"Last of the V8s" is filing fake scam reports

[realr0ach]

As I explained in the other thread:

LastoftheV8TrilemmaShills is now filing FALSE REPORTS against me.  Anyone who has been in this thread knows for a fact that Bob was telling everyone to "hodl" at the top near $20k while he was dumping instead.  I don't feel like digging up the posts now (but I can if Bob didn't go back and edit them).  There is absolutely nothing in that post that isn't true:

[hacker1001101001]

This better suits in the Reputation section


I think this as a wrong way of using trust by the way. But trust system is not moderated and you would be at a better chance to remove the neg by PMing Last of the V8s

I personally think the negative trust is unwanted for such issues.

[realr0ach]

And here's some evidence to prove my point:

Patently false. I sold no-where near ~$5,000 USD of the top. Sold as it was crashing down from the top, and I started panicking.

Nowhere near $5000 off the top you say?  There's a quote below of you selling $1 million worth at $14.5k.  You sold around $5 million worth from what I can tell altogther while posting bull spam the entire time telling everyone else to buy or "hodl".  By your own admission in the quotes below, you were telling everyone else to buy or "hodl" after you had already extracted "an obsecene amount of fiat".  If you actually believed the price was going higher or even believed bitcoin was a store of value at all, you would be buying instead of selling.  Instead, you were dumping like mad and then posting bull spam while doing it and afterwards. 

In chronological order:

Don't trust anyone

I'm totally fucked at Coinbase. Sitting on an obscene amount of fiat from a recent sale, but don't have access to my Funding/Withdrawal page.

Having one really fucking bad time trying to pull out lots of cash from Coinbase.

CHOO-CHOO TOWARDS $20K MOTHERFUCKERS !!!

Saddle up boys. Time to ride that bull !

BTC buying opportunity.

LOL.  Here's betting we're flirting with $18k by Friday.

Ok. Extracted just north of $1M @ $14,500 USD/BTC.

Once the wire hits my account, I'll load up for round 2.

Who SODL'd the bottom ?

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

I came to understand, feedbacks which aren't related to trade or scam like activities shouldn't be left with a positive or negative tag. The third option which is the neutral feedback should be used in a case if you feel the need lo leave a feedback.

Although realr0ach, you aren't supposed to worry about every feedbacks you get, the trust system isn't moderated people will always take advantage of that but you should know, most feedbacks are worthless, they don't contribute to your trust score.

V8 is now DT2, so it does effect his score.

Thanks for the information, I viewed his profile and didn't see a score could be because of my custom trust list.

[bones261]

I came to understand, feedbacks which aren't related to trade or scam like activities shouldn't be left with a positive or negative tag. The third option which is the neutral feedback should be used in a case if you feel the need lo leave a feedback.

Although realr0ach, you aren't supposed to worry about every feedbacks you get, the trust system isn't moderated people will always take advantage of that but you should know, most feedbacks are worthless, they don't contribute to your trust score.

V8 is now DT2, so it does effect his score....However, given r0ach's current stance on crytocurrency, I don't see exactly how this would impede him at all. Unless he is hoping to use bitcointalk to construct a network of people white men willing to do face to face commerce involving silver and gold bullion.

[actmyname]

This should be moved to Reputation. It is a user-based issue and not that of the forum.

[Lauda]

I came to understand, feedbacks which aren't related to trade or scam like activities shouldn't be left with a positive or negative tag. The third option which is the neutral feedback should be used in a case if you feel the need lo leave a feedback.

Which is false. Stop spreading misinformation.
I was contemplating whether to act on this or not for a long time just like I did with bcash scammers. There you go.

[asche]

I came to understand, feedbacks which aren't related to trade or scam like activities shouldn't be left with a positive or negative tag. The third option which is the neutral feedback should be used in a case if you feel the need lo leave a feedback.

Which is false. Stop spreading misinformation.

I am also really annoyed by his topic with basically wrong guidelines regarding tags, which he keeps bumping as if it was THE TRUTH.

Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100675.0

[hacker1001101001]

I came to understand, feedbacks which aren't related to trade or scam like activities shouldn't be left with a positive or negative tag. The third option which is the neutral feedback should be used in a case if you feel the need lo leave a feedback.

Which is false. Stop spreading misinformation.

I don't know why you think it is a misinformation, but thats exactly what's stated by theymos, about the usage of trust.

In particular, in my view:
 - Giving negative trust for being an annoying poster is inappropriate, since this has nothing to do with their trustworthiness. If they're disrupting discussion or never adding anything, then that's something for moderators to deal with, and you should report their posts and/or complain in Meta about it.

