Hhampuz Reputation Thread

[Quickseller]

I have no reason to believe anyone wants me to remove my signature. No one has made any effort in any way to get me to remove it

I am not sure what happened with you and Hhampuz as well as Livecoin campaign, but the key rule is managers have rights to remove participants after announcements if they think those participants are not fitted with campaigns they managed.
There are two kinds of actions:
- Removed at the check and pay day: without payment of last week at all. This one might lead to complaints.
- Removed after check and payday: It means participants got payments for last week and only be removed for next one after getting announcement. I think this one is fine. This rule even states that participants can be removed without payment or notice.

*Do not have any legitimate negative feedback from any DT member. Receiving negative feedback during your stay could lead to your termination from the campaign without payment or notice.

I am not sure what you are trying to say. I have not received any trust ratings since I joined his campaign.

Hhampuz confirmed via PM that he removed me due to personal pressure (benefit he would receive) and not due to the effectiveness of my advertising. Further, he has made *zero* attempts to get me to try to remove the signature I have been wearing since removing me from the campaign.

He is obtaining personal benefit to the determent to his client, the entity who has hired him to maximize the value of their advertising dollars.

It is ridiculous to suggest posting this in a censored (self moderated) thread, and it is worthless to leave a trust rating when multiple of his friends (who are getting paid by hhampuz money from his clients) will leave ratings covering this up.

Hhampuz appears to be making decisions on behalf of those he is working for (eg his advertisers/clients) that benefit him personally, that are detrimental to his clients/customers.

If you are considering hiring Hhampuz, I would suggest that you not.

Untrustworthy

Says a troll who's got anything but a clean trust history on this forum. QS, NO ONE cares about your irrelevant and often incorrect OPINIONS. You bring nothing but drama and nonsense to this forum. 

If you are considering hiring Hhampuz, I highly recommend doing so. He's a good buddy of mine because he's a man of integrity with a big heart. He takes his work very seriously and is highly trustworthy.

I am not sure why someone with a history of plagiarism thinks he can speak to the integrity of someone else. This is someone who effectively stole something when he thought no one would notice.

...If you are considering hiring Hhampuz, I would suggest...

If you are considering listening to Quickseller, I would suggest that you not.

If you are considering hiring Hhampuz, I would suggest you do it, he is a professional and valuable member of Bitcointalk community!

I see no reason to engage in any kind of debate with you considering you are incapable (refuse) of debating anyone who disagrees with you.

I would point out that your post was paid for by hhampuz, out of money from one of his clients. 

[ChiBitCTy]

I have no reason to believe anyone wants me to remove my signature. No one has made any effort in any way to get me to remove it

I am not sure what happened with you and Hhampuz as well as Livecoin campaign, but the key rule is managers have rights to remove participants after announcements if they think those participants are not fitted with campaigns they managed.
There are two kinds of actions:
- Removed at the check and pay day: without payment of last week at all. This one might lead to complaints.
- Removed after check and payday: It means participants got payments for last week and only be removed for next one after getting announcement. I think this one is fine. This rule even states that participants can be removed without payment or notice.

*Do not have any legitimate negative feedback from any DT member. Receiving negative feedback during your stay could lead to your termination from the campaign without payment or notice.

I am not sure what you are trying to say. I have not received any trust ratings since I joined his campaign.

Hhampuz confirmed via PM that he removed me due to personal pressure (benefit he would receive) and not due to the effectiveness of my advertising. Further, he has made *zero* attempts to get me to try to remove the signature I have been wearing since removing me from the campaign.

He is obtaining personal benefit to the determent to his client, the entity who has hired him to maximize the value of their advertising dollars.

It is ridiculous to suggest posting this in a censored (self moderated) thread, and it is worthless to leave a trust rating when multiple of his friends (who are getting paid by hhampuz money from his clients) will leave ratings covering this up.

Hhampuz appears to be making decisions on behalf of those he is working for (eg his advertisers/clients) that benefit him personally, that are detrimental to his clients/customers.

If you are considering hiring Hhampuz, I would suggest that you not.

Untrustworthy

Says a troll who's got anything but a clean trust history on this forum. QS, NO ONE cares about your irrelevant and often incorrect OPINIONS. You bring nothing but drama and nonsense to this forum.  

