cristiano and him with the VAR if they have to. For some, VAR is there to help them. For others, like Iran, the VAR is there to make them stumble and punish them due to politics.

Colombia will struggle with Ghana but Argentina will complete their match with Cape Verde quite easily. With available players for this World Cup, Colombia still relies too much on James Rodriguez and it can be their weakness in a match against a very physical strong team like Ghana. I guess the match between Argentina and Cape Verde will finish after 90 minutes while Colombia and Ghana will pull it to 120 minutes and even penalty shootouts.

None of Colombia and Ghana want to go home after this match while they don't have too many players who can decide this match, so playing carefully will bring them to another penalty shootouts for World Cup 2026, after Netherlands vs Morocco, Germany vs Paraguay.

[knuckey]

I just realized that deposits don't require any withdrawal requirements. Once deposited, you can withdraw immediately. Am I the only one who noticed this? Most casinos require a 1X wager, and at Earnbet, this rule doesn't apply. Is Earnbet not anticipating money laundering or simply using it as a transaction intermediary? This situation will clearly be detrimental to Earnbet.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

I just realized that deposits don't require any withdrawal requirements. Once deposited, you can withdraw immediately. Am I the only one who noticed this? Most casinos require a 1X wager, and at Earnbet, this rule doesn't apply. Is Earnbet not anticipating money laundering or simply using it as a transaction intermediary? This situation will clearly be detrimental to Earnbet.

Money laundering is just some excuse most casinos use to ensure that you at least play in the casino and not just take out your money after depositing. Tell me why exchanges that are mostly used would let you withdraw the money you just deposited, minus any trading activity, without any issues. Wouldn't they force you to at least make a 1x trade before you withdraw your funds?
Why is it referred to as money laundering in casinos but not referred to as money laundering when it comes to crypto exchanges?

[julerz12]

Wimbledon is as big as it gets when it comes to tennis. There is no bigger tennis tournament in the calendar.

I see, so it makes it even more unfortunate that EarnBet didn't at least put out a specific promo for it.
They could have made any special promo, blasted the announcement on their social media channels, so the Tennis fans and bettors might flock to their platform.

It's only unfortunate for it that it's taking place during the football world cup and therefore isn't getting the spotlight it normally would.

I guess this would be part of the cause of what I've mentioned above. Everyone is so focused on the World Cup that the EarnBet team just didn't bother to promote the tennis event any further, since well, no one would pay attention to it. lol
Some guy on their official Telegram chat also seems upset about the lack of promo codes on the newsletters recently. Do any of you still receive such newsletters from EarnBet?

[Pmalek]

Colombia will struggle with Ghana but Argentina will complete their match with Cape Verde quite easily. With available players for this World Cup, Colombia still relies too much on James Rodriguez and it can be their weakness in a match against a very physical strong team like Ghana. I guess the match between Argentina and Cape Verde will finish after 90 minutes while Colombia and Ghana will pull it to 120 minutes and even penalty shootouts.

It turned out to be the opposite. The Argentina match went into extra time and Cape Verde again surprised everyone. They are out of the tournament but the team hasn't lost any match in the regular 90 minutes. Colombia, on the other hand, defeated Ghana in regular time.

I just realized that deposits don't require any withdrawal requirements. Once deposited, you can withdraw immediately. Am I the only one who noticed this? Most casinos require a 1X wager, and at Earnbet, this rule doesn't apply. Is Earnbet not anticipating money laundering or simply using it as a transaction intermediary? This situation will clearly be detrimental to Earnbet.

The terms and conditions paint a different picture. It says that deposits must be wagered at least once and that withdrawals won't be processed before the money is wagered.
Did you try to withdraw funds from your account without wagering and it worked or did you read about it somewhere?

Here are the points in EarnBet's T&Cs that discuss this topic:

As a prevention of money laundering, a deposit must be wagered at least once before a withdrawal can be made. Please note that if wagering requirements are in place, the wagering requirement needs to be respected before a withdrawal is requested.

A withdrawal request will not be processed until all wagering requirements have been met.

https://earnbet.io/terms

[DPHOR]

Wimbledon is as big as it gets when it comes to tennis. There is no bigger tennis tournament in the calendar.

I see, so it makes it even more unfortunate that EarnBet didn't at least put out a specific promo for it.
They could have made any special promo, blasted the announcement on their social media channels, so the Tennis fans and bettors might flock to their platform.

