How to tell which mod actually deletes a post?

[cryptohunter]

As per the title.

How to tell which mod deletes a post?

Do Global mods have the powers to moderate all boards or are there boards that have their set mod and that is that?

[1715383040]

1715383040

[1715383040]

1715383040

[1715383040]

1715383040

[mdayonliner]

As per the title.

How to tell which mod deletes a post?

Looking at the board moderator you can guess the mod.

Do Global mods have the powers to moderate all boards or are there boards that have their set mod and that is that?

They can moderate globally that is why they are global moderator.

PS: Don't forget that admin can do anything. They have the ultimate access.

[cryptohunter]

As per the title.

How to tell which mod deletes a post?

Looking at the board moderator you can guess the mod.

Do Global mods have the powers to moderate all boards or are there boards that have their set mod and that is that?

They can moderate globally that is why they are global moderator.

Yes this is what I mean so if you look at a board and see the moderated is X but then a global mod Y can moderate all boards .... then how to know which deleted for sure?

Does it not show somewhere who deleted?

[AdolfinWolf]

Does it not show somewhere who deleted?

I don't think it does. I don't think the modlog came with the SMF software in the first place, and it just simply isn't something that has ever been implemented/programmed into the "custom" modlog?

Does anyone know if this is different on epoch?

If you have posts that are deleted and you think there's some personal reason behind it, you can always start a thread charade, in which i'm guessing the chances of the mod in question responding to you are pretty high.
E.G. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4047890.0;all

[mdayonliner]

Yes this is what I mean so if you look at a board and see the moderated is X but then a global mod Y can moderate all boards .... then how to know which deleted for sure?

Does it not show somewhere who deleted?

Looking at the board moderator you can guess the mod.

As I said, you can guess but can't be 100% sure about it. It could be the moderator of that specific board or a global moderator or an admin.

[suchmoon]

I guess we're gonna have a thread for each deleted post now.

Your post in the election thread was deleted because it was off topic, just your usual rants against The Pharmacist et al with no attempt to post anything relevant to the thread. So why don't you stop wasting mods' time with this frivolous thread and blame the real culprit, i.e. me, for reporting that post. You know you want to.

This is why I unignored you and I'll put that to good use.

[cryptohunter]

I guess we're gonna have a thread for each deleted post now.

Your post in the election thread was deleted because it was off topic, just your usual rants against The Pharmacist et al with no attempt to post anything relevant to the thread. So why don't you stop wasting mods' time with this frivolous thread and blame the real culprit, i.e. me, for reporting that post. You know you want to.

This is why I unignored you and I'll put that to good use.

I want you to prove it is off topic or else I want it put back there or yes I will make a thread about it.

Bring the proof within 1 hour else I make a thread about it and insist the post is replaced.

1. it is factual
2. it is on topic
3. it is in reply to a post he referenced me in and made incorrect statements regarding myself else I would not have taken time to give my factually correct and valuable reply.

Now stop trying to silence the facts that don't suit your agenda.


the pharmacist is aka Huge Black Woman. The sneaky, devious , greedy racist trolling sock puppet sig spammer

Do you deny this?? suchmoon?

1. bring the pharmacists post about me
2. bring my post and demonstrate how it is off topic and needs to be deleted.

Yes scunter is his pet name for me unless you wish to try and deny this too.


Do you suggest that the pharmacist aka huge black woman has the right to call me scunter and make false accusations about myself. HOWEVER my factual and reasonable post that I can provide evidence and observable events to substantiate must be removed???

I will post on topic , relevant facts in response to false claims regarding myself whenever I feel like it and if they are deleted I will be making a huge fuss about it and highlighting that you seem to be having way too much influence over free speech here.

[TheBeardedBaby]

Does it not show somewhere who deleted?

I don't think it does. I don't think the modlog came with the SMF software in the first place, and it just simply isn't something that has ever been implemented/programmed into the "custom" modlog?

Does anyone know if this is different on epoch?

I just started lurking in the epochtalk but  I haven't messed up with the logs yet. Interesting is that now you have an option while reporting to choose whether you want to report the posts itself or the user profile.

I guess I'm gonna write a review if I get the time for it.

