Bitcoin Forum

IEO (initial exchange offering) is better than ICO,to participate in any IEO you have to be a member on the exchange launching the IEO ,this are my reasons

1)IEO is safer and better than ICO because its not what anyone can just conduct ,to conduct an IEO the project teams must meet and comply with the exchanges requirements in order to launch the token sale .

2)contributors are protected by the exchange,why? Many big exchanges offering the IEO now are after there reputations so its not easy to launch IEO through them,if the project before them is not genuine enough the exchanges won't dare take the risk.

I think this is what many investors have been waiting for , better risk limiting investment ,IEO is the only way to go
,don't forget ,DYOR ,thank you

Yes, me personally very like this model it brings liquidity for the token and, now, at the start, exchanges are interested to make big gains for the individual investors.

The truth of this whole thing is non is better everything is all channeled towards collecting money from investors. Why we feel IEO is better now its because it's new and just stadting give it time I think it won't last as ICOs lasted. ICOs boom was like this as well. Time reveals the deepest hidden secrets. Let's see what happens by year end

I love the IEO concept, it seems sustainable because investors are no longer interested in ICO's due to the prevalence of scam. IEO assures the investors of listing in the exchange where the IEO is conducted and several others after the IEO.

translation:
now with IEOs you are creating centralized powers that can decide to ask for money to advertise a new scam. many of the exchanges are going to start making millions while people are still getting ripped off.


exchanges are not protecting anything right now! if they decide they want more money the lie about "getting hacked" steal your money and get away with it, what makes you think they protect anything else?

Still depends on the project and what problem are they trying to solve for the community, yes the crowdfunding will be successful, but after the crowdfunding, what will become the project, will the exchange has something to do with the development, so better if the project is really legit and what can it offer to the community.

The IEO is a good way to make money during this period, it is much better than the ICO, now Binance will sell the IEO on March 19 and this is probably an opportunity for us to make a profit.

I agree with it and quadriga cx has become evidence about how bad the centralized exchange is, there was on insurance and it has the same potential risk like ico.
the latest investigation tells about all of the money from quadriga cx is getting stolen. Everyone should not overrated with IEO

What is the future for the IEO? I think Initial Exchange Offering is a new trend in the crypto market. The era of fraudulent ICOs is over as well as waiting months for listing on the stock exchange

IEO is great for selling token. Will project developers transfer to IEO instead of ICO. So how do bounty hunters do now?

It doesn't look like better for me. STO or IEO are same with ICO or ITO. One way or another, projects are trying to sell future. Firstly they are collecting money, then they are trying to make something. This is the real thing. So whatever its name is doesn't matter. It is matter of project. If project is good, then it will be better.

I agree with you. But remember to participate only in reputable exchanges to protect your funds. New exchanges can turn into scam since they often do not ensure high security, rules for IEO listing etc. Sometime IEO owners create an exchange and start the project, in that case, they might go away with funds. However, after overall coparism, IEO wins over ICO.

Just few days ago, I learnt from this forum that ieo is not different from ico
The difference is just that an exchange platform aliases with a project and host their crowdfunding event

Such projects only use the hype from the exchange reputation to get sales and investors; and sorry to say such investor would only dump upon listing

The IEO is indeed promising.
there are some explanations that I read in this forum that explain about the IEO.
and I'm very excited.
I hope this is a good sign for crypro

Lol unless the exchange is truly legit and reputable but i am afraid that these IEO will use the said exchanges when they can be caught legally

Or what about the rules to comply?when these IEO can just use power and money to looks legit but after getting the investors money they will gone.

This are just like ICO when they are starting and sooner the true color will comes out to be a scammers

IEOs make a lot of sense. It treats one of the shortcomings of the previous ICO models. Because now you don't have to invest and wait an eternity to be listed on an exchange. The exchange itself has already listed the coin project to assure investors of their seriousness with the project

I think this not will last very long, all try to jump in this train, and often choose weak projects.

IEO will finish the ICO process soon. ICO owners could not trust the investor. Many ICO scam output are finished or finished. Therefore, all investors began to avoid ICOs. The prolongation of the bear season also affected the process negatively. As you have mentioned, IEO soon seems to be a process in which all the exchanges begin.

You're just saying that a project should care more of bounty hunters than themselves? Here is a case, if a coin is part of an exchange right now,  after the releasing of bounty, bounty hunters will just sell their holdings.

I do jot think that ieo makes much difference the only positive thing that ieo does is that it improves the trust and perception of the project in investors mind because alongwith the ico project the exchange that is providing the ieo its reputation is also at stake so they only do list a project after strict due diligence, research and interviews as far as i know so this does give investor confidence to invest their money on exchange listed ico and trust really matters while investing.

Well with your points above, ieo is definitely good for the exchange platform and the project
Because they both make good profits from the crowdfunding event

But the individual investor still needs to ensure personal safety and profit

It's too early to tell the first set of IEO was successful but it still comes down to the project itself, it is just hype at a start, we are going to find out after a few months if those IEO are successful in the market, and are they here for a long term.

I'm of the opinion that IEO would make a better deal for the cryptocurrency space owing to the fact that participants or investors will be confident about their investment and the possibility of the project getting listed within the stipulated period would be high. The IEO will ensure that exchanges review projects indeptly before giving them the opportunity to raise funds owing to the fact that they have a reputation to protect.

i personally don't like so much these new ieo they seem to me the bad copy of the sto and the ico, with only more the obligation to invest through exchange (therefore kyc obligation) the only ones that will gain will be the exchanges that will offer them...

The best IEO should only appear in large exchanges. I think Binance, Okex, Huobi, Bittrex should be exchanges that investors care about because the opportunity to earn profits will be higher. I believe that this trend will last for a very long time and can replace all ICO projects because ICO in the eyes of investors is just a lie.

Yes, it is better than ICO in many perspectives. First it provides instant liquidity for the project which is the bane of many ICOs out there. Also if the exchange platform is credible, the probability of it being scam is slim because the exchange will not want to spoil its name

This new IEO sounds like a really good way to do better with making bigger profits compared to some of the ICO which did not do very well in past few weeks but we can still hodl for better result and get IEO as well.

I think its getting hard to escape the kyc obligation because of growing regulations so for me there’s no way to skip that step in order for you to achieve more since the future will still depend on regulations. IEO is new, so its still hard to tell which is the better because investors are still buying an ico coin, the future will tell this one for us.

of course the IEO is far better and can protect investors because it will risk the reputation of the exchange.
we should be able to accept changes that are better than before.

You know what...this is true in deed that IEOs could've been a better bet but it shall have repercussions as time goes by. The same thing happened with ICOs when they started until the bullrun came and then many scams evolved. Nevertheless IEOs are still a better bet since you can decide to join those provided by trusted exchanges.

Yes, I agree, IEO is a really good alternative to ICO! Investors feel safer and will not have long expectations with trading on the exchange, and in this case, the exchange on which this token will be traded will already be known. 8)

Now many of the exchanges do iso, but I think we still need to choose the right project, as the exchange is not responsible for the loss of funds in the event of a drain of the course , and so I agree with you that it is more secure than the ico

This is the biggest trend at the moment, because all the projects that were launched on Binance, are really successful. I hope this we will see the same by all other big exchanges and there would not be any difficulties like at Bittrex at the moment.

An IEO is really good if launched on top trading platforms. Currently there are many small trading floors implementing the IEO but did not achieve significant results.

i just know about IEO and and after some reaserch i aggre with you.
projects that issue their ICO on exchange or IEO have more credibility than ICO normally, because they already have Exchange as their backs. With Initial Exchange Offerings exchanges will aid developers in making sure that everything is good.
sadly not many ICO issue their project on a reputable exchange because of the high cost.
in short IEO clearly have a low risk compared to normal ICO.
but in the end always DYOR before investing.

Who cares If it is ICO, IOU or IEO, If the project is lit then any raising campaign will achieve its cap or better to say hard cap.

The new direction, which is now used by the exchange, because now they are left unattended, but it seems to me that the scammers can hold ICO there, so this will not add any guarantees. I think that this is not a problem for scam projects.

I don't see any difference between the IEO and the ICO. so I don't think it's better or not. there is still a possibility if the project that uses the IEO to raise funds turns out to be a scam project. exchange is only like escrow but they certainly will not want to give accountability if it is later proven that the project is a scam.

