Did we actually really land on moon?

[BADecker]

It's the same foil you wrap your fish in.

https://i.imgur.com/uUGyhJl.jpg

Don't we wrap our fish in newspaper?     

What is "Newspaper?"

Most cities and towns still have it. Check out Phoenix - https://www.yellowpages.com/phoenix-az/newspapers.

To produce the trees that such archaic sheets might come from would require a high energy output from a source in the sky.

Such a source could be triangulated, and the size and total output in joules estimated. Also, it's distance from the Earth could be computed to a first approximation by an eight grade student.

That would require no flat earth. Since we are, according to Noblabman, on a flat earth, there could be no trees and hence no newspapers.

You are clearly delusional.

Thank you. I haven't read the comics in a newspaper for a long time, much less anything else. However, I buy one now and again for packing, or for placing my freshly polished shoes on.

Btw, the triangulation isn't all that precise, and it is automatic. I just look and do. Do you think it would work on a flat earth the same way?

[1715605743]

1715605743

[1715605743]

1715605743

[1715605743]

1715605743

[Spendulus]

It's the same foil you wrap your fish in.

https://i.imgur.com/uUGyhJl.jpg

Don't we wrap our fish in newspaper?     

What is "Newspaper?"

Most cities and towns still have it. Check out Phoenix - https://www.yellowpages.com/phoenix-az/newspapers.

To produce the trees that such archaic sheets might come from would require a high energy output from a source in the sky.

Such a source could be triangulated, and the size and total output in joules estimated. Also, it's distance from the Earth could be computed to a first approximation by an eight grade student.

That would require no flat earth. Since we are, according to Noblabman, on a flat earth, there could be no trees and hence no newspapers.

You are clearly delusional.

Thank you. I haven't read the comics in a newspaper for a long time, much less anything else. However, I buy one now and again for packing, or for placing my freshly polished shoes on.

Btw, the triangulation isn't all that precise, and it is automatic. I just look and do. Do you think it would work on a flat earth the same way?

No. Not at all. Even a long time ago, those targeting guns on battleships knew they had to use spherical trigonometry. Their triangles went from the center of the earth outwards.

In spherical trig, you can have a triangle up to 900 degrees, where in flat world, it would be 180.

This is why there are very few Flat Earthers around today. Whenever a Flat Earth Country went to war, they all got killed off by the more accurate targeting of Round Earthers.

[notbatman]

I'm just going to leave this here:



The Top 10 Reasons I Don't Trust NASA -- https://youtu.be/pEE7OPKLhaM

[notbatman]

^^^ Just kill yourself now and get it over with.

[Astargath]

I'm just going to leave this here:



The Top 10 Reasons I Don't Trust NASA -- https://youtu.be/pEE7OPKLhaM

Yeah mate leave that there, try to ignore the answers from nutildah as much as possible, they might just disappear. Admit you lost the argument, you have no reply to what he said, you fucking dishonest liar.

[notbatman]

I'm just going to leave this here:



The Top 10 Reasons I Don't Trust NASA -- https://youtu.be/pEE7OPKLhaM

Yeah mate leave that there, try to ignore the answers from nutildah as much as possible, they might just disappear. Admit you lost the argument, you have no reply to what he said, you fucking dishonest liar.

I post video of NASA manufacturing evidence and somehow that makes me a dishonest liar? Please explain.

BTW #4 "NASA caught faking the Moon landings" is especially relevant to this thread: https://youtu.be/pEE7OPKLhaM?t=871

I've got them "red handed" why does that make me the dishonest liar, I don't understand?

[Spendulus]

....

I post video of NASA manufacturing evidence and somehow that makes me a dishonest liar? Please explain.

BTW #4 "NASA caught faking the Moon landings" is especially relevant to this thread: https://youtu.be/pEE7OPKLhaM?t=871

I've got them "red handed" why does that make me the dishonest liar, I don't understand?

If you've got someone "red handed," I have no clue where and how and on what subject.

That link is a rambling, nonsensical thing with unfounded assertions and bad photography/video.

If you've got an assertion to make, make it directly.

I'm all ears.

And let's get back to that cardboard. Still waiting for proof on the cardboard.

[BADecker]

I'm just going to leave this here:



The Top 10 Reasons I Don't Trust NASA -- https://youtu.be/pEE7OPKLhaM

Yeah mate leave that there, try to ignore the answers from nutildah as much as possible, they might just disappear. Admit you lost the argument, you have no reply to what he said, you fucking dishonest liar.

I post video of NASA manufacturing evidence and somehow that makes me a dishonest liar? Please explain.

BTW #4 "NASA caught faking the Moon landings" is especially relevant to this thread: https://youtu.be/pEE7OPKLhaM?t=871

I've got them "red handed" why does that make me the dishonest liar, I don't understand?

Manufacturing evidence doesn't have anything to do with the fact (or not) that we landed on the moon.

[notbatman]

DOTR can't come soon enough...

"... "NASA caught faking the Moon landings" is especially relevant to this thread: https://youtu.be/pEE7OPKLhaM?t=871 ..."