[Lauda]

I came to understand, feedbacks which aren't related to trade or scam like activities shouldn't be left with a positive or negative tag. The third option which is the neutral feedback should be used in a case if you feel the need lo leave a feedback.

Which is false. Stop spreading misinformation.

I don't know why you think it is a misinformation, but thats exactly what's stated by theymos, about the usage of trust.

In particular, in my view:
 - Giving negative trust for being an annoying poster is inappropriate, since this has nothing to do with their trustworthiness. If they're disrupting discussion or never adding anything, then that's something for moderators to deal with, and you should report their posts and/or complain in Meta about it.

Annoying =/= consistently posting misinformation (there is no doubt about OP when it comes to this clearly). This is elementary school knowledge, don't waste our time.

I am also really annoyed by his topic with basically wrong guidelines regarding tags, which he keeps bumping as if it was THE TRUTH.

Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5100675.0

Sadly there is little that can be done (based on current forum policies) to prevent the spread of such or any other misinformation.

[realr0ach]

I came to understand, feedbacks which aren't related to trade or scam like activities shouldn't be left with a positive or negative tag. The third option which is the neutral feedback should be used in a case if you feel the need lo leave a feedback.

Which is false. Stop spreading misinformation.

I was contemplating whether to act on this or not for a long time just like I did with bcash scammers. There you go.

Of course the scammer feedback system is not for completely arbitrary opinion bullshit like you don't like their taste in music or fashion so you give them a negative score.  It's pretty obvious Last of the V8s is abusing the system when he filed a scam report against Jbreher for simply owning Bcash (lol).  I could give two shits about Bcash, and Jbreher and I are not friends, but if you can file a scam report against someone for owning Bcash, then filing a scam report on people for owning Dogecoin or Monero would be valid too.  

Hell, it would also be completely viable for me to file a scam report against EVERY SINGLE PERSON on the ENTIRE FORUM supporting bitcoin for being scammers because transaction validators are designed to centralize in every cryptocurrency and decentralization is a 100% completely unsolvable problem.  So do you really want to play by the rules you and Last of the V8s advocate now, Lauda?  I just noticed you left a fake scam report on my page too.  

You're literally an ANTIFA member.  They're unable to win in any legit debate so their only valid tactic is to try and censor or practice defamation.  Just like you, Last of the V8s is also incapable of beating me in debate which is why he did this.  Nothing I've said is even false.  It's YOU that's spreading disinformation.  Creating a decentralized digital currency is 100% impossible, and any non-fungible currency is also a permissioned ledger by default, which is why I advocate physical metals.

[realr0ach]

Then we have:

On feedback pages, you can leave trade feedback. There are no rules for this, but here are some guidelines:
- Do not rate people based on the quality of their posts.

Which is what Lauda and Last of the V8s are arbitrarly doing to random people they disagree with or can't beat in debate.  Did I also mention women perjure themselves in court at a rate far higher than men which is why no civilized nation in the past ever allowed women to be stand as witnesses in the first place?  They have no form of honor whatsoever, no integrity, do not respect any type of logic or reason, and just lie to try and distort things in their favor. Your (Lauda) cognitive dissonance level is so high that you don't even understand I'm the only person on the forum NOT lying and that you are the one attempting to lie about "decentralization" for personal gain.

[Lauda]

You're literally an ANTIFA member.

This is good to know. Keep trying.

[TECSHARE]

I came to understand, feedbacks which aren't related to trade or scam like activities shouldn't be left with a positive or negative tag. The third option which is the neutral feedback should be used in a case if you feel the need lo leave a feedback.

Which is false. Stop spreading misinformation.
I was contemplating whether to act on this or not for a long time just like I did with bcash scammers. There you go.

I see, so some one disagrees with your burn them all attitude and they are automatically spreading misinformation and get a negative rating. You believe whatever serves you at any given moment. The tide is changing around here, and you aren't going to like the way you look, I guarantee it.

[bones261]

I came to understand, feedbacks which aren't related to trade or scam like activities shouldn't be left with a positive or negative tag. The third option which is the neutral feedback should be used in a case if you feel the need lo leave a feedback.

Which is false. Stop spreading misinformation.
I was contemplating whether to act on this or not for a long time just like I did with bcash scammers. There you go.

I see, so some one disagrees with your burn them all attitude and they are automatically spreading misinformation and get a negative rating. You believe whatever serves you at any given moment. The tide is changing around here, and you aren't going to like the way you look, I guarantee it.

