[POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????

[actmyname]

You also have a nice new metric to look at: Largest Merit Circle

That's not really a circle, it's more of a web: the sum of all unique users you've Merited or who have Merited you. I didn't know OgNasty holds the record of meriting most unique users.

It would be a statistic used for refutations when talking about "merit cycling". Unless we have scores upon scores of accounts in the DT bike club

P.S. Just merit a few more people... you can beat Og

[1714004768]

1714004768

[1714004768]

1714004768

[1714004768]

1714004768

[1714004768]

1714004768

[cabalism13]

@The guzzler
We are not fucking joking around.

Now, you know...


Hey man, @LFC_Bitcoin just voted for you mate, for I wanna take your place as guzzler 😂 (based on what CH is saying, LMAO)

[The-One-Above-All]

owlcatz looking a little lonely there with no vote recognition...

Let's have a look through them and see what it looks like. I mean if there is no cycling/collluding I very much doubt we will see the same names all over each others trust lists. There are 100's of 1000's of members are there not if not millions.

I want to point this out: suchmoon has sent merit to 1183 unique profiles. However, usually, the better the post quality, the more merit an individual will accumulate.

It will naturally be a pyramid and not equal across all users. It would be ridiculous so say that forum members are 1:1 in terms of post quality. Go to the Altcoin discussion board and try to find five consecutive posts that are useful. It would surprise me since I've reported consecutive pages on threads.

You also have a nice new metric to look at: Largest Merit Circle

Can we have the top 20 fans and recipients lists of the Dirty Turds on the initial post. We are certain a picture (or a bunch of lists) is going to speak a 1000 words.



Since there is no objective set of criteria that define the value of a post is it quite amazing that each of the dirty turds have all chosen to determine that each others posts  are indeed so very valuable and that they should also include each other on DT and be part of the same handful of highest paying sig campaigns run by pals who also happen to be part of the dirty turds group (we do NOT say darkstar is  a dirty turd although his sig spot choices are certain a cause for concern and certainly cause for a debate in the future) yahoo2039420 is certainly a part of the dirty turd outer circle we have just not got around to him as yet )

This thread should at this stage be considered considered by the reader.  

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088852.0

Now it is interesting to observe that the majority of those claiming there is NO collusion and gaming of the merit here (that leads in part to control of the highest paid sig spots) are those ones wearing the highly paid sig spots. This is again quite undeniable.

Whilst we accept that it is ridiculous to claim all posters would be of equal ability to produce posts of REAL VALUE. That is why we would never claim that and nor would any other person here. However it is ludicrous to believe that persons such as Tman et al  are merely a fair and reasonable home for merit based on the value of posts if you will a product of natural selection in a true meritocracy. Rather than the product of perhaps a tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny subset of the entire board that without any definition nor criteria all seem to believe that their small group of pals produce the most valuable output in their personal subjective opinion. They also believe they are ALSO the most trustworthy and all seem to elected on a non transparent basis to enjoy the best paid sig campaigns. No collusion, no gaming nothing to see here. LOL

Not to mention that is clearly observable that most merit, even in this thread is left on political grounds or for net negative garbage that actually prevents or inhibits the optimal outcome in many cases.

As suchmoon correctly blurted out good poster and bad poster are meaningless terms without strict criteria or definition. We agree with that,  it's super low value and also dangerous in many ways.

Nearly every thread that we or our friend CH participated in on meta, our posts were far MORE valuable than any person that was trying to pose faux rebuttals because our central points are still there and they are not debunked at all. Faux rebuttals that are attempted on  political grounds for selfish personal gain are HIGHLY net negative and the lowest value  posts on the board and yet they received a ton of merit on political grounds.

Even posts where you whilstle blow on scammers and their prior scamming and lying are NET POSITIVE or posts calling for the introduction of fair and transparent rules that ensure the fair treatment of all members are some of THE MOST VALUABLE posts and I am sure satoshi would agree, however in such threads those opposing that goal get the most merit in most cases.

Merit is the worst thing ever to be introduced to this board. Building a trust system upon this broken and gamed garbage just played into the Dirty Turds hands completely.

