Did we actually really land on moon?

[Spendulus]

The "photographs" NASA provides shows they landed a tinfoil wrapped cardboard box with a facade of tar paper, curtain rods, cellophane tape and BMX brand bicycle parts on a Los Vegas movie set.....

And eclipses are ...

[1714967411]

1714967411

[1714967411]

1714967411

[1714967411]

1714967411

[1714967411]

1714967411

[notbatman]

... not caused by a giant heavy ball in the sky blocking the Sun.

[TimeBits]

The "photographs" NASA provides shows they landed a tinfoil wrapped cardboard box with a facade of tar paper, curtain rods, cellophane tape and BMX brand bicycle parts on a Los Vegas movie set.









@scopatumana, so you believe that men rode on top of rockets and went to the Moon?

Dey did but dey wan out of deditated wam to wun the pc`s and it is a painfullly proceessor to make it again.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16MMZJlp_0Y

[Spendulus]

I don't think so many people would participate on a farce like that. You say technology on that time didn't look sufficient to take men to the moon, but governments always have access to more advanced technology than civilians: there are technologies governments are using now that we, common citizens, will access only in 10 years or even more.

Men just don't go there too often because it's an expensive trip and there isn't any practical benefit on that. During 60's it had, besides it was an unexplored area, Usa had to show strength towards Urss.
All these speculations that men didn't land on moon come from communists that had to demoralize the americans deed and for that, they used their puppets, the hippies and similars.

This is actually the correct answer and what has actually happened.

[TimeBits]

I don't think so many people would participate on a farce like that. You say technology on that time didn't look sufficient to take men to the moon, but governments always have access to more advanced technology than civilians: there are technologies governments are using now that we, common citizens, will access only in 10 years or even more.

Men just don't go there too often because it's an expensive trip and there isn't any practical benefit on that. During 60's it had, besides it was an unexplored area, Usa had to show strength towards Urss.
All these speculations that men didn't land on moon come from communists that had to demoralize the americans deed and for that, they used their puppets, the hippies and similars.

This is actually the correct answer and what has actually happened.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsjWEDSkbUU  "Buzz Aldrin - Never went to the moon"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16MMZJlp_0Y  I'd go to the moon, but we don't have that technology anymore - NASA Astronaut Don Pettit

I mean what else do you need bud? There is double shadows all over the shit, water bubbles and a bunch of stuff that makes no sense.

look I don`t think the earth is flat, but I think the space mission was b.s., and I think the bankers killed JFK.

[Spendulus]

I don't think so many people would participate on a farce like that. You say technology on that time didn't look sufficient to take men to the moon, but governments always have access to more advanced technology than civilians: there are technologies governments are using now that we, common citizens, will access only in 10 years or even more.

Men just don't go there too often because it's an expensive trip and there isn't any practical benefit on that. During 60's it had, besides it was an unexplored area, Usa had to show strength towards Urss.
All these speculations that men didn't land on moon come from communists that had to demoralize the americans deed and for that, they used their puppets, the hippies and similars.

This is actually the correct answer and what has actually happened.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsjWEDSkbUU  "Buzz Aldrin - Never went to the moon"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16MMZJlp_0Y  I'd go to the moon, but we don't have that technology anymore - NASA Astronaut Don Pettit

I mean what else do you need bud? There is double shadows all over the shit and everything.

Bah.

Flight transcript of Apollo 11.

https://historycollection.jsc.nasa.gov/JSCHistoryPortal/history/mission_trans/apollo11.htm

Online virtual copy of the Apollo Flight Computer.

You can program it yourself and see what it did. It was really the first personal computer. The first PC.

http://svtsim.com/moonjs/agc.html

[TimeBits]

I don't think so many people would participate on a farce like that. You say technology on that time didn't look sufficient to take men to the moon, but governments always have access to more advanced technology than civilians: there are technologies governments are using now that we, common citizens, will access only in 10 years or even more.

Men just don't go there too often because it's an expensive trip and there isn't any practical benefit on that. During 60's it had, besides it was an unexplored area, Usa had to show strength towards Urss.
All these speculations that men didn't land on moon come from communists that had to demoralize the americans deed and for that, they used their puppets, the hippies and similars.

This is actually the correct answer and what has actually happened.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsjWEDSkbUU  "Buzz Aldrin - Never went to the moon"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16MMZJlp_0Y  I'd go to the moon, but we don't have that technology anymore - NASA Astronaut Don Pettit

I mean what else do you need bud? There is double shadows all over the shit and everything.

