Bounties with limitations pays higher rewards

[triangles]

for payout problem, in fact, most offer a lot of rewards, but in some bounties it happens because their allocation is also limited and it is usually done on bounties that use bitcoin payments, for general bounties it is very unfortunate that many bounty managers don't limit participants, of course it is detrimental, because each participant only gets a small reward, but some of bounty platforms that I see are actually many who have implemented it.

[Wittny]

Most bounty managers use this tactics to minimize bounty participants for their bounty program which is indeed a great, the lesser the number of participants, the higher the rewards per hunter.

[JuanPaulo]

The best opportunity to earn is in those projects that have long been traded on exchanges and conduct a bounty campaign to attract an additional number of investors.

[Backupnime]

yes of course, because the allocation divided into a few people and of course this makes everyone's payments increase
rather than bounties whose participants are not limited.

limiting user based on account rank is also important because many spammers now participate in several bounties.

Most bounty managers use this tactics to minimize bounty participants for their bounty program which is indeed a great, the lesser the number of participants, the higher the rewards per hunter.

yeah that's a good decision from bounty manager, even for me are missed a few bounties and can't join them because the slot are full

[timmmers]

Only BTC paid campaigns with fixed BTC coin pool has limited amount of participants in bounty rules.
While bounty campaigns paid tokens doesn't have any limits for participants in most cases.

[SMOKEU]

i agree.. higher payouts.. but the problem is if the project is legit.. time and effort is wasted if they are scam

[miklesm]

Limitations of the participants for Bounty campaigns are good for goth hunters and project. Participants get higher rewards, while the project do not get thousands of fake likes and retweets looking very suspicious.

[hongus]

Of course, large projects make different constraints on the participants. This is done so that the hunters would earn more. Can also put conditions for hunters on quality. Let's say in the project Veil seriously reacted to the restrictions and do not take fake Facebook accounts.

[other_side]

It all depends on the value of the rewards.
No matter how many rewards or how huge you get it would always comes down to the price.
So even if you receive plenty of token it wouldn't matter if the value is zero .
Besides they open up a bounty program because they want to be promoted by as many as possible so why would they limit the participants?

There are many bounty after the distribution of their price bonuses still increases. This year I think that the project I am working on for the IEO will cause it to increase several times compared to the price of IEO. And those who join the bounty of Harmony will also sell more money

[ameliana]

right, limiting the number of bounty hunters might be a good way to do so that the bounty hunter gets a pretty big bounty and that would make the bounty more attractive to many people and that would make the bounty better because most bounties now waste time.

[giletto]

RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN = HIGHER PAYOUTS

The limitations can be done in two ways:

1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.

Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign

2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.

Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.

This is true. That is why some bounty platforms like bountyhive and bounty0x pay better. They have caps. Bitcointalk bounties without strict rules and limitations are usually marred by fraud from participants. Imagine a Telegram Bounty with over 5000 participants on the Spreadsheet and 1k members in the project group. Pathetic

[Spider A4]

I think participants limitation is dosen't matter if bounty manager will select valuable hunter. After that automatically which participant reward will increased. Because majority of the hunters to be get rejected. Otherwise must be limitation in bounty campaign.

[Iccang161096]

RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN = HIGHER PAYOUTS

The limitations can be done in two ways:

1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.

Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign

2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.

Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.

It's depends on the project you are following. Each bounty project pays with their own token/coin. Each of the token/coin they give to bounty participants can be said to be low or high if we look at the total supply of the project ... We can only value that if they have already listed the market they promised

[shakesbear]

Recently there have been very few bounty hunters, so there were no limitions, but we all see that the market is alive, the forum and telegram are more active, so I think we should start to see new bounty. Even the old scams started to come alive - it's a miracle.

[Anonylz]

This is not often the case, bounties with such limitations are mostly already trading in the exchange and the bm trying to make sure only those who actually meet the requirements are taken, but do they bring high reward! not necessarily, only that there is 100% guarantee that there is market to trade or sell your token/coin after the end of bounty, the waiting period for an exchange listing has been eliminated,
If you observe closely, any bounty already trading in any exchange is sometimes carries limitations than the yet to be listed bounty, and the bounty pool is always small too.

[Wingo]

RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN = HIGHER PAYOUTS

The limitations can be done in two ways:

1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.

Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign

2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.

Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.

Unless they are not a scam project. There are few bounties that requires a limited amount of participants. The primary goal of bounties is to grow their community and have a wider range of broadcasting information about their project. Conducting a bounty is an additional marketing strategy for the project. Usually, limiting the number of participants is according to the rules of the bounty manager and not primarily from the company behind the project itself.

I join some bounties with limited number of participants, some are quite successful and some failed. And yeah, they give a nice amount.

[aditasetia123]

Recently there have been very few bounty hunters, so there were no limitions, but we all see that the market is alive, the forum and telegram are more active, so I think we should start to see new bounty. Even the old scams started to come alive - it's a miracle.

the number of bounty hunters now very much.and if bounty manager didn't limiting participant in their campaign they could be super busy to check all of their work.and it's very rare to find manager that limiting participants, except on campaign that paid using btc.

[wenwen]

You misunderstand the essence of the bounty program. It is voluntary and optional. Therefore, the organizers are entitled to decide how many participants should be at their bounty. Bounty program is created to popularize the project. Therefore, the more participants the higher the probability of financial success of the project. And it also lower the probability that you will be deceived.

[levvv]

RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN = HIGHER PAYOUTS

The limitations can be done in two ways:

1)Quantative — when a max number of participants is set and no one is allowed to join after that.

Example: Max 1000 entrants in a facebook campaign

2)Qualitative — when the requirements are raised up by the bounty managers.

Example: Minimum 500 followers to participate in an article/blogging campaign.

The limitations and restrictions can make the rewards higher indeed, but it can reduce the number of hunters too.
I think the most campaign filled by hunters is the content creation campaign.
Maybe limitations will be required in content creation campaign, so the hunters won't make copy paste articles.

[Augustyusuf]

absolutelly right, few participant mean more rewards will we get, because divide by few people, not divide over 1k people.