If you are considering hiring Hhampuz, I highly recommend doing so. He's a good buddy of mine because he's a man of integrity with a big heart. He takes his work very seriously and is highly trustworthy.

I am not sure why someone with a history of plagiarism thinks he can speak to the integrity of someone else. This is someone who effectively stole something when he thought no one would notice.

...If you are considering hiring Hhampuz, I would suggest...

If you are considering listening to Quickseller, I would suggest that you not.

If you are considering hiring Hhampuz, I would suggest you do it, he is a professional and valuable member of Bitcointalk community!

I see no reason to engage in any kind of debate with you considering you are incapable (refuse) of debating anyone who disagrees with you.

I would point out that your post was paid for by hhampuz, out of money from one of his clients.  

I didn't try and hide anything, nor did I intentionally break the rules. I copy/pasted a couple posts during a single day to uphold my promise to my campaign manger during a time of extreme turmoil in my life.  Yes I fckd up.  Every single satoshi of those funds received went to charity as well (hence not benefiting me in any single way). You are a douche of all douches and I simply can't understand why you are still on this forum. Look at your trust, you've done nothing wrong here before? You're pathetic, and NO ONE wants you here. NO ONE trusts you. The same can't be said for myself. Take that as you will.  Go troll 4chan or something.


edit- LOL to the fact you still wear a signature and don't get paid. Why not go and join a campaign that will actually pay you? Oh right, because no one would hire you. Pathetic.

[Hhampuz]

@Quickseller, this will be my last reply to your claims.

Against the better of my judgement and several other users voicing their opinions (you may believe it to be 1-2 but there were many, many more) I hired you in the LiveCoin campaign to give you a chance at earning some BTC since you do post a lot. For 6 weeks straight I paid you, on time and without issues and this is how you repay that favor?

I am under no obligations to hire you or anyone else and I am free to do what I want in terms of removing members from the campaigns I manage. Each and every one of my clients have full confidence in me and my ability to manage a campaign and that is why they let me handle it all the best way I see fit. I removed you due to receiving messages from many members, yes. You can call it pressure if you want but more than anything I just didn't need the extra work needed (justifying you being paid to post). It was a mistake to even give you a chance to begin with, and I see that now considering how you are handling all of it.

Regarding not trying to get you to remove the signature/avatar: You are free to wear any signature/avatar you see fit, they are all publicly posted here at the forum and I can't control you. I messaged you several times to explain to you that you'd be removed and I would assume that it was enough combined with removing you from the spreadsheet. Evidently not so consider this my formal request, please Quickseller, remove your signature and avatar. You are no longer being paid by me or by LiveCoin and this, the wearing of them, sees no benefit for you.

I'm pretty sure most members would back me up on you burning your bridges on trying to earn from a campaign and considering how you are now treating me, someone who gave you an honest chance for 6 weeks straight, I'd say you've made it even more difficult for anyone to give you a chance in the future too.

Now I'd appreciate it if you'd stop posting in this thread as I will no longer reply to you.

[Quickseller]

edit- LOL to the fact you still wear a signature and don't get paid. Why not go and join a campaign that will actually pay you? Oh right, because no one would hire you. Pathetic.

I continue to wear the signature to show there is no repetitional concern of my advertising for livecoin.

I am under no obligations to hire you or anyone else and I am free to do what I want in terms of removing members from the campaigns I manage. Each and every one of my clients have full confidence in me and my ability to manage a campaign and that is why they let me handle it all the best way I see fit. I removed you due to receiving messages from many members, yes. You can call it pressure if you want but more than anything I just didn't need the extra work needed (justifying you being paid to post).

You are intentionally not hiring the most effective advertisers so that you obtain personal benefits. This is in effect you taking a little bit of the advertising budget off the top for your personal use.

Your post indicate my advertising for livecoin is no detriment to their reputation, and your PM indicated to me that you acknowledge livecoin has received an outsized positive benefit to my advertising.

This is not unlike how you accepted a friend of yours into another one of your campaigns that you knew was plagiarizing post -- you accepted an inferior advertiser who you knew was not going to make good posts into your campaign because he was your friend and you would benefit.

[ChiBitCTy]

edit- LOL to the fact you still wear a signature and don't get paid. Why not go and join a campaign that will actually pay you? Oh right, because no one would hire you. Pathetic.

I continue to wear the signature to show there is no repetitional concern of my advertising for livecoin.

