🐺WOLF.BET - Advanced Dice Game 🎲 Sportsbook 🏟️ Slots 🎰

[serjent05]

Site keeps loading here. Any more users with this problem??
 
I am just seeing the loader, not more.

Probably its your internet connection or something?  Mine is loading fine and I don't encounter any lagging during my auto game on the site.  I have a crappy connection since I am from a country that have a slow internet connection.  Anyway you can try to fix it by checking your connection or clearing your browser cache.

[1982dre]

Site keeps loading here. Any more users with this problem??
 
I am just seeing the loader, not more.

Probably its your internet connection or something?  Mine is loading fine and I don't encounter any lagging during my auto game on the site.  I have a crappy connection since I am from a country that have a slow internet connection.  Anyway you can try to fix it by checking your connection or clearing your browser cache.

Well the connections here in the Netherlands aren't crappy, one of the best in the world. But I heard some other users had also problem with some lagging yesterday.

[tomal1003]

Site keeps loading here. Any more users with this problem??
 
I am just seeing the loader, not more.

Probably its your internet connection or something?  Mine is loading fine and I don't encounter any lagging during my auto game on the site.  I have a crappy connection since I am from a country that have a slow internet connection.  Anyway you can try to fix it by checking your connection or clearing your browser cache.

Well the connections here in the Netherlands aren't crappy, one of the best in the world. But I heard some other users had also problem with some lagging yesterday.

As far as i know the site was updating, that's the reason everyone was facing a bit lag

[Lanatsa]

Site keeps loading here. Any more users with this problem??
 
I am just seeing the loader, not more.

Probably its your internet connection or something?  Mine is loading fine and I don't encounter any lagging during my auto game on the site.  I have a crappy connection since I am from a country that have a slow internet connection.  Anyway you can try to fix it by checking your connection or clearing your browser cache.

Well the connections here in the Netherlands aren't crappy, one of the best in the world. But I heard some other users had also problem with some lagging yesterday.

As far as i know the site was updating, that's the reason everyone was facing a bit lag

Doesn't experience any lag on any browsers that I had. Chrome,Opera,IE,Firefox,Brave,Microsoft Edge. I all works find on my end.

[rexxarofmoknathal]

The high rollers list today looks looks impressive with insane payouts of 99% and probably for the same player. This is so crazily ridiculous that has gotta be shared 

[deisik]

That's what I call luck!





As they say, from rags to riches (and in just one lucky roll)! I'm curious if it is possible to set a higher payout or is it the highest possible? Regardless, congratulations to AlbertTrotta for making it (as well as giving us a bit of hope)

The high rollers list today looks looks impressive with insane payouts of 99% and probably for the same player. This is so crazily ridiculous that has gotta be shared

I would look into that

[WolfBet]

In today's top 10, we can see a few new players who made it to the top 10 and some others who kept their previous positions, good job everyone! Speaking in contests, have you joined our contest here on bitcointalk? Click here!

[ahmadakbari]

That's what I call luck!
As they say, from rags to riches (and in just one lucky roll). I'm curious if it is possible to set a higher payout or is it the highest possible? Regardless, congratulations to AlbertTrotta for making it (as well as giving us a bit of hope)

For becoming hopeful, there is no need to see such bets. As the game is provably fair, every number from 0.01 to 99.99 can be the outcome. Also, we cannot say this user is lucky because we don't know how many times the user has bet before hitting this number. Should check the profile.
Payout can be set from 1.0102 to 9900.

[deisik]

That's what I call luck!
As they say, from rags to riches (and in just one lucky roll). I'm curious if it is possible to set a higher payout or is it the highest possible? Regardless, congratulations to AlbertTrotta for making it (as well as giving us a bit of hope)

For becoming hopeful, there is no need to see such bets. As the game is provably fair, every number from 0.01 to 99.99 can be the outcome. Also, we cannot say this user is lucky because we don't know how many times the user has bet before hitting this number

Why does that feel like a wet blanket?

We all want to hope and we all want to believe in our luck, even beyond hope. Seeing someone being that lucky (as we perceive it) is what makes the game worth it for us personally. Otherwise, why would we want to bet at all? We all know that we are set to lose eventually, given the house edge and enough time, and it is only through luck that we can win. Well, you can also try martingale but your mileage may vary

Payout can be set from 1.0102 to 9900

See, there is hope for the better!

[serjent05]

We all want to hope and we all want to believe in our luck, even beyond hope. Seeing someone being that lucky (as we perceive it) is what makes the game worth it for us personally. Otherwise, why would we want to bet at all? We all know that we are set to lose eventually, given the house edge and enough time, and it is only through luck that we can win. Well, you can also try martingale but your mileage may vary

Payout can be set from 1.0102 to 9900

See, there is hope for the better!

 I hope much of that 9900x so I set the win chance on 0.01%  but to no avail lol.  It seems luck does not shine on me today.

In today's top 10, we can see a few new players who made it to the top 10 and some others who kept their previous positions, good job everyone! Speaking in contests, have you joined our contest here on bitcointalk? Click here!

