No knowledge is lost.

[adzino]

Not sure what you mean my non ICO project. There are lots of alt coins out there that were created which were either some clone of a coin or some pure shit coins. They just pop up and then dies in just few days. They are just made the developers to dump it in the market and few few bucks profit out of it. Again, ICO projects are not always a scam. There are projects out there that are actually being successful. Again there are projects out there that are just scamming the investors by running away with their money or just failing to deliver what they promised.

[Bitbtc8]

I think you are right because coins like monero ,dero ,deeponion etc hosts no ICO at all and they are doing better ,I think it doesn't matter though ,there are few ones that fund there projects themselves e.g Apollo currency ,I think we all only need to be smarter when choosing coins to invest in

[Fadhil Pahlawadi]

As long as I participate here, I have never seen a question like you asked. Projects directly with the ICO are clearer and far from scams. Maybe you have other meanings with your question, can you explain more clearly?

[CoinCollect]

Because those projects that do not conduct ICO look more promising because they often already have a good product and they just need to attract people. And there is less chance that such a project will be a scam.

[pageraji]

Because those projects that do not conduct ICO look more promising because they often already have a good product and they just need to attract people. And there is less chance that such a project will be a scam.
[/quote

Because those projects that do not conduct ICO look more promising because they often already have a good product and they just need to attract people. And there is less chance that such a project will be a scam.

ICO or IEO is needed for startups who do not have the funds to develop their project, at the beginning of the emergence of many cryptocurrency coins that do not need funding only need adoption and support, but now with more competition one and the other coins need more than funds for listings etc.

[Altero]

Because those projects that do not conduct ICO look more promising because they often already have a good product and they just need to attract people. And there is less chance that such a project will be a scam.

I don't think so. ICO and any promotional activities will help to make a certain project known to the community and investors could notice it. In this way, investors can look into any scam possibility as they can review feedback for the community. Unlikely, due to the widespread of scam ICO's it makes investors worries and doubts to put their money with them, and it could be better for them to invest those who have already a working product.

[Gabali126]

What exactly do you mean by No-ICO projects? Give an example so that people understand what you are asking. Projects have more control if they hold funding through ICO. So in that way it gives scammer chance to set a trap since there is no third party to look over it.

I guess the original O.P is referring to projects that did not perform token sales for example HYDRO which has continued to do very well in the cryptocurrency market despite not performing any crowdfunding.

[Danslip]

What exactly do you mean by No-ICO projects? Give an example so that people understand what you are asking. Projects have more control if they hold funding through ICO. So in that way it gives scammer chance to set a trap since there is no third party to look over it.

I guess the original O.P is referring to projects that did not perform token sales for example HYDRO which has continued to do very well in the cryptocurrency market despite not performing any crowdfunding.

Some projects are not performing good in the market unless there was any guide by known market analysts. HYDRO is an exception in this case but I believe their developers made a great job with playing rules of the game.

[michellee]

As long as I participate here, I have never seen a question like you asked. Projects directly with the ICO are clearer and far from scams. Maybe you have other meanings with your question, can you explain more clearly?

Maybe he was getting scam from many projects which have ICO and NO ICO, and he wants to know how to detect the scam project. The truth is we don't know how to do that because every project will be potential to be a scam project. But the difference is the real project will still continue the project no matter how bad the market conditions and they will explain everything to their investor about the real situations because they don't want to make their investor worried.

[repear7]

I will only express my opinion according to my knowledge. I think the project that is run without ICO is indeed sometimes better because this project without ICO will pay its workers with coins that are already on the market. Of course coins that are on the market are coins that have been proven to be able to survive in the market and potentially provide benefits. But if a project is ICO funded, the ICO will offer their coins which certainly cannot clearly survive and compete in the market or not.

[aderidwan98]

I understand what you mean, I also have the same question, why projects that don't use ICO are far better than those using ico even though they don't use large funds to develop their projects, and I think it's because of the vision and mission of the founder, but that's just a guess I

[Pamadar]

As long as I participate here, I have never seen a question like you asked. Projects directly with the ICO are clearer and far from scams. Maybe you have other meanings with your question, can you explain more clearly?