No, Lauda has not given CryptopreneurBrainboss a negative rating. She has given R0ach a negative rating. However, if you want to become a white knight for realr0ach, please go ahead. I'm popping the popcorn, now.The stuff he posts on this forum would have gotten him banned on the vast majority of social media platforms. Him being allowed to continue to post here is a testament to how liberal bitcointalk is when it comes to letting people express their views.

@R0ach. Have you attempted to get your original account back recently? If you still have the original e-mail that you created that account with, the chances are fair you can have it back in about a week.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5089777.0

[cryptohunter]

I came to understand, feedbacks which aren't related to trade or scam like activities shouldn't be left with a positive or negative tag. The third option which is the neutral feedback should be used in a case if you feel the need lo leave a feedback.

Which is false. Stop spreading misinformation.
I was contemplating whether to act on this or not for a long time just like I did with bcash scammers. There you go.

REALLY?? so you are saying you will do what you like then? Because I just saw Theymos say red trust will be for scammers or those strongly likely to scam.

Of course you will continue to abuse the trust system as suits you and the goons. Right up until the tide builds against you. Then you and the rest of the turds are going to be flushed down and away from the systems of control you abuse.

@bones

This could or could not be true (i have not read his recent posts but he is a famous poster from the old days on the alt boards and I never saw anything very offensive there - this is the original roach or not??) but again this is a matter for ADMIN not a bunch of self serving goons to take care of. Unless it is scam related this is not a scam tag issue.

[bones261]

@bones

This could or could not be true (i have not read his recent posts but he is a famous poster from the old days on the alt boards and I never saw anything very offensive there - this is the original roach or not??) but again this is a matter for ADMIN not a bunch of self serving goons to take care of. Unless it is scam related this is not a scam tag issue.

Yes this is the original R0ach. His points are exactly the same from when his account got hacked in 2017. He didn't miss a beat. Also, if you happen to be a women, a jew, or have any skin color other than white, you probably are not going to enjoy a great deal of his material... Also, r0ach has "evolved" quite a bit from the old days. Basically, he thinks cryptocurrency as a whole is a load of BS. I think the turn around was complete just prior to bitfinex getting hacked.

[cryptohunter]

@bones

This could or could not be true (i have not read his recent posts but he is a famous poster from the old days on the alt boards and I never saw anything very offensive there - this is the original roach or not??) but again this is a matter for ADMIN not a bunch of self serving goons to take care of. Unless it is scam related this is not a scam tag issue.

Yes this is the original R0ach. His points are exactly the same from when his account got hacked in 2017. He didn't miss a beat. Also, if you happen to be a women, a jew, or have any skin color other than white, you probably are not going to enjoy a great deal of his material... Also, r0ach has "evolved" quite a bit from the old days. Basically, he thinks cryptocurrency as a whole is a load of BS. I think the turn around was complete just prior to bitfinex getting hacked.

Well, I can not say that I ascribe to these views. However I hold to the view that these are admin related concerns and not for DT red trust nazi's to take into their own hands when clearly their mandate is for scammers and scam related matters. When you start allowing red trust for any other reason it leads to abuse and the crushing of free speech.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

V8 is now DT2, so it does effect his score....However, given r0ach's current stance on crytocurrency, I don't see exactly how this would impede him at all. Unless he is hoping to use bitcointalk to construct a network of people white men willing to do face to face commerce involving silver and gold bullion.

Exactly, r0ach is just a troll. I have no idea why he posts here. He enjoys ridiculing bitcoin too, his presence here is a total waste of his time. Life is too short!

[bones261]

@bones

This could or could not be true (i have not read his recent posts but he is a famous poster from the old days on the alt boards and I never saw anything very offensive there - this is the original roach or not??) but again this is a matter for ADMIN not a bunch of self serving goons to take care of. Unless it is scam related this is not a scam tag issue.

Yes this is the original R0ach. His points are exactly the same from when his account got hacked in 2017. He didn't miss a beat. Also, if you happen to be a women, a jew, or have any skin color other than white, you probably are not going to enjoy a great deal of his material... Also, r0ach has "evolved" quite a bit from the old days. Basically, he thinks cryptocurrency as a whole is a load of BS. I think the turn around was complete just prior to bitfinex getting hacked.

Well, I can not say that I ascribe to these views. However I hold to the view that these are admin related concerns and not for DT red trust nazi's to take into their own hands when clearly their mandate is for scammers and scam related matters. When you start allowing red trust for any other reason it leads to abuse and the crushing of free speech.

If you were a women, a Jew, or a non-white person, would you want to engage in trade with this guy? (Especially divulging shipping details.)