Question about Bounty managers

[Mypanara19]

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

I choose the first option. That's why we have bounty managers so that they will manage and fix everything that are related to bounty campaign they handle. But either of the two options there are instances when the bounty hunters are being fooled by the bm and they sometimes take advantage of their position for their own personal gains alone. I just hope that all the bm's are just and fair with their people because as a bounty hunter it's undeniable that we truly contribute to the success of the project by means of spreading updates with every campaign we joined in.

[juanda]

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

in my opinion tokens / coins are held or managed by the project team to be distributed to all bounty participants ... because I often experience fraud if the distribution is carried out by the bounties manager and team ... there is a reduction in the amount of coins previously set ... we should get 1000 coins, but in the end we only get 700 - 800 coins.. so I agree more like the answer number 2 that you mentioned above.

[pageraji]

I think the first choice is  really save for bounty hunter if bounty manager is trusted like yahoo, sapta, arteezy and many good manager here, and i really like if we all paid not token but BTC or ETH is good one

[daniel2023]

It depends on the credibility of the manager or the team. There are some reliable bounty manager, i will like  to hold the tokens. There are also some faithful teams too. Your prayer as a hunter is for you not to meet a fraudulent manager or team. 

[elpiji]

now there are so many new bounty managers if you choose option 1 then I think it's too risky, you could just run away with a bounty manager carrying bounty hunter token

[zhekinsp]

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

Its better to hold the token by manager itself or under some escrows but that doesn't make much difference.

Tokens are worthless until it hit exchange,so it is all in the hands of team.

[aundroid]

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

Basically I would prefer 1), like the majority here does.

In case I still have one wish left, I would like to have the payment in BTC or ETH. Thank you. 

[mendra_2009]

It should be if I will choose the first choice, because if the Bounty Manager holds the coin it will make me relieved and not think negatively. If the gift manager must send the spreadsheet back to the team after the prize ends for distribution, I think it's about technicality. Sometimes it makes participants bored with rules that might be changed.

[cryp24x]

If I would choose among the two options, then I prefer to choose the first option provided that the Bounty Manager have a good track record and the integrity is really high on doing his/her job. The reason would be speed because we don't need to wait for the team to assign one of their team to distribute. They are so busy to do that. One thing is that the Bounty Manager knows who really works hard and support the project.

[Mr.ZODIAC]

I think my answer will be like a double-edged stick when each end can strike.  On the one hand, you can rely on the project team, But despite the fact that the team may have an official legal entity, it can still be deceived by explaining for various reasons, as it has already been repeatedly noted.  And now if you put all the responsibility and funding on the Bounty Manager, then you need to know the person specifically and have an influence on him so that there is no temptation to deceive members of the Bounty company.  Today, both those and others successfully abuse their capabilities.

[Jrfranco]

Given the choices, i would focus on the list number 1, because a trusted bounty manager could easily distribute the token after the campaign, unlike list number 2 it could take months that the team could be able to.distribute the coins to the participants, and yes its a good idea that the tokens be hold by the bounty manager.

[ven7net]

I think the first option is better than the second. If you find a normal manager who can be trusted, then if he has tokens for payments, it will be much better than if the manager sends the table to admins and we will wait for the tokens from them. Still, finding a good manager is easier than constantly worrying about whether the admins are reliable in a particular project.

[shakesbear]

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

Really difficult question, in my memory there were bad cases in both option, if the Manager is trusted by the community, then the first option, if it is a beginner, then the second option.

[oseikuf44]

I Prefer Both Bounty managers and the team holding a bounty funds in an escrow account. So at the end of the campaign, both can initiate the transfer to hunters. The bounty manager alone holding the coin is not safe since the hunter is a also a bounty hunter working for incentives, he can bolt away with the funds if so huge ; the only punishment will be to get red trust on Bitcointalk forum.

[asbak66]

Not both. If we have bad manager, he/she can run with the token from option one
If we choose option two, it all depends with the team. They can not pay us too.
So I don't know, but usually I join with the second option. It's more familiar.

[Averim]

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .
2) Bounty managers should submit spreadsheet back to the teams after bounty ends for distribution.

A well integrated bounty platform is more performant than the options mentioned above.

[asyakashi]

To all bounty hunters on here which one do you prefer?
1) Bounty managers should be the ones to hold the coins/tokens and share with bounty participants .

I found many managers to be dishonest and rigged the campaign, this is the reason that No. 1 is not a good choice. Except using Escrow is more reliable

[Bonwin]

There are particular managers I work with and as for those I work with, I do not mind if they pay by themselves, because I trust them.
There are now new managers allover, but their integrity has not yet been tested. For those type of managers, I might prefer that the team do the distribution.

[Ultimist]

Better those bounty managers who have the tokens of the project and then immediately distribute them to the bounty hunter. It is safer I believe.

[Kiefner]

I think it does not matter if you participate in those projects that are reputable bounty managers. But if you have joined a project with a Manager unknown to you before, it is better to have tokens with him, not with the team.