and why is that a bitcoin worthy discussion again?
An insignificant impostor deleted his twitter account - why it is even being discussed??
No need to shoot the messenger.
A fork of a fork, by people and companies, filing multiple patents on the original technology protocols, threatening mass legal actions, claiming Bitcoin SV as the 'original' Bitcoin, causing market uncertainty and mass confusion across the board, is not worthy of bitcoin discussion ?
The individual in question has asserted himself to be 'Satoshi Nakamoto' and has provided no signed or verifiable proof (to-date), whatsoever.
It is very significant as twitter appears to have taken this action, following multiple user reports of said individual impersonating 'Satoshi Nakamoto'.
Don't trust. Sign and Verify. This is financial cryptography.
...
EDIT: I should probably add the B-Side here ...
-
https://youtu.be/jO5VV5PISHU