Let's not forget that most people here fall over themselves to produce garbage lists of shitty stats puke at the drop of a hat.

Ask for the top 20 fans and recipients of the dirty turds here and you can't even bribe shits like robovac or moronbozo to produce them even if you promise them things they are begging for. They are shit scared to present them because it will be quite clear that this a tiny subset of the board that are all pals on meta, DT, merit sources and highly paid sig spots that all fit nicely together and entrench each other in power and entrench them in the top paid sig spots.

That is just the direct financial REWARDS of gaming the wide open and vulnerable stupid systems of control, not to mention you can Lie, scam, turn evil, employ double standards and get paid the highest rates for doing so and not get red trust and made a pariah.

Merit is joke, DT is a cancer that now needs complete removal. There is no going from totally corrupt and broken to fair and reasonable decentralized governance. Governments generally go from fair and reasonable and descend over time into corrupt self serving shit. You can't start at corrupt self serving shit pool, and tinker your way back to reasonable and fair.

We built a house on a foundation of decomposing fecal matter (merit), now the cracks in the walls have opened the roaches have poured in and the roof is leaking hard, let's not sit around saying lets rotate the roaches, lets move some bricks around,  let's work out the probability of rain leaking in  sufficiently and washing the roaches out enough that they don't multiply fast enough before the next cloud burst...... let's forget this shit pile and go build a house on a firm and solid foundation?? time spent tinkering and temp fixes are time we can spend designing a nice new house that functions as a house.

@LFC - we try to keep it light hearted as possible  whilst pushing for a transparent and fair set of rules that ensure each member is treated equally.

This largest merit circle on bpip seems to mean ZIP regarding our central point on merit circles here and as far as we can tell. This is large circle is not even a circle at all. You could have a bunch of people that give 1 or 2 merits out to thousands of people and then all plaster a tiny group of pals/alts with very large chunks of merit who all do the same thing. Form a mini powerful merit circle inside a "large circle" of tiny merit crumbs.

Pull up the top 20 fans and recipients of the dirty turds and stop wasting time with this smoke and mirrors garbage.

Actually DO IT FOR THE ENTIRE DT1 including lauda, vod and moronbozo (they have done plenty of merit damage) let's see it you pussies stop hiding it away. Do the nice little picture with all the connected lines. Fuck it do the top 30 that is still a fucking tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny subset of this board. I bet we see LOTS AND LOTS of these DT's all over those other DT's merit lists. CRAMMED FULL.

Please even attempting to validate this merit sham is laughable. Subjective , gamed and dangerous dirt.  That financial incentive to game and the fact it is wide open to gaming. It is almost by its subjective nature impossible to get busted for abuse concerning the content it is given for. It is almost too funny to based trust upon it ... well ONLY giving trust to those that have gamed it the most is BRILLIANT. hahaha

Now please don't waste time pretending there is no colluding and cycling and then being too scared to present the top 20 merit lists when usually you can not contain yourselves from plastering lists everywhere about any convoluted garbage you can dream up to validate your "best posters" , "most trusted" gamed nonsense. It just looks silly.

Now as LFC said the thread was getting far more fun just slagging each other off and vying for ways to ensure you win the dirtiest turd of bitcointalks first months poll ... this is an ongoing poll so your fame will last as long as you are top dog, but to win the first one is a truly historic event. Right now we have greed dominating with hhampuz back-room deals on sig campaigns bringing him out on top. Will he be August 2019 dirtiest turd of bitcointalk? could he hold his title for the rest of the year? well perhaps so, unless we get other sig campaign managers here all offering similar back room  deals. Suchmoons beast wrestling classes don't seem to be tempting those votes away as we were sure they would. We may be up for a bit of that ...holding back our votes for now. Then again will the guzzler invest in one of those massive funnel things to secure every last drop vote?

