Stop badmouthing new projects

[anatolij.shishkin]

Thats part of the circulation of cryptocurrency because critics is there to popularized the cryptos

And ICO is really scamming and only few are legits that we can count by fingers,and those victims are only expressing their anger towards scam team

We have good projects that never launched ICO but only distribute airdrops and they are still alive today, ICO is not a must for every projects, ICO doesn't mean a project will do better, we have many no ICO no Premine coins and tokens that are doing better

And also those projects that launched IEO instead of ICO in which some are successful,though there are some issue that saying it was manipulated by the whales

And there is. If the project entered the market without the help of fundraising from investors. In 99% of cases, it successfully operates in this market. The fact is that the majority of such projects have an excellent team and a finished product. And this is what this market needs.

[Vishnu.Reang]

The problem is that there are a number of good projects being listed currently for ICOs. But the problem is that many such projects, with much potential failed after their listing in the markets earlier. A project needs a minimum of 3-4 years to stabilize. Here the problem is that we don't know whether this development work will continue for the next 3-4 years or whether it will become dormant after the ICO.

[Zurcermozz]

It is because of the project and the team have done before and that is the reason why people don't trust a lot now in new projects, look, many projects are created before , many people invest on it, many people trust on them, but the result is, they keep running away , they keeping stealing the money and leaving the projects and investor nothing. This is the reason why people dont trust projects right now

[jumiapaul]

There's this philosophy that most persons share, which is hinged on the fallacy of generalisation. Its a known fact that most projects don't reach their soft cap and others decided to exit as a scam ICO. Its best not to compare one project with another, because they are established by different teams and have different potential.

[Little Mouse]

Investors treat any new project with some kind of prejudice because many have had a bitter experience from participating in fraudulent projects. Normal and good projects will always be, just need to be able to select them, among other things, slag. And this is the most difficult.

We are used to see how people come with a exclusive concept to build and raise fund but later, we find everything is copy paste. Nothing new, in some cases, no project is being developed and scam investors money. So, toxic words are normal. Apart from that, in bitcointalk, people need to be more patient.

[takngantuk]

basically we don't look down on new projects, but just be vigilant. because everyone knows that there are currently no new projects of high quality and on average have the same concept of projects that already exist. it's no secret that almost 90% of projects now are scam projects and projects fail. people are alert because of this, no one wants to lose. it becomes normal if now people are looking bad at a new project.

[installer]

You may not call every project scam, only because they are not listed on exchanges. I have mentioned that many people are blaming projects for delaying bounty payments for several weeks. Calm down and wait for your rewards, not everything is a scam on this market.

[Christinebeauty]

I also believe in new coins, especially the Veil project you are talking about. It has a very experienced team with a great idea behind the project. I won't be surprised to see it among the top 200 coins on coin market by the end of the second quarter of the year

[Nivelir]

And why do you think that someone scolds them? If you can not collect the right amount of money, then this is your problem! Because people are tired of giving you their money! Heartless people who today use it just sick in the head!

[martychubbs]

That’s a lot to read but what you’re saying is relevant to what is going on now. I also suspect it’s a part of business, to spread ill information about competitive pojects.

[zidanw]

if the projeck uses the ICO method, it is certain that he will get an ugly result due to the list of projects that failed with the method. but if indeed they use the IEO With good Exchange, it can be ascertained that currently the project will be successful in sales

[sandra_x]

The launch of new projects can be a source of innovations and improvement over existing ones but the problem is that most new projects are just copy cats with no improvement. Worse off is the fact that the team of many o them abandon further development as soon as they raise the money or have been able to sell the initial hype,and investors end up with another shit coin.This space can only get better if we investors demand and only sponsor good projects.Some new projects are very nice and we have to sieve through the bulk to get them

[julius caesar]

I agree with the OP that by time, there will be more cryptocurrencies and exchanges that are more innovative than current ones. But, it doesnt mean there will be currency that stronger or more innovative than Bitcoin. I mean that Bitcoin will be always leading blockchain product and if Bitcoin dies, it means that crypto world is dead.

I don't really think of that idea because as I can see, bitcoin is being popular as a cryptocurrency that starts all of it, and through that, what they've just built, is the reputation that they need in order to be steady. I think there is still some cryptocurrencies that are better than BTC even though, it has already a lightning network, still, transaction speed of other altcoins is better.

[fullhdpixel]

You can't tell people to stop saying what they are seeing or experiencing, I want to own a startup in the future, so bad mouthing existing one shouldn't be something I should do, but I just have to do it because most of the project currently in existence don't really have anything to offer to its investors than just promises that might not be fulfilled once they lay hold of the money, because their mind have always been how to make away with the money and not how to deliver value to their investors, I am saying this because I experienced it too.

[No One]

I also side with you on this subject. People keep saying that new coins are always bad and old and established coins are the best investment opportunity. There are many good new coins out there in the market with much potentiality and much to offer. And many new promising coins are coming in the market. So I want to ask my friends not to see all the coins from the same point o view. Just review it and see its whitepaper. New coins have also good things to offer.

[Babbylily1112]

It's evident that old projects have really impacted the blockchian in a very positive way but nonetheless there are very great projects springing up and we don't have to overlook that and we shouldn't be surprised that this new projects will overthrow the old ones

[bebekangsoo]

It's evident that old projects have really impacted the blockchian in a very positive way but nonetheless there are very great projects springing up and we don't have to overlook that and we shouldn't be surprised that this new projects will overthrow the old ones

it all depends on what project and whether the team can develop or not so not all projects new are bad.
before following it or before choosing it you must first know the project so that you understand the project so you are sure to choose it.

[Akpuv]

You cannot blame people of speaking ill of most new projects. If you have been severely hurt in ICOs before, you will surely understand the pain of the people bad mouthing the new unrealistic projects.

[hrunya102]

If the project is not Scam, he will draw conclusions, think that can be improved and corrected. Adequate criticism is always needed.

[Estehmanis]

I don't think 99% of the new tokens are scam in my opinion, only a few new projects are scam and that might be very imprint on the hearts of investors, because that makes the name of the new project no longer trusted