IEO IS WAY BETTER

[semobo]

IEO (initial exchange offering) is better than ICO,to participate in any IEO you have to be a member on the exchange launching the IEO ,this are my reasons

1)IEO is safer and better than ICO because its not what anyone can just conduct ,to conduct an IEO the project teams must meet and comply with the exchanges requirements in order to launch the token sale .

2)contributors are protected by the exchange,why? Many big exchanges offering the IEO now are after there reputations so its not easy to launch IEO through them,if the project before them is not genuine enough the exchanges won't dare take the risk.

I think this is what many investors have been waiting for , better risk limiting investment ,IEO is the only way to go
,don't forget ,DYOR ,thank you

the value and development is getting better for the investments like this only make the future and the people feel that the development is trend only so that we can invest in this and make the future to be brighter that's why the development is happening for IEO

[1715015226]

1715015226

[1715015226]

1715015226

[1715015226]

1715015226

[1715015226]

1715015226

[AlaEhBTC]

If most projects today will be successful by using IEO rather than ICO then I can say that this is much better. Right now I am doing bounties for projects with IEO if most of them did not turn to scam and failure then I can say this is the solution.

[meanwords]

IEO (initial exchange offering) is better than ICO,to participate in any IEO you have to be a member on the exchange launching the IEO ,this are my reasons

1)IEO is safer and better than ICO because its not what anyone can just conduct ,to conduct an IEO the project teams must meet and comply with the exchanges requirements in order to launch the token sale .

2)contributors are protected by the exchange,why? Many big exchanges offering the IEO now are after there reputations so its not easy to launch IEO through them,if the project before them is not genuine enough the exchanges won't dare take the risk.

I think this is what many investors have been waiting for , better risk limiting investment ,IEO is the only way to go
,don't forget ,DYOR ,thank you

Still depends on the project and what problem are they trying to solve for the community, yes the crowdfunding will be successful, but after the crowdfunding, what will become the project, will the exchange has something to do with the development, so better if the project is really legit and what can it offer to the community.

That's true. The funding for the project will be successful but it doesn't mean the project itself would succeed. I think what makes IEO better is that it would tell the legitimacy of a project which means there's a high chance that it would succeed. But it still depends on the investors.

[Nihal6443]

There are a number of bare minimums that an investor needs to look out for to gauge the prospects of a project including:

What does the project seek to solve? Is the problem clearly stated, and how do they go about solving it? Is there a working minimum viable product?
What are the team's credentials?
Are there any partnerships (even potential)?

I always do research before investment one of my the best project that i like and have good potential to grow
is Moozicore
https://tokensale.moozicore.com/

[yazher]

No doubt about it since it's been introduced to the public for the new investment system there are more investors has grabbed the chance to invest in IEO than ICO. Most of the time ICO are becoming more and more nightmare to the public because of its unsuccessful method of investment/ its gone to almost 90% now. unlike its counterpart IEO there are only a few cases of it who turned to be a scam the rest are good to go.

[baigreen]

No doubt about it since it's been introduced to the public for the new investment system there are more investors has grabbed the chance to invest in IEO than ICO. Most of the time ICO are becoming more and more nightmare to the public because of its unsuccessful method of investment/ its gone to almost 90% now. unlike its counterpart IEO there are only a few cases of it who turned to be a scam the rest are good to go.

Well, it's good that we got a new tool that attracts investors. For hunters it is very important. Because improvements in the market and the fight against fraudsters also affect our swami income.

[farraddy]

I agree that the IEO has now become more attractive. But investors still need to carefully analyze IEO projects. Now there is no such as in 2017 when almost any project made a profit...but after a while, it would disappeared

[Pamadar]

when compared to ICO, IEO is indeed better for investors, especially the IEO that is done in a big exchanger, of course there is no doubt about the quality of projects that enter and pass the IEO selection.
but I personally have never followed the IEO since the IEO used the ticket system.

Big exchanges bring the success of this new venue of investment, how they handled the project makes more attraction for investors to join, after those many failed ICO's either delayed for listing or never been list to any exchange, IEO's gather the attentions of traders investors because of the new system where you can sell your tokens  right after the sale period inside the exchange who offers the IEO sale.

[cryptolove.143]

Very informative points by the OP and I definitely agree that IEO is way better than ICO's on all aspects. Initial Exchange Offerings provide more security to the investors in which ICO's failed to do and left a bad taste to several investors a few years back. These exchanges also carefully vet projects and its great to discover legitimate blockchain projects that provide products to improve scalability, security, and blockchain functionality. I even know some friends that won't even consider participating on ICO's due to its risk, anyways everything has a risk and you just have to play your cards smart.

[MCDev]

I agree that the IEO has now become more attractive. But investors still need to carefully analyze IEO projects. Now there is no such as in 2017 when almost any project made a profit...but after a while, it would disappeared

Now if you join the IEO. 100% you need to sell them as soon as listed. Over time, its price will drop. Do not try to hold like 2017, it will definitely fail

[Denongels]

in my opinion, safer is not because most launchpad do not do research on the project that is listed in their launchpad and what they offer is a project scam and certainly that is not good for investors, so doing this research is important.

[masterusd]

You have to search deeply before investing, either the  project is ICO or IEO it does not mean it is a successful project

[Hans Groober]

in my opinion, safer is not because most launchpad do not do research on the project that is listed in their launchpad and what they offer is a project scam and certainly that is not good for investors, so doing this research is important.

If you are going to sell tokens of a new project right after the end of the IEO, then you absolutely don't give a damn what this project is. It is important for you on which exchange you participate in the IEO, if the exchange is famous, it means that they artificially raise the price for the tokens of the new project so that you can earn.

[Bay_Harbour_Butcher]

The IEO is indeed far better than the ICO, the main reason is clear because ICO has been polluted with many scammers, but the IEO is far more difficult to fake, because not everyone can imitate the IEO, the IEO must have legal agreements and cooperate with certain exchanges

[Miy Monk]

Definitely, IEO is way better than ICO. Because of lower chance of scam projects investors can invest fearlessly.

[Siren]

But I don’t think all company prefers doing ieo specially those team that has no big capital and relying on the investors only but has a good project as well
Maybe in future this will be the applicable way to promote a project and to avoid scamming but not for today or not for tomorrow,this will took longer time to take effect since ICO is the most common way to promote a project

[altscaner]

for ieo, it is currently a substitute for investment in addition to ico and others and offers a fairly fast profit, but this also must be watched out because now the exchange that has a lot of volume also offers a lot of projects that are unclear and it would be a bit dangerous if you try to participate there must be vigilant.

[Ifychuks]

IEO will be way better if at the long run it doesn't take the turn of ICO. Exchanges are already using IEOs to propagate scam which is very discouraging. The fake sell off announced by exchanges for IEOs and yet you see a huge dump in price of the project after listing. That is not expected.

[Google+]

From the results of the research that I did the IEO method was the same as when I first got ICO, it would still be crowded when in the initial period, if there were many problems such as the ICO, the IEO would also be quiet and investors might feel bored and try to find more interesting method.

[Firefoxx]

The initial exchange offerings has been a great move to save the face of cryptocurrency crowdfunding after the initial coin offerings failed due to scam and other unnecessary activities. So I agree with you on the fact of initial exchange offerings being way better than the initial coin offerings