Relax, friend. There’s too much hype around IEO right now. IEO is a great model, but not the best. Let's see what happens in a few months, then we draw conclusions.

Yes, this is the first time Bittrex has held an IEO and was immediately canceled because of the reason there was a problem with the RAID team.

I also like the new format of collecting investments. It is good, first of all, because the money is paid to the exchange, which holds the IEO of a new project and investors have no risk of losing their money. With the current number of scammers in the crypto market, this is a very good insurance. Also, the exchange itself is interested in increasing the price of a new project, which guarantees an increase in prices.

For me also looks better. Exchanges will not every ICO and ICO will have a "free" advertisement. But ICO have to share their raised money to an exchange and that is not acceptable for many ICOs.

I personally will be more comfortable in investing my money in an IEO rather than investing it in ICO since companies that carries out IEO already have a working project and might likely not be a scam, unlike the ICO market where you don't know how to differentiate one project from another because the once you think they are genuine always ends up in becoming a scam, and one once you think it's a scam might likely end up becoming genuine.

I don't have such money to throw away anymore in enriching another man's pocket.

The only thing I don’t like is that the exchanges will do their best to promote their tokens, allowing them to invest in new projects only through their tokens; this somewhat binds our hands and makes us dependent on the exchange.

It could be better than an ICO in the crowdfunding aspect but at the end of the day it's still the project and what it can offer to the community is what going to matter, like all the other ICO research and find out if they are legit and their potential in the market for a long term.

You've got a point here.  Many didn't notice IEO until Binance launchpad paved the way. Exchanges like LATOKEN have been on it but investors were not that much comparatively. IEO gives a form of assurance to investors, that's why they troop in and before you know it, token sale is over. Bittrex recently has proven big exchanges care more about their reputation by dropping RAID IEO after they lost a big partnership, that's good sign.

You have truly said it all. It shows you are in touch with the realities of the cryptocurency market. IEO offers investors security and confidence and that it is why its becoming popular by the day

The launch pad that created by binance will be so different with launch pad that created by another exchange site and i should remind you about the fact that the popularity of exchange site will determine the result of the launch pad.

I absolutely concur. It is for this reason that most projects are now currently adopting IEO. it brings in more confidence on the part of the investors and also helps eradicate issues associated with fraud since most of the projects are veted by the exchanges before an IEO can be conducted. Also, on the issues of price stability, IEO help a great deal in this regard since people tend to buy at a certain price and tend to hold their tokens/coins more than what ICOs present.

I don't think IEO is better. but I'm very interested in this way. Unlike STO, the IEO can be the right step to support a new project. but only a few exchanges are really serious about providing IEO services. from all the exchanges that I have, I just believe that with the rest of the binance I don't believe it too much.

I totally agree with you. IEO and recently added IAO is really better than typical ICO! There is little chance to manipulate the raised money volume in exchanges. So, People can see how much raised for that ICO! ICO market is dying and if the bear market continues then ICO Market may die badly! So, IEO is a good way for the legit project to catch legit investors!

Now major exchanges have come up with an excellent option for collecting investors for new projects. The exchanges themselves promote IEO and pumped the course of new tokens, this gives an excellent opportunity to make money.

Yes, I agree it's better than ICO but also it doesn't mean that a project will actually devliver on its promises. They might still take people's money and exit scam.

After binance launchpad always gain successful, many big exchanger launch their own launchpad with different name. I think its good for investor because every exchanger have their own team to analys the project

bittrex now do the same way after they see inital exchange offering looks like will give them much benefits.and i think this methode give more certainity to investors,they could sell their coins or token after its coins tradeable.and also they be very optimistic will gain profit by joining in this IEO.

These are all quality projects and have a reasonable choice for investors to feel safer when investing. I think if the trend continues, ICO will be replaced by the IEO and this is what all investors want because the current ICO projects are mostly scam and there is no obvious development when project ends. I think this will be a new era for the modern world when everything has certainty in investment

Of course, there are a lot of advantages, including the most important advantage of the fact that now projects will have fewer scam projects, but then, as usual, everything is very relative and everything can change, because the stock exchange’s reputation can drop very much.

IEO is a novelty in the cryptocurrency market, however, this is a great way to renew the dried up flow of investments. It seems to me that now, with IEO, it has become safer and more convenient to invest in new projects.

IEO are better? Maybe at the beginning because there were only few IEOs. But after all ICOs switch to IEOs problem will not be solved. Investors are not more interested in cryptostartups.

IEO is good when it is in binance. The important factor here is binance, and IEO will not be as profitable in other exchanges. Already in recent times the sale of some coins is made in exchange, but their sale is not even completed in a few months.

The crypto world never seems to stop amazing everyone. Different concepts just come up everyday. ICOs came, later turned into a platform to scam investors, then the STO now IEO. Let's see how this goes then.

The IEO is more promising because investors will not worry about exchanges. they feel confident because exchanges have large communities in various countries.
Opportunities to get profits are also large because coins can be traded directly. We'll see that Bitrex will follow binance success.

Well, i think we just can't just because big exchange having Initial Sale it doesn't mean this is safe. Also this thing in the next time im afraid for getting worse, just like what happen with RAID IEO that was cancelled due to the fake partnership.

We were waiting for regulations for ICOs  and we got IEOs instead. I think that exchanges would like to protect their customers
from scam projects and they will support only projects with proper idea, development and experienced teams which are capable
to realize the project. Exchanges will list that coin for sure and this way it is a win-win-win solution for the project team,
the investors and for  the exchange as well.

This is one way of removing anonymous project with the potential of screwing people. Because getting a deal with a reputable exchange means the exchange itself has actual arrangements with the team themselves and did their part of investigation. They will not let others to ruin their image by a newcomer in the industry so they will make sure that everything is legit with the project, which is the reason why most IEOs are successful specially if handled by a famous exchange.

IEO is better than ICO but STO is better than all of them! Because STO has a good service like they will protect the investor's money by buy backing the low price token! So, this is a good opportunity to earn good money from the STO! IEO is a good choice for the current moment, and Binance is leading the IEO and more will come by watching the Binance Launchpad success!

I don't fully agree with this. The IEOs just started, I am sure we also had this feeling when ICOs initially kicked off until the negative trends started. We can only judge the IEOs after a year of performance.

IEOs more save than ICOs we already know. Many ICOs not listed in exchanger and makes investor lossing opportunity to trade in exchanger and beside that IEOs can avoid investor from scam ICOs

IEO is the new order of the day . Projects have discovered that they can easliy sell their token via IEO and many projects are leaving the traditional ico and diving into IEO. And of a truth IEO havw bewn delivering good roi since this year. 2019 might just be an IEO year

IEO's do offer investors the added reassurance that startups launching their crowdsales have passed due diligence and are also of a certain level of quality if the exchange is highly reputable such as Binance, Bittrex or LAToken but as always you should do thorough research into both the viability of the investment product and the exchanges terms and conditions before committing any capital

IEOs are bad because big part of the money goes to the exchange and not to the project. I prefer pool investment.

We can easily liquidate when we invest in IEO projects. I think this is the main reason why the IEO has attracted so many participants recently. In the future, the IEO will cause ICO to become a landfill because most of ICO projects are now scam and the extension of time makes investors feel depressed ICO so the IEO will be the best solution at this time

I agree that IEO is a worthy replacement for ICO, the most important advantage is that the exchange takes on reputational risks and guarantees the addition of coins to the exchange. Only two of these parameters we can count on the increase in the value of the coin.

I'm in total agreement with the fact that IEO is better than ICO. With IEO there's certainty that the project will be listed after the crowd funding and there's greater chance that the project is valid, this is because the reputation of the exchange is at stake when they float scam projects.

Maybe it really is better than just some kind of ICO that is not controlled by anyone, but on the other hand, this is in fact cryptocurrency, this is anonymity, because we fought for it? Is not it?

I do think it's a way to go but NOT the only way. I like the sense of security of funds it guarantees and the fact that only projects with good use can get listed. Also IEO will help prevent the easy dump that often characterizes ICOs.

Indeed, I would rather invest in IEO than ICO's. IEO are much safer to invest and knowing it will be listed on the exchange after the token sale. And many investors are looking for security and transparency that's why almost all IEO's are successful.