"... That link is a rambling, nonsensical thing with unfounded assertions and bad photography/video. ..."

Hey shit for brains, why don't you actually watch the video before commenting?

[BADecker]

^^^ How did you know my daughter is coming for a visit?     

[Astargath]

I'm just going to leave this here:



The Top 10 Reasons I Don't Trust NASA -- https://youtu.be/pEE7OPKLhaM

Yeah mate leave that there, try to ignore the answers from nutildah as much as possible, they might just disappear. Admit you lost the argument, you have no reply to what he said, you fucking dishonest liar.

I post video of NASA manufacturing evidence and somehow that makes me a dishonest liar? Please explain.

BTW #4 "NASA caught faking the Moon landings" is especially relevant to this thread: https://youtu.be/pEE7OPKLhaM?t=871

I've got them "red handed" why does that make me the dishonest liar, I don't understand?

Still ignoring the argument nutildah presented several times destroying your stupid logic i see. What makes you a dishonest liar is that, which is what i said in my post

[notbatman]

^^^ The fucker claimed the Moon rock given to the dutch prime minister by Buzz valued at $380,000 was stolen by thieves and replaced with a fake.


^{Source: Google}

All the evidence for the Moon landing is manufactured and it's not because thieves broke into NASA and switched it all with fakes!

**Queue Mission Impossible theme song**

[notbatman]

@nutildah there's nothing wrong with the story I linked, the rock is a proven fake.

Q: what about all the other moon rocks that aren't fake?
A: There are no Moon rocks that aren't fake; the Moon is not a physical object.

Q: Why are people paying massive amounts of money for them if they are fake?
A: Same reason people massive amounts of money for gold coated tungsten bars; they're fooled into thinking they're real.

Q: Why hasn't any other country that received moon rocks during the goodwill tour come forward and had similar stories published about their reception of fake rocks?
A: No motivation to do so.

Just a FIY, fossilized wood is considered a "rock".

[Spendulus]

@nutildah there's nothing wrong with the story I linked, the rock is a proven fake.

Q: what about all the other moon rocks that aren't fake?
A: There are no Moon rocks that aren't fake....

I only need to look at a rock under a 20-50x power magnification to tell you it's from the Moon, and I have done that multiple times.

Anyone with a couple of semesters of geology could do this.

You are either very ignorant or outright lying.  All the Moon rocks I have looked at were actual Moon rocks from, duh... the Moon.

And you've repeatedly, and provably, misrepresented the facts on the story you linked to.

[Spendulus]

"... "NASA caught faking the Moon landings" is especially relevant to this thread: https://youtu.be/pEE7OPKLhaM?t=871 ..."

"... That link is a rambling, nonsensical thing with unfounded assertions and bad photography/video. ..."

Hey shit for brains, why don't you actually watch the video before commenting?

I did watch it, and you've got my response.

... That link is a rambling, nonsensical thing with unfounded assertions and bad photography/video. ..

If there's anything there that supports anything you've claim, please provide a start point for that section in minutes and seconds and I'll check it once more.

See how easy and polite I am? No need to insult people.

[Astargath]

@nutildah there's nothing wrong with the story I linked, the rock is a proven fake.

Q: what about all the other moon rocks that aren't fake?
A: There are no Moon rocks that aren't fake....

I only need to look at a rock under a 20-50x power magnification to tell you it's from the Moon, and I have done that multiple times.

Anyone with a couple of semesters of geology could do this.

You are either very ignorant or outright lying.  All the Moon rocks I have looked at were actual Moon rocks from, duh... the Moon.

And you've repeatedly, and provably, misrepresented the facts on the story you linked to.

Notbatman refuses to do any experiments on his own, he admitted not having any type of science degree and yet he still claims stupid shit without even testing it. What do you see when you look at a moon rock under the microscope notbatman?

[notbatman]

@Spendulus I've timestamped the link to the most relevant part. The video came from NASA and they're perpetrating a hoax in it!

#4 "NASA caught faking the Moon landings" -- https://youtu.be/pEE7OPKLhaM?t=871



@nutildah the Moon is real just not a solid object. Tides are a question for the Flat Earth thread...

[Spendulus]

@Spendulus I've timestamped the link to the most relevant part. The video came from NASA and they're perpetrating a hoax in it!

#4 "NASA caught faking the Moon landings" -- https://youtu.be/pEE7OPKLhaM?t=871

No, that is the part I watched and I meant exactly what I said.

"... That link is a rambling, nonsensical thing with unfounded assertions and bad photography/video. ..."

I'll go further.

TERRIBLE photography/video.

But if there's something there that convinces you of something , please explain what it is exactly.

[notbatman]

^^^ NASA is documented hoaxing an image of the Earth in their window you fucking douchebag.

[Astargath]

^^^ NASA is documented hoaxing an image of the Earth in their window you fucking douchebag.

Is it now? Because what, a youtube video says so? Is that how you do your research? Now wonder you believe in stupid shit if you simply believe any youtube video. Oh look a youtube video says nasa faked something, it must be true.