[HELP] distribution of tokens

[dark1234]

1 Don't allocated so much coins for bounty hunters

Actually, bounty hunters are a group of people that normally hold the smallest percentage of token allocation so we can't really blame them. A study of the bull season will tell you bounty hunters actually have no control on the market... it's always the investors

3 Don't spend so much coins on marketing

Yeah, very true (especially those so-called influencers taking huge sums for virtually nothing)

5 If possible then released bounty token after 6 months of exchange listing. But they should be declared that terms in the beginning otherwise its create fud about the project.

lol..as I said earlier, investors are always to blame for everything. Bounties can be held for years but should the investors (mostly having 50%+ of tokens) spoil the market, nothing can be done to save the day!!

I think back to the project itself ... if the project develops according to the road map and is accepted by the community, the token will last and even increase. And what if it doesn't, the token will fall and have no price
Remember ... bounty hunters only hold no more than 10% of the total tokens even though a dump might happen for a while, I think investors can also make a dump price when they benefit from selling everything because of the many bonuses they get during pre-sales

[diazepam666]

what is the most interesting and safe way to distribute token example (erc20) so that it does not have high dumping in exchange?

There are some people making scripts and software to make the token distribution possible and very easy for the users. Here is my suggestion please contact him at telegram to get help on this mate.

Telegram him @iceman

[btccrusher]

Use custodial funds for any kind of token rewards like bounty or marketing. Give the reward on your platform an lock it for at least six months, so that people who did not participate in the sale, can't withdraw for dumping. Reducing fund allocation won't work, I have seen this before. Do not promise what you can't deliver in time, people dump when they see project failed to meet the roadmap.

[btccrusher]

what is the most interesting and safe way to distribute token example (erc20) so that it does not have high dumping in exchange?

There are some people making scripts and software to make the token distribution possible and very easy for the users. Here is my suggestion please contact him at telegram to get help on this mate.

Telegram him @iceman

Can this script or software stop dump? That's a pretty good feature if it really exists. I wish I had one of the scripts to stop some of my favorite coins dumping. By the way, probably you got him wrong, man, read it again.

[spydee1522]

I know most people still hold the fact and idea that bounty hunters are the ones who always cause dump in tokens and that drastically affects the token price. well good, in as much as some bounty hunters are really hungry, not all of them are hungry enough to dump their tokens for wearing signatures, posting and sharing contents for months and out of this tiresome stress, still decide to dump for a small penny. let us face facts here, which bounty ever or current has or is offering more than even 15% of token allocation? it rarely happens, mostly only 5% of tokens are allocated for bounty and are we saying just the 5% out of the total 100% is has much influence than the remaining 95%? To me hell no. Its high time bounty hunters get a piece of mind and concentrate on their work but I suggest project managers to pay bounty hunters in ETH or BTC to protect their tokens from being dumpped.

[Eildosa]

Usually, a drop in the price on the exchange after a coin listing is not a good sign. The project team is trying to monitor the development of their project and it should make sure that their coin does not fall so low.

[Denongels]

Most of what is done is to provide distribution in stages, but there are a number of ways : distribution every month 5-10% of all bounty allocations so participants only get a little distribution is done by distributing appropriate tokens, but only every week or month is 10-30 the participants who get the reward, the last is to do a method that is hated by hunters which is to make lock tokens for a certain period of time.

[Sundaey]

I think distributing after listening will be good but not too long for you not to see the real dumpers(investor's) and to also have who blame. And send the bounty rewards weekly according to their name on spreadsheet, for example 250 - 300 weekly in a spreadsheet of 1000. You can try it and see how helpful it is.

[lobat999]

I have also seen some projects choosing to list their tokens on exchanges only after they have released the final product which in effect is also a great way to reduce token dumping and should encourage token retention and accumulation instead.

[Redemption59]

well, in my very opinion, not distributing all tokens to both investors, team developers and bounty hunters is key. holding like say 50-50 with investors plus bounty hunters is very phenomenal and this prevents massive dumping. Again, when developers or project leaders put in the effort of paying bounty hunters with ethereum or any other top cryptocurrency, I think it will be a great step to prevent dumping.

