🐺WOLF.BET - Advanced Dice Game 🎲 Sportsbook 🏟️ Slots 🎰

[SirLancelot]

Showing the all top 30 could actually make for a good marketing, I mean when people see the top 10 they think maybe they can't afford to be in the top 10 but if they have seen the top 30 they could actually try to beat the 30th spot or be in the 23th spot or whatever and that way you could attract a lot of smaller fish as well, top 10 will always be there anyway so the whales you would like to give it a try will continue to do so while you would be getting the fish as well.

It is not a must, it is not really a priority neither, it is just the best case of marketing you can do for free, all you need to do is have a bigger picture in the bitcointalk topic and that's it, doesn't cost anything and would take an extra 30 seconds at tops to do that if you wanted to.

[WolfBet]

I have always supported Wolf.bet, but I don't know why wolf.bet does not reply people here. For example, in the previous posts there was a discussion regarding showing the all 30 winners. I think wolf.bet should make a post about this.

We did, sorry if it wasn't clear.

We thought it was better for everyone a short and clear image with the most competitive positions, but of course, 30 players get rewarded everyday.
We are still studying some options on ways to display the winners from previous races, we appreciate any feedback you want to leave here!  

We're sorry if you feel we don't do enough around here, without further excuses and even though we never missed a message, we promise to be more active answering your concerns.

Regarding updates, we are currently focused on a few big features which are taking some time to develop but might create the momentum we aim for, one of them was going to be implemented last week but we had a few step backs during the process, however, after some testing for these past few days and we are almost certain we can update all of you tomorrow (if not bring you feature already)!


And we are also happy to show you how much the top 10 players wagered on the last 24h

[khaled0111]

Seeing the wagered amounts and the number of online players and how they are increasing everyday, we can conclude that WB is on the right path  

However, I stil believe that deposit addresses shouldn't expire after 24 hours. And why you accept only one transaction per address?

[ahmadakbari]

However, I stil believe that deposit addresses shouldn't expire after 24 hours. And why you accept only one transaction per address?

Here is what they announced 20 days ago.

We actually plan to change the deposit address system really soon!

But the deposit system has not changed yet and the address expires after 24 hours.
I don't think there is a technical issue. But I don't know what is the reason and would like to know.

[khaled0111]

But the deposit system has not changed yet and the address expires after 24 hours.

This is exactly why I asked again. I want to know if there is any updates regarding this issue.
Besides, lately, transactions with low fees are taking too long to confirm and a transaction with 1sat/b may take longer than 24 hours to confirm.

[WolfBet]

However, I stil believe that deposit addresses shouldn't expire after 24 hours. And why you accept only one transaction per address?

Here is what they announced 20 days ago.

We actually plan to change the deposit address system really soon!

But the deposit system has not changed yet and the address expires after 24 hours.
I don't think there is a technical issue. But I don't know what is the reason and would like to know.

Hey, yes, unfortunately we still have the same system, but he didn't forget this, we would love to give you an exact time but we might miss the schedule since we still have a few challenges ahead, once we have a solid update on this you guys will be the first to know

[Bitinity]

But the deposit system has not changed yet and the address expires after 24 hours.

This is exactly why I asked again. I want to know if there is any updates regarding this issue.
Besides, lately, transactions with low fees are taking too long to confirm and a transaction with 1sat/b may take longer than 24 hours to confirm.

So be sure to use the recommended fee once you are going to make a deposit to your Wolfbet account to make it confirmed faster. There is no point of using so low fee if people knows that it may take more than 24 hours. Even if people use too low fee and it takes more than 24 hours to confirm while he is depositing at wolfbet, I'm sure there will be still a way to claim the deposit. So no need to worry too much but obviously it is better to make deposit with recommended fee (at least not using the lowest fee).

[serjent05]

But the deposit system has not changed yet and the address expires after 24 hours.

This is exactly why I asked again. I want to know if there is any updates regarding this issue.
Besides, lately, transactions with low fees are taking too long to confirm and a transaction with 1sat/b may take longer than 24 hours to confirm.

So be sure to use the recommended fee once you are going to make a deposit to your Wolfbet account to make it confirmed faster. There is no point of using so low fee if people knows that it may take more than 24 hours. Even if people use too low fee and it takes more than 24 hours to confirm while he is depositing at wolfbet, I'm sure there will be still a way to claim the deposit. So no need to worry too much but obviously it is better to make deposit with recommended fee (at least not using the lowest fee).

Another thing to address is issue on withdrawal, sometimes wolfbet use the smallest tx fee option that leaves the transaction to be confirmed in a longer period of time.  As for me I do not care much for a reasonable larger tx fee charge as long as the transaction can be included on the next 5 blocks at most (time of waiting to be confirmed).  

[khaled0111]

Hey, yes, unfortunately we still have the same system, but he didn't forget this, we would love to give you an exact time but we might miss the schedule since we still have a few challenges ahead, once we have a solid update on this you guys will be the first to know

Thank you for the quick reply.

