[ANN] EXPI 🔥 POS/MN 🔥 Application for Payment of Your Knowledge 🔥

[John_Silver]

Waiting for a response from the team. Some controversial moments I so understand they decided, but still something that remained

Contraversional moments? Is there something to be cautious about?

As the above has been fairly emotional person, so far no changes have been made in the white paper.

His accusations look... well, disturbing to say the least. But there is something strange about them. AFAIK bitcointalk is very quick about pinning scam warnings on suspicious messages. Sometimes there is no need in solid proofs. Right here there is no warnings pinned and OPs trust isn't red, so there's these accusations probably are not so solid as they look.
Did developers answer something on these accusations?

We hope that they will rewrite the white paper and announce the team.

It doesn't matter to me whether the team will rewrite a white paper or leave it alone, the most important thing is that the team follow the roadmap and inform the community about the news and project updates.

This still needs to be done, otherwise these issues will be raised constantly.

[Umka.Beliy]

Waiting for a response from the team. Some controversial moments I so understand they decided, but still something that remained

Contraversional moments? Is there something to be cautious about?

As the above has been fairly emotional person, so far no changes have been made in the white paper.

His accusations look... well, disturbing to say the least. But there is something strange about them. AFAIK bitcointalk is very quick about pinning scam warnings on suspicious messages. Sometimes there is no need in solid proofs. Right here there is no warnings pinned and OPs trust isn't red, so there's these accusations probably are not so solid as they look.
Did developers answer something on these accusations?

It’s too easy to say “scam” and leave the thread after it. Investors and community need proofs to this words.

Unfortunately lately called scam everything, even without sufficient arguments.

[esofelap]

Waiting for a response from the team. Some controversial moments I so understand they decided, but still something that remained

Contraversional moments? Is there something to be cautious about?

As the above has been fairly emotional person, so far no changes have been made in the white paper.

His accusations look... well, disturbing to say the least. But there is something strange about them. AFAIK bitcointalk is very quick about pinning scam warnings on suspicious messages. Sometimes there is no need in solid proofs. Right here there is no warnings pinned and OPs trust isn't red, so there's these accusations probably are not so solid as they look.
Did developers answer something on these accusations?

It’s too easy to say “scam” and leave the thread after it. Investors and community need proofs to this words.

Unfortunately lately called scam everything, even without sufficient arguments.

I think that if you made some money from that project - that is not a scam for you.

[nutildah]

I think that if you made some money from that project - that is not a scam for you.

Spoken like a true piece of shit. You're basically saying scams are OK so long as you make money.

Who made money from this project besides you? You didn't invest anything in this project -- you were hired by them to spam for them. You'd have to be a complete idiot to invest in this scam.

Plagiarized white paper
No team
Hired bumping service

This project is a scam. Potential investards be warned.

[a.kaetana]

This still needs to be done, otherwise these issues will be raised constantly.

Yes. Right now the situation looks too unbalanced. Though I remember that Tron whitepaper was plagiatrised too, but Tron lives well.
Let's see what will they do next

[Umka.Beliy]

I think that if you made some money from that project - that is not a scam for you.

You are confusing the concept of fraud and failure of the project. Fraud can be very, very successful, but unsuccessful project is not always a fraud...

[kolnides]

Almost every project has its advantages and disadvantages. Masternodes projects have more advantages than other.

[esofelap]

This still needs to be done, otherwise these issues will be raised constantly.

Yes. Right now the situation looks too unbalanced. Though I remember that Tron whitepaper was plagiatrised too, but Tron lives well.
Let's see what will they do next

It must be fixed! I think team need to give answer about it to community .

[ThunderA4DLightning]

Almost every project has its advantages and disadvantages. Masternodes projects have more advantages than other.

Some hold other views and prefer traditional mining.

[Bugatti73]

How does that team increase popularity in nowadays?

[Umka.Beliy]

How does that team increase popularity in nowadays?

Listings on masternode services occur regularly, in the same place and paid for banner advertising. Soon the promise of the second exchange.

[Bugatti73]

How does that team increase popularity in nowadays?

Listings on masternode services occur regularly, in the same place and paid for banner advertising. Soon the promise of the second exchange.

Where is info about second exchange? Do you have any conditions of future listing?

[a.kaetana]

Waiting for a response from the team. Some controversial moments I so understand they decided, but still something that remained

Contraversional moments? Is there something to be cautious about?

As the above has been fairly emotional person, so far no changes have been made in the white paper.

His accusations look... well, disturbing to say the least. But there is something strange about them. AFAIK bitcointalk is very quick about pinning scam warnings on suspicious messages. Sometimes there is no need in solid proofs. Right here there is no warnings pinned and OPs trust isn't red, so there's these accusations probably are not so solid as they look.
Did developers answer something on these accusations?

It’s too easy to say “scam” and leave the thread after it. Investors and community need proofs to this words.

Unfortunately lately called scam everything, even without sufficient arguments.

I think that if you made some money from that project - that is not a scam for you.

Only if you fix the profit and get out just in time. Well, I'd call that a decent strategy too.

[Flangler]

I think that if you made some money from that project - that is not a scam for you.

