No knowledge is lost.

[Kiefner]

It doesn't matter if you are involved in a project that is led by a good team. In a good, hard-working team, any project will be successful, regardless of whether they conduct an ICO or not.

[Gabteb]

Dont think you are right maybe you aren't so good informed but ETH was done with ico many good exchanges like Kucoin one ,the bigest one Binance was done with ICO so dont know why you think that way do a little more research.

[farlack]

The truth is that projects without ICo are more aimed to deliver product and their initial goal is create MVP and then create community.
As for ICOs, people just collect money and then start to develop something

[MidnightWolf]

I think that with such a state of things you need to fight very hard.  The team should represent real projects that can really be in demand in society, not to pursue the original goal of collecting money from investors.  Today, investors are very careful and attentive, and will not give their money to anyone.

[Pet240]

The success of an ICO, if it is to be determined by the  method of fundraising is not a good yardstick. What I feel should be used is the solution that it provides to a problem and how much it is able to solve it.
Most of the projects doing well these days are IEO projects, which is already happening almost everywhere.

[joshy23]

I think that with such a state of things you need to fight very hard.  The team should represent real projects that can really be in demand in society, not to pursue the original goal of collecting money from investors.  Today, investors are very careful and attentive, and will not give their money to anyone.

They have learned their lessons in such a hard way so they are now very selecting finding and selecting projects to invest their money, developers now
needs to show more on reality and not just promises that already been heard by the investors it's no longer effective.

[budakjawa]

I think that with such a state of things you need to fight very hard.  The team should represent real projects that can really be in demand in society, not to pursue the original goal of collecting money from investors.  Today, investors are very careful and attentive, and will not give their money to anyone.

They have learned their lessons in such a hard way so they are now very selecting finding and selecting projects to invest their money, developers now
needs to show more on reality and not just promises that already been heard by the investors it's no longer effective.

learn and you have knowledge, with learning you have provisions for later.
investors are not careless in investing and of course research each project, because not all projects are good and therefore not easy to believe.

[viananda2525]

I think that with such a state of things you need to fight very hard.  The team should represent real projects that can really be in demand in society, not to pursue the original goal of collecting money from investors.  Today, investors are very careful and attentive, and will not give their money to anyone.

They have learned their lessons in such a hard way so they are now very selecting finding and selecting projects to invest their money, developers now
needs to show more on reality and not just promises that already been heard by the investors it's no longer effective.

learn and you have knowledge, with learning you have provisions for later.
investors are not careless in investing and of course research each project, because not all projects are good and therefore not easy to believe.

our knowledge will make us survive in this market.without our knowledge we just like a blind man in the dark.we will find nothing and even will loss our money.observe and research will show us which the opportunity in market.

[r_delossa]

If you mean an IEO as a non ICO variant than it is pretty obvious that projects are collecting funds if they are going to be listed on a good exchange. There are some projects that are going live on the market even without fundraising, because they already have a working product.

[Almasani]

My advice is to all of us who will invest in the ICO program for now because there are many scams. then we must be careful and careful in looking at the various media that we can access to find out the truth and it is clear that they are developers of the projects we will follow ... so that we can better know that the project is SCAM or REAL

Before you invest in any new project, you must have a guide, or you need to search for the details of the project so you can have a vision about the project. That will give you more information to decide to invest or to leave the project, and you can prevent from choosing the bad project. Always be careful is the only way we can do and don't attract from any promotion that is not always true because the project wants to reach more investor.

Actually before we verify a project, it is first verified by official platforms such as ICObench, ICORating, ICO Stamp and others. But the ending of the project listed there is also a scam. I think it's very difficult to know about a scam or no a project.
What I want to say is that perpetrators of fraud will be present when they intend to commit fraud. Sometimes project scams are more seriously managed than those that aren't.

It is not hard to gain knowledge because we know now a day crypto currency is very famous, it is famous on google, YouTube, and there are so many websites, so it can put us in risk, if we really want to gain profit we will have to learn more and more about crypto currency investment,. Trading and mining, learning and gaining knowledge is key for success in crypto currency.

