~Hhampuz

[Hhampuz]

If you don't mind, I've already messaged theymos asking him to blacklist me from DT1 but when I think about it I probably don't want anything to do with DT2 either.

This one goes out to most people that have me on their list without us actually interacting through a transaction. My collectible peeps can keep me on, most of them left DT anyways  

EDIT; I will not answer any questions in this thread.

EDIT2; Happy 4th of July to all my muricans out here!

[1714099888]

1714099888

[actmyname]

Now who's going to support our abusive flags, cycle merit and usurp the forum?

[TheNewAnon135246]

Please don't step out of the extortion circle .

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Hhampuz, I like you a lot so I’m not going to agree to ~ you for now because I’m hoping this is just a temporary feeling you have, mate.

I’m going to give this a while to see if you change your mind. Sometimes emotions can be raw & we make reactionary decisions.

I hope you’re OK any way, I’m always here to chat via PM if you need a pal.

[Hhampuz]

Hhampuz, I like you a lot so I’m not going to agree to ~ you for now because I’m hoping this is just a temporary feeling you have, mate.

I’m going to give this a while to see if you change your mind. Sometimes emotions can be raw & we make reactionary decisions.

I hope you’re OK any way, I’m always here to chat via PM if you need a pal.

Don't get me wrong, I am doing better than ever and this has nothing to do with anything besides me just feeling like this forum matters less and less each day that passes on. Getting rid of the "responsibilities" of being DT and what not would just make me feel even more free .

[The Cryptovator]

Second that what said @LFC_Bitcoin.
Wondering why few well reputed members want to leave trust system. I will not ask any questions but I would like to suggest reconsider your decision. Since you are on DT1 means people's voted you and they want you on DT network. Stay calm and turn cool your mind. I don't think this is a wise decision. Although it's your personal decision but I will not welcome it.

[TMAN]

Funny how many people want to leave since Theymos decided to let scammers run free with his shit new system.
Bet he won’t react to senior members just walking away, unlike his reaction to loonatics like Thule and TAA/cryptocunter

[LoyceV]

I probably don't want anything to do with DT2 either.

Marlboroza tried that, but it didn't work. Even you didn't remove him from your Trust list.

I didn't exclude marlboroza and I'm not going to exclude you.

This one goes out to most people that have me on their list without us actually interacting through a transaction.

That's an interesting choice, I would argue a Trust list doesn't necessarily have to do with personal transactions.

Wondering why few well reputed members want to leave trust system.

There's too much drama. I would argue the users who don't like the drama should stay on DT1 instead of leaving. DT1 especially needs level-headed users who dislike the drama.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Getting rid of the "responsibilities" of being DT and what not would just make me feel even more free .

I'm not sure that you really have any responsibilities being on DT other than leaving accurate feedback--and you were never a serial scam tagger anyway, so I wouldn't worry so much about that.  It really is a mark of respect people have for you that doesn't come with many obligations as far as I can see.  You're a good guy and deserve to be on DT--even if you're detaching from the forum.  

You've probably given this a lot of thought, so I won't advise you to think it over.  But I really don't want to exclude you from my trust list, bro.

There's too much drama. I would argue the users who don't like the drama should stay on DT1 instead of leaving. DT1 especially needs level-headed users who dislike the drama.

Fully agree.  DT should be loaded with more members like Hhampuz.

[actmyname]

If only there were a way to add someone to your trust list without adding them to the central trust list...

(other than using your alt to do a depth-1 trust and then trusting your alt, which is also not a great solution)Unfortunately, drama will plague users whether they're on DT or not. :/

[suchmoon]

I love you hh but this is a bit of a dick move to get yourself out of DT:



You didn't have to do that.

[Vod]

Don't get me wrong, I am doing better than ever and this has nothing to do with anything besides me just feeling like this forum matters less and less each day that passes on. Getting rid of the "responsibilities" of being DT and what not would just make me feel even more free .

You can easily do what I did.  Identified a few idiots and ignore them.  Made all the drama go away, and left them mumbling to themselves for a while.

What would you do if a major new client wanted a banner campaign with a manager on DT?