Yes ieo is good safe blah blah
Good hypes
Massive hypes

But ico started out as well the same manner and when the hype went out.... we knownthe storyb

Let’s eait until the hypes surrounding ieo is over

if the exchange is well known in the space then conducting IEO with them is a good idea but i see a lot of new projects doing IEO on unknown or new exchange which did not give them a lot of hype unlike the projects that was launch in Binance.

It's proven that many crypto enthusiasts believe in IEO's genuineness because they've been scammed by several scam ICOs. I think Binance set the pace for this boom, with the tremendous success of its launchpad. Now Binance is modifying their IEO to lottery program for BNB holders. Many exchanges in this light have embraced IEO, the likes of BITTREX, HUOBI, etc.  LATOKEN has been doing IEO but the impact wasn't felt that much, not until Binance launchpad escalated it.

Nice points made but there's an "if" clause we should be cautious of. Should anything happen and another ICO or better called IEO boom happens again, there we shall see all the negatives popping up again as the greed for money and scammers take over. Fr niw, I'd say yes IEOs are better when compared to ICO. But we need to give it more time to test it out.

New Love In the world of crypto is IEO. More and more projects are leaning towards IEOs. It's early to give a check sheet that Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) is way better than ICO. Like others I am still in dilemma so I'm not quick to get in on an IEO right now.

Right now, we can say that, but maybe this is also just a trend that will also be able to go down like when the ico and airdrop hype actually has its own time. so now we have to take advantage of the situation

Exchanges that carry out IEO projects must have strong capabilities to drive the success of the project.

IEO is really a very, very profitable process, if exchanges are responsible for the truthfulness and quality of the product, but do you understand how much load they can take on?

IEO is definitely better than ico, because of the security it offers and the exchange will also guarantee the genuity of the product, giving the investors a confidence and also more potential customer.

Your argument is correct, the IEO concept is a good solution to the ICO problem, where many ICOs are currently scamming and making investors reluctant to invest.
Hopefully IEO will be the best solution for ICO

the appearance of the IEO is indeed full of pros and cons. but if the IEO can be better than ICO I am very supportive for the advancement of technology and developments in the digital world. this will be very interesting for further investigation.

IEO way better when The exchange behind that IEO is quit big
just like Binance , bittrex , or Huobi
let say about IEO on latoken or yobit it safe for investing but look at previously history its getting worse the price get down when hit market

You say great things. IEO is a really good find for the cryptocurrency market, but you should not forget that the growth of tokens of new projects for IEO is primarily due to the exchanges. They artificially pumped the price. And it is precisely this bad thing that if the exchange stops pumping the price of new projects, then interest in the IEO will drop dramatically.

We created a chat on the subject of IEO, there we discuss everything that is interesting and can help make a successful IEO. Here is a link if anyone is interested: https://t.me/ieoone

IEOs are the upgraded ICOs as they are backed by the exchanges and under their supervision. Binance invented this new model and up now it seems to be very successful one and other exchanges started following their example.

The concept is good at this point of time, because investing in ICO is now considered unsafe, and it took the ICO date to finish, whereas on IEO the sales could be over within 24 hours, but we'll see after a couple of months if the point you are giving are all still correct.

You are right as due to big scams in ICO and at the end no keen interest shown in ICO by investors but on main loss will be to bounty hunters, But i personally like this IEO system but only with big exchanges.

You are right IEO seem to be the better choice for investors this days because of the trusty exchanges are bringing to investors ,integrity is what exchanges will be after so they won't dare promote scam projects on there exchanges which is a very good thing

some exchanges also do not only large Exchange ieo, but perhaps that many are those who believe the big Exchange. because it might be a little more risk for manipulation of acquisition funds.

About the original exchange offer (IEO) started talking somehow suddenly and very recently. Therefore, the mechanism of its implementation is incomprehensible. It seems that it differs little from the ICO. I hope that with this form of fundraising from investors, bounty hunter services will be in demand.

Exchanges will earn their cut in IEO and investor will be still in risk . There is no guarantee that IEO cannot fail or cheat on later stage.
Did not see the exchange listing the scam/worthless coins first and delisting at later stages?

IEO is just like safe listing. I find ICO projects not true to their words. Did you know Aitheon? Many people invested on that project. That was way last year. And until now, their token hasn't been unlocked yet. They just keep on telling everybody, "We're close in exchange listing" but there's none. With IEO, the exchange who introduce the project surely will list that project.

True, and mostly IEO projects are very successful.

IEO is now considered a very popular way to sell tokens of any company which wants to sell its tokens, but some companies cannot afford to spend their IEO on the most popular cryptocurrency exchanges, so ICOs will still live for now.

The investor is always in a bad position. No one gives any guarantees. Invest your money at your own risk.

yes, im agree with you, project whos doing IEO already partnering with exchanger, even not permanent listed, at least the investor hasnt worry their fund will be lost, because there is guarantee of safeness on exchager itself.

Today it seems better than everything before, for example ICO or its derivatives. But there are always problems that cannot be simply solved and solved, I think that there will be the same problems here, so it seems to me that this is an inevitable matter.

I like IEO but everyone keeps following the same format. Every exchange transforming into IEO already. So every year new trend set. Last year ICO does failed as now IEO is becoming popular. I hate to say it, but later on people will also complained why the price of the tokens on IEO becoming poor or beyond their brought coins. Take a look on Latoken, some coins in the IEO are now below its ico price. So it depend on the exchange who conduct IEO. If they have reputation more investors will dive but unlike Latoken, forget it. I think they dont screen projects on their exchange as long as those pay them.

IEO is a right step at the right direction especially at this time that investors are fed up with ICO, but it should never be seen as a hundred percent guarantee that some project will not fail even after passing through IEO process so we must invest with caution.

There is actually already people who cheat , as there is maximum you can buy with one account . Lets say your 5 friends create account on binance . Then there is IEO happening and you and your friends buy in , then you pay your friends lets say 10$ + investment money . After IEO they transfer tokens to you . Its called IEO Farming =D Imagine if you have alot of money and do it with 100-200 accounts , you can buy quite load cirkulating supply out like that

I don't think Yobit or Latoken IEO is safe for investing because yobit actually not a reliable exchange and another one Latoken exchange worst because there majority of the IEO project very shit you can check from this link https://latoken.com/ico/ETH

They are not better, they are giving huge profit, but I cannot say that they are a way better, because I have never seen a person that successfully took part in IEOs by Binance and Huobi. They have just bought these tokens and sold for x10 from ICO price.

Maybe you are right that IEO is better than ICO! But IEO is not safe enough too. By seeing some successful IEO, did you notice how many exchanges are coming with IEO projects? And most of the exchanges are awful! If investors go through IEO without investigation enough then IEO will become a place for scammers like ICO! Scammers are very smart, so we need to be smarter to avoid IEO scamming! That's why everyone needs to participate only in potential exchanges!

That's the real fact! Big exchanges are playing with its supporters and investors! I did not see anyone in Binance and Huobi group who could buy from the Binance Launchpad and Huoibi Prime! It's like Binance and Huobi are buying those IEO tokens and they are selling on exchanges by pumping the price highly! ICO is open for all, but good IEO only for whales! Overall, IEO is not a better option, it is just a new trend and this trend will end very soon!

Bittrex is just an average crypto exchange nowadays! This exchange is getting down to down! And, we don't know yet about their IEO! I don't think Bittrex's IEO will be successful like the Binance or Hubobi! However, Binance and Huboi's IEO were successful and they will be coming with more IEO in the near future! What about Yobit and Latoken? Yobit is a very familiar mid-core scam exchange, Investing in Yobit, Latoken IEO will be the worst decision for anyone! If you follow Latoken's IEO, most of them are shit and very unknown projects! and the good fact is, no one is buying from the Latoken IEOs! DexAge, Alfa Enzo and most of their IEO projects haven't made even 10K USD by 3-4 months! So, Try to avoid these exchanges and lock your eyes on big exchange's IEOs only!

As the prophecy read individual investors will not be allowed to flip and gain high profits, the whales will take all allocations of the market and then will sell to hamsters

IEO is good alright and better than ICO which I agree. However, its a very risky exchange since scammers can join anytime. I believe IEO is not way better than bitcoin and ethereum.

