Stop Blaming Bounty Hunter!

[Redemption59]

Bounty hunters are very dedicated to the work they have been doing but this has always been nothing to project and bounty managers. Bounty and project managers are ungrateful for the work of bounty hunters thinking bounty hunters are always the cause of dumping while at the same time forgetting the whole bounty allocation is less than 5% of total tokens and which is very hard for hunters alone to dump and also the bonuses dedicated to investors. It is time these project and bounty managers stop blaming hunters but rather appreciate their good works.

[1715035180]

1715035180

[1715035180]

1715035180

[Akoldi_ibk]

This writeup clearly show what is being going on behind the scenes and afterward, the blame is always on hardworking bounty hunters who put resources, energy, time and money together to make project a success. An additional advantage of hunters that Bounty Managers and project managers are not aware of is that hunters in most cases are also investors. They often invest, contribute financially to the ICO/IEO once they see the prospect of project is good one. But bad decisions from projects always cause the down fall. Next after that is a blame game and hunters are always at the receiving end. I can only hope that we have transparency to reveal who is really the bad actor.

[akirasendo17]

Since I signed up for the Forum, there is a subject that the project teams have been constantly complaining about. People who deal with Bounty are seen as a dumper.

I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.

Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?

$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?

Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!

This is true a lot of them take advantage of the earlybird promo, snd huges discounts that the developers never look at it as a hole in a projects , they also tolerate it, because as we know some projects doesnt care what happen to a projects they just want to sell all the coins , and also take profit, what should they really need to do is stop that kind of way or promotions, because its going to hurt the project badly that it will not going to see the project go further, because the holders with a big part is going to dump it once its listed, they should be making a clause that its just going to sell a part of it not dump it all

[futureofeth]

All right. As a rule, investors who own a much larger number of coins than bounty hunters destroy the price. However, they cannot blame themselves,
which is why they blame the bounty hunters who, if they wish, can bring down the price only if the coin is extremely low on the market since the start of sales.

Many people will not accept this because no one from the bounty will not ask to allocate higher amounts to the bounty. Even if the value of the coin decreasing and they will blame the bounty hunters, why don't they think in a different way a person who is holding a higher amount coin will sell them in order to decrease its value.

[joromz1226]

Since I signed up for the Forum, there is a subject that the project teams have been constantly complaining about. People who deal with Bounty are seen as a dumper.

I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.

Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?

$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?

Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!

Those project who blame bounty hunters are stupid, greed, cheater,  obviously they're making alibi only.
In fact, most of the time the one who dumped the price is their no. developer who made the token of course. Then, transparency
for the project is very hard to find now in every project. They're good only to collect fund but for giving a rewards is not.

[matchi2011]

Those project who blame bounty hunters are stupid, greed, cheater,  obviously they're making alibi only.
In fact, most of the time the one who dumped the price is their no. developer who made the token of course. Then, transparency
for the project is very hard to find now in every project. They're good only to collect fund but for giving a rewards is not.

Developers still the wide control of their projects, if the team is there only for collecting funds then blaming games is expected. They will continue pointing fingers and most of the time it's the hunters that being labeled. How come, 1-5% of the entire supply can harmed the entire value of the token? no way. but in reality, it's the developing team together with the early investors who have a huge rewards.

[Anonylz]

I don't think it is entirely right to always blame bounty hunters whenever their is a decline in price of a project, I know some hunters do sell their reward in haste while some don't, individual choices,
but looking at it from the little percentage mostly allocated to bounty, it shouldn't have such impact on price compare to the bonus given to early buyers or private investors,
I guess it's more convenient to blame hunters for price dump because it is given for free even though hunters did put their effort to promote the project.

[Ziskinberg]

I guess it's more convenient to blame hunters for price dump because it is given for free even though hunters did put their effort to promote the project.

In the first place, it's not given free because there is a condition or task they have to do in order to receive the reward.
Some bounty hunters already considered bounty hunting as a job, therefore their reward is considered as a salary, and if they dump that is their will, and take not that they also loss value when they dump so its not the investors only who lose their money but the bounty hunters as well.

[kak uli]

Since I signed up for the Forum, there is a subject that the project teams have been constantly complaining about. People who deal with Bounty are seen as a dumper.

I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.

Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?

$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?

Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!

I agree with your opinion ... don't always be a bounty hunter who is blamed as a dumper ... actually we all know that the discount (%) given to investors is also very large ... so in the case of dumper don't always be a bounty hunter blamed as a dumper ...

[djselery]

The amount allocated to the bounty pool is generally very small compared to the total supply of tokens, so I agree that we can't blame bounty hunters for dumping the price. Usually, the dumpers are the early investors who bought the tokens with huge bonuses, sometimes even more than 50% bonus, so they receive their tokens with half ICO price and then sell them with cheap rates.

[mdzahed134]

We cannot blame bounty hunter if they sell their tokens because of some of them needs money. We cannot force them to hold their tokens because that will make the price drop too deep. I am sure that not all of them sell their tokens once they received the token because many of them still waiting for the high price to sell.

Bounty hunters will work a long times for the payments than their reward is precarious if which project will not reach the goal. There are no exact deadline because in most of the bounty campaign increase the weeks limit. A couple of months will spend in every single campaign than if received payment why they have to keep hold so that majority of the hunters will go to sell first. Projects team harassed bounty hunters in many different ways like as KYC process.                   