It's only unfortunate for it that it's taking place during the football world cup and therefore isn't getting the spotlight it normally would.

I guess this would be part of the cause of what I've mentioned above. Everyone is so focused on the World Cup that the EarnBet team just didn't bother to promote the tennis event any further, since well, no one would pay attention to it. lol
Some guy on their official Telegram chat also seems upset about the lack of promo codes on the newsletters recently. Do any of you still receive such newsletters from EarnBet?

What you must know is that not all gambling site that would be that willing to such offer bonuses based on this Nation world cup. Of course such bonuses they  mentioned shou that having their requirements so that people wouldn't be that jumping to the site to deferent casino with the aim of trying to unlock a better bonuses.
People shouldn't be that entirely relying on bonus because I know that bonuses are something that quickly lured people into missing their track line, bonuses are mostly issued by new gambling site just attract more gambler to their site.

[Fortify]

I just realized that deposits don't require any withdrawal requirements. Once deposited, you can withdraw immediately. Am I the only one who noticed this? Most casinos require a 1X wager, and at Earnbet, this rule doesn't apply. Is Earnbet not anticipating money laundering or simply using it as a transaction intermediary? This situation will clearly be detrimental to Earnbet.

Money laundering is just some excuse most casinos use to ensure that you at least play in the casino and not just take out your money after depositing. Tell me why exchanges that are mostly used would let you withdraw the money you just deposited, minus any trading activity, without any issues. Wouldn't they force you to at least make a 1x trade before you withdraw your funds?
Why is it referred to as money laundering in casinos but not referred to as money laundering when it comes to crypto exchanges?

It depends if they are receiving funds to a single address and only allowing withdrawals to the same or a specifically defined wallet, otherwise it could in theory be abused but no more than sending on funds to a different wallet that you have control over. Requiring 1x wager from a a casino is not necessarily a high barrier to someone trying to launder money and if you did it with a sports book you could bake in a certain margin - around 5% to achieve the same effect with matched betting. I'm not sure that making an analogy to trading platforms is very useful as I doubt many of the bit platforms require any sort of minimum trading because it would annoy customers who might change their minds and then have their funds held hostage.

[mitchr4]

...

It depends if they are receiving funds to a single address and only allowing withdrawals to the same or a specifically defined wallet, otherwise it could in theory be abused but no more than sending on funds to a different wallet that you have control over. Requiring 1x wager from a a casino is not necessarily a high barrier to someone trying to launder money and if you did it with a sports book you could bake in a certain margin - around 5% to achieve the same effect with matched betting. I'm not sure that making an analogy to trading platforms is very useful as I doubt many of the bit platforms require any sort of minimum trading because it would annoy customers who might change their minds and then have their funds held hostage.

I think the wager rule that most casinos use is more like a business strategy to keep players playing for some time, not really a full protection against money laundering. Some casinos also make the wager rule harder or easier depending on the type of game being played, such as Slot, Original games, and Sportsbook. If someone really wants to misuse the system, there is still a way to get around the 1x wager rule, especially through matched betting on a sportsbook.

[Strongkored]

I just realized that deposits don't require any withdrawal requirements. Once deposited, you can withdraw immediately. Am I the only one who noticed this? Most casinos require a 1X wager, and at Earnbet, this rule doesn't apply. Is Earnbet not anticipating money laundering or simply using it as a transaction intermediary? This situation will clearly be detrimental to Earnbet.

It is standard practice to require a 1x rollover on deposits, did you really manage to make a withdrawal without completing the rollover first? After all, withdrawing without fulfilling the rollover requirement is highly unusual. I’m going to try it out to verify this.

[Pmalek]

It is standard practice to require a 1x rollover on deposits, did you really manage to make a withdrawal without completing the rollover first? After all, withdrawing without fulfilling the rollover requirement is highly unusual. I’m going to try it out to verify this.

If it's a small and insignificant amount, perhaps the person who was assigned to process the withdrawal didn't bother to check how it was wagered or if it was wagered at all. And that's how it got processed without ever being wagered. I doubt anyone would succeed in doing that will a big sum. We know that many crypto casinos like to claim that they have instant withdrawals, but very few do. In many cases they are processed and sent out following manual verification.