An IEO depends on having an exchange function as a counterparty. Developers mint the tokens of the project and send them to the exchange, which then sells the tokens to the contributors for Ether. An IEO is a fundraising strategy that implies collaborating with a crypto exchange as a counterpart. The project doesn’t sell tokens to the investors but it sends them to the exchange, which in turn would sell the tokens to individuals. I really think Ieo is way better.

Despite the low level of risk for investments, it doesn't mean there cannot be any loss if one invests in IEO. The same strategy deployed by whoever  has been succeeding in UCO, might also be required. Nonetheless, IEOs has been the safest so far.

IEO is good and at the same time, ICO Is also good, talking about IEO  first, you are right with your observations but very soon, scammers will start operating on scamming people with IEO, ICO started with a good record aswell!! So to me, both is good and I we say none is better than the other.

Ieo is nothing compare to btc and eth  .  the said cryptos are the base of all crypto related stuffs  .  if btc and eth didnt exist there wont also be ieo's and ico's  .  ieo is only trendy because it is hype by big exchanges but as soon as it subsided   . the state of ieo's will also be like ico and people will start crawling back to cryptos .




Ieo is better today/thesedays but ico was better before . if we compare them i can say that ico is already veteran while ieo is just a starter  . we wont know if ieo will soon follow the path of ico's (  i hope not )   .  

Yes, for now the IEO is on the rise, for example, IEOs in the Binance exchange market have always been successfully sold out, so this will increase profits for investors, because we know that the IEO at Binance is the best IEO so far.

It is true that I also agree with you with the existence of the IEO which has had a very good impact with the development of new projects because with the IEO it can minimize the possibility of us getting the wrong token because for several years ICO has failed to give trust to many investors because they always give tokens who failed.

The only constant thing in life is change. The ICO that so rare now running away from, was once like today's IEO. People might begin to find faults in IEOs with time.
It is presently a safe and profitable means, which you can effectively utilize as an investor.

A great project and a hype exchange.
Looks Fetch now, that is natural demand which if Fetch not use IEO on binance and the first listing isn't in binance, might be an investor will be rekt :)
However crypto is manipulation, sometimes marketing & advertising is needed more than the product. Yeah, We know trader and investor the only speculation is only for profit (don't think about the project).

Well, if IEO was not better than ICO, investors would not put their money on it.
The fact that the IEO in binance exchange always sold out, show that many investors are more interested in IEO.

That is, it turns out that investors will buy tokens already on the exchange. But how then will discounts act, thanks to which investors were attracted? After all, if they do not exist, there will also be no point in investing in investors to buy tokens at the IEO stage, which may turn out to be fraud all the same. They will then be better off buying tokens after IEO, when tokens fall in price.
I am also interested in the forms of participation of headhunters in IEO projects. Will anything change for our participation or not? Will bounty hunters need to register on the exchange? I do not know, kskoy too confusing way. It seems to me that this is not the best form of fundraising for the release of new tokens.

The presence of IEOs became a solution to replace ICO which proved to be a failure and was used for scam, I hope that the market is more selective in choosing the IEO so that it does not participate in ICO, especially the number of IEOs must be selective.

I agree IEO becomes a trusted investors hub for crypto not just it make sense why so many projects got sold out fast since the people wanna share on the profits or gain it does given when the coin got started to trading. Ive been only participate once and never again. But its okay at least I ripped some profit from it.

I just thinking if IEO is the combination of ICO and STO since there are so many features and its very secure in any side of the token or coin offering.

The IEO is indeed very good, but I see the development of the IEO not as good as ICO. well, after I noticed, even the IEO had a fairly slow investment fund collection compared to ICO. well, hopefully in the future it will be better.

IEO is very good and very active ,90% of IEO meet hardcap highest in hours ,IEO has delivered trust to investors which is a very solid way raise funds I just hope nothing will affect it later on

The main drawback is that it is very difficult to get there. Especially if we are talking about such exchange as binance, huobi, kucoin.

indeed the IEO and ICO have different strategies and both of these have their own risks, but for a better strategy I think I can use the IEO strategy which proves to be more efficient and faster to sell because it gets support from a large exchange place.

Dont think so, tokens of even big exchanges dump so bad right after IEO, look on Huobi and Kucoin, only Binance can support his cource as practice shows.. Another thing that small percent of people can take a part with their hands, scripters and bots are dominating in all IEOs, thats why exchanges start to change their IEO sale politics and introduced lottery or longway holding systems, FCFS in not working anymore..Plus there no TRANSPARENCY, nobody knows actually what happening behind the scenes of IEO, regular ICO with smart contract much more better for me imho!

I absolutely agree with you. IEO is better than ico.
Because , IEO more safer and guarantee for the investors.

I think ieo is good but I do not agree it is better

If ieos can only be sold out in the big exchanges only; then it is a bias form of crowd funding

Thus, we need to figure out ieo to favor all major exchange platforms and also the project dev

But this is crypto currency where the champions reigns

Well I will say that truely IEO is good but sometimes people easily scam people through IEO because it is already in an exchange.

I see only 1 risk in IEO for buyers. Once IEO is finished, price of exchange tokens is dropping dramatically. Look at BNB, HT and Kucoin( it has dropped like 20-30% in a 1st evening after sale)

Personally, I have many questions about IEO and I do not consider them as panacea to prevent from scam projects. Probably, in terms of quick earnings - yes, but even in this case, as far as I know, it is quite difficult to participate in them - because on the other hand the participants are bots. I perceive this as a lottery, which is now quite popular.

The reason why IEOs are so demanded is profitability. Investors are interested with Binance, not with IEO. The last IEO in Bittrex is over 10 seconds. Do you think it will the same in others?

I hate IEO. I tried to get into it on several exchanges, bought exchange tokens at inflated prices, passed KYC with the provision of all documents. After all the work done and the money spent on the purchase of tokens, I did not manage to get into any of the IEO conducted by the major exchanges. I think this is a fraud on the part of the exchanges and they themselves are buying tokens of new projects.

Was the supply sold out for the very first day of IEO? This is not good if the exchanges also buying the new coin because they tend to manipulate their own volumes and for sure it will not also good to that coin because no real investors are coming in. Well, IEO so far have a good feedback but not this one.

I don't agree that there is much of a difference between IEO and ICO. Besides, why no one talking of the STOs anymore? I am afraid the IEOs will also soon be forgotten.

It's actually a welcome breather for investors, they do not have to do extensive research if the project will go to the market or not, or get funded, both of these factors can be achieved by IEO, because it safer and everything done n a flash, IEO is now the trend in crypto investing.

Yes it is happening, last few projects launched on Binance sold out in 15 mins. Many of the people in the Binance community fight back to acquire some tokens but mostly people are reaching such growth after the coin listed on the same exchange.
Those times that exchanges blocked completely with the big traffic on the site. If that alone recovered up I will be also happy with IEO launchpad listing.

It's good that the IEO becomes the main choice of investors, the market has long needed it, the ICO is the past, the best times are behind, and now we get only negative results, the scammers have won

I do not think that IEO is much better than ICO. Recently, everywhere you can find a lot of negative information from people who tried to participate in the IEO and they did not succeed, these people have lost a lot of money on the purchase of tokens of some exchanges.
After reading the negative reviews, I decided not to participate in the IEO at all.

IEO is way better? No, see the reality, yes we agree IEO is best way to raise funds because many people trust exchange but for project also many of them shitcoin, after they raise funds, the team doesnt care anymore, and many project like this. For me ICO still better, Yes my personal opinion

In the end everyone focuses on the IEO because it has a big hype. but eventually all IEO coins fall slowly.
what's the difference with ICO. I think nothing is better at this time.

I think IEO is far superior to ICO, because it is far safer and more profitable, if the IEO in Binance market always has a good price after the IEO is done, I have experienced it myself.

Well I agree on the part that IEOs really protecting their reputations but on the first part not really. IEOs are like just ICOs but being able to solve the listing problem.

It is really like a game of chance, if you buy an IEO you will have multiple accounts. If you do not buy it, you will lose 10-20% of the property because of the sale. Now there are more lottery laws. so boring.