Meanwhile cannibalism13 is chomping at the bit to offer some back-passage munching you simply will not be able to refuse for a mere vote on this poll. and at least 1 merit. We should have explained before cannibalism13  voted on LFC that he can not take the guzzlers votes on as his own, if the guzzler is switched out  that would just be too unfair unless you are going to fill in on the bukkake next friday evening at the fox hole with vod oiled up in his leopard thong and tiara fluffing (but also now vod now says he wants to finish off as well, apparently will only do it if you stare unblinking free of swimming goggles into his bloated sweating mongoloid  face as he unleashes "the wrath"  of vod??. So you will be starting off at zero if you know what is good for you. The ass feasting cannibal though can apparently change his votes later to vote for himself .  

I feel it is a little unkind to leave poor owlcatz there with zero votes all by herself? All of  suchmoon only has 2 votes? are we dealing with a bunch of misogynistic scum or something else? you don't want any suchmoon beast wrestling experience days? you're not interested in what owl can offer (after tman has had at it)?  what's up with you guys? Just give poor old owl one out of mercy ffs. Everyone else has quite a few. Zero votes is no place for a famous extortionist is it on bitcointalk??. Perhaps bones and his alts are behind all of this after all? If you HAD TO bones. I mean there was no other choice.. which are you going to give one to:  suchmoon or owl?

[actmyname]

Fine. Here's what you want.

[The-One-Above-All]

thanks actmyname. We do NOT want to sound ungrateful but the top 20 will be FAR more useful. These are only the top 10.  I mean there are going to be far more than 10 in the initial post finally? why is bpip only showing the top 10, when you have people with 5k merits surely it is useful to see even the top 30 or more really.

thanks for being the 1st to at least to attempt to offer the data we are requesting be put on display here for people to take a look at.

really we need a stats LOVER who can push all this to some lovely charts and pics for people to make up their own minds. I'm sure a nice chart with it all one will demonstrate clearly that the dirty turds are VERY VERY VERY frequently on each others fans and recipients even with just a top 20.

[marlboroza]

Seems this cycle is getting bigger each day  

Mikeywith is stuck in the middle of the cycle, Mikeywith is a newbie "cycler" , don't be like Mikeywith , be Like Quickseller.

Not at all, it was a -> b -> c -> a randomly picked example from quickseller's merit page. You can probably do a-b-c-a with most merit senders/receivers.

[actmyname]

thanks actmyname. We do NOT want to sound ungrateful but the top 20 will be FAR more useful. These are only the top 10.  I mean there are going to be far more than 10 in the initial post finally? why is bpip only showing the top 10, when you have people with 5k merits surely it is useful to see even the top 30 or more really.

Sorry, I don't operate BPIP. Stats are available on Loyce's site if you want to compile them.

really we need a stats LOVER who can push all this to some lovely charts and pics for people to make up their own minds. I'm sure a nice chart with it all one will demonstrate clearly that the dirty turds are VERY VERY VERY frequently on each others fans and recipients even with just a top 20.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Even if a "DT cycler" is in a user's top ten, it doesn't mean it's abuse. After all, suchmoon is the third most merited user on Bitcointalk. They have also received merit from nearly 300 profiles.

And here's the thing: with such high merit counts, most of the users you've listed are bound to be on the top 20 send/receiver lists. 20 is a lot.

Here's the global ranking of users by how much merit they have, filtered to your list.

#    MERIT USERNAME
3.   2778 | suchmoon
7.   2032 | The Pharmacist
14.  1275 | Vod
24.  1131 | Hhampuz
26.  1096 | marlboroza
27.  1090 | Lauda
30.  1068 | nutildah
33.  1038 | TMAN
37.  965  | LFC_Bitcoin
71.  723  | yogg
96.  538  | Foxpup
304. 224  | owlcatz

Makes sense to me why suchmoon, The Pharmacist and Vod would show up as common occurrences on someone's list.


suchmoon also shows up on the following people's merit sent lists ranked by merit received from ranks 1 to 50:

#4  | DdmrDdmr
#5  | o_e_l_e_o
#10 | hilariousetc
#20 | xtraelv
#22 | iasenko
#28 | bob123
#31 | mikeywith
#32 | coinlocket$
#34 | Steamtyme
#45 | TryNinja
#50 | ICOEthicsIn comparison, here's the same thing but ranked by merit sent (within 50)

By the way, suchmoon is the top merit sender.