Even if people use too low fee and it takes more than 24 hours to confirm while he is depositing at wolfbet, I'm sure there will be still a way to claim the deposit. So no need to worry too much but obviously it is better to make deposit with recommended fee (at least not using the lowest fee).

That's true. All you have to do is to contact the support team and they will help you to claim the deposited money. I know this from a previous experience (I mentioned it before) and it wasn't because of low fees, in fact I even bumped the fees to accelerate the transaction to be able to join the wolf race but forgot that you can't send more than one transaction per address.

[SquallLeonhart]

Showing the all top 30 could actually make for a good marketing, I mean when people see the top 10 they think maybe they can't afford to be in the top 10 but if they have seen the top 30 they could actually try to beat the 30th spot or be in the 23th spot or whatever and that way you could attract a lot of smaller fish as well, top 10 will always be there anyway so the whales you would like to give it a try will continue to do so while you would be getting the fish as well.

Yeah, seeing the top 30 would make a huge difference, I know I am far away from 10th spot but I may not be that far away from 30? So, there should be the top 30 both here and there at the same time so people could check themselves. Seriously, when you think about it, giving prizes to 30 people and only showing 10 of them and hiding the other 20 is not making any sense, why would they be hidden?

We should be able to see what the money is, there was a lot of talk on how there are too many hidden usernames and I can understand people wanting to be hidden and that is fine and all but hiding the results? There is only 33% of the results shown right now, we need to see the rest so we could at least get a better result from our tries to reach that top 30 levels.

[WolfBet]

Showing the all top 30 could actually make for a good marketing, I mean when people see the top 10 they think maybe they can't afford to be in the top 10 but if they have seen the top 30 they could actually try to beat the 30th spot or be in the 23th spot or whatever and that way you could attract a lot of smaller fish as well, top 10 will always be there anyway so the whales you would like to give it a try will continue to do so while you would be getting the fish as well.

Yeah, seeing the top 30 would make a huge difference, I know I am far away from 10th spot but I may not be that far away from 30? So, there should be the top 30 both here and there at the same time so people could check themselves. Seriously, when you think about it, giving prizes to 30 people and only showing 10 of them and hiding the other 20 is not making any sense, why would they be hidden?

We should be able to see what the money is, there was a lot of talk on how there are too many hidden usernames and I can understand people wanting to be hidden and that is fine and all but hiding the results? There is only 33% of the results shown right now, we need to see the rest so we could at least get a better result from our tries to reach that top 30 levels.

We have the same system we had when we only awarded 10 people, this should be worked in a near future, we already have it on our list of things to reconsider:)

Btw, here is the Top 10 from today, congratz everyone

[MonsterV]

~snipp

We have the same system we had when we only awarded 10 people, this should be worked in a near future, we already have it on our list of things to reconsider:)

In my opinion if it's just a matter of showing the top 30 players don't need to be too focused because it's not so important in my opinion. It's better to consider new features that can attract more players and are more comfortable gambling here. Seeing the top 10 in my opinion is enough or you can display the ranking of players in each of their accounts so that each player can see their wagering rank.

[ralle14]

~snipp

We have the same system we had when we only awarded 10 people, this should be worked in a near future, we already have it on our list of things to reconsider:)

In my opinion if it's just a matter of showing the top 30 players don't need to be too focused because it's not so important in my opinion. It's better to consider new features that can attract more players and are more comfortable gambling here. Seeing the top 10 in my opinion is enough or you can display the ranking of players in each of their accounts so that each player can see their wagering rank.

It's important for them to show the entire leaderboard most contest shows the users who are usually eligible for prizes you rarely see tournaments or competitions that doesn't have a complete leaderboard of the winners.  I'd only agree if there was sufficient information for the contest(prize distribution for top 1-30) but without any information to look for the top 11-30 I think it's appropriate for them to update it.

[Lakai01]

In my opinion if it's just a matter of showing the top 30 players don't need to be too focused because it's not so important in my opinion. It's better to consider new features that can attract more players and are more comfortable gambling here. Seeing the top 10 in my opinion is enough or you can display the ranking of players in each of their accounts so that each player can see their wagering rank.

Of course its important for all the players who didnt manage to climb into the top 10. Seeing your stats only in your profile isnt enough, if you are eg at place 12 you definitly want to know how many btc separate you from rank 11 for example.

It  showing the full leader board is definitly not something which takes the devs years to implement, so this shoildnt have any impact on new features etc.

[justdimin]

But the deposit system has not changed yet and the address expires after 24 hours.

This is exactly why I asked again. I want to know if there is any updates regarding this issue.
Besides, lately, transactions with low fees are taking too long to confirm and a transaction with 1sat/b may take longer than 24 hours to confirm.