[terrific]

what is the most interesting and safe way to distribute token example (erc20) so that it does not have high dumping in exchange?

You run an ICO/bounty? the latest rule that I've read is about the delay to bounty participants.
The investors is a total exception and they can dump after the distribution whenever the token gets listed to an exchange.
While the bounty participants, they are only allowed to transfer or sell after a certain period of time probably after 3-6 months.

[thorRJ]

what is the most interesting and safe way to distribute token example (erc20) so that it does not have high dumping in exchange?

The campaign Bounty depending on the amount allocated will not make a difference in the market, what I see today and the huge amount of bonus, this rather interferes. So not to dump, small amount for the Bounty and also for the bonus.

Project for example with 100% bonus and high dumping at the time of listing.

[Kiweikoo]

what is the most interesting and safe way to distribute token example (erc20) so that it does not have high dumping in exchange?

I don't believe that it's just distribution that cause high dumping of a coin in the Crypto market, there are many factors that could cause this and some of them are: distribution of tokens to people who never worked for it in the name of airdrop, this is one of the thing that causes major dump in the price of a token because the holders of the tokens are not people who bought it during their ICO stage but are people who received the tokens for free maybe for just following their facebook page and putting down their name in a Google spreadsheet.

[agusiska]

i think nobody cant control many people to dont sell their token at lower price, im sorry im pick example bounty hunters, who cant stop them for selling their token at low price, because some of them need fast money, i think nobody can.

[udidrone]

what is the most interesting and safe way to distribute token example (erc20) so that it does not have high dumping in exchange?

If that allocated for bounty, i think your team must be already prepared with anything that people will use from it. And actually, delay distribution will only make a lot of people fud in a project. But that is from what i see when i join some telegram channel.

[Soberb]

Limit the structure of bonus and bounty pool. In general, many of projects allocate excessive amount of bonus and bounty pool so as to attract investors and make the project known to a large number of audiences. But it may affect in the long run and can also help dump tokens upon hitting exchanges. Another most important factor is that the project itself should be very much good and potential. If the project does not have relevant goals and strong team, it will fail in the long run.

[Jonking]

if you are having an ico's limit the tokens for pre sale as investors would be the one who will dump the tokens.. if you are having a bounty campaign limit as well the distribution list..

[veraro]

I believe the main reason why projects can avoid dumping is having very useful and exciting products or at least promising to create it in nearest future. So a lot of people will want to invest and keep this tokens for years. Also good thing will be don't give earlier investors big bonuses, because as a rule they dump price selling this free tokens.

[CryptoBry]

what is the most interesting and safe way to distribute token example (erc20) so that it does not have high dumping in exchange?

Ideally, if the project is fantastic and valuable plus there is a solid community built around it there will be a strong demand for the tokens the project generated and so any dumping from the bounty hunters can easily be swallowed by the demand. Realistically, this is not the scenario that happened as even the token investors can also scramble to let go of their hoard to make immediate profits especially since they are thinking that the dump is coming immediately after exchange placement. So maybe a staggered release of the tokens not just for bounty hunters but even for the investors can help though many investors may not like the scheme save the bounty hunters who have no choice. This is the problem with the crowdfunding projects introduced via ICO, STO or even IEO since many of them are start-ups unproven and have no solid track record on the market yet.

[FanEagle]

what is the most interesting and safe way to distribute token example (erc20) so that it does not have high dumping in exchange?

You run an ICO/bounty? the latest rule that I've read is about the delay to bounty participants.
The investors is a total exception and they can dump after the distribution whenever the token gets listed to an exchange.
While the bounty participants, they are only allowed to transfer or sell after a certain period of time probably after 3-6 months.

You see, anytime a project developer points accusation finger to hunters of causing dumping, it makes me first see the team behind the project as an unreasonable people which make me first judge their projects as one that would fail in future, because if they have the ability to reason far.

Most of them will realize that what they pay to hunter will be impossible to cause dump even if all the participants sell. It is just like recently that Binance lost 7000BTC and people thought it will cause dump for BTC, but in the real life, if you calculate it and compare the ratio to the total market cap of bitcoin, we will see It won’t go far in causing a dump, same as allocations for hunters are so insignificant compared to the bonuses they give to investors which is what they need to cut down.