Forwarding as an impartial messenger. Readers should have all arguments at their disposal so they can make an informed decision.
All [hard] forks we have seen chose the scammy way and paid the price for it. Never did the far majority of this economy doubt about what coin[hard fork] to support.
That’s correct.
But alas all the other fools in this thread forget that this “economic majority” (i.e. the ones with private keys hodling
BTC)
have not yet been asked to decide between Legacy and Core yet. That is because Core did a scammy “soft fork” pretending that
miner signaling is equivalent to the economic majority. Those are not the same given that miners follow the economic majority because the coin with the greatest value can pay the most minted rewards and fees to miners for security.
That economic majority “vote” is coming soon. The impostor Core “soft fork” will be forced to defend its
scam protocol by hard forking when the SegWit booty piles so high (
millions of BTC in non-Legacy addresses) that some miners are incentivized to take the SegWit donations, which are
“anyone can spend” (i.e. lacking a signing key for spending) in the Legacy protocol. At that juncture (which
Craig Wright claims will be at the halving May 2020) everyone must decide which fork (Legacy or Core) to support.
Yet those who have been hodling their
BTC in Legacy addresses anticipating this event, will receive a free airdrop of Core shitcoins for dumping (so we can buy moar Legacy
BTC) while retaining their Legacy
BTC. Whereas those idiots hodling their fake “
BTC” in Core addresses will only receive Core shitcoins after this hard fork, so they will have no Legacy tokens to sell,
. The Legacy miners will receive all of those idiots’
BTC in exchange for the miners protecting Satoshi’s immutable protocol from attempted forgeries such as Core.
Remember the value of Bitcoin only exists because of
Nick Szabo’s unforgeable costliness. For Bitcoin to have any value going forward, the unforgeability must be defended and thus Core and its mutation of the protocol must be defeated. Bitcoin is not destined to be a transaction system for the masses. The powers-that-be have
put Facebook Libra here for that. The powers-that-be (who may be indirectly paying some of these trolls in this thread to lie to you, because fleecing the minions is an integral part of their master plan of how to transition the world to Libra) put Bitcoin here to ultimately be a store-of-value only for the uber wealthy and reserve asset for the “stablecoin” Libra system after they destroy the value of the dollar with Bitcoin. The uber wealthy do not give a fuck about the “cute bunny rabbit”, witless minions and will gladly slaughter all of you taking the SegWit donations for themselves and kicking all you fools off onto the Libra 666 enslavement system. Get a fucking clue people. This snowflake world does not exist and was only propped up with debt. Now we head into the Grim Reaper payback period of misery and gnashing of teeth:
https://steemit.com/money/@anonymint/rise-of-hard-money-is-a-harbinger-of-misery All the fools who think I am a nutjob are going to lose all their
BTC. That’s going to be very funny. I tried to warn them, and they were too stupid to understand English. Lol.
Of course the paid trolls will reply with more vitriol because they’re very angry if they can’t achieve their objective to slaughter all the greater fools. They hate me for telling the truth. Of course they will spin it the other way. Readers just need to go read the entire linked discussion and think clearly.
Remember
I told you so. And remember these other trolls tried to fool all of you. I will be vindicated
as I always am.
P.S. A couple of weeks ago
I predicted this:
And voila correct again:
Wtf is this guy rambling about? what is he saying is the "real" bitcoin if it's not core ("the one everyone thinks is the real bitcoin"), BCH or BSV? Is this some shitcoin he came up with or something else?
From what I understood, he is referring to the Segwit soft fork from 2017, which would be "bitcoin core" and which addresses start with 3, whereas the old addresses starting with 1 would be the "real bitcoin". However, both adresses formats are bitcoin, because the miner majority signalled Segwit in 2017. Bitcoin is P2P, meaning it need consensus to run. If there is no consensus, we have hard forks, like BCH and BTG for example.
“Soft forks” via miner signaling just delay the decision of the economic majority about the consensus.
When Core is forced to fork off after the Legacy protocol takes the SegWit UTXO as donations, then the economic majority will finally vote on the Core hard fork which has been masquerading as Bitcoin when in fact it has no claim to be Bitcoin, because the economic majority has not voted yet.
Thanks for linking to the thread where I wiped your face in the facts after you accused me of being a “nutjob”. Readers can read and decide for themselves who is correct, based on the facts that have been presented.
LOL, I invite anyone to read and find out for themselves.
Indeed. I invite readers to re-read the linked thread where I already refuted your vacuous posturing. Some idiots who lack the ability to think clearly may be convinced by your nonsensical points, but that is okay because those idiots will lose all their
BTC because they lack the intelligence to be worthy investors.
Anyone with basic intelligence can see […]
Anyone with above average intelligence can see that you’re not very intelligent.
Extremely few nodes exist on the network that would view your chain as valid
You continue to use this vacuous nonsense even though I already refuted in the cited thread. No need for me to repeat all my arguments again here.
