Question about Bounty managers

[cytpoway121]

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

I believe it is better if the tokens are kept with the bounty managers
It makes it easy and secure and bounty managers will send spreadsheet to the team for audits

Sending rewards by the team is not bad either; as Long as a mutual agreement is reached

[triangles]

of course I chose the first one because the reward obtained was certain, escaping from tokens or the coins obtained had value and also if all the bounty managers could do that might be a good thing

[serjent05]

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

I prefer to have an escrow.  Though in some point the bounty manager would be an escrow but that would be a conflict of interest because both party, the manager and the owner are involved in such campaign.  It would be best if there is a third party to hold the bounty reward.

There are several cases wherein the bounty manager failed to distribute the token to their paricipant.  Aside from that, there are also cases wherein some manager manipulate stakes in their own favor such as calculating stakes of disqualified participants and divide the stake together with the stake of these dq'ed account.

[Eildosa]

I think the first option would be the most ideal. Because it often happens that bounty the managers, too, are deceived by the project team, but if they would have tokens at once, the bounty would be paid more. I think so.

[Mianae]

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

The first option should be better or even the use of escrow for bounty Payment. Most times the project reduce payment at the end of the day but if they hand it over to the managers it won't reduce.

[akitha]

I would prefer the first one.. it should be like that.. bounty managers should demand the rewards or escrow it in one wallet for security..For the dev team, they should check the background of the BM if he/she is trust-worthy

[andibongkol]

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

I prefer the first choice rather than the second, Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants , but until now this has never happened, I hope that in the future this will become a reality

[Stargazer]

Though most of the people will prefer the first one, but that is not possible for the most bounty managers. Because only highly reputed bounty managers like yahoo or Hhampuz can get the bounty tokens before the campaign ends! Otherwise, maximum bounty managers got their payment in token and they don't have control in payment, only the team does!

[sngwinner]

I prefer the tean does the distribution. Most of the bounty managers use dubious means to get more tokens especially when they see the project has a great potential.

[Tosyn2]

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

This is a major issue facing bounty hunters when it comes to receiving reward at the end of the bounty campaign. Both options had its own pros and cons but I would prefer to go with the second option where the spreadsheet will be delivered to the team. Some bounty mangers are cunning in character, who will even prefer to have his way if possible when it comes to distribution of rewards.

[fortunecrypto]

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

I'm ok bounty managers managing the token distribution, bounty managers wants to make the project finish and distribute the token so they will gain trust from investors, bounty managers are nothing if they will not gain support from bounty hunters, their job defends on how hunters reacts to their reputation.

[strunberg]

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

This is a major issue facing bounty hunters when it comes to receiving reward at the end of the bounty campaign. Both options had its own pros and cons but I would prefer to go with the second option where the spreadsheet will be delivered to the team. Some bounty mangers are cunning in character, who will even prefer to have his way if possible when it comes to distribution of rewards.

only trusted bounty manager that could on first option.maybe yahoo, hhampuz and other trusted by many developers team to distributed bounty reward.or atleast coins/token hold by escrow, so it will has certainity that reward will distributed soon after bounty finish.

[Innocant]

It was not good idea if the bounty manager will hold the bounty reward. Must better to the team will be one distributing on it because they are the one open the project. The bounty manager only only was the one to put some stake in the spreadsheet to pass to a team if the spreads are done.

[reza7777]

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .

But not all bounty managers do that because most projects do their own distribution

2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

For this, all bounty managers must do it

[Mahanton]

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .

I do prefer on this way yet you can somehow assure that participants would be paid up but well its still no an assurance
yet we wont know if the manager itself would ran away with the funds that's why its important to stick into reputable managers.

2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

Even bounty managers cant assure if he himself would be paid up after the bounty.This do depends on their agreement on the first place.

[rodel caling]

I choose both because showing spreadsheet in all participants is very important things for the transparency to ensure no discrepancy.
Hodling token or coins of manager are one of the most factor that need to considered and also popularity as manager herein bitcointalk.

[Jatawneh]

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

The second option due to the fact that the task of the bounty manager is to calculate and assign rewards to bounty hunters then submit spreadsheet  to the teams for distribution. some time token is not ready to be distributed by the time of bounty ended, but the manager should keep in contact with hunters and team to ensure distribution.   

[pedpedped101]

Although I prefer that the bounty managers should hold the tokens, but such manager must be very honest and trustworthy, because there are some managers that will not want to pay bounty hunters.
There are several platforms that receive the tokens first before agreeing to manage the project and with such, bounty managers might not have issue with their participants.

[Almasani]

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

It would be nice for campaign managers to distribute tokens for bounty participants. If we make a complaint it's also easy, because it's part of his job. If the team distributes tokens, of course they are very difficult to deal with bounty problems, because many investors also have to send their tokens. But, how about campaign managers who are not trusted?That means goodbye.

[taguig]

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

After the LIKER locking the thread indefinitely, there are no safe side developers and bounty managers can make things miserable for bounty hunters, but I like bounty manager to handle the token for distribution because they want to do it fast and they are easy to contact than the developers.