STO vs ICO - FIGHT!

[der_troll]

There is no fight anymore, because IEO have already won all the fights. There are only several projects on the market right now, that do not require help from exchanges to achieve their soft cap, but the majority of projects prefers to make an IEO to achieve their financial goals.

[tavernakava]

So recently I cam across this article in regards to Germany's first STO backed by the German financial regulation authority called Bitbond. What do you think about the evolution of ICOs? Do you see it as a positive or a negative?

I would love to hear what you think about it, would you rather invest into an ICO or and STO? What are the main differences / pros and cons between the two? You can read about Bitbond's STO by clicking on the link below.

https://www.publish0x.com/bitbond-sto/bitbond-first-german-sto-with-security-prospectus-xyewj?a=GELe3POa69

Also check out the blogging platform that the article is written on, it's a new crypto blogging site that pays you for upvoting articles and writing content. It's a nice way to earn some extra crypto. 

Looks a very interesting project, and it's impressive they have raised over 2 million, and they still have another 13 days to raise some more. Not too shabby indeed. They also have a very strong and large team.

[SaRmY]

And the winner of this fight will come out. IEO Now there is a struggle for customers in different ways. But what is better and what is worse, only time will tell. Let's wait a year and see there.

[Ranly123]

The integrity of ICO has been tarnished, and now STO is making some noise. Yet for me, they both share the same priciple and that is to lure investors to put their money to the project they made. In other words, even with the improvement on security for STO, it is not guarantee that scammers cannot leverage on people's money.

[Nolimitz84]

So recently I cam across this article in regards to Germany's first STO backed by the German financial regulation authority called Bitbond. What do you think about the evolution of ICOs? Do you see it as a positive or a negative?

I would love to hear what you think about it, would you rather invest into an ICO or and STO? What are the main differences / pros and cons between the two? You can read about Bitbond's STO by clicking on the link below.

https://www.publish0x.com/bitbond-sto/bitbond-first-german-sto-with-security-prospectus-xyewj?a=GELe3POa69

Also check out the blogging platform that the article is written on, it's a new crypto blogging site that pays you for upvoting articles and writing content. It's a nice way to earn some extra crypto. 

I am currently investing in a decent in my opinion ICO and participate in the IEO.Alas,for some reason I have not met STO until today.Be that as it may, if we compare ICO and STO, I choose ICO in this fight.Participating in an ICO is simply much easier and simpler.

[Dr.Osh]

And the winner of this fight will come out. IEO Now there is a struggle for customers in different ways. But what is better and what is worse, only time will tell. Let's wait a year and see there.

well, you're right, until now, I still often see the development of ICO compared to STO. but, between STO and IEO, I think the IEO is still better. well, and between ICO and IEO, at present, ICO is still a little better, and is in demand nowadays

[leea-1334]

The integrity of ICO has been tarnished, and now STO is making some noise. Yet for me, they both share the same priciple and that is to lure investors to put their money to the project they made. In other words, even with the improvement on security for STO, it is not guarantee that scammers cannot leverage on people's money.

Crypto and ICOs are forever tarnished by the corporates who get together and try to centralize crypto. The projects like Bitcoin Monero and Litecoin will always have the respect of people but when it comes to EOS, XRP, whatever,,, it is impossible to forget how their greed blinded their projects.

STOs and IEOs? They are just exactly the same as ICOs if you ask me. Just dressed up better but equally scammy (my generalization).

[altcoinhoarder65]

So recently I cam across this article in regards to Germany's first STO backed by the German financial regulation authority called Bitbond. What do you think about the evolution of ICOs? Do you see it as a positive or a negative?

I would love to hear what you think about it, would you rather invest into an ICO or and STO? What are the main differences / pros and cons between the two? You can read about Bitbond's STO by clicking on the link below.

https://www.publish0x.com/bitbond-sto/bitbond-first-german-sto-with-security-prospectus-xyewj?a=GELe3POa69

Also check out the blogging platform that the article is written on, it's a new crypto blogging site that pays you for upvoting articles and writing content. It's a nice way to earn some extra crypto. 

It's a decent looking project (The one mentioned above) but honestly I don't see that much of a difference between ICOs and STOs it's the same horse with a different name. Always focus on the project itself, not if it's an ICO, STO or an IEO.

Thanks for the tip about the blogging platform, signed up and already started earning! would recommend the blogging platform to anyone who wants to earn some crypto.

[Ayobami99]

there is no doubt that it is easy and great to invest in a project with evidence of existence rather on unseen results relying on just belief. There is a huge gap between STOs and ICOs that ICOs cannot cover unless they go an extra mile. Many investors will go for regulated STOs rather than ICO because of their past experience

[kewlc3s]

ICO got no future in existing model. No one wants to risk and invest big amounts in ICO, if you could buy later coins from exchanges with at least 50% discount.
Hope STO will be better, without huge risk, might be investors will come back.