Spoken like a true piece of shit. You're basically saying scams are OK so long as you make money.

Who made money from this project besides you? You didn't invest anything in this project -- you were hired by them to spam for them. You'd have to be a complete idiot to invest in this scam.

Plagiarized white paper
No team
Hired bumping service

This project is a scam. Potential investards be warned.

Technically he is right, but morally it just doesn't sound right. Some people say that bitcoin is scam. They probably have btt bounty on discord so that's a reason, for that activity on this thread, or maybe it is real. It is so easy to call a project scam and you don't have strong arguments.

[kolnides]

I think that if you made some money from that project - that is not a scam for you.

Spoken like a true piece of shit. You're basically saying scams are OK so long as you make money.

Who made money from this project besides you? You didn't invest anything in this project -- you were hired by them to spam for them. You'd have to be a complete idiot to invest in this scam.

Plagiarized white paper
No team
Hired bumping service

This project is a scam. Potential investards be warned.

Technically he is right, but morally it just doesn't sound right. Some people say that bitcoin is scam. They probably have btt bounty on discord so that's a reason, for that activity on this thread, or maybe it is real. It is so easy to call a project scam and you don't have strong arguments.

Agree with your words, everything could be. A lot of people saying that all cryptocurrency industry is scam but they still invest in it their money.

[nutildah]

I think that if you made some money from that project - that is not a scam for you.

Spoken like a true piece of shit. You're basically saying scams are OK so long as you make money.

Who made money from this project besides you? You didn't invest anything in this project -- you were hired by them to spam for them. You'd have to be a complete idiot to invest in this scam.

Plagiarized white paper
No team
Hired bumping service

This project is a scam. Potential investards be warned.

Technically he is right, but morally it just doesn't sound right. Some people say that bitcoin is scam. They probably have btt bounty on discord so that's a reason, for that activity on this thread, or maybe it is real. It is so easy to call a project scam and you don't have strong arguments.

I've been around here a lot longer than you. I know a scam when I see one. Stick around and see for yourself. Morally its perfect. Spamming for a living is what is un-moral.

[yanoaziz]

I don't know why we should call this project a scam!
team and whitepaper plagiarism don't judge the situation. why? because if the team have some reason to be unknown we can't impose for hem to be on public. and we really know some project like that.
about plagia we know again that writing a whitepaper not easy like we think. especially if the team don't speak English as a mother language.
at last the investor know the risk of investing.

[a.kaetana]

I think that if you made some money from that project - that is not a scam for you.

Spoken like a true piece of shit. You're basically saying scams are OK so long as you make money.

Who made money from this project besides you? You didn't invest anything in this project -- you were hired by them to spam for them. You'd have to be a complete idiot to invest in this scam.

Plagiarized white paper
No team
Hired bumping service

This project is a scam. Potential investards be warned.

Technically he is right, but morally it just doesn't sound right. Some people say that bitcoin is scam. They probably have btt bounty on discord so that's a reason, for that activity on this thread, or maybe it is real. It is so easy to call a project scam and you don't have strong arguments.

All we have to do is to wait. In crypto you never tell a decent project from scam before the project is fully working... and even then there's no guarantee

[esofelap]

I think that if you made some money from that project - that is not a scam for you.

Spoken like a true piece of shit. You're basically saying scams are OK so long as you make money.

Who made money from this project besides you? You didn't invest anything in this project -- you were hired by them to spam for them. You'd have to be a complete idiot to invest in this scam.

Plagiarized white paper
No team
Hired bumping service

This project is a scam. Potential investards be warned.

Technically he is right, but morally it just doesn't sound right. Some people say that bitcoin is scam. They probably have btt bounty on discord so that's a reason, for that activity on this thread, or maybe it is real. It is so easy to call a project scam and you don't have strong arguments.

All we have to do is to wait. In crypto you never tell a decent project from scam before the project is fully working... and even then there's no guarantee

Truly, there are slot of projects with fake team but they are still working.

[holydarkness]

It doesn't matter to me whether the team will rewrite a white paper or leave it alone, the most important thing is that the team follow the roadmap and inform the community about the news and project updates.

It's funny how you judge what's important is their roadmap and updates, kindly allow me to throw this self confession to you, the very one that admin also conveniently "forgot" to answer.

Before showing the team members we have a difficult way to register a company in Estonia. View WhitePaper WP Etherium and Tron and you can also say that Justin Sun from Vitalik Buterin. Believe me, our team did not work on this project. If you knew the cost of developing this application, you would not be talking about the fact that we had enough money to hold an ICO and do everything professionally. In the world of cryptocurrencies you have to survive. Gone are the days when any idea seemed futuristic. Our main task is to make increase coin consumption as much as possible inside our app.

They admitted that they didn't care about any aspect of their project, there's no idea here, no interesting details, only hype and attempts to fool the price. It's kind of fortunate that we're on the cryptocommunity 2.0, smarter people would understand without reasonable feature and working products, hype will eventually lost its power and price will plummet in a blink of eye, which I think is also the reason why this thread is filled with posts from trash accounts talking to each other, real investors know better this project is worthless and wouldn't bother wasting time to ask around.