Game Protect flag

[Hhampuz]

Not banned. Signature still there and they aren't shown as banned on BPIP.Looks like they're just taking a break - maybe finally veering off the forum and now into sanity?

Depends on the ban I guess? When I got a 7-day ban my signature was still there.

[suchmoon]

Not banned. Signature still there and they aren't shown as banned on BPIP.

Not permanently banned is what you mean. Yes, I can read your mind. Although Hhampuz can too (and faster).

[Initscri]

Not banned. Signature still there and they aren't shown as banned on BPIP.Looks like they're just taking a break - maybe finally veering off the forum and now into sanity?

Depends on the ban I guess? When I got a 7-day ban my signature was still there.

Don't worry, we'll know the minute he gets back.

[Stedsm]

Not banned. Signature still there and they aren't shown as banned on BPIP.Looks like they're just taking a break - maybe finally veering off the forum and now into sanity?

Depends on the ban I guess? When I got a 7-day ban my signature was still there.

Don't worry, we'll know the minute he gets back.

Through the way he's giving people those kiddish trust ratings?

@Game-protect, how self-absorbed a person you are who didn't even try to get off the flag by providing evidence that you're not guilty, but accused all of the community with your stupid and laughable ratings to prove that you're the innocent one alone and we're all fools here? What a great act of trust abuse by you, thank God you're not a DT, man!

I mean, I abused some children who were in my contact? Seriously dude? It means you're a 5 year old kid whose extremely huge ego got butthurt when we people decided not to give you the toy you want, so now you want us to ask  you to please take a class action against "responsible" participants? Go and buy yourself a lollipop, kiddo!

[Initscri]

Not banned. Signature still there and they aren't shown as banned on BPIP.Looks like they're just taking a break - maybe finally veering off the forum and now into sanity?

Depends on the ban I guess? When I got a 7-day ban my signature was still there.

Don't worry, we'll know the minute he gets back.

Through the way he's giving people those kiddish trust ratings?

@Game-protect, how self-absorbed a person you are who didn't even try to get off the flag by providing evidence that you're not guilty, but accused all of the community with your stupid and laughable ratings to prove that you're the innocent one alone and we're all fools here? What a great act of trust abuse by you, thank God you're not a DT, man!

I mean, I abused some children who were in my contact? Seriously dude? It means you're a 5 year old kid whose extremely huge ego got butthurt when we people decided not to give you the toy you want, so now you want us to ask  you to please take a class action against "responsible" participants? Go and buy yourself a lollipop, kiddo!

Most likely.

Weirdly enough, he's been online in the last couple of days w/ no posts (not sure if this updates through a temp ban?)
I wonder if he's just attempting to wait it out until the flak dies down.

[bones261]

Weirdly enough, he's been online in the last couple of days w/ no posts (not sure if this updates through a temp ban?)
I wonder if he's just attempting to wait it out until the flak dies down.

You are still allowed to log in and read posts when you are under a ban. When you are logged in and start reading posts, it will log in as activity. Somehow, game-protect does not strike me as someone who will take a break for the flak to calm down. He's had "flak" for years. 

[Initscri]

Well, looks like there's a new set of negative feedback today lol.

Honestly wondering when there is going to be put a stop to this. I have 10 now from GP alone.

"is extremely mentally ill" and threatening a lawsuit, well, that's mature.

https://i.imgur.com/2VDWkay.png
https://i.imgur.com/MGS4W2E.png

[bones261]

Well, looks like there's a new set of negative feedback today lol.

Honestly wondering when there is going to be put a stop to this. I have 10 now from GP alone.

"is extremely mentally ill" and threatening a lawsuit, well, that's mature.

https://i.imgur.com/2VDWkay.png
https://i.imgur.com/MGS4W2E.png

   Well, this threat and accusation that we are all mentally ill is slightly better then accusing us all of abusing children.   Also, I hope he learned his lesson from his little break not to go around spamming the sig campaign threads with accusations. Also, his class action lawsuit is going to have an uphill battle convincing the court that our warning against him caused damages to other people. He will have to establish that the warning flags and negative feedback deterred individuals from seeking his services and that his services were more likely than not to recover the funds for them.

[Initscri]

Well, looks like there's a new set of negative feedback today lol.

Honestly wondering when there is going to be put a stop to this. I have 10 now from GP alone.

"is extremely mentally ill" and threatening a lawsuit, well, that's mature.

https://i.imgur.com/2VDWkay.png
https://i.imgur.com/MGS4W2E.png

   Well, this threat and accusation that we are all mentally ill is slightly better then accusing us all of abusing children.   Also, I hope he learned his lesson from his little break not to go around spamming the sig campaign threads with accusations.

Well, apparently not.

Still wanting to know if it's confirmed that he got a temp ban or not. If so, who the hell get's a temp ban for spamming, gets unbanned, and then continues to spam trust.

He knows he gets away w/ bloody murder when it comes to the trust abuse, that's how cocky he is. Mods should definitely make a stance on this. I know they don't want to interfere/modify trust, but nonetheless, he's clearly that arrogant about it.

[hilariousetc]

Not banned. Signature still there and they aren't shown as banned on BPIP.Looks like they're just taking a break - maybe finally veering off the forum and now into sanity?