#4  | Foxpup
#5  | bones261
#6  | LoyceV
#10 | Vod
#16 | Welsh
#20 | DdmrDdmr
#29 | The Pharmacist
#33 | o_e_l_e_o
#41 | nutildah
#50 | marlborozaReminder, these values are for suchmoon alone and only for the sent merit list. We have not scratched the "received merit" list in which suchmoon can be found in most of the top merit receivers, including those that are not on your poll option list.

[Veleor]

Does anybody remember how this "DT drama" with cryptohunter (aka The-One-Above-All) started and don't you think that it was being blown out of proportion?

I believe this prolonged story can end when negative feedbacks - which had arisen from a heated debate - will be removed from cryptohunter.

If cryptohunter doesn't trust DT members, s/he can just use own Trust list, instead of writing critical essays about DTs throughout the forum. If cryptohunter has any facts against DT members, then let s/he public them in Reputation.

It depends on you, whether you want to continue squabble or finally stop this fight.

[nutildah]

Does anybody remember how this "DT drama" with cryptohunter (aka The-One-Above-All) started and don't you think that it was being blown out of proportion?

Blown out of proportion?? ?? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ?

No way! Proportion is adequate for the grievous offenses we have committed. We should probably all be drawn and quartered, actually.

I believe this prolonged story can end when negative feedbacks - which had arisen from a heated debate - will be removed from cryptohunter.

How can that be when they adamantly reject all suggestions that they are the same people?

It depends on you, whether you want to continue squabble or finally stop this fight.

I find that a bit hard to believe. I think ch toaa will continue to bitch here for the rest of eternity. but thanks anyway for the suggestion. I don't even read what they write anymore. Not only is it too long but its just rehashing the same nothing over and over again.

Now watch as they continue to rehash the same nothing...

[TimeBits]

I don`t know but whoever banned my old account for talking about time banking/duration distribution/self voting and the end of bitcoin mining and showing a simulation of it 6 years ago, flush them, Fiat loving fuck.

[xolxol]

thanks actmyname. We do NOT want to sound ungrateful but the top 20 will be FAR more useful. These are only the top 10.  I mean there are going to be far more than 10 in the initial post finally? why is bpip only showing the top 10, when you have people with 5k merits surely it is useful to see even the top 30 or more really.

Sorry, I don't operate BPIP. Stats are available on Loyce's site if you want to compile them.

really we need a stats LOVER who can push all this to some lovely charts and pics for people to make up their own minds. I'm sure a nice chart with it all one will demonstrate clearly that the dirty turds are VERY VERY VERY frequently on each others fans and recipients even with just a top 20.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Even if a "DT cycler" is in a user's top ten, it doesn't mean it's abuse. After all, suchmoon is the third most merited user on Bitcointalk. They have also received merit from nearly 300 profiles.

And here's the thing: with such high merit counts, most of the users you've listed are bound to be on the top 20 send/receiver lists. 20 is a lot.

Here's the global ranking of users by how much merit they have, filtered to your list.

#    MERIT USERNAME
3.   2778 | suchmoon
7.   2032 | The Pharmacist
14.  1275 | Vod
24.  1131 | Hhampuz
26.  1096 | marlboroza
27.  1090 | Lauda
30.  1068 | nutildah
33.  1038 | TMAN
37.  965  | LFC_Bitcoin
71.  723  | yogg
96.  538  | Foxpup
304. 224  | owlcatz

Makes sense to me why suchmoon, The Pharmacist and Vod would show up as common occurrences on someone's list.


suchmoon also shows up on the following people's merit sent lists ranked by merit received from ranks 1 to 50:

#4  | DdmrDdmr
#5  | o_e_l_e_o
#10 | hilariousetc
#20 | xtraelv
#22 | iasenko
#28 | bob123
#31 | mikeywith
#32 | coinlocket$
#34 | Steamtyme
#45 | TryNinja
#50 | ICOEthicsIn comparison, here's the same thing but ranked by merit sent (within 50)

By the way, suchmoon is the top merit sender.

