Why blame people for your failure?

[trash321]

Because people cannot be held accountable for themselves and for their actions, it is such people who usually cannot say for sure that in the end they did not do it in such a way as to really have a result. I think that such people always swear at others.

[playboy654]

Definitely we don't know what is happening in the future so blaming someone for the losses is not been a right that in any kind of situation because Crypto market is not predictable by anyone so if something happened to our investment leave that the past is past it will not come again so blaming anyone is not being the solution for that.

[dizzy1996]

Of course, you yourself are responsible for your investments. The project may lose its funds at any time and so do you, so before investing, check the project so that you do not complain about your failures.

[rijaljun]

Bounty hunters are less likely to be investors. They are the ones who work to earn and they have rights to liquidate their payout. That's a reason bounty hunters are always the ones to blame if a project's token price fell. Another reason is because in any condition, most people including me, have a little pride that make us easier to blame others than ourselves.

[shakesbear]

And many of the projects that are on the CMC is a scam in one form or another, of course their price will be a dump. Even in good projects sometimes there is simply no one to invest.

[natka]

Of course, you yourself are responsible for your investments. The project may lose its funds at any time and so do you, so before investing, check the project so that you do not complain about your failures.

I think that this is generally nonsense, if a person cannot see his guilt in his failures.  Any action or inaction is primarily a person’s personal choice, so it makes no sense to talk about how strongly, for example, someone agitated to invest in cryptocurrency, because in any case, everyone made the choice himself.

[xOdiumNostrumx]

Most of the project that held the bounty campaign are trash, simple as that. Remember the Icon, Zilliqa, IOST, Aion etc. campaigns? They have all run bounties and are still in strong top 100 MC positions. Why? Because they are competent and are not just plain money grabs. The guilt of failure is solely on team members of the projects and their poor decisions.

[whirlcoin]

I come across different posts and allegations that bounty hunters are dumpers and they make projects lose it value upon exchange listing. But from my experience with bounties most projects don't offer bounty allocation of more than 5% of the total token sold. So how will 5% dump have a huge effect on the remaining 95% price. And what about projects that don't have bounties but still dump hard on the exchange, is it bounty hunters too?
The bitter truth is that most projects dump because of the ridiculous number of bonuses the team have offered during the tokensale and pre-sale period. Imagine giving investors 70% bonus for their investments, they can decide to sell everything off and be happy with the 70% profit.

the success and defeat are only faced by the investors if it was successful also then the profit will be come under your hands and it will be same for defeat also so if train was meant was going round then the blame was also being faced by only you this is the thing that anyone putting the pressure under every investors at the end if it was not successful.

[Falgorn]

Of course, bounty hunters do not play a significant role in dumping new tokens after transferring them to the stock exchange. Tokens fall in price where ICO teams do not provide for signature campaigns in their ICO.
A few percent of the tokens that are allocated to bounty hunters are of secondary importance compared to the total number of tokens that early investors receive with significant discounts. It is very profitable for them to buy tokens with a discount of 40, 50 and even 70 percent and immediately sell them on the exchange at the price of ICO. Therefore, indeed, the participants of the ICO bounty campaigns cannot significantly influence the price reduction of new tokens; the main role is played by investors' actions.

[mrdeposit]

Of course, bounty hunters do not play a significant role in dumping new tokens after transferring them to the stock exchange. Tokens fall in price where ICO teams do not provide for signature campaigns in their ICO.
A few percent of the tokens that are allocated to bounty hunters are of secondary importance compared to the total number of tokens that early investors receive with significant discounts. It is very profitable for them to buy tokens with a discount of 40, 50 and even 70 percent and immediately sell them on the exchange at the price of ICO. Therefore, indeed, the participants of the ICO bounty campaigns cannot significantly influence the price reduction of new tokens; the main role is played by investors' actions.

You just depreciate the power of bounty tokens. After the bounty, teams usually extends the bounty token distribution time for a perfect reason. They first want to list their token on the exchanges and want to pay the bounty tokens later.

[Mahanton]

I come across different posts and allegations that bounty hunters are dumpers and they make projects lose it value upon exchange listing. But from my experience with bounties most projects don't offer bounty allocation of more than 5% of the total token sold. So how will 5% dump have a huge effect on the remaining 95% price. And what about projects that don't have bounties but still dump hard on the exchange, is it bounty hunters too?
The bitter truth is that most projects dump because of the ridiculous number of bonuses the team have offered during the tokensale and pre-sale period. Imagine giving investors 70% bonus for their investments, they can decide to sell everything off and be happy with the 70% profit.