Bah.

Flight transcript of Apollo 11.

https://historycollection.jsc.nasa.gov/JSCHistoryPortal/history/mission_trans/apollo11.htm

Online virtual copy of the Apollo Flight Computer.

You can program it yourself and see what it did. It was really the first personal computer. The first PC.

http://svtsim.com/moonjs/agc.html

Bah Bah black sheep have you any wool?

nice more forgery, sick movie script.

Btw why is all that stuff classified for years before it is released, the tax payers should know what is going on, they fund the shit.
why is stuff like this censored? https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/document/cia-rdp79b00752a000300070001-8  "SANITIZED COPY"  like it is a book for ffs and you remove 200 pages of the 250

[notbatman]

Google made me complete captchas for 30 mins straight for this post.  



Source: https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/document/cia-rdp86-00513r001343720008-3

[af_newbie]

Google made me complete captchas for 30 mins straight for this post.  

Source: https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/document/cia-rdp86-00513r001343720008-3

And in the same document, the very next defended dissertation is on the measurement of gravity at sea using the pendulum method.

You conveniently skipped that one.  Why?

[BADecker]

^^^ Maybe notbatman was the only one who landed on the moon, and that is why he knows the earth is flat.

[notbatman]

Google made me complete captchas for 30 mins straight for this post.  

Source: https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/document/cia-rdp86-00513r001343720008-3

And in the same document, the very next defended dissertation is on the measurement of gravity at sea using the pendulum method.

You conveniently skipped that one.  Why?

There's another thread in the off-topic section better suited for discussing the acceleration commonly referred to as gravity, since you feel the need to change the subject. An electrically active firmament when described by Coulombs Law explains how up & down works. The force pushing on objects (a seporate phenomenon from up & down) is pressure from both the air and the aether (a gaseous substance so fine it penetrates everything).

There's a mirrored dome (firmament) above us and the Moon is not a physical (solid) object; it's a 32 mile wide projected light. It's not possible to travel to the Moon, there's nothing to land on!

[af_newbie]

Google made me complete captchas for 30 mins straight for this post.  

Source: https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/document/cia-rdp86-00513r001343720008-3

And in the same document, the very next defended dissertation is on the measurement of gravity at sea using the pendulum method.

You conveniently skipped that one.  Why?

There's another thread in the off-topic section better suited for discussing the acceleration commonly referred to as gravity, since you feel the need to change the subject. An electrically active firmament when described by Coulombs Law explains how up & down works. The force pushing on objects (a seporate phenomenon from up & down) is pressure from both the air and the aether (a gaseous substance so fine it penetrates everything).

There's a mirrored dome (firmament) above us and the Moon is not a physical (solid) object; it's a 32 mile wide projected light. It's not possible to travel to the Moon, there's nothing to land on!

I think it is you who changed the subject from the moon landing to "flat Earth" and "firmament" providing some obscure source.  I just pointed out that your PDF source also discussed how to measure gravity using the pendulum method, completely invalidating your "flat Earth" model.
Thanks to gravity all objects in the known universe coalesce to form spherical objects where the distance to the center of mass is more less the same anywhere on the surface of the object.

You selectively filter information to fit your contrived delusion.

[Spendulus]

I don't think so many people would participate on a farce like that. You say technology on that time didn't look sufficient to take men to the moon, but governments always have access to more advanced technology than civilians: there are technologies governments are using now that we, common citizens, will access only in 10 years or even more.

Men just don't go there too often because it's an expensive trip and there isn't any practical benefit on that. During 60's it had, besides it was an unexplored area, Usa had to show strength towards Urss.
All these speculations that men didn't land on moon come from communists that had to demoralize the americans deed and for that, they used their puppets, the hippies and similars.

This is actually the correct answer and what has actually happened.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsjWEDSkbUU  "Buzz Aldrin - Never went to the moon"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16MMZJlp_0Y  I'd go to the moon, but we don't have that technology anymore - NASA Astronaut Don Pettit

I mean what else do you need bud? There is double shadows all over the shit and everything.

Bah.

Flight transcript of Apollo 11.

https://historycollection.jsc.nasa.gov/JSCHistoryPortal/history/mission_trans/apollo11.htm

Online virtual copy of the Apollo Flight Computer.

You can program it yourself and see what it did. It was really the first personal computer. The first PC.

http://svtsim.com/moonjs/agc.html

Bah Bah black sheep have you any wool?

nice more forgery, sick movie script.

