Hhampuz Reputation Thread

[The-One-Above-All]

I have added Hhampuz to my trust list after the way he handled the latest smear campaign. 

well after he was one of the ONLY people to merit you doxxing a member and placing him and the boards funds in grave danger then we did not expect you would not be feltching him back a little bit.

An trust endorsement from someone this wreckless and dangerous is not really an endorsement.

There is no smear campaign against hhampuz either he accepts and denies persons to his campaigns on the basis of the same fair and transparent rules or he is a corrupt and untrustworthy campaign manager that taints all projects he works for. Simple as that.

Sorry if having to be transparent and fair is something he does not want to abide by.

Funny... You are starting to sound like another QS alt at this point. Fucking fool....

Funny another untrustworthy person coming here to support hhampuz non transparent and dubious looking actions.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.0

[1714251740]

1714251740

[1714251740]

1714251740

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Stop spamming the forum with incoherent, paranoid, borderline schizophrenic bull shit.



Hhampuz is a highly trusted individual here. One Hhampuz is worth a million of you.

[owlcatz]

I have added Hhampuz to my trust list after the way he handled the latest smear campaign. 

At least I have the fucking balls to use my REAL account, UNLIKE you, IDIOT.... BTW, that extortion thread is bullshit made up by Quickseller, at least for my part, so fuck off again.
well after he was one of the ONLY people to merit you doxxing a member and placing him and the boards funds in grave danger then we did not expect you would not be feltching him back a little bit.

An trust endorsement from someone this wreckless and dangerous is not really an endorsement.

There is no smear campaign against hhampuz either he accepts and denies persons to his campaigns on the basis of the same fair and transparent rules or he is a corrupt and untrustworthy campaign manager that taints all projects he works for. Simple as that.

Sorry if having to be transparent and fair is something he does not want to abide by.

Funny... You are starting to sound like another QS alt at this point. Fucking fool....

Funny another untrustworthy person coming here to support hhampuz non transparent and dubious looking actions.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.0

[The-One-Above-All]

Stop spamming the forum with incoherent, paranoid, borderline schizophrenic bull shit.



Hhampuz is a highly trusted individual here. One Hhampuz is worth a million of you.

Bring me the incoherent paranoid schizo bullshit so we can analyse it. That's a challenge right there. Because presenting observable instances is nothing like that. You are lying are you not dip shit?


Did THEY threaten to make you eat unclean ass for a year if you did not post that?
You do realize now we have confirmation that you are Laudas Feltching Clown that your public brown nosing of laudas known gang associates just makes you look more pathetic and weak LOL

It also does nothing to refute the fact that hhampuz seems to be removing persons without giving transparent fair explanation. He looks corrupt and dirty by failing to set of rules for everyone and making them apply equally to every member. This is called corruption and is untrustworthy.

What part of that is difficult to understand for you Laudas Favorite Cumguzzler?

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Paranoid schizophrenia - Constant use of ‘we’ points towards multiple personalities. You’re an absolute fucking weapon of a human being. You need psychiatric help.

It’s observably clear that you invent other people ‘agreeing with your bull shit’.
How come in all these threads where you attack other people’s reputation you’re the only one passionately doing it.

You’re on your own pal, you’re a lonely, sad, pathetic, cuckold.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

Now I wish this was a self moderated thread so you could have filtered the off-topic spam off the thread so when interested forum users or projects hoping to hire you for future campaigns comes to read this reputation thread they won't be discourage (from reading the thread) because of all the nonsense off-topic spam I'm seeing from users their red tagged is like that of BTC during bear market.

[Quickseller]

Scam accusation against Hhampuz https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5147938.0

Your hypocrisy is just laughable. So the fact that I messed up once, means that Hhampuz shouldn't have given me a chance?

Would it be a good idea to allow someone who is known to have just stolen to be a bank teller or other employee with access to money? No of course not, anyone who does that should get fired.

I gave every satoshi during all my campaigns to charity,

So you steal from Peter to pay Paul? Kinda like a Peter pan kinda guy. Good to know.

[The-One-Above-All]

Now I wish this was a self moderated thread so you could have filtered the off-topic spam off the thread so when interested forum users or projects hoping to hire you for future campaigns comes to read this reputation thread they won't be discourage (from reading the thread) because of all the nonsense off-topic spam I'm seeing from users their red tagged is like that of BTC during bear market.

Can you point to some off topic nonsense  you think should be deleted in your opinion?

RED TAGGED users that have been given red tags for presenting observable instances of wrong doing. Obviously you forgot to mention that. Those are the most trustworthy persons on the entire board.

Future campaigns will find ALL hhampuz related threads and read if they are sensible. Censoring this thread would look more shady. Of course where you are from shady shit may pay off but here in the 1st world it catches up with  you.

The real take away from this thread is hhampuz refuses to be transparent about his actions. That is shady.