Back on topic, the only way to find out is to ask the mods, which you already did and now is only a matter of time to get a response.

[Quickseller]

No. If you have a concern with why a post was deleted, you can PM a global mod, or admin. If you don’t get a response, or if you cannot agree you can open a thread in meta about it.

At the end of the day, the mod is responding to a report from someone (most likely), and is taking action based upon the forum rules. The same action should have been taken regardless of which mod responded to the report.

[suchmoon]

I want you to prove it is off topic or else I want it put back there or yes I will make a thread about it.

Bring the proof within 1 hour else I make a thread about it and insist the post is replaced.

If you're certain it's on topic you can put it back yourself, you have a copy in your inbox and probably in your drafts too.

Or you can create new threads about it, IDGAF.

[cryptohunter]

I want you to prove it is off topic or else I want it put back there or yes I will make a thread about it.

Bring the proof within 1 hour else I make a thread about it and insist the post is replaced.

If you're certain it's on topic you can put it back yourself, you have a copy in your inbox and probably in your drafts too.

Or you can create new threads about it, IDGAF.

You reported it

STATE YOUR CASE NOW

YOU deemed it needing removal. NOW PROVE IT.

I mean you are snitching around on this board day and night for minor shit I bet the mods barely look at the reports since you create so many.

You are scared to present your case because you know you have NO case.

The pharmacist made false accusations about me and I replied with facts and observable events regarding him.

Now you reported it .... prove it should have been removed in the context that it was made.

What are you scared of? that I will tear your case to shreds like every other conflict we have had and you will end up spouting ludicrous drivel that I will be able to bitch slap you around with forever?

This is exactly the sort of silencing of facts that are on topic and relevant EVEN in response to  false claims they are allowed to make about you ?

Why stop there? just be like lauda and give red trust for presenting facts and reasonable statements based on those facts and observable events.

[suchmoon]

You reported it

STATE YOUR CASE NOW

I already stated my case to a moderator, who agreed with it. You can either re-post the rant that was deleted, or keep bitching. I really don't give a fuck either way nor am I going to play your stupid word games.

[cryptohunter]

You reported it

STATE YOUR CASE NOW

I already stated my case to a moderator, who agreed with it. You can either re-post the rant that was deleted, or keep bitching. I really don't give a fuck either way nor am I going to play your stupid word games.

Ha so you are refusing to present it now?  what a chicken shit piece of snitching dirt you are.

1 hour then I will start the thread that demonstrates just how you are trying to silence a facts based reply to a false accusation that one of your "circle" of merit pals and DT inclusions made.

tick tock bring to me now your case.... copy and paste the "case" you sent to the mod.

I will title it something like..

suchmoon instructs mod to delete facts and observable events rebutting false claims and accusations from his pal huge black woman.

this actually is not as bad as the lauda incident but it nicely lends itself to being very similar in nature.

seems like a person trying to cover up the proven wrong doing of their friends and DT inclusions and merit pals to me.

Post the pharmacists aka huge black womans post about myself and then my own post in reply then explain how mine is off topic and deserves to be deleted

I challenge you to do it right now. If not then you have no case that you care to present. If you can easily prove mine should be deleted and his left there then fair enough.

If not I want you to message the mod and have it replaced.

[suchmoon]

Ha so you are refusing to present it now?  what a chicken shit piece of snitching dirt you are.

I already told you. The "case" was that the post was off topic, nothing to do with elections, personal attack. I don't have the exact wording because reports aren't visible to me.

[ BS rant skipped ]
I challenge you to do it right now. If not then you have no case that you care to present. If you can easily prove mine should be deleted and his left there then fair enough.

You're right about one thing. I don't care much about your rambling except when you break the rules. If you think some other post was off topic too - report it.

If not I want you to message the mod and have it replaced.

You can replace it yourself and skip the drama. Despite what you're insinuating, moderators don't take orders from me.

[cryptohunter]

Ha so you are refusing to present it now?  what a chicken shit piece of snitching dirt you are.

I already told you. The "case" was that the post was off topic, nothing to do with elections, personal attack. I don't have the exact wording because reports aren't visible to me.

[ BS rant skipped ]
I challenge you to do it right now. If not then you have no case that you care to present. If you can easily prove mine should be deleted and his left there then fair enough.