Btw why is all that stuff classified for years before it is released

When you can run the Apollo Flight computer, or download the code, or buy a replica on Ebay, it's laughable you would suggest it was fake.

We can trace the development of computers prior to, and after the AFC. Parts of the OEM items are still available for examination.

therefore, we had a flight computer capable of the operations of the Apollo program. The Apollo astronauts used a sextant and a telescope to figure orbits. The design of each exists and that they worked and will work is a fact.

Hence, we do know how to get to the Moon and get back.

[TimeBits]

When you can run the Apollo Flight computer, or download the code, or buy a replica on Ebay, it's laughable you would suggest it was fake.

We can trace the development of computers prior to, and after the AFC. Parts of the OEM items are still available for examination.

therefore, we had a flight computer capable of the operations of the Apollo program. The Apollo astronauts used a sextant and a telescope to figure orbits. The design of each exists and that they worked and will work is a fact.

Hence, we do know how to get to the Moon and get back.

I don`t think the computer was fake and I never suggested it was . I suggested the transcripts you gave me to be fake, which they are no proof at all and anyone could of written those at any time, it is like a movie script you gave me as proof. I guess I am suppose to believe in the Bible to and Quran/Tanakh because they were written on paper?

I think the moon mission was fake, why? because of these 3 (main reasons) not because of any computer.

Buzz Aldrin himself says he does not go https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsjWEDSkbUU
The moon rock turned out to be fake https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html
We could not go back for a long time https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16MMZJlp_0Y  I'd go to the moon, but we don't have that technology anymore - NASA Astronaut Don Pettit

Now have I have 10 other minor reasons, like the shadows, the gravity, the water bubbles and a bunch of other stuff (wind blowing on a flag) etc.

I am not a flat earther. I know the whole flat earth propaganda was to throw people off from the money. Which is the main thing everyone should be talking about.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5151153.0




I do think they went to the moon later (than they said) with robot/drones and put some metal thing there so they could say they put some metal plate in when we shine lasers to prove we were there, funny how that metal plate being put in is not in your transcripts, just another anti proof by nasa themselves.

Show me in the transcripts where you see "retroreflector" and think about that word they made, retro reflector.


"I met Buzz Aldrin and it did not seem like he went to the moon" -Theo Von 
He says it on JRE podcast at some point.

[exemplaar]

Space may be the final frontier, BUT it is made in hellwood basement

[BADecker]

^^^ So you agree that we actually landed on the moon! Thanks for the thumbs up.

[TimeBits]

Space may be the final frontier, BUT it is made in hellwood basement

yah was there not like 20 layers on Obama`s birth cert? released right from the government website.

[Spendulus]

Space may be the final frontier, BUT it is made in hellwood basement
...

yah was there not like 20 layers on Obama`s birth cert? released right from the government website.

I'm not sure why you are pushing these lies and propaganda items. There were x number of layers in Obama's BC because that's the structure of the PDF file, nothing to do with the government.

It's interesting how truly dumb this discussion is. There was nothing like photoshop in the days of Apollo.

As for the Earthrise photos, you and whatever paid shill did that picture are truly idiots.

The Earth is in the same position in the Lunar sky, when viewed from the surface. This is because the Moon orbits the Earth with the same side facing the Earth always.

It does not "rise" like the Moon does on Earth. When photos are taken from a ship orbiting the Moon, then of course the Earth will at one point rise above the horizon.

[TimeBits]

Space may be the final frontier, BUT it is made in hellwood basement
...

yah was there not like 20 layers on Obama`s birth cert? released right from the government website.

I'm not sure why you are pushing these lies and propaganda items. There were x number of layers in Obama's BC because that's the structure of the PDF file, nothing to do with the government.

It's interesting how truly dumb this discussion is. There was nothing like photoshop in the days of Apollo.

As for the Earthrise photos, you and whatever paid shill did that picture are truly idiots.

The Earth is in the same position in the Lunar sky, when viewed from the surface. This is because the Moon orbits the Earth with the same side facing the Earth always.

It does not "rise" like the Moon does on Earth. When photos are taken from a ship orbiting the Moon, then of course the Earth will at one point rise above the horizon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jk3KRxTfkLM Sheriff Joe Arpaio Releases New Information on President Obama's Birth Certificate (FNN)

[notbatman]

WikiLeaks ( JULIAN ASSANGE ) Releases MOON LANDING Cut Scenes Filmed In Nevada Desert (A MUST WATCH) -- https://youtu.be/Z3FJ2dhr-aA