WanderingPhilospher
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 235
Shooters Shoot...
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 18, 2021, 04:15:29 AM |
|
is your card an LHR model/version?
Yes, I just saw that. ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) But I understand that all of the 30 series are. No, none of my 3070s are LHR. They were part of first batches before companies decided to nerf them. Also, I do believe that all Founder's Editions cards will not implement LHR. Honestly, that is the only thing I can think of now...unless it's something odd that I haven't read or experienced before.
|
|
|
|
NotATether
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 7186
In memory of o_e_l_e_o
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 19, 2021, 06:50:04 AM |
|
No, none of my 3070s are LHR. They were part of first batches before companies decided to nerf them. Also, I do believe that all Founder's Editions cards will not implement LHR.
Honestly, that is the only thing I can think of now...unless it's something odd that I haven't read or experienced before.
Do you have any LHR cards lying around so you can make a vanitysearch benchmark between LHR and non-LHR cards? Surely, somebody had to have run some tests with them by now. Though it doesn't sound like NVIDIA would nerf Vanitysearch (it sounds like they are only nerving stuff like arith ops).
|
|
|
|
WanderingPhilospher
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 235
Shooters Shoot...
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 19, 2021, 07:47:39 AM |
|
No, none of my 3070s are LHR. They were part of first batches before companies decided to nerf them. Also, I do believe that all Founder's Editions cards will not implement LHR.
Honestly, that is the only thing I can think of now...unless it's something odd that I haven't read or experienced before.
Do you have any LHR cards lying around so you can make a vanitysearch benchmark between LHR and non-LHR cards? Surely, somebody had to have run some tests with them by now. Though it doesn't sound like NVIDIA would nerf Vanitysearch (it sounds like they are only nerving stuff like arith ops). I do not have any LHR cards. Right, I am wondering if there is something in Vanitysearch that is similar to an eth miner/ethash algo.
|
|
|
|
WhyFhy
|
In regards to 3000 series cards and LHR If it isn't memory intensive it's probably not throttled. Where technically along the lines of sha256 witch is not memory intensive at all. I have non lhr cards as well that simply don't perform as expected on VS it could be user error but as long as I've been using this program I dont think so. For now to me tesla's still dominate VS. I tried a a100 and couldn't get it to work at all.
|
|
|
|
Andre_25
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 7
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 24, 2021, 02:15:34 PM |
|
Friends, one question, does the Vanity run faster on linux or on Windows?
I currently use it on Windows and I am wondering if it is worth using it on Linux.
Thanks in what can help me
|
|
|
|
eozdem
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/lamp.gif) |
September 24, 2021, 02:37:02 PM |
|
I have doubt, if it is starting from 1 each time I start, or it is starting from a random private key ... ./VanitySearch -o /content/drive/MyDrive/sonuc.txt -gpu -i /content/drive/MyDrive/rch.txt -stop -r 100000 VanitySearch v1.15.4, add BitCrack mode [keyspace] start= 1 [keyspace] end=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFEBAAEDCE6AF48A03BBFD25E8CD0364140 Search: 46 addresses (Lookup size 46,[1,1]) [Compressed] Start at Fri Sep 24 13:14:17 2021 Number of CPU thread: 1 GPU: GPU #0 Tesla P100-PCIE-16GB (56x64 cores) Grid(448x512)
|
BTC: 3CK57YEqbkQNAj9UetrK2S2WpBEe8rke4J Telegram : EttercapDb
|
|
|
WanderingPhilospher
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 235
Shooters Shoot...
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 24, 2021, 02:46:22 PM |
|
I have doubt, if it is starting from 1 each time I start, or it is starting from a random private key ... ./VanitySearch -o /content/drive/MyDrive/sonuc.txt -gpu -i /content/drive/MyDrive/rch.txt -stop -r 100000 VanitySearch v1.15.4, add BitCrack mode [keyspace] start= 1 [keyspace] end=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFEBAAEDCE6AF48A03BBFD25E8CD0364140 Search: 46 addresses (Lookup size 46,[1,1]) [Compressed] Start at Fri Sep 24 13:14:17 2021 Number of CPU thread: 1 GPU: GPU #0 Tesla P100-PCIE-16GB (56x64 cores) Grid(448x512)
1, every time. The -r flag you are using (-r 100000) is for rekey, not random. So once your GPU checks 100,000,000,000 keys, the threads will shift up by 100,000,000,000/# of threads.
|
|
|
|
eozdem
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 24, 2021, 02:50:11 PM |
|
I have doubt, if it is starting from 1 each time I start, or it is starting from a random private key ... ./VanitySearch -o /content/drive/MyDrive/sonuc.txt -gpu -i /content/drive/MyDrive/rch.txt -stop -r 100000 VanitySearch v1.15.4, add BitCrack mode [keyspace] start= 1 [keyspace] end=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFEBAAEDCE6AF48A03BBFD25E8CD0364140 Search: 46 addresses (Lookup size 46,[1,1]) [Compressed] Start at Fri Sep 24 13:14:17 2021 Number of CPU thread: 1 GPU: GPU #0 Tesla P100-PCIE-16GB (56x64 cores) Grid(448x512)
1, every time. The -r flag you are using (-r 100000) is for rekey, not random. So once your GPU checks 100,000,000,000 keys, the threads will shift up by 100,000,000,000/# of threads. So how can I force it to start from a random key?
|
BTC: 3CK57YEqbkQNAj9UetrK2S2WpBEe8rke4J Telegram : EttercapDb
|
|
|
WanderingPhilospher
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 235
Shooters Shoot...