[Mahdirakib]

I just realized that deposits don't require any withdrawal requirements. Once deposited, you can withdraw immediately. Am I the only one who noticed this? Most casinos require a 1X wager, and at Earnbet, this rule doesn't apply. Is Earnbet not anticipating money laundering or simply using it as a transaction intermediary? This situation will clearly be detrimental to Earnbet.

Casinos occasionally process the withdrawal of an old user without the deposit rollover requirement if the user makes the withdrawal to a previously used address. I believe this is the reason for receiving the withdrawal successfully without completing the 1× deposit rollover requirement. But you shouldn't expect the same thing always. Earnbet also follows the AML law.

[TopTort777]

I just realized that deposits don't require any withdrawal requirements. Once deposited, you can withdraw immediately. Am I the only one who noticed this? Most casinos require a 1X wager, and at Earnbet, this rule doesn't apply. Is Earnbet not anticipating money laundering or simply using it as a transaction intermediary? This situation will clearly be detrimental to Earnbet.

Have you figured it out with new account or with old account? I used to think that casino I gambled in previously also did not have a wagering requirement on deposits, but it turned out that I have wagered enough already during years of gambling and they probably count that towards new deposit. So if you have wagered previously, I guess your deposit-withdrawal could go without 1x wagering requirement. Or, they could have done your address check when you deposit, and when you withdraw on same address, they allow you not to do 1x wager.

[Pmalek]

Did you guys read the news that Balogun's red card ban was overturned by FIFA and he will be allowed to play for the US against Belgium in the 1/8 finals of the World Cup?
This tournament is turning into a joke. They are punishing the teams they don't want to progress to the next stage and giving a hand to others.

If you don't know what happened here is a quick summary. Balogun got a straight red card when the US played Bosnia in the 1/16 finals. The orange pedophile and other Epstein rape-buddies put pressure on FIFA and their cuckold Infantino so the suspension was cancelled. If the US gets knocked out against Belgium, FIFA should simply allow the Americans to go through anyway, regardless of the result.

[Yurkov]

Did you guys read the news that Balogun's red card ban was overturned by FIFA and he will be allowed to play for the US against Belgium in the 1/8 finals of the World Cup?
This tournament is turning into a joke. They are punishing the teams they don't want to progress to the next stage and giving a hand to others.

If you don't know what happened here is a quick summary. Balogun got a straight red card when the US played Bosnia in the 1/16 finals. The orange pedophile and other Epstein rape-buddies put pressure on FIFA and their cuckold Infantino so the suspension was cancelled. If the US gets knocked out against Belgium, FIFA should simply allow the Americans to go through anyway, regardless of the result.

Yeah, I know exactly what happened and I completely agree with you. It’s honestly unbelievable. Balogun getting his red card overturned after US government pressure just leaves a bad taste. This kind of political manipulation and corruption is exactly what makes football lose its beauty. When the World Cup hosts can just use legal loopholes and pressure Infantino to change the rules for their own benefit, the whole tournament turns into a joke. Today's match might be great, but this behavior is totally unacceptable.

[Slow death]

Yeah, I know exactly what happened and I completely agree with you. It’s honestly unbelievable. Balogun getting his red card overturned after US government pressure just leaves a bad taste. This kind of political manipulation and corruption is exactly what makes football lose its beauty. When the World Cup hosts can just use legal loopholes and pressure Infantino to change the rules for their own benefit, the whole tournament turns into a joke. Today's match might be great, but this behavior is totally unacceptable.

This case has already caused a lot of controversy. The White House confirmed the connection and also confirmed that it provided additional evidence for appeal. According to what I saw on TV, the FIFA disciplinary committee used article 27 of the FIFA disciplinary code.

The article clearly states that the disciplinary committee can suspend the application of a disciplinary measure.

This doesn't change the fact that the United States national team won the game even though they were down to 10 players from the 64th minute onwards. So I believe that FIFA didn't give the USA any favoritism. They have won their games so far on merit. I confess that I'm even surprised by the good performance of the US national team; coach Mauricio Pochettino is doing a good job.

[mitchr4]

Did you guys read the news that Balogun's red card ban was overturned by FIFA and he will be allowed to play for the US against Belgium in the 1/8 finals of the World Cup?
This tournament is turning into a joke. They are punishing the teams they don't want to progress to the next stage and giving a hand to others.

If you don't know what happened here is a quick summary. Balogun got a straight red card when the US played Bosnia in the 1/16 finals. The orange pedophile and other Epstein rape-buddies put pressure on FIFA and their cuckold Infantino so the suspension was cancelled. If the US gets knocked out against Belgium, FIFA should simply allow the Americans to go through anyway, regardless of the result.

