Would you participate in new project if it is not listed in ICO rating websites?

[spike420211]

Rating sites are not a panacea. Everyone knows that there you can easily buy a rating for any project.
I don’t know how things are now, maybe rating sites have become more serious structures, but of all the rating sites that I used, only one showed a stable and high-quality result. This site is icodrops.com
However, I am much more willing to enter a project that is on rating sites than not.

[spydee1522]

Ico rating websites are off late found of promoting scam projects and hence depending on ico rating scores to participate in a bounty has become hard for me. I rather choose to participate in bounties currently without even checking whether if it is listed on ico rating website or not. I take part in projects even if it is not listed on these ico rating sites.

[Krabby]

Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?

Appreciate your participation

If the projects are not listed on the ICO ranking sites, I probably never know it. I only care about projects that are highly rated at ranking sites

[khiholangkang]

Most ICO rating websites are paid to do an rated, some are not paid but few can really rate a project
So the ICO rating website is not very important to determine whether I will invest in a project or not

[Quintrix]

It's 51 to 14 in favor of yes, people don't believe in ICO rating sites anymore because of connivance which still exists today, dubious projects can still find it's way to their top list by paying a fee.

[joybella]

I would participate in such project if I carry out a proper research and I'm convinced the project is worth my investment. Most ico rating website base their judgement on individual level not on standard degree.

[spydee1522]

I have never used ICO rating. I have my own criteria for choosing projects such as white paper, a roadmap, a project team ... but I don’t trust rating sites. I believe more in my strength and well done research.

Great to hear such since the use of ico rating is getting out of hand and not a single individual is ready to use it since ratings have not been genuine and ico rating websites have been found promoting scam projects which had higher ratings on their websites. Research is the only option left in other to trust and participate in a project.

[mihtju]

I believe that the ICO rating on the site may not be true, so when choosing a project, I don't rely on such sites. I always evaluate the project on my own and highlight its pros and cons.

[Chuky92]

Most of these ICO rating websites can't be trusted, some can collect funds and give whatsoever rating they want so as to attract investors for the project. I have seen some projects which had good ratings or so we thought but ended up failing. I think the main issue is, studying and knowing if the project is worth it or not, and if it does , whether its listed on any ICO rating websites or not participating in it. It is our duty to know the legitimacy of a project not a group of people telling us based on their own opinion (although it might count atimes).

[Alohadanc3]

In my opinion at this time most of the ICO rating sites are nothing but some fake promotion. So if the project is good I don't care its in a ICO rating site or not. There is one or 2 sites which is good. I always prefer project with great ideas. But sometimes ICO ratingbsites are useful. And I also use some ICO rating sites cause its easy to find technical status of the project. That's it.

[tippytoes]

In my opinion at this time most of the ICO rating sites are nothing but some fake promotion. So if the project is good I don't care its in a ICO rating site or not. There is one or 2 sites which is good. I always prefer project with great ideas. But sometimes ICO ratingbsites are useful. And I also use some ICO rating sites cause its easy to find technical status of the project. That's it.

And to note that most of these ICO rating sites are paid ones. So the ratings might be biased in favor of their client, right? I have seen projects with high ratings but I personally know the people managing that project and I can say, they are crap. And from that, I surmise that not all high ranking ico projects are really good.

[ElmedoRator]

Never, because if the project is good, it will get the attention of the people, and it will definitely be listed in the ICO ranking websites. There are so many bullshit projects appearing every day so I will never care about them

[desticy]

Yes why not? Rating sites are not a determining factor in the quality of a project, but it is obvious that among all those not on rating sites there will be significantly more scam than among those posted on similar sites.
In view of this, everyone should conduct their own "investigation" of the project and only after they make a decision.

[pelumi20]

For me it doesn't make a difference on the off chance that it is listed or not as long as I probably am aware the project itself and the team as of now have validity in dealing with the said project. You know there are engineers that are as of now known to deal with effective projects before. Additionally, ICO evaluations isn't so dependable, we as a whole know why and regardless of whether the project is listed, having high appraisals doesn't ensure that the project isn't a scam in any case, in any case, I don't perceive any reason why a decent project would decline to be listed in ICO sites. To start with, that will an or more prevalence and not to deny that there are financial specialists that truly believe inclining to be a major ordeal

[prehisto]

I consider that it is a bad thing that they are not listed.
All in all the rating sites try to rate all projects especially promising ones because this is what their traffic is looking for and this is is what makes money for them.

[odukoyaewatomi27]

In my opinion I think it is not really a big deal if the project is not listed on ico rating websites because these sites cannot be totally trusted as they are often biased with their ratings.
I have seen projects that were rated low on these ico sites but still did very well. What matters the most is the project itself and your own personal research. If you research the project and found it to be good and legit, then go for it regardless of whether it is on ico rating sites or not.

[Bananington]

ICO rating websites can only give me awareness and information about new projects but will never influence my decision to invest in a project or not. So yes, I can invest in a new project if it's not on ICO rating website. The two ICO websites I usually monitor are ICOBENCH and ICODROPS with fair reviews, although most are paid ratings.

[anggracoin]

The ICO rating site is only as a reference for me to get information about new projects, not as a determinant for participating in the project. A good project can be identified from a professional team and experience. However, good projects are usually in demand by many investors so that the ICO rating site indirectly also reviews the project.

[rdewilde]

Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?

Appreciate your participation

Overtime I have stopped trusting all these projects rating websites or ICO rating websites because in many occasions they have failed to live upto expectations. So, if I see a project and after careful consideration and research proves to be legit and good I would participate whether it is on any rating websites or not. Also, there have been many news that these websites collects money to alter their reports and owing to the outcome of some of projects it has been proven to be true. In my opinion, make your research and invest.

[TaliskerDarkStorm]

If you think ICO rating websites reflects the correct information, you need the change your mind asap. Most well-known ICO rating websites are paid. For example, Icobench is paid platform. You can create a totally shitcoin and give some money to icobench and they can give you 5 stars. I saw a lot of 5 start project on icobench got scam. For example, there was a project called "BrainSpace" and it was reviewed on icobench as 5 star project. And icobench approved this project got already 30.000.000$. And guess what happened? All the team disappeared instantly; the website closed, telegram channel transformed another project's telegram channel so on.

So what I'm trying to say is do not believe ICO rating websites, do your own research ALWAYS!.