Existing problems totally unsolved

[ife2020]

One of the troubles that derailed ico investment was the dumping of the tokens once it is listed on exchange platforms

Fast forward few weeks; ieos became of the day and seemed as the best crowdfunding way
But even ieos project dump upon listing upon exchanges.

Why is there no corrective effects about this ? If ieos keep dumping upon listing on an exchange
It leaves no difference to an ico

[Adriano2010]

Well was that was a problem, but major problem on my opinion was that a lot of projects was scams, but now who invest on IEOs will have on trusted exchanges will have a good chance and more profit can made.

[joseyphil82]

My advice to those who are still tempted to invest in ICO and IEO is to be very careful especially ICO case ,for IEO they should just only invest in ones from binance or top exchanges only

[dizzy1996]

I do not think this is a problem because the dump does not depend on the exchanges but directly from large investors if the project does not do anything and provides products, then of course investors lose faith in the project and sell immediately after the listing.

[crwth]

I think it's not a problem, and it's just what society is doing with their investments. They want the instant money that they are expecting with their finances. I know that it is going to be what happens every time an ICO and IEO is presented. As long as someone is offering something and there's a way to profit, that's just going to keep on happening.

[ife2020]

My advice to those who are still tempted to invest in ICO and IEO is to be very careful especially ICO case ,for IEO they should just only invest in ones from binance or top exchanges only

Investing in only binance or too exchange is not an outright solution
Ieo tokens on those exchanges, still dump upon listing

Does it mean dumping of tokens is a normal lifestyle of crypto currency tokens ?

[DeepChipolino]

The problem is not crowdfunding.
Most startups remain unimplemented. The release of the assets of such projects into free trade is premature and illogical. However, hundreds of assets are traded on crypto exchangers, which are not collateraled.

[qazgroup]

Yes it is a bit strange because IEOs does not offer big private or pre sale bonuses like regular icos and most even do not have any airdrop or bounty campaign either so dumping of even such coins makes me wonder why people invested if they are selling in loss i mean even if someone needs urgent money he should alao ask not less than ico value there is no point investing if you end up in loss.

[chenille]

One of the troubles that derailed ico investment was the dumping of the tokens once it is listed on exchange platforms

Fast forward few weeks; ieos became of the day and seemed as the best crowdfunding way
But even ieos project dump upon listing upon exchanges.

You are totally right. The dumpings of IEO is even bigger because the people don't need to send their coins to an exchange; they are already there, ready to dump fast whenever the dumpers like.

Why is there no corrective effects about this ? If ieos keep dumping upon listing on an exchange
It leaves no difference to an ico

Projects will notice the problem but I don't see a technical solution in IEO. The best solution is to make to project promising that people don't sell and speculate on holding instead.

Yes it is a bit strange because IEOs does not offer big private or pre sale bonuses like regular icos and most even do not have any airdrop or bounty campaign either so dumping of even such coins makes me wonder why people invested if they are selling in loss i mean even if someone needs urgent money he should alao ask not less than ico value there is no point investing if you end up in loss.

It's the misinformation that bounty people will dump. If the project is good, there's not need to sell the tokens. Projects have to realise it.

[Wale777]

Some corrections will happen when there is wide adoption of blockchain technology by more corporate bodies, investment is not about fast money and one of the problem of dumping is the huge bonus investors get which make them sell below ICO price and still get profit, in the long run it'll become more serious business where investors hodl their investment until it get to appreciable level of growth

[poodle63]

One of the troubles that derailed ico investment was the dumping of the tokens once it is listed on exchange platforms

Fast forward few weeks; ieos became of the day and seemed as the best crowdfunding way
But even ieos project dump upon listing upon exchanges.