If hhampuz said

" I will review peoples posts and will review peoples trust history MYSELF and make a decision that if when called to explain my actions I will be able to present it for public scrutiny" that would be fine.

He seems to be saying. I will add and remove who I like based upon some hidden agenda that I am unwilling to present for public scrutiny.
That is shady and opens him and the project up to a  lot of  criticism. Rightly so.

[El duderino_]

@The-one-with-lot-of-BS



Take a few hours of Thank you in advance sir!

[The-One-Above-All]

@The-one-with-lot-of-BS



Take a few hours of Thank you in advance sir!

Watch this challenge.


BRING SOME EXAMPLES OF BULLSHIT AND PRESENT THEM NOW.

Watch nothing happen or just some more stupid memes


I have no care for your opinion until I see some evidence you have the capacity to form something based up on observable instances that makes some kind of sense. You appear to be some noob ass kisser to scammers and their feltchers.

Play human centipede with your pals elsewhere.

[El duderino_]

Boy, I answer to NO one, I don't deal with scammers, and I don't kiss ass.... or its my GF ass that might be the only one...

Proof to present you of BS = your numerous threads all the same, could easily been said in 1 thread!

Your always telling us the exact same sh*t..... BS without any content or whatsoever, and just always trying to accuse people of things they didn't commit!

This forum has so many eyes trying to catch scammers, with you pointing members out and get no support of anyone, that has to speak for itself doesn't it...

Talking with you feels exactly like talking to r0ach in the WO (only about different stuff, but similar guy always the same BS talk)

Just remember when 1 person believes his GF is honest and loyal, but everyone else from friends to family telling you she's cheating then like ALWAYS the majority is right.....

By the way are you even a BTC'er and are you here with reason, or just to be interested in members here? Cause first thing of importance on this forum = BTC, so maybe start talking about that in some threads and leave these places behind, you ain't got anything to bring to the tables here!

[The-One-Above-All]

Boy, I answer to NO one, I don't deal with scammers, and I don't kiss ass.... or its my GF ass that might be the only one...

Proof to present you of BS = your numerous threads all the same, could easily been said in 1 thread!

Your always telling us the exact same sh*t..... BS without any content or whatsoever, and just always trying to accuse people of things they didn't commit!

This forum has so many eyes trying to catch scammers, with you pointing members out and get no support of anyone, that has to speak for itself doesn't it...

Talking with you feels exactly like talking to r0ach in the WO (only about different stuff, but similar guy always the same BS talk)

Just remember when 1 person believes his GF is honest and loyal, but everyone else from friends to family telling you she's cheating then like ALWAYS the majority is right.....

By the way are you even a BTC'er and are you here with reason, or just to be interested in members here? Cause first thing of importance on this forum = BTC, so maybe start talking about that in some threads and leave these places behind, you ain't got anything to bring to the tables here!

So here we see 0 examples provided. Just a bunch of meaningless crap.

Bring me an example of some BULLSHIT that you can demonstrate is BULLSHIT. How hard can it be. Yes, I have far more bitcoin than you. So stop worrying whether or not I'm a bitcoiner.

Bring me an EXAMPLE of something we have posted that is incorrect and you can demonstrate it is bullshit.  

Here you got a merit from your pal for essentially failing my challenge. Have another try.

[Hhampuz]

Please don't go off-topic, I don't want to start reporting posts..

[The-One-Above-All]

Please don't go off-topic, I don't want to start reporting posts..

Well tell them to pull in their false accusations then.

Also if you stop refusing to be transparent then we can leave you to go about your business in peace. There is no need to look shady if you are not shady is there? Why not be transparent if you have nothing to hide.

Any person you refuse should be able to receive a transparent answer that stands up to scrutiny. You can not just hide behind your friends red trust and their gaming of the merit system and defer responsibility to them.

YOU are paid to find the best posters that are NOT scammers. Not just use gamed metrics to ensure your pals get the best spots.

First come first served, unless you can demonstrate they do not meet the threshold of being a good enough poster or they are a scammer. Anything else is discrimination and open to gaming and corruption. It is not difficult to see that asking for transparent fair rules for everyone so that each person is treated equally is the ONLY acceptable way to go.

[El duderino_]

Please don't go off-topic, I don't want to start reporting posts..

Excuse me, will no further respond to him....

Btw keep doing your job sir.

[Hhampuz]

Please don't go off-topic, I don't want to start reporting posts..

Well tell them to pull in their false accusations then.

Also if you stop refusing to be transparent then we can leave you to go about your business in peace. There is no need to look shady if you are not shady is there? Why not be transparent if you have nothing to hide.

Any person you refuse should be able to receive a transparent answer that stands up to scrutiny. You can not just hide behind your friends red trust and their gaming of the merit system and defer responsibility to them.

YOU are paid to find the best posters that are NOT scammers. Not just use gamed metrics to ensure your pals get the best spots.