You're right about one thing. I don't care much about your rambling except when you break the rules. If you think some other post was off topic too - report it.

If not I want you to message the mod and have it replaced.

You can replace it yourself and skip the drama. Despite what you're insinuating, moderators don't take orders from me.

Are you serious?

The pharmacist aka huge black woman the person who got busted for sig spamming racist trolling under a sock puppet to earn more btc dust for spamming an extra sig and even then was so greedy got caught trying to leave one campaign for a higher paying one starts making false accusations about me out of the blue.


I was alerted to this accusation about myself directly so

1. I told the truth that he was busted for being sneaky and greedy and sig spamming under a puppet account for extra btc dust

2. i told the truth that when i asked him his greatest achievement here he told me it was getting on a highly paid sig campaign

3. I pointed out inlight of this why I disagreed with his views on the DT selection and elections and on myself being a baffoon voicing incorrect  stupid unworkable views ( can't please everyone argument).. and why he may be making these false claims.

It is obviously on topic because he is commenting on the elections and the trust system and actually telling people my views are incorrect and that I am a baffoon and his views that it is all working perfectly are the correct views?this  is of course likely motivated by the fact that even such a person of proven untrustworthy repute as him and his master lauda can still be given powers of trust and rewarded for essentially gaming the systems.

So suchmoons you say he huge black woman.. can say my views are incorrect and I look like a baffoon (all unsubstantiated bullshit from a proven untrustworthy scumbag) and I have to have my post deleted for presenting facts as to his background and why he is saying this about me and the lack of need for any changes to the DT system and elections are not required or even worth debating??

Now explain how it is off topic and non relevant?

I await your explanation.

It is clearly just an attempt to silence facts that demonstrate your DT inclusion pal and merit fan and receiver cycling pal the pharmacist is clearly a sneaky and greedy and untrustworthy person.

This by your own definition suchmoon makes you untrustworthy ...again from yet another source.

You are starting to look very shady indeed. I see you colluding with all manner of observably untrustworthy individuals. You need to be watched very closely.

[suchmoon]

Are you serious?

As a heart attack.

[ case in point - unable to stay on topic even in your own thread ]

So suchmoons you say he huge black woman.. can say my views are incorrect and I look like a baffoon (all unsubstantiated bullshit from a proven untrustworthy scumbag) and I have to have my post deleted for presenting facts as to his background and why he is saying this about me and the lack of need for any changes to the DT system and elections are not required or even worth debating??

If you start presenting everyone's "background" in every thread you'll be derailing the whole forum with that shit. Come to think of it, that's what you're doing most of the time. The correct way to make such character complaints would be to create your own threads or use the ones that already exist for that purpose.

Now explain how it is off topic and non relevant?

I await your explanation.

It is clearly just an attempt to silence facts that demonstrate your DT inclusion pal and merit fan and receiver cycling pal the pharmacist is clearly a sneaky and greedy and untrustworthy person.

This by your own definition suchmoon makes you untrustworthy ...again from yet another source.

You are starting to look very shady indeed. I see you colluding with all manner of observably untrustworthy individuals. You need to be watched very closely.

Knock yourself out. Use binoculars for the extra pervy touch.

[cryptohunter]

Are you serious?

As a heart attack.

[ case in point - unable to stay on topic even in your own thread ]

So suchmoons you say he huge black woman.. can say my views are incorrect and I look like a baffoon (all unsubstantiated bullshit from a proven untrustworthy scumbag) and I have to have my post deleted for presenting facts as to his background and why he is saying this about me and the lack of need for any changes to the DT system and elections are not required or even worth debating??

If you start presenting everyone's "background" in every thread you'll be derailing the whole forum with that shit. Come to think of it, that's what you're doing most of the time. The correct way to make such character complaints would be to create your own threads or use the ones that already exist for that purpose.

Now explain how it is off topic and non relevant?

I await your explanation.

It is clearly just an attempt to silence facts that demonstrate your DT inclusion pal and merit fan and receiver cycling pal the pharmacist is clearly a sneaky and greedy and untrustworthy person.

This by your own definition suchmoon makes you untrustworthy ...again from yet another source.