Don't burn your bridges. 

[TECSHARE]

I suspect this is a pre-emptive distraction from the incoming Livecoin drama bound to unfold...

[The-One-Above-All]

Funny how many people want to leave since Theymos decided to let scammers run free with his shit new system.
Bet he won’t react to senior members just walking away, unlike his reaction to loonatics like Thule and TAA/cryptocunter

We endorse hhampuz being excluded from DT.

The reader of this thread should have some background to consider.

TMAN you mean highly probable scammers such as yourself and your friend lauda (well he is a proven scammer)??

Senior members that are abusing the trust system to line their own pockets will not be missed at all.

Let's take a moment to read over some observable instances from Tmans and hhmapuz own histories.

First TMAN.  

The reader should be aware that TMAN has been involved in prior behaviors such as these mentioned by one of the most TRUSTED users on this forum ognasty. We quote ognasty below in red

Harassed user zeroxal as part of a confirmed and documented extortion scheme.

More details on the situation can be found here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.0

TMAN used minerjones to anonymously auction a KIALARA and then attempted to manipulate the auction by stating, "wow this has to be a record low for a sub #100 serial. if I didn't have so many I would be snapping this up"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1931778.msg19286369#msg19286369

Admission it was his auction:
"Dude I haven't crossed paths with OG in over 6 months, it wasn't until he derailed my auction hosted by MJ that this kicked off."
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1946142.msg19349060#msg19349060

He also claimed I was trying to "pretend" my casascius coins were loaded: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1945817.0

He then sent BTC to my publicly known address unsolicited and claimed I was trying to self escrow: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1946305.0

I don't trust this user, and his behavior on this forum in the time period from 6/2/17-6/4/17 should make that clear to anyone.

Not to mention this dumb ass admits he has never made an original thought inspiring post that he will dare present for analysis. He claims his MERIT SCORE is warranted due to his ENTERTAINMENT value with comprises of some childish swearing and sexual deviance smeared all over the board. He has no merit. He is a low functioning untrustworthy dreg that deserves no merit at all.

Even THEYMOS has excluded TMAN and his dumb ass scamming friend lauda from DT.



Next let us consider hhampuz.

1. He refuses to be transparent regarding his selection process for his sig campaigns. Thus opening himself, his projects and those he employs open to criticism and doubt. Putting the entire board at possible risk under certain conditions.  WHY NOT BE TRANSPARENT??

2. He supported the doxing of a forum treasurer. The doxing was provided by the idiot VOD posting here in this thread (that should really be banned for such a stupid and vicious attack)

3. There is a matter of 0.5btc possibly being stolen from a project that he was working with. He has not answered to clear this matter up even if it is not true. The truth is still not known.


So yes, it is best HHampuz is excluded and so should TMAN and Lauda.

We notice suchmoon is here trying to snipe at Theymos again who she back stabbed in public because he DARED to SUGGEST that we don't want PROVEN scammers and trust abusers on DT. LOL  Some believe this is an alt of lauda.

Actually this entire thread is full of those that are SHADY or support or have supported in the past SHADY individuals and included them into DT.

The reader should take note that these SAME people all seem to be creaming off the BEST PAID sig spots on the board and therefore not so happy about the new trust system that essentially rolls back their power to abuse and game the current systems to ensure these BEST PAID spots go to THEMSELVES.

Good to see this bunch crying about the new changes that mean you can't give out scam tags to whistle blowers any longer.

The reader should exclude Hhampuz not just because he requests it, but because you only want those that are willing to be transparent and honest. Same for TMAN. Get these dirt bags out.

[Hhampuz]

I just said I've messaged theymos about it, and I'm here asking people to exclude me. There really is no point for the usual suspects to show up and beat a dead horse. My god, do you really not have anything better to do? 

[actmyname]

1. He refuses to be transparent regarding his selection process for his sig campaigns. Thus opening himself, his projects and those he employs open to criticism and doubt. Putting the entire board at possible risk under certain conditions.  WHY NOT BE TRANSPARENT??