First come first served, unless you can demonstrate they do not meet the threshold of being a good enough poster or they are a scammer. Anything else is discrimination and open to gaming and corruption. It is not difficult to see that asking for transparent fair rules for everyone so that each person is treated equally is the ONLY acceptable way to go.

You don't even know what you are talking about so why should I give you an answer?

You can ask several of my "pals" that I have removed from campaigns due to several reasons, guess what they are still my "pals". Why are you on a crusade regarding one member? I gave QS an honest chance to earn some BTC for posting for 6 weeks straight and then decided that it no longer looked good for him to be in my campaign while spewing out his bullshit that does no good for the community. I never owe it to anyone to explain why I've removed someone from MY campaigns.

[The-One-Above-All]

Please don't go off-topic, I don't want to start reporting posts..

Well tell them to pull in their false accusations then.

Also if you stop refusing to be transparent then we can leave you to go about your business in peace. There is no need to look shady if you are not shady is there? Why not be transparent if you have nothing to hide.

Any person you refuse should be able to receive a transparent answer that stands up to scrutiny. You can not just hide behind your friends red trust and their gaming of the merit system and defer responsibility to them.

YOU are paid to find the best posters that are NOT scammers. Not just use gamed metrics to ensure your pals get the best spots.

First come first served, unless you can demonstrate they do not meet the threshold of being a good enough poster or they are a scammer. Anything else is discrimination and open to gaming and corruption. It is not difficult to see that asking for transparent fair rules for everyone so that each person is treated equally is the ONLY acceptable way to go.

You don't even know what you are talking about so why should I give you an answer?

You can ask several of my "pals" that I have removed from campaigns due to several reasons, guess what they are still my "pals". Why are you on a crusade regarding one member? I gave QS an honest chance to earn some BTC for posting for 6 weeks straight and then decided that it no longer looked good for him to be in my campaign while spewing out his bullshit that does no good for the community. I never owe it to anyone to explain why I've removed someone from MY campaigns.

I am not focusing on QS. This is something that MUST be established for all campaign managers concerning the acceptance/denial of all applicants. Once this is fixed the red trust abuse and merit cycling is irrelevant to large number of people here so free speech will have a greater chance.
These concepts seems fairly simple. We have no idea why people are not able to see this for themselves.

It is not a matter of "YOU OWING" an explanation to a specific person. There must be transparent fair rules that are applied equally to all persons. What is hard to see about this. Anything else leaves you open to legitimate criticism regarding corruption and other shady practices.

It is not that hard. You need a threshold of posting quality and NOT to be a scammer. Those meet those criteria are accepted on first come first served basis.

If you can when called on it present a case and say look this persons posts are poor quality or look he has scammed that is different. That means you are doing your job fairly and people can see it is a first come first served basis or that all persons are given equally stringent criteria to be selected.

NO PROJECT wants to be accused of hiring someone to game the distribution of new tokens among colluders or be abusing their position or taking back handers from certain people to assure they get on to the campaigns. I mean there are many accusations that could be leveled at a project that hires a community manager that is not able to present a case that stands up to sensible reasonable scrutiny for their selection process.

There is no reason NOT to be transparent other than if you are shady.  Then if you dropped QS and said he was saying things that reflected poorly upon the sponsor this could be examined and verified (if it were true). Of course though you would need to demonstrate what he was saying was NOT the truth. Hiding the truth is very untrustworthy as is punishing someone for speaking the truth.

We are not specifically targeting you. Although your meriting of OG dox seems again to align you with a shady bunch many of whom are wearing sigs from your campaigns. This looks bad for YOU and your projects.

We believe that yahoo91328749 is even worse but we have not look at him yet. ALL campaign managers must be transparent over their decisions or ALL projects that use them are going to be wide open to legitimate criticism. It is just a matter of applying the correct pressure to the correct spots to force projects to be more careful in their manager selection. It is better if all of that could be avoided and you guys just get transparent of your own volition.

All those fighting against transparent fair rules that applied equally to all members must be removed in time. That is the only acceptable way forward.  All members should have a fair chance to say what they want without fear of their incomes being targeted and trashed.

If theymos removes all sigs and allows projects to ONLY advertise directly with the board that could be far more sensible if campaign managers do not makes sure they are being fair.

[Hhampuz]

Why should you decide how I manage my campaigns? I will never do first come first served basis. That's just ludicrous.

[Lafu]

Funny... You are starting to sound like another QS alt at this point. Fucking fool....

Its not QS , its CH behind that !!!!

[DireWolfM14]

Its not QS , its CH behind that !!!!

Yes, it's obviously CH.  Just look through the post history to see her swooning over CH every time some one makes the connection between the two accounts.

@cryptohunter, congratulations you're the first person ever to make it a whole week on my ignore list without the slightest temptation to peak.  Not even a little.  Life here on the forum is way less polluted as a result.