Some ICO getting hard to be listed, so solving one of the problem ICO encountered is way better. But we still need to check whether that coin will make sense or will grow in the exchange.

Few IEOs held by biinance, the price always rising after start traded and its give big profits for investor. Its true IEOs more better because its will soon listed in market and mostly the price always double

thats true, IEO could be a solution for traditional ICO whos already many cheat people on there, partnering with exchanger, IEO promise safe of investor fund.

Yes, way better than ICO for investors because it gives assurance of funds security to investors. But I think if its not properly managed by exchanges who are now in a hurry to cashout from the new process through their native token, IEO might become frustrating and less attractive for investors soon

Maybe now we can say that because indeed the IEO itself is still new, but if the scammers are able to imitate and cause the losses of IEO investors to be the same, it will harm many people.

Who would see fire and deep his hand in it, virtually every investors prefer more of IEO projects, the reason why we have not seen it shown all over the net is that much is because investing in IEO has some financial conditions too that needs to be met by investors which virtually not everyone will be able to meet it

Because, I understand that part of Binance condition is that the investor must put in minimum amount of$1600 and I guess this is one of the reason why most of these IEO gets sold out on time, although IEO will not be without its own risk too but not as much as the one of ICO which is scam.

as you are here saying that the IEO (initial exchange offering). Is way better some persons are seeing is as a challenge and issue warning in participating in it. The truth is that it's quite too early to think to decide this. Everyone is jumping into the IEO both good and bad projects

I think so, IEO is a creative idea that can reduce scam projects, of course an exchanger has a good analysis to accept which projects are given permission for the IEO.

not at all. it is impossible to join ieos for normal people. because they use some softwares to join faster. ico time at least we would be able to join increasing the fee that we pay for faster transfer.

For now, IEO is the best choice for investors. And currently the IEO only exists in some market exchanges so investors feel very protected (because there are not many markets implementing the IEO). But, I think it will not be long, other markets I think will also follow this method, to implement the IEO system. be careful, if this happens, this is the beginning of the IEO's collapse if ALL markets open the IEO system.
I hope the IEO only exists in two markets, Binance and Bittrex. This is because I personally acknowledge and like these two markets. :D

Could be yes, I'm also studying this new type of approach for investors and with IEO you have the certitude for some good exchanges but in the end IEO might kill ICOs who are looking for a quick way to make the quick buck...

I agree with your opinion, so I think that the IEO is the modernization of existing public sales and the ability for any project to reach a new level, and as we see it, it’s pretty successful.

I am glad I have someone thinking in my own direction too, so I am not alone here, many investors thinks that because a project registered as IEO, the project will not get dumped when tokens of even those exchanges gets dumped too like you said.

Binance is only lucky to escape this because of the so much believe in Binance and the strategies they are applying like forcing investors to participate in their IEO project using their coins, so users will have no choice than to make use of their coin, so even if the coin gets dumped by some investors, you may hardly notice because the coin is being used for transactions on a daily basis.

In my opinion, every time the crypto market will have new breakthroughs, besides that when the market conditions are not good, the ICOS campaign becomes difficult and the investors dare to put money into ICOS so the IEO is conducted. IEO is showing many good sides and protecting investors.

I think that IEO is accelerating the project’s entry into the market, but I don’t think that IEE is speeding up the development and adoption of the project. Therefore, I think that IEO is too overvalued.

Non is better it's all about getting money from investors to support upcoming projects. The only difference is instant listing on exchange.

Actually I agree with you, but I would rather you state IEO on reputable exchanges. Every Jack and Jill exchange now wants to run an IEO, every exchange launching their own coin too because they want to use it for IEO. I think wise people will only buy into IEO from highly reputable exchanges, and not just any exchange to be on the safe side. Also, before buying in, look deep into the token economics, no need doing checks on the team since they've already been verified (this applies to reputable exchanges only).

I think IEO protect the investors from scam projects. But as some people mentionned, it is impossible to participate in an IEO if you are a normal investor. Apparently some people use bots to buy the coins. I don't know if it is true or not? Can people really use bots in an IEO as the coins are still not for trading? Or maybe big investors have already bought all the coins before the start of the IEO. I think exchanges need to limit the number of big investors to permit more people to participate in an IEO if they want normal people to be interested in the coin. Else, only the investors who participated in the IEO are going to trade the coins.

The difference is only in the placement of sales tokens. ICO sells their coins through their own website. While the IEO sells their coins or tokens through an exchanger. And the factor that most determines the success of an IEO is an exchanger. If an exchanger does not have pupularity or large volumes, then most likely, the IEO will not be sold out.

ok ... I agree with you. But I want to explain a little about the negative side of ICO, and that makes investors go to the IEO. several reasons: 1. there is no institution that regulates the sale of ICO tokens, so if the sale of ICO tokens is not successful, then the ICO coin will not have value and only become garbage. finally we will suffer losses.
2. The team has a great opportunity to take away every investor's capital, so the irresponsible team will create a scam project.

Who tried to participate in IEO from KuCoin, check your balances on the exchange. There, a nice bonus apology from the exchange for 30 USDT came to the main account.

I received 30 USDT but my loss is 200 USDT. It's really hard to invest in this project because the competition rate is very high and very few people are lucky enough to invest. After investing, people tend to sell more KCS and that's why I lost a lot of money when participating in this project. I think the compensation for me is not worth it and I hope I can invest in this project on April 9th.

 For myself, I understood only that it is necessary to buy in advance more of the KCS and sell a part before the IEO, so that at least somehow repel the price drop after.

 

I think that's because the problem of some people who use bots only takes 1 second to spend all existing IEOs and that's unfair and known by the team from KuCoin so as a sense of demand for the members who don't have the opportunity to buy their IEO giving 30 USDT is only for people who are already in line but don't get a share when they want to buy an IEO.

I agree that this is mostly the case. And what will happen if many whales try to invest in this project? Small investors will lose their way in from buying the coin the project is having.

I don't know why they need to sell when they can use it to invest on the next IEO on the platform.  ::)

IEO is way out of league of ICOs because in IEO, there is assurance that your coin would accumulate a lot of profit. And because of IEO, the trust of investors of cryptocurrency is back now. I believe in no time, ICO will be gone already because there has been a lot of issues about it last year.

it's safer from regulation and in general terms like you said, the price however not looks so good in the longer term, I mean in binance launchpad we see any ICO launched there will be 2-3x from the first listing, but see IEO on trex on the last few days, the price not so great, i think it's below ICO now? idk, last time I check hovering around 2k sats. There's so much IEO happening right now and if the hype die, the price will follow suit.

IEO is much safer for both project and contributors, but the biggest disadvantage of IEO is that it does not help to grow a project' community - the most people are only interested in getting profit right after listing.

It is great to see that a lot of projects are ending their token sale within seconds and people who got tokens are making really good profit, but the problem is that the percentage of people who actually got those tokens is about 5 percent if not less.

nothing prevents for IEO-projects to conduct a bouty campaign and grow a project community. it won't cost too much and will be very effective.

I agree with you, then nothing guarantees that the token will last for a long time.
in the end the token fell and was worthless, it was a rational fear.
The ICO has a future if the platform runs and the community will increase according to the progress of the project.

I don’t dispute the fact that there is possibility of fraudulent people to still take advantage of IEO, every system has its own IEO which they might end up discovering pretty soon but hat will be quite difficult with exchanges that are highly respected and secured like Binance, because they have all forms of mechanism in place to guard against this.

But, I cannot really vouch that much for exchanges that are not that popular, they might not have the capacity to guide against this on their own platform.  So, it is now left for the scammer now to choose if he wants to be defrauded or not, and the only way not to be defrauded is make use of big exchanges like the one  I mentioned earlier.

Yeah because IEO is already an exchange itself and it is where the coin will be listed and traded. In addition, I feel safer investing into IEOs rather than ICOs because the main project of IEOs is the exchange itself and for the exchange to get popular it should have maintain a good and safe image to the community.

Now that we know what an IEO entails prior to investment. We will now evaluate how it fairs months after investment. Does it reflect a new positive change needed in the market or just another process with the same end every ICO processes. I believe this is equally a crucial part of the IEO process

Yes ieo's are backed by exchange but what if the exchange that conducts ieo's are scam ? For now its too early to tell because ieo"s are only starting  . wait till ieo's become really popular , im sure that other crappy exchange will also conduct their own ieo's  . watch out for them  .