Why is there no corrective effects about this ? If ieos keep dumping upon listing on an exchange
It leaves no difference to an ico

The team is the only party can solve that problem and we have a lot of example about how to fix it. You can see how those new platforms that listed on the major big exchange site like binance and any other major exchange site get a lot of demand that created very strong liquidity to the token or asset. Basically, those early investors in IEO can be considered as ICO traders. Did you know what it is? they are all short term holders that only take the advantage at the beginning of IEO. When that IEO has been giving them all decent profit and they dump it immediately and move to another IEO. It can be prevented only by the team to create a good or a lot of updates and good development progress to make them stay.

[CryptoKush]

Many speculators do not want to wait long. In general, I think that entering the stock exchange immediately after launching a project is not correct. The project cannot manage to achieve implementation in such a short time.

[rijaljun]

One of the troubles that derailed ico investment was the dumping of the tokens once it is listed on exchange platforms

Fast forward few weeks; ieos became of the day and seemed as the best crowdfunding way
But even ieos project dump upon listing upon exchanges.

Why is there no corrective effects about this ? If ieos keep dumping upon listing on an exchange
It leaves no difference to an ico

The demand on an initial offering and second market are always different. IEO is not a right choice to solve this problem, when people start feeling bored, it will be the same. IEO is only good to ensure that the token will be listed in no time. Well, I don't know exactly how to solve this problem, but I miss an old way to conduct ICO when the token price is determined by total amount raised funds and people got their tokens from percentage of total token for sale.

[uneng]

If the currency suffers a dump and doesn't recover anymore it's just the signal it's a bad and weak currency. You can consider the dump a feedback of the market about the crypto currency in question. No way to solve this, it's a natural process.
A good currency can survive speculators and their dumps, because there will be always legit investors behind it, backing the currency.

[OluwaTosin10]

There is no need to battle existing problems
Because with the existence of whales who pump and dump at will
Progression will remain on a low for quite a while

[jossiel]

What you guys are expecting with these IEOs? what's the difference between with ICO? the only difference that it has is an specific exchange supports it and will effectively list their token on them as soon as they are done.

Do you guys expect that investors of it are truly into supporting that project proponents? no. They are all in for making profit so don't be discourage if you see dumps coming to such projects that held through IEO.

[vycl87]

Why is there no corrective effects about this ? If ieos keep dumping upon listing on an exchange
It leaves no difference to an ico

I think you've completely misunderstood what is IEO! IEO don't guarantee anything about market price. Yes it can dump and dump again. Don't trust the price which IEO's.

[Desscount]

Well was that was a problem, but major problem on my opinion was that a lot of projects was scams, but now who invest on IEOs will have on trusted exchanges will have a good chance and more profit can made.

I agree with you
but the risk remains the same and there is no guarantee to prevent the scam. even though in some large exchanges
I think there must be an official standard made by the agreement of all exchanges involving IEOs.

[Red-Apple]

Fast forward few weeks; ieos became of the day and seemed as the best crowdfunding way But even ieos project dump upon listing upon exchanges.

it is like this because there is no difference between ICO and IEO apart from the name.
and the dump happens even faster because the IEOs are already listed on an exchange, that is what the letter "E" stands for!

Why is there no corrective effects about this ? If ieos keep dumping upon listing on an exchange  It leaves no difference to an ico

there is no  difference!
the project itself has to be different to have a different result and not get dumped not its name! if i put some dog shit in a bag and put a label on it saying "GOLD" it doesn't change the content of the bag.

[Wintersoldier]

One of the troubles that derailed ico investment was the dumping of the tokens once it is listed on exchange platforms

Fast forward few weeks; ieos became of the day and seemed as the best crowdfunding way
But even ieos project dump upon listing upon exchanges.

Why is there no corrective effects about this ? If ieos keep dumping upon listing on an exchange
It leaves no difference to an ico

Well you can say, there is no difference that these are all altcoins or cryptocurrencies. In that way, we can already say that these happen because of the volatility of the market. In the first place, people, or we, the investors are the determinants to these changes. If we think the price is falling, then we can save it through buying more.