You are starting to look very shady indeed. I see you colluding with all manner of observably untrustworthy individuals. You need to be watched very closely.

Knock yourself out. Use binoculars for the extra pervy touch.

LOL so here we have it. Suchmoon says no more mentioning a persons proven dirty background if they are her pals and colluders. I see her mentioning everyone elses background when it suits her. Og, QS, TS and anyone else gets their pasts or her variation of their pasts dug up when she starts colliding with them in threads.

However, even when a suchmoon colluder pal makes invalid and incorrect claims on your personal views and your character you must not present facts to demonstrate why those views regarding the topic and yourself could certainly be invalidated and propose obvious and observable events from their past to substantiate your views.

I see.   Well let's look through your post history shall we and start making the same comparisons and have them all deleted shall we?

I've missed you actually. I have forgotten what a last word imbecile you are for demonstrating your own double standards

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5109647.msg49728142#msg49728142

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106712.msg49728054#msg49728054

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106712.msg49724251#msg49724251

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106712.msg49713758#msg49713758

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg49491374#msg49491374

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100061.msg49340042#msg49340042

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5098584.msg49336299#msg49336299


more on the way all need to be reported and deleted for being background - - not allowed..

So now facts that are obviously relevant and important to refute false accusations and claims regarding the specific topic are not allowed. Especially if they reveal proven dirt on suchmoons pals.

[suchmoon]

LOL so here we have it. Suchmoon says no more mentioning a persons proven dirty background if they are her pals and colluders. I see her mentioning everyone elses background when it suits her. Og, QS, TS and anyone else gets their pasts or her variation of their pasts dug up when she starts colliding with them in threads.

If you think any of my posts are off topic please report them and watch me create a million whiny-ass threads about that... or not.

[cryptohunter]

LOL so here we have it. Suchmoon says no more mentioning a persons proven dirty background if they are her pals and colluders. I see her mentioning everyone elses background when it suits her. Og, QS, TS and anyone else gets their pasts or her variation of their pasts dug up when she starts colliding with them in threads.

If you think any of my posts are off topic please report them and watch me create a million whiny-ass threads about that... or not.

whiny to idiots like such moon = legitimate questions

Let me spell it out to you because as i have demonstrated in the merit cycling debates you are a full on dip shit and need to start making ludicrous claims to hold on to your side of any argument

1. my post and the details regarding the facts of the pharmacists background are ON TOPIC and RELEVANT to
a. his claim my views on the elections, and dt are incorrect and that makes me a baffoon
b. his claim that the dt should remain as it is because it is unworkable to try and please everyone and it works best as it can right now
c. the op that is questioning the current DT system vs elections.

2. now any relevant back ground pertinent to the OP or a statement made regarding the OP must be made on a separate  board and not mentioned on thread or it will be deleted. Who says?? you suchmoron??

You are more of a dirty snitcher for minor infractions than a whiner that is likely because at present you enjoy some pseudo power and favour here and have little to whine about since you get to instruct theymos to remove merits, mods to delete posts, display openly double standards with no comeback, support liars, suspected extortionists,  and proven trust abusers and proven greedy sneaky sig spamming troll puppets for DT positions and cycle your merit source loot. Not much to complain about I guess at the moment.

I wonder when you will break down again and start spewing out ludicrous statements. I'm glad you're back. Where have you been of late? I see minimal posting in meta from you?

[suchmoon]

You are more of a dirty snitcher for minor infractions than a whiner that is likely because at present you enjoy some pseudo power and favour here and have little to whine about since you get to instruct theymos to remove merits, mods to delete posts, display openly double standards with no comeback, support liars, suspected extortionists,  and proven trust abusers and proven greedy sneaky sig spamming troll puppets for DT positions and cycle your merit source loot.

Wow, it sounds like I'm a truly horrible person.

I wonder when you will break down again and start spewing out ludicrous statements. I'm glad you're back. Where have you been of late? I see minimal posting in meta from you?

I had you on ignore and since you don't really care about anything forum-related that doesn't stroke your narcissism - you didn't see me.


Your hour was up like three hours ago. Seems like you lied again. Not nice.

1 hour then I will start the thread