So far i dont see any campaign related to ieo's but if ever they will do it , i think it will be an instant hit because users feel that they are more safer with ieo's . the cost will depend on the campaign duration and number of participants  .

I am also more comfortable investing in the IEO now because it is more secure compared to ICO.
but I also continue to invest in ICO even though I only invest a small amount because some ICOs are still good enough for me.

In my opinion, I don't really see any differences between IEO and ICO. I basically think IEO is just a renovated form of ICO just to help re-attract investors back into investing into crypto projects. The reason by I think so is that both ICO and IEO are just a crowdfunding tool used to raise funds to support the launched crypto project. 

We can call IEOs as ICO 2.0. They are supervised by the exchanges and that should guarantee that investors won`t be scammed. It does not guarantee and ROI , as we can see with the latest example with Bittrex conducted IEO - VBK which was sold out in 10 seconds. After listing it`s price is -25% vs IEO price.

I think the IEO time will end soon. All menbshe people want to invest in an IEE. IEO does not look transparent and honest. Other people really do not like it.

Also there is a one very good point, even if you're investing by cryptocurrency you need to be a KYC verified user, so that's mean the exchange is probably regulated in some way - so investor also in some way may be protected.

With the IEO, we can choose ways to invest in new tokens with very little risk so we lose our money without getting anything like what many ICO tokens have done so far we have been hurt a lot, but with the IEO giving a little fresh wind to filter many investors to enter crypto.

Definitely IEO is better than ICO. IEO is an upgrade or an improvement version of ICO, which is bridging the gaps seen in ICO. Before an IEO is launched, the exchange platform makes sure that the necessary informations regarding the team members of the project are obtained to assure their users that it is a legit project and they are safe to invest in the project. IEO is the solution to eliminate scam crypto projects.

You are right, but I think every newly introduced thing have to benefit first before any complain. So I believe we're all enjoying the starting stages of IEO hope it works for long periods of time with more increase to the market.

Most of the IEO don’t have any signature/bounty campaign but they still get a huge number of investors I don’t know if its real or not. IEO-projects makes ICO more on risk, now let’s see if the scammers can still scam people despite of this kind of regulations. IEO is better than ICO right now, im not sure in the future.

I guess the main difference is an exchange vetting the project before conducting the IEO, this should, in theory, increase the number of quality projects getting funded in the long run.

A mix would be better maybe?  Still concentrate on building the community and then do an IEO?  The better ones should still be concerned with the long-term life span of their projects.

I don't know specific about IEO good or not and better than ICO but always all of IEO listing on greatest exchange market always sold out just few second, how to know good or not after listing on exchange market.

This phase is becoming more stable as most IEO projects have great success. I think this is very similar to the first phase of ICO and surely we can earn a lot of profits this year so list the best projects to invest because the IEO will make us profit bigger. In fact, if the project has a large community, keep that coin for a long-term goal because that price increase will help our lives.

IEO came at the right time, just as the people are having a hard time finding the right project to invest if ICO still that profitable and safe to invest, I doubt if investors will be paying so much attention to IEO, they felt it's presence, because of it';s continued run of success.

While an IEO is in its infancy, each held tokensale becomes an event, attracts the attention of investors. As a result the prices of tokens soar due to the fact that demand far exceeds supply. With the development of this technology and the mass conduction of the IEOs, the hype will subside and I think the IEO will face the same problems as the ICO.

yeah actually the idea is better. like we dont need to make kyc and share our private information each time. but on the ther hand, participating the ieos is quite harder comparing with icos because of the bots

IEO is a new trend now, evolution of ICO, one step forward.Hope we will have some time to manage earning a lot here before this hype is abandoned by the greedy people :)

For this reason, we ourselves will decide, but from the prospect, the IEO is indeed good and has great opportunities. It is true that it is not easy, we are again looking at ICO which is very good for building projects but lately it's just the opposite. We will see in the future and hopefully the IEO is the solution to this suffering.

Yep you are right till now IEO is better than ICO. But if you take a dive in past ICOs were the same successful and appreciated by many people. But somehow time came and they they out performed somehow. There is many reason scams , failed project , market conditions and so on. So the hype was gone. But it again returned with this new idea called IEO and till now it's working. But when the scammers will enter this space it will be the same like ICO. But if a big exchange like binance or huobi or kucoin offer the ieo then it's good but now all medium or small exchanges enter the IEO market and some of them promote some wannabe scam project and when people start to invest in this project it will be wrong again. So whatever you do , take some time and do some research on your own first.

Well. For investors, IEO is much simpler, more convenient and more reliable than traditional ICOs. I know that, firstly, for example, Lukki Exchange (https://lukki.io) is a platform for IEO and the team looks at each project on its website and carefully checks the tokens of issuers. Therefore, IEO can eliminate fraudulent and suspicious projects using exchange platforms. Lukki exchange offers strong protection, KYS strength and, importantly, excellent marketing support. I think that all the platforms for IEO do the same. The second, you will earn well and quickly: as practice shows, the rate of tokens that were distributed through IEO is growing by more than 100 and more% compared to the base price, especially in the first days after the tokensale. So it seems to me that this is a good way for the crypto world. ???

I agree
but the IEO has not proven to be more useful or better than ico. I think there will be more useless altcoins including those that do the IEO. so be careful if you want to try to make investment speculation

it is only one side of situation. it is just your vision as investor. but there is many good projects which for us better be lauch, but for some reasons they not accepted by exchange.

Nobody is is disputing that part, infact a lot of projects that had once launched their ICO and was not successful or they never achieved hardcap have now decided to launch IEO's, I have seen a lot of them that are still on the process while a lot have completed. IEO have brought back certain confidence investors had about new projects. Most important to me is that it helped reduce scam projects and makes it difficult business for unserious developers

agree with you
for investor of course they will go for IEO , The big name and popular exchange behind the IEO make it more comfortable for investor to spend their money on there. and look like many new coin/token will prefer to participate on IEO than ICO

In my opinion, mush anyway depends on the particular solution, project and results it shows. Cause there are many projects these days, but not all of them bring real value for users and token holders

Oh yes, this is true and I absolutely agree with you on that. But talking about you, what do you evaluate, looking at one or another solution? Are there many criteria?

This is indeed an interesting question. Well, as for me, I am having 3 components I analyze. Starting with an idea, then proceeding to the team, the product and the progress along with practical use cases. And in my opinion, these are the most important components. How does it work for you? By the way, any project you can recommend me to have a look at?

ieo is a good breakthrough, but I see a lot of new exchanger and low volume doing ieo, even though I just know the exchanger, it looks like the exchanger must also apply new rules

The most advanced one? Hmm, probably pukkamex project - heard of them already? The guys are very popular and are widely discussed these days. And they are having very high marks on leading rating platforms and many experts' reviews

Hmm, this sounds very interesting, but can you tell me what exactly they are bringing? Kinda elaborate more on the idea in general

Yep, of course. In few words pukkamex is the world’s first leveraged cryptocurrency derivative trading platform that shares its revenue with its token holders. And what is extremely important - it is easy to use for the beginners and powerful enough for the most experienced trader. And I really recommend you to check out more about the guys - just Google them or check their website

Maybe that is true, the exchange will definitely priorities those projects that are hosted by them rather than accepting an ICO project's token or coin into their exchange but it doesn't mean that your profit is guaranteed, sometimes there is shitty project that just exist to be dumped and turn into dust.

a little bit better that ICO..the advantage is you can trade as soon as possible the token that you bought.. unlike ICO you have to wait for how many months before listing in exchange sometimes its not happening also.. as so many ICO projects were failed before, they can't even proceed to list in exchange

The volatility of the crypo its because people invest it, because of speculation not because of its usage.  ICO and IEO has both pros and cons. But I still prefer  ICO first then proceed to the IEO later. IEO is quite expensive and exchanges are making more money because of this.

That's right about IEOs, they have taken the stage now and no doubt they are on the right path. I don't think exchanges can risk their reputation for anything thus will surly make sure they protect their users. In other words, participating in IEOs hosted by good exchanges matters too.
Another reason why IEOs are better is, after a successful sale come listing, thus the question of "when exchange or when listing?" ceases.