Yeah, I know exactly what happened and I completely agree with you. It’s honestly unbelievable. Balogun getting his red card overturned after US government pressure just leaves a bad taste. This kind of political manipulation and corruption is exactly what makes football lose its beauty. When the World Cup hosts can just use legal loopholes and pressure Infantino to change the rules for their own benefit, the whole tournament turns into a joke. Today's match might be great, but this behavior is totally unacceptable.

This situation makes many people doubt how consistent FIFA really is in enforcing the rules in such a big competition. If a decision like this can be changed just because of pressure from a certain side, it clearly damages public trust in the football federation. What makes it even worse, the side who benefited actually looked proud that the decision got approved so easily.

[SeriouslyGiveaway]

This situation makes many people doubt how consistent FIFA really is in enforcing the rules in such a big competition. If a decision like this can be changed just because of pressure from a certain side, it clearly damages public trust in the football federation. What makes it even worse, the side who benefited actually looked proud that the decision got approved so easily.

I really don't like it.

Mistakes can be made but in sports, what done was done forever and it is no chance for replaying a match or decision like this ban suspension for Balogun. I remembered very controversial and suspicious matches like Korea vs Italy, Korea vs Spain in World Cup 2002, Barcelona vs Chelsea in Champions League with overreactions from Chelsea players like Ballack, Drogba and more, Chelsea vs Liverpool in Champions League with a "ghost" goal from Garcia. These matches had bad mistakes or even manipulations but there were no chances to change the results back, no replays too.

The USA already made impressive journey in World Cup 2026 and they can be proud of that, but this Balogun case is very annoying, and has nothing to be proud of.

[Pmalek]

This doesn't change the fact that the United States national team won the game even though they were down to 10 players from the 64th minute onwards. So I believe that FIFA didn't give the USA any favoritism. They have won their games so far on merit. I confess that I'm even surprised by the good performance of the US national team; coach Mauricio Pochettino is doing a good job.

I am not saying they didn't deserve to win nor am I trying to take anything away from their performances so far. They have shown great football. But that card getting overturned is criminal and it is favoritism at the highest level. I think it was the US Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick that made the most pressure on FIFA to change the decision.

That's not how sports is supposed to work. First of all, the red card was deserved because it was a dangerous tackle that could have caused a serious injury. Second of all, even if it wasn't and it was an error, so what? How many mistakes have we seen in the game and we will continue to see them in the future but FIFA and UEFA aren't going to change those decisions. England got a red card last night. Should FIFA suspend that as well? We have seen other red cards as well and those weren't overturned either. Belgium, that is facing the US in the 1/4 Finals, got a red card in the second round of the group stage.

[Cryptomultiplier]

This doesn't change the fact that the United States national team won the game even though they were down to 10 players from the 64th minute onwards. So I believe that FIFA didn't give the USA any favoritism. They have won their games so far on merit. I confess that I'm even surprised by the good performance of the US national team; coach Mauricio Pochettino is doing a good job.

I am not saying they didn't deserve to win nor am I trying to take anything away from their performances so far. They have shown great football. But that card getting overturned is criminal and it is favoritism at the highest level. I think it was the US Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick that made the most pressure on FIFA to change the decision.

That's not how sports is supposed to work. First of all, the red card was deserved because it was a dangerous tackle that could have caused a serious injury. Second of all, even if it wasn't and it was an error, so what? How many mistakes have we seen in the game and we will continue to see them in the future but FIFA and UEFA aren't going to change those decisions. England got a red card last night. Should FIFA suspend that as well? We have seen other red cards as well and those weren't overturned either. Belgium, that is facing the US in the 1/4 Finals, got a red card in the second round of the group stage.

What FIFA did is known as implementation of the 'Ronaldo Rule' even though they cited that it was a technical breach in VAR protocol because Balogun wasn't initially cautioned before the video was reviewed.

This still gives to show how rigging is a possibility in big leagues and rules can be changed or bent for the favorites.

There's also another thing pointed out in this WC, although it is different from this incident, it is the fact that some people claim Argentina has enjoyed having a favorable draw against the more weaker sides, and even though Cape Verde gave them some hell, we would see how they perform against Egypt to see if there's some truth to this theory of favoritism in football at the highest level.