Not a new thing actually where people do always blame out bounty hunters when they do saw a price drop of the token without even realizing that the main reason
why it dropped is on its investors itself. 5% is too much because most bounty token allocation is on 2-3% as far as I remember.

[Zdraste16]

I come across different posts and allegations that bounty hunters are dumpers and they make projects lose it value upon exchange listing. But from my experience with bounties most projects don't offer bounty allocation of more than 5% of the total token sold. So how will 5% dump have a huge effect on the remaining 95% price. And what about projects that don't have bounties but still dump hard on the exchange, is it bounty hunters too?
The bitter truth is that most projects dump because of the ridiculous number of bonuses the team have offered during the tokensale and pre-sale period. Imagine giving investors 70% bonus for their investments, they can decide to sell everything off and be happy with the 70% profit.

Fully agree with you.  Headhunters have a small percentage of the bounty rewards.  I strongly doubt that 2-5% can have a strong influence on the price of the entire volume, and hunters do not always sell at the first listing, many hold.  Conclusion, do not blame bounty hunters.

[tins]

I come across different posts and allegations that bounty hunters are dumpers and they make projects lose it value upon exchange listing. But from my experience with bounties most projects don't offer bounty allocation of more than 5% of the total token sold. So how will 5% dump have a huge effect on the remaining 95% price. And what about projects that don't have bounties but still dump hard on the exchange, is it bounty hunters too?
The bitter truth is that most projects dump because of the ridiculous number of bonuses the team have offered during the tokensale and pre-sale period. Imagine giving investors 70% bonus for their investments, they can decide to sell everything off and be happy with the 70% profit.

Most of them do not know the peak period of the bounty is the last months of 2017 and early 2018. When the market is very active, and with a few dozen or a few hundred thousand dollars, it is impossible to make a coin dump. And then start on bear market, chaos has created a dump for the whole market. That is the main cause, not caused by bounty hunter

[okala]

I have always made my point clear that any good project will succeed no matter any conditions and any project that base it failure upon bounty Hunter dumping after ICO and listening is just looking for way of exit, because bounty hunters can not do any harm to a good project because they just make up a small percentage.

[cchub]

I come across different posts and allegations that bounty hunters are dumpers and they make projects lose it value upon exchange listing. But from my experience with bounties most projects don't offer bounty allocation of more than 5% of the total token sold. So how will 5% dump have a huge effect on the remaining 95% price. And what about projects that don't have bounties but still dump hard on the exchange, is it bounty hunters too?
The bitter truth is that most projects dump because of the ridiculous number of bonuses the team have offered during the tokensale and pre-sale period. Imagine giving investors 70% bonus for their investments, they can decide to sell everything off and be happy with the 70% profit.

Bounty hunters actully help projects create hype so they benefit the price much more than the opposite. It is so ridiculous to think the opposite!

[jackflag]

I think that for everything that we ourselves do, we must be responsible.  Can we blame someone?  I still like it when they ask what the content is and then they believe the one who sowed that he cannot earn money.

[Ezenwanyi1]

Exactly.
Most projects dump because of the high discount that the team offer to investors.
Even after some withheld bounty hunters rewards for months ,the price of their country continuous to fall .
So technically, it's the  investors that are dumping .

[Genemind]

I certainly agree with you. It's disappointing to know the failure of new projects is being blamed to bounty hunters who are only rewarded few and small valued coins.
They have worked for it yet the blame is still on them which is really frustrating because bounty hunters played a vital role in their token sale. If a project is really successful, no dumping activity could fail them.

[Argoo]

The last year of the ICO team in general rarely pay off bounty hunters. In most cases, they delay it and the fear of a fall in the price of tokens after payments and transfer of tokens to the stock exchange plays a significant role here. I have many ICO campaigns that have not paid theirs. tokens since last year. At the same time, I would not say that these are fraudulent projects.
It’s no use accusing each other now. The situation with the activities of the ICO is now generally very difficult.

[Doell]

Exactly.
Most projects dump because of the high discount that the team offer to investors.
Even after some withheld bounty hunters rewards for months ,the price of their country continuous to fall .
So technically, it's the  investors that are dumping .

Technically investors and bounty hunters are also not to blame ,there is nothing wrong here ,it could be that the project team already has a strategy and all have their own roles its difficult to Say it ,but I think about the most indeed project is not good enough to compete in cryptocurrency