Stake vs Fixed bounty allocation

[freedomgo]

That defends on your rank but like me which is a legendary rank, I would prefer on stake basis as I know I have bigger share compared to members with lower ranks.

[TheClownSong]

With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?

With a system stake, if there are few participants, there will be a lot of reward for bounty hunters. Unlike fixed allocation, if a participant in a bounty campaign, it will not affect the acquisition of tokens because it has been determined by the bounty manager. I think both systems are good as long as the project is running and has value in the market

[zero714309]

It depend how much token alocation and how many bounty partisipant. We must look at other factors. If token alocation quite big but bounty partsipant also more than expectation it will also decrease our payment. We must more detail about it.

[zero714309]

It doesnt matter if its stake or fixed allocation what matters is the project itself,if its good enough i won't mind promoting the project either staked or fixed

Indeed. I think stakes or fixed is not really big problem,it depend on how great project it self. Its quite difficult to find project with great plan. Its not 2017 or 2016, we all know so many project failed. If we choose fixed alocation sometimes they limited partisipant also. It better we join on stakes based but they limited partisipant.

[Furryball]

The both are good,this doesnt mean the project will do better if  stake or fixed reward are been used,meaning it has no impact on the project itself,why can't we focus on how good the project is?i think that's all that matters?

[junkerr]

now it seems like the bounty manager and developer don't really appreciate the bounty hunter. there are no restrictions on participants and they at will limit the participants who can join. and allocation cuts, or other rules changes are very reasonable.

[puremage111]

Well there's pros and cons

With Stake allocation, your pay will be vary and it could be much higher than initial or lower than what you expected
With Fixed allocation, your pay will be consistent and you will get what you see

Well i prefer Fixed allocation as it seems better here

[mirakal]

now it seems like the bounty manager and developer don't really appreciate the bounty hunter. there are no restrictions on participants and they at will limit the participants who can join. and allocation cuts, or other rules changes are very reasonable.

If that's the case, then stop supporting the project they like you to promote.
They can't cut the reward or change the rules when it's already part of the contract in the beginning, that would one sided and not fair for bounty participants. There are other bounties that has a statement "the manager reserves the right to change the rules anytime", you should not join that kind of bounty.

[sherenikaw]

Well, actually both have different advantages. But personally, I prefer to choose fixed bounty rewards, moreover, we can get it is fixed amount and sent weekly or monthly so that we will not feel worried not getting the coin or token.
Fixed bounty reward is very profitable especially for the members that have lower accounts (especially for the signature campaign). And we can also count in what amounts we will get in a certain period.

[Xalata]

I prefer fixed allocation to stakes system because at the beginning of the bounty, you know the exact amount you can get. In the stakes system, those with higher ranks normally cheat those with lower stakes.

[mirakal]

I prefer fixed allocation to stakes system because at the beginning of the bounty, you know the exact amount you can get. In the stakes system, those with higher ranks normally cheat those with lower stakes.

I understand you sentiment, we high rank really benefit more if the stake is followed.
It's the same effort and yet high rank get's higher reward, and I think that would not change because high rank also has a wider and bigger signature display.

[nicecrypto]

I prefer fixed allocation to stakes system because at the beginning of the bounty, you know the exact amount you can get. In the stakes system, those with higher ranks normally cheat those with lower stakes.

I understand you sentiment, we high rank really benefit more if the stake is followed.
It's the same effort and yet high rank get's higher reward, and I think that would not change because high rank also has a wider and bigger signature display.

yeah very frustrating atimes to see what the high rank members are getting in comparison to low rank accounts, but as a low rank you have to accept it since that is how it is, they are like old staffs in a company that will earn more than new intakes , fixed allocation makes it more just for both high and low ranks, you will get what you deserve no calculation needed.

[umbara ardian]

I prefer fixed allocation to stakes system because at the beginning of the bounty, you know the exact amount you can get. In the stakes system, those with higher ranks normally cheat those with lower stakes.

that's of course. People with higher rankings will get more stake than those with lower rankings. That is the difference between the members in bitcointalk. And you only know the exact amount you received when you received it

[zzortyx]

I very rarely participated in projects with a fixed payment depending on the rank of BTT. Usually, a staky. But the main thing is to pay on time, which is now a rarity.

[akungagal]

I understand you sentiment, we high rank really benefit more if the stake is followed.
It's the same effort and yet high rank get's higher reward, and I think that would not change because high rank also has a wider and bigger signature display.

indeed this seems unfair to some people, but i think it's legitimate.
as you say high ranking has a pretty large signature display and it will make investors more quickly see the project being promoted.

that is why allocations for high rankings such as Legendary and hero rank are greater than below their rank.

[Samboo]

I also prefer fixed allocation of tokens instead of stakes. Bounty hunters can calculate how many tokens they can earn at the end when there is a fixed pool of tokens for bounty campaigns. There are some problems in stakes like bounty pools may be reduced under various pretexts, and you cannot know how many tokens you can get at the end. 

[Tomohisa]

With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?

I choose stake allocation, coin that doesn't have a market price yet look more attractive to me than a fixed allocation coin or token.

[coin-investor]

If we are talking about a signature campaign I always prefer stake allocation, as a high-rank member it's advantageous and profitable for me there are not many signature participants compare to other bounty campaigns where the participants can number thousands of participants because everybody can participate, they can include as many campaigns as possible.

[letyouearn]

Stakes are more risky but more profitable potentially. Fixed allocation is more predictable but often less profitable. Both types of bounty are good, it's up to you, which one to take part in.

[princerepon]

With stake allocation you can get more tokens based on the stake and how many participants join the bounty but that's that, the reason why I choose fixed allocation over stake is because right from the start you've know how much tokens you will get and the fact is merely looking or comparing bounties from one to another fixed bounty allocation performs better,they pays most times and no single participants is left out,what do you guys say about this?

I am doing bounty also for a long time but i didn't think that fixed prize better than stakes. Yes you know that how much you'll earn end of the week but in my little experience that wasn't worth it. example, in stakes way you can earn weekly from a twitter campaign 60$ if that project is really good but in fixed campaign's project it's too much for them. because they have to advertisement there project smoothly with this fixed prize.