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 24, 2021, 05:42:16 PM |
|
I have doubt, if it is starting from 1 each time I start, or it is starting from a random private key ... ./VanitySearch -o /content/drive/MyDrive/sonuc.txt -gpu -i /content/drive/MyDrive/rch.txt -stop -r 100000 VanitySearch v1.15.4, add BitCrack mode [keyspace] start= 1 [keyspace] end=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFEBAAEDCE6AF48A03BBFD25E8CD0364140 Search: 46 addresses (Lookup size 46,[1,1]) [Compressed] Start at Fri Sep 24 13:14:17 2021 Number of CPU thread: 1 GPU: GPU #0 Tesla P100-PCIE-16GB (56x64 cores) Grid(448x512)
1, every time. The -r flag you are using (-r 100000) is for rekey, not random. So once your GPU checks 100,000,000,000 keys, the threads will shift up by 100,000,000,000/# of threads. So how can I force it to start from a random key? The easiest way without recoding yourself, or using my version, is to create a new start range each time you want to start from a different key.
|
|
|
|
Andre_25
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 7
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 28, 2021, 12:45:18 AM Last edit: September 28, 2021, 10:48:33 AM by Andre_25 |
|
Friends, one question, does the Vanity run faster on linux or on Windows?
I currently use it on Windows and I am wondering if it is worth using it on Linux.
Thanks in what can help me
i repeat this question, please help me. Thanks,
|
|
|
|
Trancefan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 2
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 28, 2021, 04:46:27 AM |
|
How would I create a 128 bit unsigned data type in int.cpp?
|
|
|
|
eozdem
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 28, 2021, 04:11:56 PM |
|
Friends, one question, does the Vanity run faster on linux or on Windows?
I currently use it on Windows and I am wondering if it is worth using it on Linux.
Thanks in what can help me
i repeat this question, please help me. Thanks, from my experience there is no big difference, so you can use both OS.
|
BTC: 3CK57YEqbkQNAj9UetrK2S2WpBEe8rke4J Telegram : EttercapDb
|
|
|
Andre_25
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 7
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 29, 2021, 02:43:06 PM |
|
Friends, one question, does the Vanity run faster on linux or on Windows?
I currently use it on Windows and I am wondering if it is worth using it on Linux.
Thanks in what can help me
i repeat this question, please help me. Thanks, from my experience there is no big difference, so you can use both OS. Thanks for your reply. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Then I will not complicate and I will continue in w10
|
|
|
|
eozdem
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/thumbup.gif) |
October 03, 2021, 03:13:30 PM |
|
I could make test with this code in Bitcrack version, it really writes pkey to the output file, >VanitySearch-1.15_bitcrack -stop -t 0 -gpu -r 10000 -s 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000A00000000 1CABDYTie48wXV93XJ4Bdk7MFSTyshTXxg but how can I make a test with the original version of VanitySearch?
|
BTC: 3CK57YEqbkQNAj9UetrK2S2WpBEe8rke4J Telegram : EttercapDb
|
|
|
bigvito19
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 04, 2021, 10:37:04 AM |
|
Anybody thought about making VanitySearch search with a public key to decrease the search range to 2^128 like how kangaroo is but looking for prefixes?
|
|
|
|
a.a
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 36
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 04, 2021, 12:31:07 PM |
|
Kangaroo is cracking the discrete Logarythm of the pubkey. VanitySearch is looking for Prefixes which are pubkeys sha256 and ripemd160.
How do you want to mix those?
|
|
|
|
bigvito19
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 04, 2021, 01:30:48 PM |
|
Kangaroo is cracking the discrete Logarythm of the pubkey. VanitySearch is looking for Prefixes which are pubkeys sha256 and ripemd160.
How do you want to mix those?
Can you search for an address with vanitygen with a public key? I was thinking would that be able to shorten the search space like kangaroo.
Not 100% sure with vanitygen but vanity search takes inputted address and converts it to its RIPEMD160, then searches for a match for the RIPEMD160. One could tweak code to search for a pubkey which would save one sha256 and the one RIPEMD160 function. Priv key Pub key sha256 ripemd160 so you would save two functions but I am not sure on the speed gained since normally, the most time consuming part. whether its CPU or GPU. is doing the math from priv key to pub key.
|
|
|
|
|
|
a.a
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 36
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 04, 2021, 05:30:07 PM |
|
But how does it reduce the range by 2^128? By using the public key
PublicKeys are symmetrical till N/2. And 2^256 /2 is 2^254. So why do you repeat the wrong number of 2^128?
|
|
|
|
|