Depends on the ban I guess? When I got a 7-day ban my signature was still there.

Don't worry, we'll know the minute he gets back.

Someone temp banned him from all the spam after he went crazy, but as you can see he reappeared yesterday. I've had lots of complaints about this guy over the years and he sure seems shady but there's never really been anything concrete presented other than him being annoying. It's likely his business model is to just harass companies in the hope that they'll pay him something to leave them alone, and people have accused him of extortion before, which is what that would be if it was the case, but when I asked for proof of extortion ie has he explicitly asked them for money then nothing has really been given. On the flipside, a lot of these companies probably don't have licenses to operate in some of the countries they do so that's his level of attack so there's probably not much that can be done about his business practises unless he is breaking the law himself and trying to extort people.

[AdolfinWolf]

Someone temp banned him from all the spam after he went crazy, but as you can see he reappeared yesterday.

Did he himself actually remove the feedback about abusing children or did an admin/moderator interfere? Just curious.

Substratra has a special place in game-protect's heart it seems  

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=874254;page=sent;offset=50

[hilariousetc]

Someone temp banned him from all the spam after he went crazy, but as you can see he reappeared yesterday.

Did he himself actually remove the feedback about abusing children or did an admin/moderator interfere? Just curious.

No idea. He either removed it himself or theymos did.

[marlboroza]

but there's never really been anything concrete presented

There is something in Meta https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3112348.0, however, some posts are missing from forum.

Did he himself actually remove the feedback about abusing children or did an admin/moderator interfere? Just curious.

No idea. He either removed it himself or theymos did.

Is removed trust feedback stored somewhere?
Latest mental gymnastic:

If the definition for a red flag is "high risk of losing money" why do not all the casinos promoted on bitcointalk.org get a red flag? 

Are you able to see the schizophrenia? Game Protect is not a casino and victims can not lose money!

[Lafu]

Guess that falls under hardcore abuse at the feeback system !




and there are more of that replys.

[game-protect]

Also, his class action lawsuit is going to have an uphill battle convincing the court that our warning against him caused damages to other people. He will have to establish that the warning flags and negative feedback deterred individuals from seeking his services and that his services were more likely than not to recover the funds for them.

Over the years several online casino victims wrote in the support tickets or emails that they read on bitcointalk.org negative things like Game Protect is a scammer or blackmailer and based on this they did not give the order to enforce its claims!

Until recently bitcointalk.org publicly warned that some bitcointalk users strongly believe that Game Protect is a scammer! Only recently it changed to "high-risk".

Here is an example posted in a support ticket:

We agreed I pay you after the court. I also read a lot of negative things about game protect ( refers to bitcointalk.org). I do not care if I threw away the 4,5k. If you are making problems about the 1k then do not investigate it anymore and our coorporation will end here. bye

[actmyname]

Over the years several victims wrote in the support tickets or emails that they read on bitcointalk.org negative things like Game Protect is a scammer or blackmailer and based on this they did not give the order to enforce its claims!

Here is a support ticket example:

"We agreed I pay you after the court. I also read a lot of negative things about game protect (he refers to bitcointalk.org). I do not care if I threw away the 4,5k. If you are making problems about the 1k then do not investigate it anymore and our coorporation will end here.
bye"

cat post | grep (scammer|blackmailer) yielded no results.

Even in your own examples they don't align with what you're saying. Where did they say that you were called a scammer, or a blackmailer?

Your secondary remark about "high-risk" feedback relies on the first.

[game-protect]

Where did they say that you were called a scammer, or a blackmailer?

In support tickets and emails.

Over the years several online casino victims wrote in the support tickets or emails that they read on bitcointalk.org negative things like Game Protect is a scammer or blackmailer and based on this they did not give the order to enforce its claims!

[actmyname]

Where did they say that you were called a scammer, or a blackmailer?

In support tickets and emails.

I don't see those keywords in your example.

Typically, when people provide examples, they are used to support their argument rather than detract thereof but perhaps you are taking an avant-garde approach to defending yourself. I support your modern twisting of the orthodox but I don't think that we should deviate from the classics, especially on a forum like this one. After all, the ancestral roots have cemented themselves because they brought forth a strong foundation from which we have grown, and because of that, the basics and fundamentals are truly the most crucial part of the process. All modern twists are rooted in the originals and their development is fueled because of it. It would be rash to completely ignore them and plant a completely new tree: even quite disrespectful at that.

[game-protect]

Typically, when people provide examples, they are used to support their argument rather than detract thereof but perhaps you are taking an avant-garde approach to defending yourself.

Why do not you support your claims?

Your lottery is a scam. QED.

Or even more interesting, why do not you put the proof on the table who and for how much my lottery scammed?

The schizophrenia of some bitcointalk accounts is surely limitless!

[AB de Royse777]

~snip~

The schizophrenia of some bitcointalk accounts is surely limitless!

Your problem is that you do not see your hypocrisy. You are a liar, false accuser, stupid non-sense. I have no idea how you claim you are going to solve other's problems, protect others when you are not able to protect yourself and surely is failing to solve your own problems.

Stop pretending to be a savior. You are a complete package of nonsense and fake.