Stop Blaming Bounty Hunter!

[Borisov]

it has long been known that bounty hunters do not greatly affect the cost . the earliest investors lock in profits or losses. Or the development team sells its own.

[1714832289]

1714832289

[1714832289]

1714832289

[1714832289]

1714832289

[1714832289]

1714832289

[coin-investor]

Even if they locked the bounty hunters rewards their coins are still dropping I have seen that to so many coins coming out of ICO Liker Dexage and now Xcrypt are locking their bounty hunters rewards but their coins are still dropping, from this we have seen the big picture that it is not the bounty hunter's fault.

[johanesrobin]

Bounty Hunter is actually a victim.
they work but there is no guarantee to get payment. a few months they worked and at the end of the campaign they got nothing because the tokens were locked and various adverse reasons.

[Ziskinberg]

Very good topic, and I don't even understand why the coin would dump if they really raise a good amount of money, unless they are just deceiving investors. Bounty hunters are here to work so it's normal that they will dump right after, devs should anticipate that already and do necessary measures to avoid dump if they can.

But on the other picture, even if there is a dump but when the volume is even less than 3% of the total amount raise, that would not entirely affect the future of the project, price dump could be temporary but then again, it's better if the project will have a good start as investors usually sees it first compared to it's potential in the long run.

[fvb]

Blaming bounty hunters for all the failures of the project has already become a habit.  How hunters can drop the price of a token when they have a very small percentage of the total number of tokens.  And even more so now projects are paid for work in the bounty later, or tokens of hunters are frozen at all.

[nowlscor18]

I strongly agree with you, I am also a bounty hunter, and I think the coin price fell not because the bounty hunter sold coins that he got cheaply, but indeed a huge presale discount bought by investors that made the price of the coin very cheap after listing to exchange

As bounty hunter I needed to have assurance for my bounty coins, which indeed cannot be dominated by investors. I choose to hold instead of being an dumper. Others may thought hunters were just doing same thing as other, but don't generalize the idea.

[idekai]

Bounty are seen as a dumper.

I've been studying for a long time.

I'm so curious, what makes you so angry and did your research. If only words on the street that are saying " Bounty Hunter is the dumper ".
Well, that won't trigger me that much. Any other reason behind your research?

[wack slacker]

Bounty hunters have thousands of participants to promote a project and their rewards are not much.  Most projects do not have liquidity when being put on the trading floor, investors panic and sell assets at low prices.  That was bad.  I have seen many projects still have the ability to increase their token value without depending on bounty hunter like Pundix, Sero and many other projects.  The value of a project depends on the market, the development team, the project partner, the investor and what the development team can do.

[ansarose1]

Yes absolutely correct, if the coin or token is being dumo after being listed, it is not the bounty hunter's fault. Because if we can see total allocation distributed to all bounty hunters its just a a few percent, about 1-3% of the total tokens allovated for bounty hunters, it may affecy the price if being traded but not so big, investors are thenes who has many volume of the tokens, so they might be.

[zhea]

Bounty hunters have thousands of participants to promote a project and their rewards are not much.  Most projects do not have liquidity when being put on the trading floor, investors panic and sell assets at low prices.  That was bad.  I have seen many projects still have the ability to increase their token value without depending on bounty hunter like Pundix, Sero and many other projects.  The value of a project depends on the market, the development team, the project partner, the investor and what the development team can do.

How can they cope up with the dumping of investors who bought the token with the very cheap price as what OP had said. If investors sold millions of what he bought then it could really affect the market price.

[Icologies]

Since I signed up for the Forum, there is a subject that the project teams have been constantly complaining about. People who deal with Bounty are seen as a dumper.

I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.

Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?

$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?

Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!

what is the power as a bounty hunter who only hopes to benefit from the project being worked on. I don't blame the bounty hunter because I can also be considered a bounty hunter. but what you have to know from a bounty hunter is don't expect too much, because you get it for free without investment. I am also active in trading so it does not depend on the results of the bounty hunter.

[adekogbe]

The budget for bounty hunting is only but a small fraction of the marketing budget and always about 2% of the total hardcap.
So in a case of a successful listing, the trading price action cannot be judged by this few percentage of coins circulating, however enormous bonuses is one of those factors responsible for a price dump and not bounty hunters. 

[farraddy]

I think that the main collapse in the prices of tokens is due to their sale by investors who bought tokens with significant discounts and due to the General fall of the market. I agree that the bounty hunter can't do much to influence the exchange rate of the coin.

[abeecrypto]

Exactly! I have seen so many projects blame bounty hunters for the dump. It always sounds Bizarre, especially when reward for bounty is of small percentage. When you see projects blaming bounty hunters, it goes to show that the project team have got no good strategy of making their project successful.

[posporo]

I agree that bounty hunters shouldn't take all the blame because of the small percentage of the coins or tokens which is distributed for those who joined the bounty but still they are newbies who lacks patient in holding their rewards from the bounties, imagine the numbers of newbies dumping their coins or tokens for cheap price in different bounty rewards which could affect also the marketplace even in its small amout it could affect the market.

[juperos]

I think that the blame is just a habit of those who fail, they like to criticize others. If that is really a good project, the number of tokens we have cannot make the price down seriously.
A good project always has a big buy back and buy wall policy when starting to distribute for bounty hunters.
therefore, we should not be too concerned with their criticism. Anyway, it's still bad projects.

[Daha19]

Since I signed up for the Forum, there is a subject that the project teams have been constantly complaining about. People who deal with Bounty are seen as a dumper.

I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.

Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?

$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?

Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!

interesting observation if that is the case. Bounty hunters now receive a very small income, and whether it is worth it, sometimes it is not clear

[NathanJB]

In the earliest days of exchange listing of a coin, it is believed that bounty hunters are the ones who really do the dumping. So that ICO price is almost immediately far from the current price. I think that most of the bounty hunters will dump as soon as the coin is admitted on an exchange. But over time, the coin should get back to its price since it is only a very small portion of the total number of coins that allocated for bounty. If it fails to, the project and not the bounty hunters should be blamed.

[chanler]

I am also surprised at the slanted views of people to bounty hunters. We are always considered as actors who make the price of coins destroyed, or often referred to as a dumper. In fact, we also work diligently, and not all bounty hunters will directly sell their tokens at prices that make it dumped. Sometimes we also become victims of dumpers.

[Skieleton]

Since I signed up for the Forum, there is a subject that the project teams have been constantly complaining about. People who deal with Bounty are seen as a dumper.

I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.

Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?

$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?

Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!

Now are the hard times for bounty hunters. I had a long break myself. Recent campaigns in which I took part have brought not only losses of time. We will see how it will be now ...