[Bunsomjelican]

So recently I cam across this article in regards to Germany's first STO backed by the German financial regulation authority called Bitbond. What do you think about the evolution of ICOs? Do you see it as a positive or a negative?

I would love to hear what you think about it, would you rather invest into an ICO or and STO? What are the main differences / pros and cons between the two? You can read about Bitbond's STO by clicking on the link below.

https://www.publish0x.com/bitbond-sto/bitbond-first-german-sto-with-security-prospectus-xyewj?a=GELe3POa69

Also check out the blogging platform that the article is written on, it's a new crypto blogging site that pays you for upvoting articles and writing content. It's a nice way to earn some extra crypto. 

STO, ICO or IEO for me are not fighting to one another, they are just giving option to all investors and bounty hunters here in this field of business. As long as they are giving profit to anyone here, Well I think they are all good for sure. Remember that ICO is the reason why STO and IEO was made here in the forum, just like what happened into Bitcoin, without it crypto won't also be created, without blockchain for sure Bitcoin won't be created too.

[cepot9]

STO is an evolution of ICO, they provide better investment security than ICO, their law is also real and now it seems that the ICO is being abandoned because now STO gets a new rival, IEO. no matter who is better but this is very good for the future of a serious project and it would be great for the cryptocurrency ecosystem that continues to experience balanced quantity and quality

[Fuhre]

if ICO is compared to STO, and when we criticize investor security issues, STO is the winner. but STO is still something new, if STO in Germany is successful, then the next STO is likely to be born, which is expected to create a solution to the threat of Scam.

[hongus]

As you do not call these projects. How do you not convince investors. If you are a cheater. Nothing will change this. It is difficult today to search for projects. It is difficult to work. And in this confrontation there is probably no winner because there is another new type of IEO.

[thatsnotmyname]

I've invested in all three (ICOs, STOs and IEOs) and they are all flawed. It really depends on the project. I would suggest that if anyone is looking to invest they do their home first.

It doesn't matter what classification they are in, if the project is bad, it will fail. I like the fact they are trying to evolve it though.

Thanks for sharing the content and the blogging platform though, I've signed up and already started earning tokens for upvoting articles, great hidden gem!

[ahmia39]

I've invested in all three (ICOs, STOs and IEOs) and they are all flawed. It really depends on the project. I would suggest that if anyone is looking to invest they do their home first.

It doesn't matter what classification they are in, if the project is bad, it will fail. I like the fact they are trying to evolve it though.

Thanks for sharing the content and the blogging platform though, I've signed up and already started earning tokens for upvoting articles, great hidden gem!

For ICO and STO, there are many who are flawed, but different from the IEO which is made in large exchanges, where the potential profits are very clear and very minimal for defects, because the IEO that has happened in several good exchanges on average they are very successful.

[guoyu78]

So recently I cam across this article in regards to Germany's first STO backed by the German financial regulation authority called Bitbond. What do you think about the evolution of ICOs? Do you see it as a positive or a negative?

I would love to hear what you think about it, would you rather invest into an ICO or and STO? What are the main differences / pros and cons between the two? You can read about Bitbond's STO by clicking on the link below.

https://www.publish0x.com/bitbond-sto/bitbond-first-german-sto-with-security-prospectus-xyewj?a=GELe3POa69

Also check out the blogging platform that the article is written on, it's a new crypto blogging site that pays you for upvoting articles and writing content. It's a nice way to earn some extra crypto. 

I see STOs as the next step in evolution of ICOs but they haven't taken off, hence why IEOs have jumped ahead as they are seen as a better option as STO.

It's an interesting STO as they are backed by Germany, i'm going to do more research into the project. Also thanks for showing the blogging platform, i've signed up and already started earning some crypto.

We have some STOs that has already taken off like the bitbond, I have seen some projects on the internet and they attached themselves to STO, although it is not quite clear if those project seen on the internet are fully recognized by the SEC. Most of the STO project I have seen are not really gaining much attention, not that they are not secured, but after reading their whitepaper, you will realized it is not better than borrowing financial institution money at certain rate.

Opening a microfinance bank pays much more than putting money in STO project because of their very low interest rate, staking would even give more than what STO projects will give one as return on investment.

[adekogbe]

I have come to believe that, STO has a major edge in light of the fact that ICO currently are completely failed and scam-fest, over the most recent years there is a whole lot of nothing ICO that we've seen succeed, there are such a large number of good projects in ICO that have been stopped, ceased and deferred, this is on the grounds that investors have lost trust in this ICO and STO is a decent substitution.
I would rather invest in STO than fall a victim Of scam ICOs

[sergei1703]

Nothing interesting information here... Everyone knows that STO as a model of investment has no promising future. Only ICO or IEO!

[Sartrute]

Many people expected that STO will become a new form of ICO. But at the moment, STO has not gained popularity. Now IEO is very popular. Perhaps in the future the situation will change.