I am under no obligations to hire you or anyone else and I am free to do what I want in terms of removing members from the campaigns I manage. Each and every one of my clients have full confidence in me and my ability to manage a campaign and that is why they let me handle it all the best way I see fit. I removed you due to receiving messages from many members, yes. You can call it pressure if you want but more than anything I just didn't need the extra work needed (justifying you being paid to post).

You are intentionally not hiring the most effective advertisers so that you obtain personal benefits. This is in effect you taking a little bit of the advertising budget off the top for your personal use.

Your post indicate my advertising for livecoin is no detriment to their reputation, and your PM indicated to me that you acknowledge livecoin has received an outsized positive benefit to my advertising.

This is not unlike how you accepted a friend of yours into another one of your campaigns that you knew was plagiarizing posts, and that actually plagiarized posts while in your campaign -- you accepted an inferior advertiser who you knew was not going to make good posts into your campaign because he was your friend and you would benefit.

If you can prove that I plagiarized during his campaign, I'll leave this forum.  Good luck as my plagiarizing issue was when I was in Atriz's Moonlight campaign.  Take a look at my posts while in Hhampuz campaigns. Not good posts? I've done plenty for this forum in terms of posting positively.  I don't troll nonsense every other post like yourself. Get your story straight.

[suchmoon]

~

What an extraordinary asshole. If any of that was true you'd be signing up for another campaign instead of attacking the one person who gave you the benefit of the doubt. But it doesn't look like anyone wants to hire you and your meltdown here shows why.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

he's a man of integrity with a big heart. He takes his work very seriously and is highly trustworthy.

That's all I've ever observed from and heard about him.  We've got some really good bitcoin-paying campaign managers, but I've often thought that most altcoin/token bounty managers ought to use him as a model for how they should run their bounties.  And yeah, he definitely seems like a personable guy, which is a rarity on bitcointalk.

It was a mistake to even give you a chance to begin with

Yes it was.  I'm not sure if any project would want someone with QS's very tarnished reputation advertising for them.  I'm actually surprised you gave him a shot but nobody's perfect, right?  And there's a very good reason for all that tarnish, but now he's trying to get it to rub off on you by smearing your reputation and saying that you shouldn't be hired as a campaign manager.  That's low but not unexpected, and the good thing is that he's not going to convince many people.

I continue to wear the signature to show there is no repetitional concern of my advertising for livecoin.

You really have a hard time getting messages that are loud and clear, don't you?  I've seen examples of this before, too.

QS, NO ONE cares about your irrelevant and often incorrect OPINIONS.

Right, this is one of the examples I was thinking of.  There surely is some sort of autism involved here, but that's just me playing armchair psychiatrist. 

[TheUltraElite]

I think Hhampuz has learnt his lesson about accepting people with walls of red trust and those known to be involved in wrongdoings.  

This should serve as enough of an impetus to see that those members of this forum who have been trying to get the best of the DT for their own advantage even after being red trust should not be be given even a single opportunity.

Giving someone a second chance always ends up biting back. There is no doubt about about. In either case they will move on to a new account with a completely new name and bitcoin address just because they cant control the urge for free money.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Hhampuz is very approachable, very friendly, extremely trustworthy & an absolute credit to our community here.
I don’t even know why his reputation is being discussed. Anybody who questions his integrity clearly has a motive.

Edit - Hhampuz, you should lock this thread now. You have nothing to prove to anybody. Look at the masses of respected accounts in your corner.

[marlboroza]

you accepted an inferior advertiser who you knew was not going to make good posts

I completely agree with this, I am not sure why Hhampuz accepted quickseller.

It is actually sad, someone gave them second chance and then they choose to shit on that person. How fucked up you have to be to do that? 

Hhampuz is very approachable, very friendly, extremely trustworthy & an absolute credit to our community here.

I will just quote this and agree with it.

[DireWolfM14]

I continue to wear the signature to show there is no repetitional concern of my advertising for livecoin.

Don't try to spread that BS to thickly.  You're still wearing the banners out of spite, and you know it.  You have no altruistic reason to promote some new random exchange, and if the circumstances were different you would stop wearing their banners the minute you were taken off their payroll.  All you're doing is flaunting your power struggle with Hhampuz.  Shame on you for being such a bully.