Anyway glad I got it to 4th place this time, last time  I was on 6th and 9th. Could have been on 3rd if I had not hesitated on the last minute. 

[posi]

That's what I call luck!
As they say, from rags to riches (and in just one lucky roll). I'm curious if it is possible to set a higher payout or is it the highest possible? Regardless, congratulations to AlbertTrotta for making it (as well as giving us a bit of hope)

For becoming hopeful, there is no need to see such bets. As the game is provably fair, every number from 0.01 to 99.99 can be the outcome. Also, we cannot say this user is lucky because we don't know how many times the user has bet before hitting this number

Why does that feel like a wet blanket?

We all want to hope and we all want to believe in our luck, even beyond hope. Seeing someone being that lucky (as we perceive it) is what makes the game worth it for us personally. Otherwise, why would we want to bet at all? We all know that we are set to lose eventually, given the house edge and enough time, and it is only through luck that we can win. Well, you can also try martingale but your mileage may vary

You both said well but no matter the number of time a gambler have bet or the amount lost before winning in gambling take luck and maturity in putting ones buzz in check before a gambler can be profitable but trying the martingale strategy is risky and it also not meant for every individual.

[Bitinity]

That's what I call luck!
As they say, from rags to riches (and in just one lucky roll). I'm curious if it is possible to set a higher payout or is it the highest possible? Regardless, congratulations to AlbertTrotta for making it (as well as giving us a bit of hope)

For becoming hopeful, there is no need to see such bets. As the game is provably fair, every number from 0.01 to 99.99 can be the outcome. Also, we cannot say this user is lucky because we don't know how many times the user has bet before hitting this number. Should check the profile.
Payout can be set from 1.0102 to 9900.

Hitting that payout itself is a lucky already no matter how long the user try to hit, why we cant say that he is lucky to hit it? Do you mean that he is lucky enough if he hit it just after he start hunt the payout (with few bets only)? I would even say that someone is lucky enough to hit even if he need hundred thousands of bets before he hit it eventually because hitting big payout is something rare, not all players are lucky enough to hit although they try it every single day.

[ahmadakbari]

Hitting that payout itself is a lucky already no matter how long the user try to hit, why we cant say that he is lucky to hit it? Do you mean that he is lucky enough if he hit it just after he start hunt the payout (with few bets only)? I would even say that someone is lucky enough to hit even if he need hundred thousands of bets before he hit it eventually because hitting big payout is something rare, not all players are lucky enough to hit although they try it every single day.

This example makes that more clear.
When the payout is 2600x, the chance of win is 0.04%. It's unlikly to win the bet.
But assume that you roll 2000 times. Mathematically, Your chance to win at least one time is 55%.

[deisik]

That's what I call luck!
As they say, from rags to riches (and in just one lucky roll). I'm curious if it is possible to set a higher payout or is it the highest possible? Regardless, congratulations to AlbertTrotta for making it (as well as giving us a bit of hope)

For becoming hopeful, there is no need to see such bets. As the game is provably fair, every number from 0.01 to 99.99 can be the outcome. Also, we cannot say this user is lucky because we don't know how many times the user has bet before hitting this number. Should check the profile.
Payout can be set from 1.0102 to 9900.

Hitting that payout itself is a lucky already no matter how long the user try to hit, why we cant say that he is lucky to hit it? Do you mean that he is lucky enough if he hit it just after he start hunt the payout (with few bets only)? I would even say that someone is lucky enough to hit even if he need hundred thousands of bets before he hit it eventually because hitting big payout is something rare, not all players are lucky enough to hit although they try it every single day

Someone's got it right finally

It is a purely psychological thing that works on us here, not on that user as it is about our perception of luck, i.e. how we perceive it, not how it objectively exists (or doesn't, for that matter). But it should work on that user too. And even if statistically his chances are in fact pretty high to hit so high a payout after a few hundred thousand bets (inquiring minds can come up with the actual probability on their own, it should be on the order of a few thousand bets), it would still feel like a stroke of extreme luck. This is how our minds work since after hitting a few thousand losses, we would have long lost all hope (and probably stopped rolling altogether)

[fullhdpixel]

However, wolf.bet is brand new already, they don't need to make a new website, they can rebrand themselves as a "not just a dice site" with their current name, I don't get why people think that having a dice in your name must mean you are purely a dice website, there are a ton of websites with weird names that go for only slots for example and that doesn't mean they can't have any other game, they just don't want to.

Wolf.bet has a good name with no dice in it and no nothing so they could just put any game and not worry about the situation of people thinking they are just a dice game website neither. So, it works out great for them

Well, it is not quite our business anyway

So we can only speculate here. As I see it, there is a certain window of, say, a couple of years when adding new games wouldn't hurt the image of the site. But after this window is closed, it might be better to keep things as they are. It doesn't actually have anything to do with the name itself (i.e. whether it has the word dice in it) but rather with the public perception of the casino that will be firmly established by that time

I disagree, I think it is exactly the opposite, this is why running a casino is such a hard task. If they improve their website for years then we should be expecting them to keep improving their websites, if they want to change something they should do it right now so we don't get too comfortable with it.

