snip
Obviously you are too dumb to read my trust feedback. You have gotten that feedback because your only intention was to damage the reputation of Hhampuz with unproven nonsense (you call it "questions").
He's an excellent signature campaing manager and his achievements for the forum are outstanding.
If some other services are also interested to hire Hhampuz, they might read your bullshit that Hhampuz would reject good posters knowingly with malicious intent and that's just an outright lie. Everyone can check that Hhampuz is well-known for choosing the best users for campaigns managed by him.
You are damaging his business with malicious intent. Your accusation out of nowhere shows how dangerous you are. Obviously, I wouldn't trust such kind of users and avoid to send them money - not a single satoshi.
Maybe you are so pissed because he rejects shitposters effectively.
Aside from that your accusations against me are totally off-topic and not related to my Merit source application. If you want to discuss it further (although everything is said) create a new
not selfmoderated thread in Reputation. If you can't do that you'll just show what's your real intention is: damaging the reputation of other users at any cost.
It's tiresome...
Enuff off-topic in my Merit source application...
Anyway have to disagree with the statement quoted, since there are many valuable posts in the German Sub, which QWK can not merit as much as he could (compared to merits received for less or similar quality/content in our language-Sub´s).
I can agree here, there are times when qwk is very busy distributing Merit because he's distrubuting nearly 50% of all Merit on our local board and if he hasn't much time, some posts made during that time receive less Merit or threads where he isn't active, too.
LOL at this low functioning idiot. This is not off topic. If you are unable to grasp even simple concepts like this how can you be trusted to apply merit to posts of value???
You can't just say that is your opinion and that makes it correct. You are speculating on our intentions. You have clearly demonstrated you are too stupid to form reliable opinions. We are asking you to now demonstrate you are capable of forming a reliable opinion that does not fall apart under even mild scrutiny. This is vital for merit to one day have any meaning here.
NOW RE READ AND ANSWER SPECIFICALLY.
You are repeating FALSE ACCUSATIONS that you made earlier. We are challenging them directly. Your LACK of ability to recognize these direct challenges is evidence that you are too stupid to be a merit source.
1. Bring the specific " unproven nonsense" that we were asking Hhampuz if he had direct knowledge of - that clearly demonstrates our intention was to damage hhampuz reputation. You need to understand that you are dealing with observable instance, events that undeniably took place.
You do understand you can not cast those aside as simply "bullshit" , "nonsense" "our opinions" and then those observable instances vanish just like that.
A low functioning dreg such as yourself ( I say that based on the clear evidence in this thread) can not speculate on the intentions of those far smarter. You are UNABLE to provide any refutation to those observable instances we were asking hhampuz if he had knowledge of
but now you claim those instances are bullshit nonsense??
Do you not see how stupid you appear?
You don't just get to say it's my opinion that these observable instances are bullshit nonsense LOL and now I will say you are untrustworthy for asking if someone that may be directly employing these people are aware of these observable instances?? haha
How does that sully hhampuz reputation?? all he has to say is I WAS NOT AWARE or NOW THAT I AM AWARE I WILL NO LONGER EMPLOY THEM or I WILL GIVE A TRANSPARENT ANSWER AS TO MY ACTIONS REGARDING THEM.
Your entire argument that hinges on YOUR OPINION falls to pieces in our hands, with just a gentle probing. Bit like your mommy would.
NOW TRY AGAIN.
Demonstrate you are capable of understanding even very simple concepts.
You want to CLAIM something is bullshit, or nonsense then you must be able to demonstrate that. You have zero hope of doing that when someone is only presenting observable instances.
Now delete your merit source application until you can grasp simple concepts like this. You have no business trying to fathom where values lays in any specific thread. Back to school silly bitch.
Can you not see how we are crushing your feeble mind in public to any reader with even an average level of intelligence? we almost feel sorry for you. Please stop forcing us to do it to you 1moron.
HHampuz subsequent to that thread has sullied his own reputation.
1. He refuses to be transparent about his selection process (seems shady, why not be transparent if you have nothing to hide)?
There should be transparent and fair rules for sig campaigns that ensure ALL members are treated equally.
2. He supported doxing of the forum treasurer placing him and the boards funds at risk
3. He is now implicated in a possible 0.5btc theft a projects funds - there has been NO CLEAR explanation as far as we can see.
Your "opinions" are laughable. Since his selection process he REFUSES to make transparent, then again is simply your opinion and that is obviously just a joke.
1miau to stupid to be a merit source. Also looks to be deliberately attempting to silence whistle blowing or the presentation of observable instances that demonstrate "some members" are involved with financially dangerous behaviors.
Can you publish your top 20 merit fans and recipients? also those that include your on DT? thanks.