The Legacy nodes can be turned on in 1 minute when the time comes. Miners go where the money and economic majority go. There is no technological difficulty in enforcing the Legacy protocol. Seesh there’s $10+ billion at stake here. You think the powers-that-be can’t afford programmers and a secret testnet that you can’t see.
Anyone with a basic technical understanding of hard forks knows the vast majority of the network will ignore your stupid fork.
The economic majority always sells the protocol which has mutated from Satoshi’s protocol and hard forked away from Satoshi’s immutable protocol. Because unforgeable costliness is the only attribute that gives Bitcoin any value. Without immutability, then politics could create unlimited forks of Bitcoin diluting the money supply. Also politics could potentially even raise the money supply limit of a fork. Politics is a slippery slope and reduces trust. That is why Satoshi locked the protocol at “v0.1” as he wrote. We discussed that already in the linked thread and quoted Satoshi. I will not rehash all of that again here. The readers can go to the linked thread instead.
This is not only because their nodes would literally ignore the fork, but because very, very few Bitcoin users have any interest in opting into a hard forked chain where miners stole half of the BTC supply.
Correct. The economic majority will not opt for the Core fork when it finally is forced to hard fork off from Satoshi’s Legacy protocol, because Core is a bug that enabled miners to spend Core’s “anyone can spend”
BTC (presumably to themselves) and the only way to permanently repair that bug is to “burn their fingertips up to their armpits” of those foolish enough to hold Core addresses which donates their
BTC to the future security of Bitcoin gained by punishing those fools who use buggy client software that spends their
BTC to “anyone can spend” addresses. Who is foolish enough to be scammed by Core into spending their
BTC to a “soft fork” that does not exist? Apparently we have a lot of fools in this world.
In short, the Core scam Bitc0n-job has caused
BTC to be lost by convincing people to spend their
BTC to “anyone can spend” addresses. How foolish is that?
Even Trezor still supports Legacy addresses. If users are foolish enough to configure their wallet to use Core’s scam, they deserve their fate.
Anyone with a brain can see you are a) an unhinged lunatic, b) extremely intellectually dishonest, or c) both.
Anyone with above average intellect can see that you are not the sharpest tool in the shed.
What the Shelby character didn't put into consideration was that his "Real Bitcoin" will split from Bitcoin, forking into a new chain, which has Segwit as "anyone" can spend.
Incorrect. Satoshi’s immutable protocol can’t fork from itself. Blockstream invented this term “soft fork” which really means:
Be a fool, trust us, and misconfigure your wallet to spend to addresses which Bitcoin can’t recognize and thus are spendable to anyone. 
And then tell all your worthless comrades to trade their lunch money on exchanges which also use similarly misconfigured clients and we’ll huddle together near the cliff as one-for-all-and-all-for-one sheepeople, so we can safely and assuredly fall over the cliff into the woodchipper together. The “soft fork” exists only as an illusion for
obedient idiots who huddle together in
bankrupt “democracy” to destroy themselves as per the following depicted example (click the image to read about it):
What exchanges, which are part of the economic majority, would be stupid enough to give that chain the ticker "BTC", or stupid enough to list it?
The uber wealthy who control most of the
BTC don’t give a fuck about your worthless lunch money exchanges. They trade on
the OTC markets in size. The exchanges exist only
to take BTC from greater fools.
A chain which miners can steal Bitcoins? Will the community let this happen?
Indeed! Core is effectively stealing your
BTC (and
eventually forcing miners to take it as donations for the defense against Core’s political corruption) by convincing you to spend your
BTC to unrecognized addresses. The Core protocol is not Bitcoin. It is a hard fork masquerading as a “soft fork”. Only worthless fools incorrectly hallucinate to imagine and
profess to the faithful that
“really this is Bitcoin because we all voted and we will stand together near the cliff when the hard fuck/fork off comes”.
The economic majority decide. And you worthless fools are not the economic majority.
[…] if the forkers[Satoshi’s protocol] 51% attacked[defended] b[B]itcoin to promote their [existence of a] fraud[ulent imposter] chain, they'd need to expend huge[normal ongoing level of mining] resources on an ongoing basis. not gonna happen. everyone[worthless fools] knows bitcoin users can [not] just wait out the attack[removal of the scammers from the ecosystem and restoration of Nash equilibrium] at no cost.
ftfy.
the more you feed him the more he is going to create alt-accounts and post his crap here. just let his topics die since mods don't remove them.
So you’re calling for censorship.
You want to force everyone to trust Core. Bitcoin is a trustless system, not a system that relies on politics for its survival.
Note @Traxo and myself
“arguing” about religion as some evidence that he is not my sockpuppet. You may also ask mods to check my IP address (I still login in the account in my real name) and note that both of our IP addresses are ISPs (mine in Philippines and his in Eastern Europe) so it’s impossible we are both places at the same time.
You’re dumber than a decaying tree stump.