IEO is better than ICO because

1)Listing is faster than ico
2)Can still get roi after listing at least 1x roi.
3)the possibility of a scam project is very small

Yes, your reasons are right and adequate. With exchanges promoting IEOs they tend to offer a great degree of fund security which is one of the things ICOs lacked. Also, if the IEO is promoted by a good exchange there is always a good chance of having a successful IEO, thereby giving a good return to investors while listing takes place as soon as possible. But this isn't always the case of ICOs; that is even with successful sale listing takes place when the team wishes, which might be in months or even a year.

Not really, most of the people could just invest few hundreds of dollar because they are limited, the demand is just too high and there is lottery system aswell.
If there's ever some people who said that to follow into an IEO requires thousands of dollar or huge chunk of money then that is blatant lie.

ICOs were a huge let down in 2018 and several key players including exchanges and cryptocurrency personalities sought for solution. STO was proposed but it wasn't as appealing as IEOs because IEOs offered everything an ICO lacked and that was why investors quickly adopted it

Indeed it is going on, keep going couple of projects launched on Binance sold out in a short time. Huge numbers of the general population in the Binance people group battle back to gain a few tokens yet for the most part individuals are achieving such development after the coin listed on a similar exchange.

Those occasions that exchanges blocked totally with the enormous traffic on the site. In the event that that by itself recouped up I will be likewise content with IEO launchpad listing

Investing in IEO in recent times is a great way for investors to multiply their accounts several times in a short time and this is also a way for Exchange to attract investors. But the purchase of IEO is very difficult and there is a great competition so very few people can buy it, especially on Binance.

IEO is already replacing the ICO. People sre nowadays only talk abiit IEO and IEO there is no place for ICO anymore because people just lost their interest in it because majority of them are a failure. It is totally understandable considering that most of ICO back then just fail after raising so much money.

There are no ensures that the token will keep going for quite a while. Be that as it may, at last most token fall and become useless, and still the individuals who got them due to FOMO will bear the misfortunes.
The ICO has a future if the platform runs an IEO and the network will expand as indicated by the advancement of the project (roadmap)

IEO brought the market a necessity, and since the IEO was first launched in March, market has had very good growth and everything has been very volatile over the past time. I think the IEO trend will last until the end of 2020 and another trend will appear much better than the IEO. Anyway, IEO is the best solution in this period and if I choose to invest, I will look for the best projects available in this market.

I disagree with you as there are many ICOs that they are already enlisted their tokens in the exchange during the ICO public sale before to show the investors that they are legit and to attract them to invest but still in the end was a scam after dumping their own tokens and run away the money therefore this was already practice before and now they named it IEO.

Initial Exchange Offering is now the trend. Many investors investors prefer Initial Exchange Offering for some reasons like security, also being able to get listed when it has gone through the requirements for IEO. It has an edge over ICO.

IEO and ICO are totally different, so there is no condition here. IEO serves for exchanges, and ICO serves for crypto projects. It means IEOs have their very specific purposes and very limited targets, only for crypto exchanges. However, it is too hard to screen good ICOs and good IEOs for newbies in crypto.

IEO are much more trusted now and safe for the investors and bounty hunters, because there is an exchange already were can they able to sell it, once they receive their token rewards. But I'm not saying that ICO and STO are not trusted anymore, of course there are still good project under by it as long as you are reviewing it first before investing unto it.

IEO now attracts many investors and promises profits after listing on the market. But not all exchangers are good for IEO because several days ago there was a new project that felt cheated by large enough exchanger.

actually this is one of the reasons I returned to the BTT forum after hearing the concept of the IEO, which in my opinion "scam project" is less because there must be rules from the exchange itself so that it doesn't arbitrarily create projects, and seems to function as we see fewer prizes possible  this is a sign of the difficulty of fraud projects to enter the IEO

Unlike ICO the IEO is not open to the public. You must be a hosting exchange user to participate in token sales. While ICO allows contributors to buy tokens for sale by sending funds to certain addresses, an IEO requires contributors / users to buy tokens using a stock account. Compared to ICO, IEO risk is much lower for project teams and contributors. The exchange risked their credibility when carrying out the IEO, because he did not have control over the operations of the IEO project team and the product delivery as promised in the last white paper. To maintain trust with its customers, the exchange must carry out a comprehensive project assessment before launching the IEO. This provides an additional layer of protection for contributors.

It is not only this, but also requires you are huge investors to get advantages and invest in IEOs of good exchanges. Small investors are unable to join IEOs of good exchanges, believe me. However, I don't think reasons to feel upset if you can not join IEOs. You can observe and wait for good price to buy exchange coins of exchanges that you want to invest in their IEOs. Eventually, returns from capital is final objectives, IEOs or not, it does not a real matter; choosing good exchanges to invest is.

The IEO minimizes the risk of loss but does not guarantee a high return, all depends on the potential and failure of the project. Also, investment in the IEO in exchanges with low reputation is still prone to fraud, so it is necessary to consider the reputation of the exchange.

https://miro.medium.com/max/700/1*RuFAkRN8Sn37zvJ_wBvHrw.png

Comparing to ICO, the risk of IEO is much lower for both the project team and contributors.
On the customer's side, not only will the exchange help them review the projects and filter out scams, but it also provides better liquidity for trading afterward as a large user base is already guaranteed. The exchange will also offer a convenient platform for contributors to manage their funds as all assets can be stored in the exchange account instead of different wallet addresses.

Advantages of IEO .

.Trustworthy
.Ready Qualified Investor base
.Easier for the projects
.Listing

I like IEO this is the best way and it is more batter than ico .
currently moozicore IEO is growing rapidly there project is awesome.
https://tokensale.moozicore.com/
  (https://tokensale.moozicore.com/)

It could be argued that it has brought hope of been listed on exchange to investor but not the hope of sustainability, because most projects are still trading beyond IEO Price, yes some have done x10, x20 but it's still not a Guarantee to say it's more safer to me, I just see it as rebranding

When a new hot trend occurs, investors can get lots of profits if they join in early days. But, when things expand more, scammers will find that new hot trend, and join the game. Proportion of scam projects in the hot trend will increase, then investors will have less chance to get profits, instead they will get more risks to lose their funds because they might make more mistakes by choosing poor quality/ scam projects for their portfolios.

to gives of one on position as trader to collects with supports on confirmation as the pairs on selection to work on customs with one on priors with personal selection and put with excessive as expending use of releases with resource on distribution.

Very nice point of view about IEO.  Not all were mentioned but the most important thing was tackled. It is all about the team behind the project and the purpose why they are doing the project. The requirements given by the exchange will be met by the project team before they start. One thing we have solved about that are fake people on the project team. Second is the intention on the project.

I would like to remind everyone that IEO is a good replacement but we need to be sure that then exchange platform has the highest trust ratings.

Try to check out this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5166859.msg51897270#msg51897270
and you would see on how these IEO isnt really that better when it comes to returns.

It's quite obvious that the initial exchange offerings are way better than the initial coin offerings which have proven to be a huge red flag to the industry. I am actually glad for the new innovation of the initial exchange offerings which made investment more safer than it used to

Yes it's obvious that IEO surpass ICO in all ramifications. Investors are confident because they believe the exchange has done thorough verification on the team and also the coin will definitely list on the exchange. I still advise crypto enthusiasts to do proper due diligence notwithstanding before participating in any IEO.

It's now crystal clear that IEO has so many advantages compared to ICO. For a fact, IEO revived the lost trust by investors who have been dealt with by scam ICOs in the past. Now most of the IEOs in decent exchanges are doing well because investors are sure the coin will be listed and also the team is verified.

Yes definitely almost every crypto enthusiast is aware of the fact that IEO is far better than ICO. In 2018 after many failed ICOs, I thought token sale will be a thing of the past since many projects enacted later started doing only private sales to raise funds since ICO phased out. When exchanges like Binance came up with IEO, the result was splendid, investors became confident knowing that the coins will be listed for sure and the project is legit.

Only a few do make profit with small percentage and loss up big time with thousand percent of loss with their investment.Success do only matter on community support.

If the said project just has nothing to offer then theres no difference for these projects which being offered when we are still on ICO.So, i dont still prefer on joining up this hype train.