That is why I think having a website for few years where you add a new game every 6-8 months means you need to keep doing that, because people would eventually grow tired of your website and will want to visit other websites if you do not provide something new to them, however if you keep making new stuff all the time people would wait for the new stuff as well. There are games (pc games) literally out for almost 20 years that still gets attention because they provide new stuff all the time.

[deisik]

However, wolf.bet is brand new already, they don't need to make a new website, they can rebrand themselves as a "not just a dice site" with their current name, I don't get why people think that having a dice in your name must mean you are purely a dice website, there are a ton of websites with weird names that go for only slots for example and that doesn't mean they can't have any other game, they just don't want to.

Wolf.bet has a good name with no dice in it and no nothing so they could just put any game and not worry about the situation of people thinking they are just a dice game website neither. So, it works out great for them

Well, it is not quite our business anyway

So we can only speculate here. As I see it, there is a certain window of, say, a couple of years when adding new games wouldn't hurt the image of the site. But after this window is closed, it might be better to keep things as they are. It doesn't actually have anything to do with the name itself (i.e. whether it has the word dice in it) but rather with the public perception of the casino that will be firmly established by that time

I disagree, I think it is exactly the opposite, this is why running a casino is such a hard task. If they improve their website for years then we should be expecting them to keep improving their websites, if they want to change something they should do it right now so we don't get too comfortable with it

But that's not exactly what I'm trying to get across

My point is that the owners may not have the resources to add new games all the time while they still have to weed out existing bugs and add new features to what they already have (read, dice). Indeed, it would be nice to have all these fancy games that other such sites entertain, the sooner the better, but this option may simply not be available due to reasons mentioned. Dice is essentially a simple hi-lo game but the stuff built around it can be quite complicated and demanding in terms of time and effort (which seems to be the case here)

That is why I think having a website for few years where you add a new game every 6-8 months means you need to keep doing that

The whole of wolf.bet itself has been around for less than that (or around that time)

[atjiat]

You really have a very interesting and easy to manage resource.  Even a novice becomes very understandable, but apparently this is not enough to attract more users.  Almost a month ago, on the site I watched about 25 users online, and today up to 60. This is not very much and, given the greater competition, you need to attract more attention to your site.  Maybe you should carry out an even more extensive advertising campaign, or maybe you have another strategy for this?

[serjent05]

Hitting that payout itself is a lucky already no matter how long the user try to hit, why we cant say that he is lucky to hit it? Do you mean that he is lucky enough if he hit it just after he start hunt the payout (with few bets only)? I would even say that someone is lucky enough to hit even if he need hundred thousands of bets before he hit it eventually because hitting big payout is something rare, not all players are lucky enough to hit although they try it every single day.

This example makes that more clear.
When the payout is 2600x, the chance of win is 0.04%. It's unlikly to win the bet.
But assume that you roll 2000 times. Mathematically, Your chance to win at least one time is 55%.

I think not, each roll is independent from each other.  It isn't something commulative so that your chance of winning is getting bigger.  it is always 0.04%  whether you roll a miilion times or not.

[DGulari]

You really have a very interesting and easy to manage resource.  Even a novice becomes very understandable, but apparently this is not enough to attract more users.  Almost a month ago, on the site I watched about 25 users online, and today up to 60. This is not very much and, given the greater competition, you need to attract more attention to your site.  Maybe you should carry out an even more extensive advertising campaign, or maybe you have another strategy for this?

60 users online for now campared only 25 in a month before aren't too much for you? It's increased 140% higher than a month ago, how can it's still not much? When wolf.bet just launced, i even seen there were only less than 15 people online on there, then they improved their site, running 1st signature campaign to promote them, improved the betting speed, and now they are back with 2nd signature campaign

[veleten]

You really have a very interesting and easy to manage resource.  Even a novice becomes very understandable, but apparently this is not enough to attract more users.  Almost a month ago, on the site I watched about 25 users online, and today up to 60. This is not very much and, given the greater competition, you need to attract more attention to your site.  Maybe you should carry out an even more extensive advertising campaign, or maybe you have another strategy for this?

60 users online for now campared only 25 in a month before aren't too much for you? It's increased 140% higher than a month ago, how can it's still not much? When wolf.bet just launced, i even seen there were only less than 15 people online on there, then they improved their site, running 1st signature campaign to promote them, improved the betting speed, and now they are back with 2nd signature campaign

compared to other sites it is not much indeed , but the site is relatively new so you have to take progress into account
it is very hard for a new dice to make it in such a stacked , competitive environment
you can do everything right, spend lot of money on marketing but end up with 50 gamblers , just because this is your share of the market
wolfbet is doing a-ok , steadily improving and gaining some audience
we don't know how profitable it is , taking into account the signature campaign and races they host , but I'm sure the money spent on marketing will return sooner or later