STO vs ICO - FIGHT!

[silver23]

as we know if the ICO is now very denger and has become a field for scammers.
That's why many investors began to go away and choose an other alternatives, that is IEO which is safer than ICO.
STO is the same as ICO and IEO but has a very good security system for investors.
when viewed from an investor's point, it is very clear that STO is superior but requires large costs and difficult steps to be able to start STO.

[Little Mouse]

None of this going ro be established in fund raising area. I think IEO, another form of ICO or STO whatever, is going to take the place. It will be interesting how the market will affect by it like back in the day ICO affect the market.

[pixie85]

We should not compare between STO and ICO. ICO is really dead and is a loser. Protection policy for investors is not available and it cannot guarantee profits for investors. That is the worst when investment demand is increasing.
STO is doing a good job and in the future, good projects will focus on mobilizing capital according to STO.

It's not dead since there are projects that can't be launched in the STO form! How do you imagine a startup company is to gather money in crypto? They can use a gofundme or some other crowdfunding platform but that's it. STO is only for big established companies and ICOs for startups that are yet to launch a product.

There are still some legit people with real ideas who need money to begin.

[surgical_duude]

ICO is really out of date because it has lost confidence from investors in late 2018. STO can be a new form of capital with advantages. Significantly eliminating virtual projects, there are no developers and increased investor confidence in technology projects. STO is considered as an upgrade of ICO that promises to bring investors many new opportunities.

[Alpinat]

I prefer STO right now based on the popularity and the market status. For me ICO is depending also at the current market situation and it makes them fail if the market is not in good condition. I knew many investors that is making money right now in STO so I guess STO is the best choice for now.

[gendang_cinta]

I prefer STO right now based on the popularity and the market status. For me ICO is depending also at the current market situation and it makes them fail if the market is not in good condition. I knew many investors that is making money right now in STO so I guess STO is the best choice for now.

for now ICO is indeed not good enough for us to follow so it might be better to try other ways for example STO and even though it really can't be ascertained if STO is better than ICO because it all depends on time and conditions.

[Nolimitz84]

So recently I cam across this article in regards to Germany's first STO backed by the German financial regulation authority called Bitbond. What do you think about the evolution of ICOs? Do you see it as a positive or a negative?

I would love to hear what you think about it, would you rather invest into an ICO or and STO? What are the main differences / pros and cons between the two? You can read about Bitbond's STO by clicking on the link below.

https://www.publish0x.com/bitbond-sto/bitbond-first-german-sto-with-security-prospectus-xyewj?a=GELe3POa69

Also check out the blogging platform that the article is written on, it's a new crypto blogging site that pays you for upvoting articles and writing content. It's a nice way to earn some extra crypto. 

There is no struggle.Now in the forefront of IEO.A lot of talk was about the benefits of STO, but in fact all the advantages are in the hands of IEO.If in IEO everything is clear how to participate in it, then how to do it in STO few people know.

[trash321]

The support in favor of the majority will definitely be on my part, because I don’t understand why today these ideas are generally shared, in general, it’s the same thing, only today I don’t understand why today it needs to be used in this form

[De_nis]

Of course, STO is safer for investors, but they are too regular and this will negatively affect the start-ups that cannot afford to go through the entire bureaucratic procedure — I hope STO will not replace ICO completely and each type will have its own niche.

[joinfree]

STO which simply means Securityy Token Offering whiles ICO means Initial coin offering are both ways through which investors are given the opportunity to invest into projects. One thing that i have realized is that most STOs have some products which they seek to back their tokens with and to bring it a real value in the long run. ICOs rather have become a hit and run, pump and dump platform where some investors gain profits and others lose big.There are only quite a few of them which are legit though and i think this project has a great plan. Look them up  on their website https://miracletele.com

[iconoclast]

STO are still very immature. So much so that there is not even agreement on what defines an STO. You might get the impression that because it is called a Security Token Offering that it has the attributes of a Security like a Share. You might be in for a big surprise as I have seen many of them where owning the tokens confers no ownership interest and they are just Utility Tokens were someone has bothered to file some paperwork with a regulator.

[Little Mouse]

STO which simply means Securityy Token Offering whiles ICO means Initial coin offering are both ways through which investors are given the opportunity to invest into projects. One thing that i have realized is that most STOs have some products which they seek to back their tokens with and to bring it a real value in the long run. ICOs rather have become a hit and run, pump and dump platform where some investors gain profits and others lose big.There are only quite a few of them which are legit though and i think this project has a great plan. Look them up  on their website https://miracletele.com

STO has been developed and named as IEO. I think IEO will only be there. However, seems like you are shilling for miracletele. I didn't see anything special in this project.

[GregH37]

STO are still very immature. So much so that there is not even agreement on what defines an STO. You might get the impression that because it is called a Security Token Offering that it has the attributes of a Security like a Share. You might be in for a big surprise as I have seen many of them where owning the tokens confers no ownership interest and they are just Utility Tokens were someone has bothered to file some paperwork with a regulator.

I am already seeing the big surprise’s already, first from the offer. I still think that STO is still a joke for now although it looks to me that it is still the safest means of investment for now in crowd funding projects aside IEO, and I see no difference between IEO and STO that much as regard regulation, they are both still being regulated and requires lots of capital for registrations.

The only big difference between both IEO and STO is the profit margin; the gap between them is too wide that people would rather go for IEO than STO. So, I think all the attention of crowd funding should really be on supporting IEO platforms for now since it is still safer that ICO.

[george_hured]

I speak in support of people who say that today ICO and all other similar processes in general have the same goal, why then are they called differently? Probably this was done for a reason. There are always reasons that are not completely clear to us today.

[bluesmoke]

STO's are better than ICO as it takes some responsibility to protect investment and make things reliable. It ensures the development of the project. Be cautious when entering into STO, it also can be scam with fake team, fake idea, wrong information and a group of cheating minded people.

[Odetolala]

I don't see much different between both, to be honest. It's just different approach to the same thing. But I think STOs are much better though, just that it isn't really that effective. In any case, I prefer IEOs because one is guaranteed of immediate listing as soon as the sales are over

[stigmacryptonight]

Actually I prefer to invest in STO, because STO is a project where the project already has the funds to run their project. Unlike ICO, of course ICO is where the project must raise funds. With the aim of running their project. However, if you want to invest in ICO it doesn't matter either. But I prefer to invest in STO.

[restuibu]

I think ICO or STO is same because they have to reach the destination but their ways are only slightly different and need to remember not to look at the project because they hold an ICO and STO but look at the concepts they bring because not all ICO and STO can benefit

[atjiat]

I think ICO or STO is same because they have to reach the destination but their ways are only slightly different and need to remember not to look at the project because they hold an ICO and STO but look at the concepts they bring because not all ICO and STO can benefit

It seems to me that the problem can be solved only realized in the very essence of the problem.  It seems to me that the whole problem was that there was a lot of fraud, and investors did not have the desire to invest in new projects.  More desires were to buy new coins on the stock exchanges, and this of course did not very well influence the development of new projects.  Based on this, you need to somehow solve the problem of fraud.

[Little Mouse]

I think ICO or STO is same because they have to reach the destination but their ways are only slightly different and need to remember not to look at the project because they hold an ICO and STO but look at the concepts they bring because not all ICO and STO can benefit

True that project idea/concept is the main point but you know STO is less risky than ICO. People may come with a good concept and simply raise fund and run away while with STO, it's not that easy to scam people.