IEO IS WAY BETTER

[IVEXO]

IEO (initial exchange offering) is better than ICO,to participate in any IEO you have to be a member on the exchange launching the IEO ,this are my reasons

1)IEO is safer and better than ICO because its not what anyone can just conduct ,to conduct an IEO the project teams must meet and comply with the exchanges requirements in order to launch the token sale .

2)contributors are protected by the exchange,why? Many big exchanges offering the IEO now are after there reputations so its not easy to launch IEO through them,if the project before them is not genuine enough the exchanges won't dare take the risk.

I think this is what many investors have been waiting for , better risk limiting investment ,IEO is the only way to go
,don't forget ,DYOR ,thank you

Well with your points above, ieo is definitely good for the exchange platform and the project
Because they both make good profits from the crowdfunding event

But the individual investor still needs to ensure personal safety and profit

[1713876985]

1713876985

[1713876985]

1713876985

[1713876985]

1713876985

[1713876985]

1713876985

[aioc]

It's too early to tell the first set of IEO was successful but it still comes down to the project itself, it is just hype at a start, we are going to find out after a few months if those IEO are successful in the market, and are they here for a long term.

[Mrcharles]

I'm of the opinion that IEO would make a better deal for the cryptocurrency space owing to the fact that participants or investors will be confident about their investment and the possibility of the project getting listed within the stipulated period would be high. The IEO will ensure that exchanges review projects indeptly before giving them the opportunity to raise funds owing to the fact that they have a reputation to protect.

[bitcoin-shark]

i personally don't like so much these new ieo they seem to me the bad copy of the sto and the ico, with only more the obligation to invest through exchange (therefore kyc obligation) the only ones that will gain will be the exchanges that will offer them...

[alan2here]

i personally don't like so much these new ieo they seem to me the bad copy of the sto and the ico, with only more the obligation to invest through exchange (therefore kyc obligation) the only ones that will gain will be the exchanges that will offer them...

The best IEO should only appear in large exchanges. I think Binance, Okex, Huobi, Bittrex should be exchanges that investors care about because the opportunity to earn profits will be higher. I believe that this trend will last for a very long time and can replace all ICO projects because ICO in the eyes of investors is just a lie.

[Serve20]

Yes, it is better than ICO in many perspectives. First it provides instant liquidity for the project which is the bane of many ICOs out there. Also if the exchange platform is credible, the probability of it being scam is slim because the exchange will not want to spoil its name

[marjil]

The IEO is a good way to make money during this period, it is much better than the ICO, now Binance will sell the IEO on March 19 and this is probably an opportunity for us to make a profit.

This new IEO sounds like a really good way to do better with making bigger profits compared to some of the ICO which did not do very well in past few weeks but we can still hodl for better result and get IEO as well.

[creeps]

i personally don't like so much these new ieo they seem to me the bad copy of the sto and the ico, with only more the obligation to invest through exchange (therefore kyc obligation) the only ones that will gain will be the exchanges that will offer them...

I think its getting hard to escape the kyc obligation because of growing regulations so for me there’s no way to skip that step in order for you to achieve more since the future will still depend on regulations. IEO is new, so its still hard to tell which is the better because investors are still buying an ico coin, the future will tell this one for us.

[inanilujimi]

of course the IEO is far better and can protect investors because it will risk the reputation of the exchange.
we should be able to accept changes that are better than before.

[acheampong64]

You know what...this is true in deed that IEOs could've been a better bet but it shall have repercussions as time goes by. The same thing happened with ICOs when they started until the bullrun came and then many scams evolved. Nevertheless IEOs are still a better bet since you can decide to join those provided by trusted exchanges.

[beehimneff]

Yes, I agree, IEO is a really good alternative to ICO! Investors feel safer and will not have long expectations with trading on the exchange, and in this case, the exchange on which this token will be traded will already be known.

[vertinfos]

Now many of the exchanges do iso, but I think we still need to choose the right project, as the exchange is not responsible for the loss of funds in the event of a drain of the course , and so I agree with you that it is more secure than the ico

[crzybilly]

This is the biggest trend at the moment, because all the projects that were launched on Binance, are really successful. I hope this we will see the same by all other big exchanges and there would not be any difficulties like at Bittrex at the moment.

[nreal]

An IEO is really good if launched on top trading platforms. Currently there are many small trading floors implementing the IEO but did not achieve significant results.

[kaito.]

i just know about IEO and and after some reaserch i aggre with you.
projects that issue their ICO on exchange or IEO have more credibility than ICO normally, because they already have Exchange as their backs. With Initial Exchange Offerings exchanges will aid developers in making sure that everything is good.
sadly not many ICO issue their project on a reputable exchange because of the high cost.
in short IEO clearly have a low risk compared to normal ICO.
but in the end always DYOR before investing.

[cunicula]

Who cares If it is ICO, IOU or IEO, If the project is lit then any raising campaign will achieve its cap or better to say hard cap.

[jan.nicolas]

The new direction, which is now used by the exchange, because now they are left unattended, but it seems to me that the scammers can hold ICO there, so this will not add any guarantees. I think that this is not a problem for scam projects.

[No Pain No blood]

I don't see any difference between the IEO and the ICO. so I don't think it's better or not. there is still a possibility if the project that uses the IEO to raise funds turns out to be a scam project. exchange is only like escrow but they certainly will not want to give accountability if it is later proven that the project is a scam.

[CryptoLogo]

Relax, friend. There’s too much hype around IEO right now. IEO is a great model, but not the best. Let's see what happens in a few months, then we draw conclusions.

[capcaypro]

Really better???
For example IEO from Bittrex looks like scam! They hasn't got BIG partner...
One...
Two...

Yes, this is the first time Bittrex has held an IEO and was immediately canceled because of the reason there was a problem with the RAID team.