[Kupid002]

I guess it's more convenient to blame hunters for price dump because it is given for free even though hunters did put their effort to promote the project.

In the first place, it's not given free because there is a condition or task they have to do in order to receive the reward.
Some bounty hunters already considered bounty hunting as a job, therefore their reward is considered as a salary, and if they dump that is their will, and take not that they also loss value when they dump so its not the investors only who lose their money but the bounty hunters as well.

This things should be considered by the project owner if they dont want to dump thier token then pay bounty hunters in other crypto like ETH or make a buy order to buy them from bounty hunters . Once the payment recieve by bounty hunters more of them choose to sell and even owner know that ,then why not just put a buy support in exchange so the price will not be affected from selling.

[miningguru]

Since I signed up for the Forum, there is a subject that the project teams have been constantly complaining about. People who deal with Bounty are seen as a dumper.

I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.

Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?

$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?

Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!

I agree with your opinion ... don't always be a bounty hunter who is blamed as a dumper ... actually we all know that the discount (%) given to investors is also very large ... so in the case of dumper don't always be a bounty hunter blamed as a dumper ...

Every time it is not a good idea to blame the bounty hunters because even investors are getting a higher percentage of bonus during their purchase. The % allocated to the bounty is not assigned by the managers, but from the company directly. It is not a good way, to blame the bounty hunters always.

[Fredomago]

I guess it's more convenient to blame hunters for price dump because it is given for free even though hunters did put their effort to promote the project.

In the first place, it's not given free because there is a condition or task they have to do in order to receive the reward.
Some bounty hunters already considered bounty hunting as a job, therefore their reward is considered as a salary, and if they dump that is their will, and take not that they also loss value when they dump so its not the investors only who lose their money but the bounty hunters as well.

This things should be considered by the project owner if they dont want to dump thier token then pay bounty hunters in other crypto like ETH or make a buy order to buy them from bounty hunters . Once the payment recieve by bounty hunters more of them choose to sell and even owner know that ,then why not just put a buy support in exchange so the price will not be affected from selling.

Allocated funds for bounty hunters should be consider as bitcoin or other form of crypto, it won't affect the trading after being listed if the project developers properly allotted  the rewards. The hunters deserve the fruit of their works they shouldn't be blamed.

Developers needs to plan everything they have to settle every possibilities and not to blame anyone with their failures.

[kusanagi01]

That's true, stop blaming bounty hunters. I am bounty hunter more work in translation of whitepaper and annonce, i waste more than week to translate single whitepaper and than get that the project its scam. its really make me angry and just want stop hunting.
what is with those hundred scam project. scams everywhere . if its not scam than low project that told coin price is 0.5$ and get 0.0000000001$ -_-
i just can return time to past ,good projects and teams. not like now everyone just want thief and scam others ,what a shame with those

sorry but its really not good in that fact.
hope someone get idea to eliminate those scammers.

[jrrsparkles]

That's true, stop blaming bounty hunters. I am bounty hunter more work in translation of whitepaper and annonce, i waste more than week to translate single whitepaper and than get that the project its scam. its really make me angry and just want stop hunting.
what is with those hundred scam project. scams everywhere . if its not scam than low project that told coin price is 0.5$ and get 0.0000000001$ -_-
i just can return time to past ,good projects and teams. not like now everyone just want thief and scam others ,what a shame with those

sorry but its really not good in that fact.
hope someone get idea to eliminate those scammers.

Likely things changes a lot from past years but the number of hunters increast atleast 100 times more from the last year then how we can eliminate scammers if people ready to promote anything?

And this topic is more about the dump on the price happened by bounty hunters,which is really not a case with the scam projects because they never give an opportunity for them to dump it.

[TinaK]

make every earning possibilities even bounty hunting is also a one of the best option for cryptocurrency users and bitcointalk members. So as you plan for bitcoin signature campaign there is no problem on working with them.
As like the same BTC payable campaign we can expect decent growth on working for bounty campaign also but that should be true.

[sayaya17]

Sometimes not all bounty hunters sell their tokens when the tokens first enter the market, so it is not possible for prize participants to make dumping prices on the exchange, even tokens for participants in the lock for a long time to avoid this dumping. Decrease or increase in price can actually be by the intervention of the developer, so the developer can raise the price and not make it dumping.

[dvmmayowa]

Well said buddy
This have become the normal trend in the crypto world, developers either blame the price downtrend on airdroppers or bounty hunters haven forgotten that only a little percentage of the tokens was allocated to them.

Another big mistake most erc-20 based projects make is distribution of tokens before market listing, this makes some impatient investors want to liquidate their holding through dex like forkdelta, hence price starts dipping even before listing.

In my own opinion, I think bounty hunters have little or no blame at all afterall, they worked for their earnings and even if they threaten the dump of the project's token, then measures should be taken by the team such as token buyback to prevent the occurrence of price dump.

[Zulkifli BI]

I agree with the assessment of the project team to the bounty hunter as a dumper ... because many bounty participants sell their coins at very cheap prices ... because many of the bounty hunters consider that they get the coins without having to spend money in the form of capital ... so they want sell at any price ... while investors spend capital to get the coin ... so that at a low price they won't sell it because they will definitely lose .. so it's natural that they blame the bounty hunter as a dumper of altcoins ..