Okay so now that you are a DT gang member you need to uphold your position in tagging liars.
Why should I? My position is not in tagging liars and never has been.
Please immediately tag lauda
Sorry, I don't do requests. If you've got a problem with Lauda, tag that cat yourself.
explain here why you will not tag a proven liar as untrustworthy?
Because I don't care. Tagging liars, proven or not, isn't my job.
Who gave this moron foxpoop so much merit to pump out and destroy the small value of that metric further.
Blame theymos. If you don't like how I (or any other merit source) distributes merits, take it up with him.
thanks, just quoting for future use. I mean if DT members have no interest in tagging proven liars that are on DT then that is fucked up.
@TryNinjaThis is exactly why I enjoy engaging with people like you.
You see your post allows me to illustrate 2 clear things about you.
1. you deliberately ignore the 3 most damning facts I present.
Lauda is a proven liar
Tman is a proven trust abuser and supports a liar
The pharmacist is a proven greedy and devious sock puppet racist sig spamming troll.
So before we go further with this discussion and I can not wait to get to the merit cycling part since it will allow me to bring you back to my most important thread of the year
Since you are questioning my evidence. I am very glad you will now seek to examine all of my evidence in depth in public fairly and give your thoughts in public. I am glad you asked me back to discuss with you.
1 why do you deliberately ignore the other evidence if you wish to discredit my claims?? When you have answered in full and we have examined my evidence then we will move to the merit cycling. Let's address my facts based claims in order.
I am fully open to indulging you in any debate or examination of evidence you would like.
Let us start now..... I am waiting for your reply.