Not all bounty hunters do research on projects

[installer]

You won't  believe this, but not only bounty hunters but investors as well, are not doing any kind of research before taking part in another project. They  just want to make profit and blindly investing in trash ICOs.

[1715074964]

1715074964

[1715074964]

1715074964

[rjp55]

I think most of the things happening in crypto currency world are happening because FOMO effect. Investors, bounty hunters %90 percent of them doing no research. Just following the other people and hope to get paid or get returns.

[maldini]

Many bounty hunters are still promoting worse projects that have worse Whitepaper and teams with no past experience of how cryptocurrency works ,what makes a team pro?its their past history of achievements with other projects or companies but I'm still surprised that people are promoting very very worse projects on here ,the last one I checked hours ago has no team but its been run by one person or two ,no office address and the Whitepaper is not making sense at all and its like a copycat project but guess what? The bounty spreadsheet is already full of hunters.

I think the problems most bounty hunters are facing is entirely their faults ,bounty hunters are responsible for their end results because many never learn to read or do thorough research and later they will start complaining about time wasted of bounties.

You also need to know that it's actually not just a project that has a lot of scams but many hunters also do scams. Such bounty hunters usually spam all your bounty projects, they register carelessly and make projects as bets, they assume that among all the projects they follow, one of them is legit.

[farraddy]

Of course some bounty hunters read Whitepaper, evaluate the idea of the project, based on their experience but many of them rely simply on their intuition and luck. It is possible that most of the bounty hunters choose projects at random.

[meysonYo]

Of course some bounty hunters read Whitepaper, evaluate the idea of the project, based on their experience but many of them rely simply on their intuition and luck. It is possible that most of the bounty hunters choose projects at random.

I personally met a man who constantly monitors the entire situation on the bounty market, and he studies the projects thoroughly before starting to promote them. I just follow his actions, and then decide about my participation in the project.

[Apes]

Not all bounty hunters are reward-oriented and follow without do a research to the projects they follow are legit or not. because the users who always do a research before joining campaign are not oriented to the reward value but the success of the project.

[jazmuzika217]

That's a clear problem because all we know that joining in every bounty is need a good and enough knowledge before you invest your time and effort to make it successful bounty make sure that you know the history and make sure that you know what you are promoting.

[Caladonian]

Not all bounty hunters are reward-oriented and follow without do a research to the projects they follow are legit or not. because the users who always do a research before joining campaign are not oriented to the reward value but the success of the project.

Those are very wise as they are not after for quick reply profits but for the long term benefits that the project will bring them after the project being released, though there's a lots of bounty hunters who are not paying attention with this and always aiming for quick benefits and in the end of the projects most of them get nothing.

Do your research and make good assessment with every projects that you'll going to support and invest your time.

[dearbesz1219]

If investors have problem to choose a good ICO to invest, then bounty participants do not have even such skills to find profitable bounty campaign.  And I am not talking about how many times the bounty campaigns that were successful did not want to send bounty tokens because they were afraid of dump.  

[mickey_miner]

Many bounty hunters are still promoting worse projects that have worse Whitepaper and teams with no past experience of how cryptocurrency works ,what makes a team pro?its their past history of achievements with other projects or companies but I'm still surprised that people are promoting very very worse projects on here ,the last one I checked hours ago has no team but its been run by one person or two ,no office address and the Whitepaper is not making sense at all and its like a copycat project but guess what? The bounty spreadsheet is already full of hunters.

I think the problems most bounty hunters are facing is entirely their faults ,bounty hunters are responsible for their end results because many never learn to read or do thorough research and later they will start complaining about time wasted of bounties.

I'm thinking. that most of the participants in this project are bots and they will not complain.) The bounty hunters have become smarter and they are studying projects.

[94K]

That's true. Not all bounty hunters do research on projects due to their laziness. Sometimes they follow the hype of people and this prevents them from further research which is bad. A bounty hunter must be smart.

[slaman29]

that's really true bro. but there are still many of them doing research before joining the project. because I myself always have the principle that if we join a project without any research, we will commit suicide. because we have sacrificed time and energy mind bro

What kind of research do they do? They look at the market cap, they look at the tokenomics, they maybe look at the team and the advisors especially. But seriously, how many do their real research? Like, do they take apart the whitepaper and see if the market research is really true? Did they see if the team and devs really are capable? I doubt it. I admit even I didn't go that deep into my first ICOs, what more bounty hunters?

[IParn]

That's true. Not all bounty hunters do research on projects due to their laziness. Sometimes they follow the hype of people and this prevents them from further research which is bad. A bounty hunter must be smart.

Indeed, sometimes laziness leads to the fact that you lose time and your money is best to lose a few hours or days to check than to lose days and money.  Also, do not trust strangers who advise very strange things.  you need to trust only yourself.

[ridha inoue]

I think not at all bounty hunter doing like that, i am a bounty hunter and i always doing research first.
If that project have a lauched product and have a good whitepaper with progress funding in their website, that is will i promote.

[Avirunes]

Many bounty hunters are still promoting worse projects that have worse Whitepaper and teams with no past experience of how cryptocurrency works ,what makes a team pro?

Well I think most of the bounty hunters don't care to do the research if the pool is good enough and they have a good chance of getting out a good percentage of tokens out of it if they plan to participate right from the start.

But the most important thing they forget is that the token price is estimated and not actual.

[proTECH77]

More reasons why many bounty hunters fell for scam project for promotion is their inability to carryout their own research before embarking on promotion. Last two years ago, I had to promote many bounty without pre_knowledge of the project and at the end got nothing from those campaigns and I regret be part of those campaigns. But now, I prefer to participates on signature campaign than Bounty hunting.

[andrearz]

If investors have problem to choose a good ICO to invest, then bounty participants do not have even such skills to find profitable bounty campaign.  And I am not talking about how many times the bounty campaigns that were successful did not want to send bounty tokens because they were afraid of dump.  

hmm ... I think you are right, as a participant indeed we only take part directly in promoting their projects not to find out more. it is true that not all participants do research because it wastes too much time.

[playboy654]

If investors have problem to choose a good ICO to invest, then bounty participants do not have even such skills to find profitable bounty campaign.  And I am not talking about how many times the bounty campaigns that were successful did not want to send bounty tokens because they were afraid of dump.  

hmm ... I think you are right, as a participant indeed we only take part directly in promoting their projects not to find out more. it is true that not all participants do research because it wastes too much time.

People want money so they get lured into the project where the bounty mentioned is huge so they think that they can make lot of money but if it is not a good project the value mentioned will not be same when it hit that exchanges.

[nowlscor18]

Of course some bounty hunters read Whitepaper, evaluate the idea of the project, based on their experience but many of them rely simply on their intuition and luck. It is possible that most of the bounty hunters choose projects at random.

Even how tough reader you are, it's not 100% assurance for every bounty hunters to be part of the perfect and successful project. I would base the ideas on how the final destination, of a certain coin to withstand after it has been introduced to the market exchanges.

[proTECH77]

I think not at all bounty hunter doing like that, i am a bounty hunter and i always doing research first.
If that project have a lauched product and have a good whitepaper with progress funding in their website, that is will i promote.

Most at times I think of most bounty hunters as not and not really humans because, those account or accounts still promote scam projects even though they are been spotted out as scam project. Even though those accounts are not bots, I strongly believe that they are those individuals who can't read or who aren't ready to read but to get the quick Money from the forum.