I actually consider you to be one of the better posters on the forum, and I value your contributions.  The help you've given to lenders by sniffing out would be scammers hasn't gone unnoticed by me.  It did strike me as odd that Hhampuz gave you a slot on one of his campaigns, but it didn't surprise me at all considering your post quality and Hhampuz's generosity.

Hhampuz asked you politely to remove the banners, quit being a bully and do as the man asked.

[Quickseller]

Anybody who questions his integrity clearly has a motive.

Are you talking about integrity such as accepting his friend who recently had plagiarized at the time?

It is actually sad, someone gave them second chance and then they choose to shit on that person.

Second chance? At what exactly? Speak slowly so I can understand.


I think I already know the answer....not criticizing you and your friends.

I continue to wear the signature to show there is no repetitional concern of my advertising for livecoin.

Don't try to spread that BS to thickly.  You're still wearing the banners out of spite, and you know it.  You have no altruistic reason to promote some new random exchange, and if the circumstances were different you would stop wearing their banners the minute you were taken off their payroll.  All you're doing is flaunting your power struggle with Hhampuz.  Shame on you for being such a bully.

You are correct I have no altruistic reason to keep my signature up, as stated the signature remained up because I wanted to point out there are no negative reputation harm to livecoin - the entity Hhampuz is ultimately getting paid by to maximize advertisements for -- of my wearing their signature.

Hhazmpuz's reply confirms that:

I removed you due to receiving messages from many members, yes. [...]

 You are no longer being paid by me or by LiveCoin and this, the wearing of them, sees no benefit for you.

He confirmed the reason he did not want me wearing the signature was because I was no longer being paid.

it didn't surprise me at all considering your post quality

This is my point. Hhampuz is specifically declining to utilize the most effective advertiser, so to personally benefit. He also accepted a friend of his, who at the time had been caught (and had negative trust for at the time) plagiarizing in recent months. I am not calling him out on this because I am involved, I am more than willing to call him (or anyone else) out on this, regardless of who is involved. Neither of these things can align with any claim that Hhampuz is acting in the best interest of his client. The line that he has "full authority" or whatever over his advertising campaigns is BS because that does not give him a license to act to the detriment to his clients (who are ultimately paying participants), especially when he receives a personal benefit.

[mikeywith]

@Quickseller I admire the determination , everyone keeps telling you that you are wrong, but you don't give a fudge , i love it   .

Not that my opinion matters a lot  , but @Hhampuz is probably one of the kindest members I have interacted with on the forum,besides him being so professional in managing campaigns (based on my experience) - I was in one of the campaigns he manages when i was accepted by @Darkstar_ to Chipmixer, and it happened like 2 days before the payout for that week.

Hhampuz was nice enough to ask Darkstart_ on my behalf ( and another member or 2) if we could keep the signature so that we don't miss the prev campaign payout, he went to the extent of PMing me to let me know that  Darkstar_ said it was okay to do so (Thanks @Darkstar_ btw) .

He did not have to do all that , he could have easily deleted my name from the spreadsheet and moved on, but he took all the time and effort to worry about someone else's benefit, this guy is amazing , regardless of what you have to say about him.

[Quickseller]

@Quickseller I admire the determination , everyone keeps telling you that you are wrong, but you don't give a fudge , i love it   .

Not that my opinion matters a lot  , but @Hhampuz is probably one of the kindest members I have interacted with on the forum,besides him being so professional in managing campaigns (based on my experience) - I was in one of the campaigns he manages when i was accepted by @Darkstar_ to Chipmixer, and it happened like 2 days before the payout for that week.

Hhampuz was nice enough to ask Darkstart_ on my behalf ( and another member or 2) if we could keep the signature so that we don't miss the prev campaign payout, he went to the extent of PMing me to let me know that  Darkstar_ said it was okay to do so (Thanks @Darkstar_ btw) .

He did not have to do all that , he could have easily deleted my name from the spreadsheet and moved on, but he took all the time and effort to worry about someone else's benefit, this guy is amazing , regardless of what you have to say about him.

I am glad he went out of his way to help you participate in a new signature campaign. Your antidote doesn’t really have anything to do with Hhampuz personality benefiting from the campaigns he runs while harming his clients.

[TheNewAnon135246]

Hhampuz appears to be making decisions on behalf of those he is working for (eg his advertisers/clients) that benefit him personally, that are detrimental to his clients/customers.

If you are considering hiring Hhampuz, I would suggest that you not.