Maybe he was getting scam from many projects which have ICO and NO ICO, and he wants to know how to detect the scam project. The truth is we don't know how to do that because every project will be potential to be a scam project. But the difference is the real project will still continue the project no matter how bad the market conditions and they will explain everything to their investor about the real situations because they don't want to make their investor worried.

Project without any ico's offering used own investment, the team behind see the potential of their products and with good dedication it will be supported after being available inside the market, OP might confused or suffered from being victimized by those scammed projects that offers ico's and needs to learn more about his research.

[NeverSop]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

I think the projects that carry ICO and No-ICO are only for reference, it is not a method to judge the level of success and effectiveness of the project but it only comes from specific conditions. From the turn, the construction, the idea and the purpose of each team in the project. Everything, does not mean we will go through fake guys, scam. Be careful and carefully consider everything before embedding money in any project.

[diazepam666]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

That is what I check the ICO before investing or participating in their airdrop or bounties.

We can accept any form ICO for investment but we need to be little closer to understand which is correct ICO project for you. Your less knowledge on finding the good ICO makes the exchanges takes control over the crypto with the name of called IEO.

So please improve your knowledge finding good ICO. Now all ICO listing are fake and soon exchanges will fake you with the IEO.

[rdewilde]

It's funny but that's the situation on ground. The reason is this, any project that is self-funded (no ICO) tends to do well as the team knows exactly what they want and how to go about it. That's why you will see the team launching new products or services every now and then, and when investors sees this will be attracted and thereby investing and helping the project to grow more. And in this self-funded projects it's hard to see scams because the team already have a goal.
On the other hand, most ICO projects tends to be another thing altogether, some will exit scam, some can't even offer any tangible results etc.

[MonsterV]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

It seems that not always a project without ICO is successful, some time ago I followed the bounty of a project without ICO but unfortunately the project was a scam and I was very disappointed, even though the project was very convincing.
Usually this project without ICO is ready in terms of funds, and they are usually funded by investor partners. This kind of project is really really to develop the concept.

[delarossa]

I think all project for the crypto in the world should need a huge money to start up for the development and operational for many sector. It cause the project held the ICO for find the investors that want to buy some their coin. But their project must be have an amazing or different something.

[Twinkledoe]

Those projects that didn't conduct no ICO at all might be sincere with what they are trying to reach the people, whilst most of the ICO projects, they're all just for the collection of money. Scammers found a way to scam easily through ICO that's why that market is becoming dangerous these days. However, there's a reinvention through IEO.

And if I may add, some of those projects who didn't conduct ICO are those that has established platform already, and they have their own funds or private investors that are sustaining the project to operate. So they are bound to success because no matter what, they are not dependent from the funds of the public community. They can proceed with their developments on their own effort and money. Whereas, those who are conducting ICO are more than likely relying on the funds that they are getting from the people, and unluckily most of them fall in the scam category.

[sujonali1819]

Please my fellow crypto friends I need answers badly about ICO and none ICO projects . my question to you all is
Why are projects with NO ICO always do better than the ones who were actually funded from ICO ? Projects with no funds or whatso ever should be the ones facing what ICO projects are facing excluding scams ones

If you posted any examples according to your question we can understand really what you want to know. Mainly a good project depends on the developer's team, active team members, project vision and the product. But obviously, need fund to keep stand your project a long time and more improvement. So team members are trying to ICO to collect some money for project improvement. In this way, I want to say ICO project is better than Non-ICO/ Self funded projects. The self Funded project can be looks like Good for a little bit of time by making hype and by increasing the token price by any pump team but not for long term IMO. So if you want to know my opinion I will always choose the ICO project instead of Non-ICO project for making any investment. Thanks

[irixo10]

I think I understand what you are saying; let's take it like this, when you build a project with your funds it is likely to do well and as people starts investing you can expand and bring in more services. This can be likened to projects which didn't carry out any ICO but are doing well than their counterparts.
Also, there are other who couldn't list or build any MVP due to lack of funds. So I think it all depends on the team, what they knows and their capabilities.