Would you participate in new project if it is not listed in ICO rating websites?

[sayaya17]

I will not participate in the ICO project that is not listed on the ICO rating website, because it is prone to fraud, the ICO project listed in the Web ICO rating can at least be accessed by us and can be traced to their data, such as developers and Team working on the project. In addition those listed on the ICO website rating is at least a project that is already ripe and ready, so that they have already submitted their project proposals to be registered on the ICO rating website.

[1714792315]

1714792315

[matchi2011]

I will not participate in the ICO project that is not listed on the ICO rating website, because it is prone to fraud, the ICO project listed in the Web ICO rating can at least be accessed by us and can be traced to their data, such as developers and Team working on the project. In addition those listed on the ICO website rating is at least a project that is already ripe and ready, so that they have already submitted their project proposals to be registered on the ICO rating website.

The good thing with ico rating is to have the exposures from investors who loves reviewing the project, those who are not listed to any kind of rating website have a lesser chance being noticed by many investors around. It's a good idea to any developers to enroll and participate to extend their popularities and have more people to influence and potential investors to join the project.

[Wildwest]

For me new projects that are not listed on the website wabsite are very doubtful because the wabsite in a bounty is very influential, many new projects appear that we do not know well and don't, I will see who has a clear vision, especially rating and further information of a project if it is clear means I will participate in it

[ereborltc]

I think a good project needs to be exposed and more people pay attention to it in order to have a chance of success. If the website does not list this project, I will not participate.

[hamba laeh]

in my opinion is not all the best projects are listed on the ICO rate website ... because what you say is that the founders of ICO can pay the website for a high rating to attract the attention of cryptocurency enthusiasts to invest in their projects ... so I don't trust the website rate to make it as a success factor or not a project that is being launched

[Jocuserious]

If I'll find good project then of course i wanna participate IEO & bounty. There are many good projects that do not think about all these rating sites and I agree with their plan. At this time, investors are more cautious about themselves, so it will not be possible to stretch the IEO / ICO rating site.

[MonsterV]

ICO rating websites aren't all true on their jobs ,they sometimes get paid for rating from developers ,I won't rely on them if I were you , project listing in ICO rating websites or not doesn't state the fact that its not a scam project, there are some good signs that good projects used to have.

yup, most of them are paid expert user on that website to make fake rating about thier project to increase the star, for example look at KryptoRedeem project that launch their ICO and getting about 4 / 5 rating on ICObench but look at them now, the project website cant be access and admin on telegram has been inactive about month , the project is totally dead right now.

so we cant really trust ICO project that having big rating on ICO rating  website like this, we need to do our own research about the project like who's the people behind the project & how the project work.

[Zazzu]

Never waste my time and money on projects like that. I only care and invest in new projects if they implement IEO in big exchanges like MXC, Gate, Hoo.com, Binance ...

[bitcoinisbest]

Never waste my time and money on projects like that. I only care and invest in new projects if they implement IEO in big exchanges like MXC, Gate, Hoo.com, Binance ...

If I am convinced with the idea of the project and do see that it will have a good future based on my understating and the interactions with the team then I would like to invest in that projects. Not necessary would be depended on the ICO rating for that, but it just acts as a guide or say one of the parameters.

[forexandcryptoauditor]

As your survey speaks, checking the project's rating on ICO rating website is one of the criteria or point in the checklist to judge the project. However, this is not mandatory to have the information and rating about the project on that rating website. Even though we see that some good rating projects also not doing well or turned out to be a scam, we can not trust that information. Based on our own research, MVP, team contacts, product development, and the concept should be part of our judgment of that project.