However now many people benefit from investing in the IEO. So it can be said that the IEO is better now. With this, surely people will continue to increase their interest in investing in the IEO, but behind that, all of you as investors must have their own analysis of projects that carry out the IEO.

I think that now the profit from IEO will decrease. more and more users are losing money because they participate in IEO on weak exchanges or they are not doing project analysis

Yes IEO is way better than what we experienced during the time of ICOs. With IEO there is better Investment security, assured listing and no scams; which have been seen as the reasons why IEO keeps growing while serving as a better choice than ICOs.

If a project has a very good foundation and strong team, it doesn't matter whether they conducted their crowdfunding on an exchange or through ICO the project would still be successful.. It is only pump and dump coins that that needs hype to grow.

since many ICO projects are scamming, the IEO is new hope for investors and bounty hunters, and both of these reasons reinforce that the IEO is a very good concept because it provides comfort and little certainty to hunters and investors  :)

I agree that IEO is better than ICO. For investors, the funds will be safer held by the exchanger because every investor does KYC before participating in the IEO. For the developer team, the IEO makes them more focused on the project and does not concentrate on achieving the sales target

when compared to ICO, IEO is indeed better for investors, especially the IEO that is done in a big exchanger, of course there is no doubt about the quality of projects that enter and pass the IEO selection.
but I personally have never followed the IEO since the IEO used the ticket system.

ICO was like a free-for-everyone universe. Every whim and imagination could turn into a project that would launch an ICO. The security level of the ICO market is almost nil. ICO investors are exposed to a higher risk as compared to IEO. IEO is way safer in that several layers of security measures are present. The mere fact that they are using an exchange means a lot. They have to convince the exchange first that they are legit.

Yes IEO is way better than ICO because the token itself can be listed right away on the exchange that the IEO hosted but nowadays we cant change the fact that most of the new IEO right now are turning to scam that's why invest on your own risk

IEO is new solution and become new trend in crypto. For me IEO is better than ICO. Scam project is a big problem in ICO which is difficult to avoid. In IEO so far i am never seen scam project or fraud.

Anything has its sides, IEO is good only for some good projects, has potential for future development, investment and support from large organizations. In 2019 it is probably the sky of the IEO. However, there are still many projects taking advantage of this trend, linking with trading platforms to fraudulently invest in investors, the IEO time is longer than ICO llol.

the value and development is getting better for the investments like this only make the future and the people feel that the development is trend only so that we can invest in this and make the future to be brighter that's why the development is happening for IEO

If most projects today will be successful by using IEO rather than ICO then I can say that this is much better. Right now I am doing bounties for projects with IEO if most of them did not turn to scam and failure then I can say this is the solution.

That's true. The funding for the project will be successful but it doesn't mean the project itself would succeed. I think what makes IEO better is that it would tell the legitimacy of a project which means there's a high chance that it would succeed. But it still depends on the investors.

There are a number of bare minimums that an investor needs to look out for to gauge the prospects of a project including:

What does the project seek to solve? Is the problem clearly stated, and how do they go about solving it? Is there a working minimum viable product?
What are the team's credentials?
Are there any partnerships (even potential)?

I always do research before investment one of my the best project that i like and have good potential to grow
is Moozicore
https://tokensale.moozicore.com/ (https://tokensale.moozicore.com/)

No doubt about it since it's been introduced to the public for the new investment system there are more investors has grabbed the chance to invest in IEO than ICO. Most of the time ICO are becoming more and more nightmare to the public because of its unsuccessful method of investment/ its gone to almost 90% now. unlike its counterpart IEO there are only a few cases of it who turned to be a scam the rest are good to go.

Well, it's good that we got a new tool that attracts investors. For hunters it is very important. Because improvements in the market and the fight against fraudsters also affect our swami income.

I agree that the IEO has now become more attractive. But investors still need to carefully analyze IEO projects. Now there is no such as in 2017 when almost any project made a profit...but after a while, it would disappeared

Big exchanges bring the success of this new venue of investment, how they handled the project makes more attraction for investors to join, after those many failed ICO's either delayed for listing or never been list to any exchange, IEO's gather the attentions of traders investors because of the new system where you can sell your tokens  right after the sale period inside the exchange who offers the IEO sale.

Very informative points by the OP and I definitely agree that IEO is way better than ICO's on all aspects. Initial Exchange Offerings provide more security to the investors in which ICO's failed to do and left a bad taste to several investors a few years back. These exchanges also carefully vet projects and its great to discover legitimate blockchain projects (http://www.hpb.io/?utm_source=lx) that provide products to improve scalability, security, and blockchain functionality. I even know some friends that won't even consider participating on ICO's due to its risk, anyways everything has a risk and you just have to play your cards smart.

Now if you join the IEO. 100% you need to sell them as soon as listed. Over time, its price will drop. Do not try to hold like 2017, it will definitely fail

in my opinion, safer is not because most launchpad do not do research on the project that is listed in their launchpad and what they offer is a project scam and certainly that is not good for investors, so doing this research is important.

You have to search deeply before investing, either the  project is ICO or IEO it does not mean it is a successful project

If you are going to sell tokens of a new project right after the end of the IEO, then you absolutely don't give a damn what this project is. It is important for you on which exchange you participate in the IEO, if the exchange is famous, it means that they artificially raise the price for the tokens of the new project so that you can earn.

The IEO is indeed far better than the ICO, the main reason is clear because ICO has been polluted with many scammers, but the IEO is far more difficult to fake, because not everyone can imitate the IEO, the IEO must have legal agreements and cooperate with certain exchanges

Definitely, IEO is way better than ICO. Because of lower chance of scam projects investors can invest fearlessly.

But I don’t think all company prefers doing ieo specially those team that has no big capital and relying on the investors only but has a good project as well
Maybe in future this will be the applicable way to promote a project and to avoid scamming but not for today or not for tomorrow,this will took longer time to take effect since ICO is the most common way to promote a project

for ieo, it is currently a substitute for investment in addition to ico and others and offers a fairly fast profit, but this also must be watched out because now the exchange that has a lot of volume also offers a lot of projects that are unclear and it would be a bit dangerous if you try to participate there must be vigilant.

IEO will be way better if at the long run it doesn't take the turn of ICO. Exchanges are already using IEOs to propagate scam which is very discouraging. The fake sell off announced by exchanges for IEOs and yet you see a huge dump in price of the project after listing. That is not expected.

From the results of the research that I did the IEO method was the same as when I first got ICO, it would still be crowded when in the initial period, if there were many problems such as the ICO, the IEO would also be quiet and investors might feel bored and try to find more interesting method.

The initial exchange offerings has been a great move to save the face of cryptocurrency crowdfunding after the initial coin offerings failed due to scam and other unnecessary activities. So I agree with you on the fact of initial exchange offerings being way better than the initial coin offerings

Yes, my friend, you are right because projects that get listed on the market via IEO typically see high rates of return. One reason for this may be because when a prestigious exchange launches an IEO, it can be thought of as the exchange giving that project a stamp of approval. These exchanges hosting IEO’s are industry leaders with their reputation at risk, so they hold the projects they list to high standards and rigorously vet the projects before deciding whether or not they will be the counterparty in the token sale and list the coin afterward.
 
I recently invested in Moozicore and they give more returns in a few years.(https://tokensale.moozicore.com/)

IEO is now more popular and in demand and better than ICO because it is managed by an exchanger. With manage from an exchanger, faster token listings on the market and quickly traded. Investors can immediately profit or accumulate their investment

I think that the key point to help investors, to attract them is stricter managements from governments. As we witnessed, due to scam ICOs in 2017, governments stepped in, then we have KYCs, that are a huge improvements in crypto, and somehow help investors to have another kind of protections from scam projects and scammers. KYCs are not perfect and they can not protect investors themselves, but at least investors have one more protective tools. I think soon IEOs will have some kind of new management tools from governments.

The IEO provides a guarantee that it will be definitely listed on that transaction.  There are many different tokens and not all projects that launch IEO are likely to add value.  People want to join the IEO because they care more about profit than the technology behind their products.  I only participated in a few projects when I studied carefully.

Indeed. The risk of losing all your investments is lesser and you can guarantee that the project is not a scam. I just hope scammers don't find their way into faking IEOs. Hopefully, not.