No knowledge is lost.

[Novatech8]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

[Avirunes]

What exactly do you mean by No-ICO projects? Give an example so that people understand what you are asking. Projects have more control if they hold funding through ICO. So in that way it gives scammer chance to set a trap since there is no third party to look over it.

[Grishanya1234]

I can not agree with your opinion as there are no projects without investments in the cryptocurrency market. You are talking about those projects that did not conduct a public sale of tokens, but they attract investors in other ways, and everything about fraudulent projects is quite a lot among the masses.

[tabas]

Those projects that didn't conduct no ICO at all might be sincere with what they are trying to reach the people, whilst most of the ICO projects, they're all just for the collection of money. Scammers found a way to scam easily through ICO that's why that market is becoming dangerous these days. However, there's a reinvention through IEO.

[puertorikosena]

At the moment, there has already been a huge amount of case of fraudulent projects that carried out the pre-sale of tokens. Nevertheless, in my memory there were projects that were published without fundraising. It was DeepOnion.
I think that now it is simply not worth investing in suspicious projects in order to protect yourself.

[masterrex]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

Im a little bit confused with your thread. but i answer it base on my own understanding, Actually ICO projects are just like fishing on the lake without any guarantee to catch any fish, thats why most of it "the project" that has not meet its funding requirements is ending failed, as i see it most of the projects that funded by ICO's results has no working product before it was launch so what can we expect with empty project that has no usecase and utilizatioin. nothing thats why it was ended up dumping its coins.

[shinratensei_]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

Because these projects used their own funds to create a platform but not at all. I thought you should recorrecting your sentences about that. Remember almost 80% of major coins were started from ico. That depends on how good you to do your own research to get the best ico.
I thought that you are a little big misunderstanding about that.

[jrrsparkles]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

I am not getting what you are trying to say but what I understood is that initial coin offerings are just a game from project developers to make more money initially which which is the recent only they created the project so they will left the project without any development if they got the profit to early that is why we don't have to support premined coins.

[davis196]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

There's no proof that "non-ICO" projects "always" perform better than ICO projects.From where did you heard this?It doesn't matter if the project is ICO,STO or IEO.The important factors are the transparency and quality of the dev team,the idea and goal  of the project and the control mechanisms so the investors won't get scammed.

[sandra_x]

Every crypto project always have some sort of funding raising stage, be it ICO or IEO, even those who did not go through this always had funds through private funding. As for j=knowing if a project is scam or not, it is on each investor to do their own due diligence before investing in them.

[rosmerius]

I think the project without ICO is more difficult and the possibility of the team does have sufficient capital in development. During this time, I have met with many projects that conducted ICOs for introductions and promotions. There are many obstacles, but this is a project that I often follow.

[iancortis]

Hello mate, i think they're all the same for reaching their goals with or without ico, and i think they reverse the mindset of traders and investors. as i noticed without ico project is easily be listed in market and most of them creating fake traders and volumes.

[shadowduck]

Everything happens so because those projects which work without raising money - they initially have a financial protection and experience with cryptocurrency.

[smyslov]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

You did not mention at least some coins  that are successful but did not launch an ICO, they did not launch an ICO because there were privately funded, and they are selling their token in the market instead of the usual ICO, which can be profitable sometimes because in the market they can hype it or create fake volume.

[Adriano2010]

I think he reffers to coins like bitcoin, Litecoin and Ethereum which not have an ICO and they are successful on long time and some of altcoins which don't need a ICO and have a great price and who buy early get a lot of profit if hold.

[efrenbilantok]

Because no ICO projects have the higher chance of being fully dedicated to creaet a fully working product for their project, they funded the project themselves because they believe in their future, while ICO projects are just usually made for their bad intentions, but of course not all ICOs are like that but it is fair to say the most of them are scam.

[Leonardo7]

Sometimes, some developers just want to collect people's money through public sales and live off the fund, they actually have nothing to offer and at the end, investors will just be crying for the loss of their funds. Whereas some project that had no ICO nor premine are doing excellently well. Hyro had no public sales, Polymath had no ICO too, yet they are still very much around and doing well. Look at ETN, Ubex, Savedroid, Storique and many others that collected huge fund, what can they show for it? Certainly nothing.

[Nalbo]

If you mean non-ICO as private funding than you are correct largely.
When projects are privately funded, they are also directly guided and looked over, they are made accountable for their work and the fiance are transparent.
While a ICO project is highly cryptic after their fund raise. Has no responsibility towards the investors and provides no transparency about the works and the wages of the team members.

[Indamuck]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

Ethereum was one of the most successful cryptos and it started with an ICO.  Many projects have succeeded by raising funds in the start but I guess people favor a more fair pow coin that everyone can freely mine at the start.

[Mysteryla]

Pre-determined price is one of the factors that affect the success, most especially the prices of projects when listed on exchange.
There is now a particular custom that is common with most traders and investors, which is that, if a coin from just concluded ICO, is listed on exchange, it would not trade at exactly or even above the ICO price. Which is why you see some of them dump to as low as -x10 the ICo price, because they are after profit making, which might come when the price starts growing back to its ICO price.
Non-ICO coins on the other hand, when listed, their prices are determined mainly by the m
market, which in some cases might trade very high.