Signature campaign selections don't need to be transparent. "Putting the entire board at possible risk" seems like you're seriously hyperbolizing the direness of the situation. If they're hired, they're hired.

Quality of a participant is the most important thing but I don't expect Hhampuz to give me a detailed breakdown of how he gauges quality and how every single participant was selected. That would be ludicrous.

3. There is a matter of 0.5btc possibly being stolen from a project that he was working with. He has not answered to clear this matter up even if it is not true. The truth is still not known.

Contrived accusations through assumptions via circumstantial evidence are interesting... but answering every accusation is quite a chore especially for someone so "popular".

[Lafu]

This user is currently ignored.

Is the best feat. in the forum about Blah blah things from CH.

Guess this is a never ending story with him !

@Hhampuz

I dont exclude you also as many others , sry !

[The-One-Above-All]

I just said I've messaged theymos about it, and I'm here asking people to exclude me. There really is no point for the usual suspects to show up and beat a dead horse. My god, do you really not have anything better to do?  

Tman seems to have nothing better to do. We are merely giving our opinion on the correct actions of excluding you. Plus our reasons for believing this is the correct action (supporting you goal of removal) and informing the reader of the background of TMAN  so that they may reach the optimal opinion themselves. Tman is pushing (we believe) incorrect information on your thread. Do you want that to stand unanswered?

The reader must be given all available information to allow them to form the optimal opinion on such matters. Anything thing else is sub-optimal.

We support your exclusion. What more assistance can we give? sorry for helping.


@actmyname

This seems off topic. However, we maintain that you are INCORRECT to claim we are seriously hyperbolizing this . There are far wider implications that you may not have considered. Especially with instances where initial distribution of tokens could be involved as bounties.

We believe first you should read some of our prior posts where this was explained in detail and there was no refutation. We already discussed this with HCP on the hhampuz possible stealing of 0.5btc thread.

We wish to say that our point still stands and that hhampuz should be excluded.

This is not the thread for that debate. If you read our prior posts (very recent with hhampuz or on his thread) and are not satisfied then we can start another thread to debate it with you.

I'm sure many of the DT that enjoy being part of the "select few" that seemingly are auto eligible to new highly paid sig campaigns have a low expectation of the trouble the current sig campaing managers should be expected to go to regarding the selection process. Not that we say you perhaps of all persons on this thread would not be suitable even should the entire board be give FAIR and EQUAL consideration. We find you to be of a far higher quality than most even if we have found you to be in our opinion incorrect in a few instances.

We risk having the post deleted if it goes off onto campaign manager best practices. This is hhampuz wanting to get excluded. We endorse his desire to be excluded.

Sometimes if you want to be in a position of trust you must face many chores to cast aside reasonable doubts of other members when called on to do so.

[eddie13]

I think this may be a wise decision..

You are a fine businessman/worker here on the forum but I don't much like your politics in some cases so think you could do well to stick to your business and stay out of controversies..
Anyone from any side becomes a target of their antagonists when they involve themselves in forum political drama so it may be wise to stay right out of that and do your own thing, especially someone like you with employment to lose.

My ~ is meaningless soo....

[Quickseller]

Funny how many people want to leave since Theymos decided to let scammers run free with his shit new system.
Bet he won’t react to senior members just walking away, unlike his reaction to loonatics like Thule and TAA/cryptocunter

I think it is more likely that someone is telling him that he is wrong in regards to his handling of the LiveCoin flag, and keeping the signature campaign open, and/or that I was not wrong for messaging those in the LiveCoin campaign to notify them of the now active flag.


I think Hhampuz should have done the right thing and close down the LiveCoin campaign. I get that the ~quarter BTC is a lot of money to earn from running it every month, but there is a good amount of evidence that LiveCoin is acting in a way that a reputable person should not want to be associated with -- preventing customers who publicly criticize the company from withdrawing their deposits -- and no amount of money should compromise his (or anyone who is participating in the campaign) ethics. If I were in his situation, I would most certainly be unhappy about having to give up that income, but I unequivocally would have done the right thing.   

I am able to confirm that he is correct about this particular rating.

His opposition to the LiveCoin flag (and a number of other flags) is questionable though.