Untrustworthy

I am awaiting negative trust if you do believe this to be true.

Also you should probably write this in my service thread for my campaign management, would make the most sense.

Ignore him, he's just struggling to remain relevant. It's not like anyone values his biased opinions ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

[ChiBitCTy]

Anybody who questions his integrity clearly has a motive.

Are you talking about integrity such as accepting his friend who recently had plagiarized at the time?

It is actually sad, someone gave them second chance and then they choose to shit on that person.

Second chance? At what exactly? Speak slowly so I can understand.


I think I already know the answer....not criticizing you and your friends.

I continue to wear the signature to show there is no repetitional concern of my advertising for livecoin.

Don't try to spread that BS to thickly.  You're still wearing the banners out of spite, and you know it.  You have no altruistic reason to promote some new random exchange, and if the circumstances were different you would stop wearing their banners the minute you were taken off their payroll.  All you're doing is flaunting your power struggle with Hhampuz.  Shame on you for being such a bully.

You are correct I have no altruistic reason to keep my signature up, as stated the signature remained up because I wanted to point out there are no negative reputation harm to livecoin - the entity Hhampuz is ultimately getting paid by to maximize advertisements for -- of my wearing their signature.

Hhazmpuz's reply confirms that:

I removed you due to receiving messages from many members, yes. [...]

 You are no longer being paid by me or by LiveCoin and this, the wearing of them, sees no benefit for you.

He confirmed the reason he did not want me wearing the signature was because I was no longer being paid.

it didn't surprise me at all considering your post quality

This is my point. Hhampuz is specifically declining to utilize the most effective advertiser, so to personally benefit. He also accepted a friend of his, who at the time had been caught (and had negative trust for at the time) plagiarizing in recent months. I am not calling him out on this because I am involved, I am more than willing to call him (or anyone else) out on this, regardless of who is involved. Neither of these things can align with any claim that Hhampuz is acting in the best interest of his client. The line that he has "full authority" or whatever over his advertising campaigns is BS because that does not give him a license to act to the detriment to his clients (who are ultimately paying participants), especially when he receives a personal benefit.

Your hypocrisy is just laughable. So the fact that I messed up once, means that Hhampuz shouldn't have given me a chance? Okay, fair enough. Than he should have never given you a chance. So why do you keep saying this?  You contradict yourself over and over with each and every argument. The fact is I messed up once, during a single day's time. Other than that, I've been a solid "poster". I'm someone who truly cares about Bitcoin and this forum. I've made good on my mistake. I served my time/serving my time, I gave every satoshi during all my campaigns to charity, I've donated to this forum etc. So why don't you shut the fuck up and move on? It is clear you're a one man band crying for some cheese w/that wine of yours.

[El duderino_]

@Hhampuz, you are extremely liked and to be trusted, I personally experienced this........ Lock the thread and just always remember

[Hhampuz]

@Hhampuz, you are extremely liked and to be trusted, I personally experienced this........ Lock the thread and just always remember

It's fine, I have QS on ignore so it doesn't bother me. I feel I need to keep this thread open in case there are any legitimate concerns regarding how I manage my campaigns or otherwise.

I appreciate all the kindness you and others here are displaying though, there's a lot of good people here .

[marlboroza]

It is actually sad, someone gave them second chance and then they choose to shit on that person.

Second chance? At what exactly? Speak slowly so I can understand.

I think I already know the answer

Sure, no problem.

Someone already quoted this:

*Do not have any legitimate negative feedback from any DT member. Receiving negative feedback during your stay could lead to your termination from the campaign without payment or notice.

Your trust looks like this: Trust: -8177: -13 / +15

So, Hhampuz is good guy who accepted you in campaign and gave you a chance to earn some btc even thought it is against campaign rules. Then you got fired.

Think about it for a second.

I think I already know the answer....not criticizing you and your friends.

I really don't know what is inside your head, "not criticizing you and your friends" means Hhampuz is not my friend because you are criticizing him or, if Hhampuz is my friend and you said you are not criticizing my friends, and you ARE criticizing Hhampuz that means you are lying.
Your statement is - wrong, and makes no sense.

[BitcoinSupremo]

Hhampuz does a great job at managing campaigns and this is being said by one member of the forum that has always been refused to join one of them although I am a much better poster than many average posters of his campaigns. This means only one thing, he is doing a good job.