So be sure to use the recommended fee once you are going to make a deposit to your Wolfbet account to make it confirmed faster. There is no point of using so low fee if people knows that it may take more than 24 hours. Even if people use too low fee and it takes more than 24 hours to confirm while he is depositing at wolfbet, I'm sure there will be still a way to claim the deposit. So no need to worry too much but obviously it is better to make deposit with recommended fee (at least not using the lowest fee).

I doubt it is really that much of a priority, I mean if people had difficulty depositing then I would understand an urgency, it is really a problem if people couldn't deposit or if they deposited but the money didn't came to their wallets.

Yet people can do that, all they have to do is use different addresses each time they deposit and that's it, now is that an inconvenience? Sure it is, but that doesn't mean it is an urgency, it is not a "problem" yet, it is just "I would rather not to" type of situation. Wolf should definitely look into changing that one day (which they are but will take some time) but that's about it, it is not "fix this right now!" type of situation.

I feel like the hidden thing is a bigger problem right now compared to any other issue.

[1982dre]

~snipp

We have the same system we had when we only awarded 10 people, this should be worked in a near future, we already have it on our list of things to reconsider:)

In my opinion if it's just a matter of showing the top 30 players don't need to be too focused because it's not so important in my opinion. It's better to consider new features that can attract more players and are more comfortable gambling here. Seeing the top 10 in my opinion is enough or you can display the ranking of players in each of their accounts so that each player can see their wagering rank.

It's important for them to show the entire leaderboard most contest shows the users who are usually eligible for prizes you rarely see tournaments or competitions that doesn't have a complete leaderboard of the winners.  I'd only agree if there was sufficient information for the contest(prize distribution for top 1-30) but without any information to look for the top 11-30 I think it's appropriate for them to update it.

Yep it would be helpfull to see the whole list and also to get a message when you got a prize so you wont be suprised if your balance rised suddenly.

[deisik]

Yet people can do that, all they have to do is use different addresses each time they deposit and that's it, now is that an inconvenience? Sure it is, but that doesn't mean it is an urgency, it is not a "problem" yet, it is just "I would rather not to" type of situation. Wolf should definitely look into changing that one day (which they are but will take some time) but that's about it, it is not "fix this right now!" type of situation

Let's call it a potential inconvenience (or even a pitfall, in a sense), though personally, I have no issues with that system. However, having been in crypto for so long (over 6 years already) I've seen some things (like transactions stuck for days and what not), and I know that these things can quickly turn from bad to worse, from a minor inconvenience into a major headache, into your personal hell of sorts. Technically, it is just a matter of time until they do

But overall I agree with you, it is not an urgency

[leea-1334]

Well I also think that way, I hope that wolf.bet always responds quickly to the questions and complaints of members here. Although I don't know if they read it all and only become silent readers, but I hope they can have a quick response here so that players are quite satisfied with the support of Wolf.bet.

In the past when wolf.bet was launched, they always responded to members questions here and discussed wolf.bet plans and features going forward and now I hope that again so that wolf.bet continues to develop better.

I learned a few things about sites and customer support. If you are polite, patient and are clear with the issue, support will actually get back to you first rather than on others. But assuming of course the service itself is legit;)

But for me things like this deposit thing is always temporary, and Bitcoin users should themselves handle issues like fees. After all what can Wolfsbet do about the network of blockchains?

[arwin100]

Well I also think that way, I hope that wolf.bet always responds quickly to the questions and complaints of members here. Although I don't know if they read it all and only become silent readers, but I hope they can have a quick response here so that players are quite satisfied with the support of Wolf.bet.

In the past when wolf.bet was launched, they always responded to members questions here and discussed wolf.bet plans and features going forward and now I hope that again so that wolf.bet continues to develop better.

I learned a few things about sites and customer support. If you are polite, patient and are clear with the issue, support will actually get back to you first rather than on others. But assuming of course the service itself is legit;)

Whether you are polite or not if there costumer service is poor your will get the same result and they should solve their users problems since it's really suck to encounter that thing and it's stressful in the part about of compromise person especially if there's money involved. If they want to be called legit then they should supposed to act professionally on distress users who encounter an issue to their site.

[1982dre]

Well I also think that way, I hope that wolf.bet always responds quickly to the questions and complaints of members here. Although I don't know if they read it all and only become silent readers, but I hope they can have a quick response here so that players are quite satisfied with the support of Wolf.bet.

In the past when wolf.bet was launched, they always responded to members questions here and discussed wolf.bet plans and features going forward and now I hope that again so that wolf.bet continues to develop better.

I learned a few things about sites and customer support. If you are polite, patient and are clear with the issue, support will actually get back to you first rather than on others. But assuming of course the service itself is legit;)

But for me things like this deposit thing is always temporary, and Bitcoin users should themselves handle issues like fees. After all what can Wolfsbet do about the network of blockchains?

The most complains on almost all dice sites are that users just don't know how to block chains works and starts complaining about that. Maybe some additional information on the deposit page can be helpful for those new Crypto users