Yes. Indeed, there have been many articles that discuss trading, mining and investment. Maybe one of the best search engines at this time is Google. So we can get information there.
If we rarely learn about crypto, of course we will be afraid if we experience price declines.
Currently many are disappointed because they did not invest in Bitcoin, when they saw the price of Bitcoin has go to the month.

[restuibu]

no ICO project means they have their own funds to develop, they will continue to focus and use the funds well. but projects that have ico I think will not use the funds properly, surely they still use it for personal needs such as vacation or shopping

[criket]

no ICO project means they have their own funds to develop, they will continue to focus and use the funds well. but projects that have ico I think will not use the funds properly, surely they still use it for personal needs such as vacation or shopping

don't be prejudiced like that. not all ICO projects are like that. if their performance is clearly visible with the success of their coins in the market and their platform is accepted by the market, I think the use of funds from ICO is very appropriate.

[Samkol26]

No ICO project means that they have already stand and they are already successful so that can't fail much problem like a project that has just started from scratch.

[Rasa nanas]

no ICO project means they have their own funds to develop, they will continue to focus and use the funds well. but projects that have ico I think will not use the funds properly, surely they still use it for personal needs such as vacation or shopping

if that really happens it means they have done what they should not have done, the funds collected must be fully used to develop the project. that kind of thing will reduce the reputation of the ico project.

[vermigerous]

Maybe it's just a coincidence that you saw some project without doing some ICO that succeeds. usually they succeed if they have a better roadmap than the others and usually when doing some ICOs scam project is at the risk. so its better to learn more before we invest because without a knowledge with this kind of thing is a sure lost for both the investors and the hunters.

[TIDOVEE]

How do you mean by project with No ICO,  If you are talking about KYC now it is understandable. How will a project without ICO link up to market cap, if it's not ICO,it should be either STO or IEO. Be sure a project without these 3 is a scam if only it is newly established by cryptographers. There are different bodies that oversees to the success of every real projects, and that is why the white paper is important to be studied. Some are team,admin, social media manager, forum post managers etc, so a good project has a lot of scrutiny to make it genuine enough.

[Rikotin]

I am confused about understanding your question above, as far as I know ico can run well because it has funds or investments from its investors and if an ico project does not have at least the minimum funds / funds do not reach the target then the project will not run again. in the case of fraud projects because the funds are taken away by the developer and the team. another story if the project is delayed or failed because the funds do not reach the specified target.

[forexandcryptoauditor]

Dont know what do you mean with projects with no ICO. I assume it as project which dont need fund raising for development.
In this scenario, projects have strong financial backup and off course a proven existing product with huge existing users. This type of project is already known to people so new users gain confidence joining it.

[altscaner]

if we see an unfunded project getting better because they are not pursuing money and prefer to develop projects, and for ico at this time, many are merely looking for money and because of this they don't care about successful projects even some projects have already have evil intentions by making projects that seem good, but apparently are scams, but some ico are still in my opinion to be followed because I believe some of them still have the intention to seek funds to develop not to do scams.

[Lanatsa]

no ICO project means they have their own funds to develop, they will continue to focus and use the funds well. but projects that have ico I think will not use the funds properly, surely they still use it for personal needs such as vacation or shopping

Certainty because money is something that is very sensitive for everyone to use or misuse by everyone. Money will have a different valuation of each of what you do.

Intended to be this way and I can say that this is inevitable and we cant really stop people on how they would make use of their own money but most of the
time they are spend into things which isn't worthy at all.Why? They are being dragged with the hype or simply being blinded by fake-good lookin projects.

if we see an unfunded project getting better because they are not pursuing money and prefer to develop projects, and for ico at this time, many are merely looking for money and because of this they don't care about successful projects even some projects have already have evil intentions by making projects that seem good, but apparently are scams, but some ico are still in my opinion to be followed because I believe some of them still have the intention to seek funds to develop not to do scams.

ICO era might had passed but there are still some numbers of good ones but they do eventually failed up due to insufficient support and we cant blame those people or investors due to lots of scammy projects and frauds.Its just normal for people to be hesitant on throwing out some money.