#4  | Foxpup
#5  | bones261
#6  | LoyceV
#10 | Vod
#16 | Welsh
#20 | DdmrDdmr
#29 | The Pharmacist
#33 | o_e_l_e_o
#41 | nutildah
#50 | marlborozaReminder, these values are for suchmoon alone and only for the sent merit list. We have not scratched the "received merit" list in which suchmoon can be found in most of the top merit receivers, including those that are not on your poll option list.

Isnt an abuse,because they are DTs,if you're out from their circle you abused the system and you are a troll if you oppose them.

[LoyceV]

Stats are available on Loyce's site if you want to compile them.

Here you go: http://loyce.club/Merit/merit.all.txt
Knock yourself out ch! Try to produce something for a change, instead of just complaining about everyone else. Good luck, this single file has all the information about Merit you ever wanted. Updates on Fridays.

[TheNewAnon135246]

I really don't understand the whole 'merit cycle' narrative. Most of the DT members are already Legendary users so getting more merit has no purpose (besides pissing off pajeets like The-Pajeet-Above-All). Are you just salty you will never become a Legendary user because nobody likes you?

[LoyceV]

I really don't understand the whole 'merit cycle' narrative. Most of the DT members are already Legendary users so getting more merit has no purpose

Bragging rights? I don't need Merit at all, and yet, I've checked every single Merit I ever received. It's more or less feedback on my post quality.

(besides pissing off pajeets like The-Pajeet-Above-All). Are you just salty you will never become a Legendary user

It's cryptohunter's alt, so he already has a Legendary account.

because nobody likes you?

This shouldn't have anything to do with Merit. Although ending up on people's ignore list because of thousands of annoying posts doesn't help either

[TimeBits]

I really don't understand the whole 'merit cycle' narrative. Most of the DT members are already Legendary users so getting more merit has no purpose (besides pissing off pajeets like The-Pajeet-Above-All). Are you just salty you will never become a Legendary user because nobody likes you?

[TheNewAnon135246]

I really don't understand the whole 'merit cycle' narrative. Most of the DT members are already Legendary users so getting more merit has no purpose

Bragging rights? I don't need Merit at all, and yet, I've checked every single Merit I ever received. It's more or less feedback on my post quality.

(besides pissing off pajeets like The-Pajeet-Above-All). Are you just salty you will never become a Legendary user

It's cryptohunter's alt, so he already has a Legendary account.

because nobody likes you?

This shouldn't have anything to do with Merit. Although ending up on people's ignore list because of thousands of annoying posts doesn't help either

Apparently Cryptohunter is on a very long and expensive holiday so The-Pajeet-Above-All can't be his alt account.

[suchmoon]

I believe this prolonged story can end when negative feedbacks - which had arisen from a heated debate - will be removed from cryptohunter.

It's been tested when marlboroza removed his neg trust and it didn't work back then. CH will find always something to bitch about.

[The-One-Above-All]

So let's have a quick recap before we take a snooze.

1. LoyceV the rampant stats spewing ROBOVAC refuses to compile a top 20 fans and recipients of DT1 members
2. Everyone else refuses to do so.


WHY? because as actmyname is preparing you to accept - that WHEN or IF you ever viewed those lists they would be CRAMMED FULL with each others names. So there you have it the VAST VAST MAJORITY OF THEIR MERITS is as a result of that tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny tiny subset of the forum believing EACH OTHERS  posts are the most valuable. Even with no single list of set criteria to measure them against. They just all happen to be pals mostly hanging in meta ( a tiny subboard) and all happen to be the best and most valuable posters in EACH OTHERS OPINIONS. Seems legit right?  I mean it does not matter that many will not even offer up 5 of their best original thought inspiring contributions or list their Achievements here, or that many are OBSERVABLY guilty of scamming, lying, double standards, and other untrustworthy behaviors or knowingly supporting them and refusing to even put a warning there to protect others. However many are TOTALLY down for putting a warning on your account IF YOU MENTION THOSE PAST OBSERVABLE INSTANCES OF WRONG DOING.

This is all just a coincidence? of course although they are observably shit posting fools and morons who get made to look foolish under any kind of pressure or scrutiny and a concentrated bunch of untrustworthy scum that will abuse trust to punish whistle blowers their VALUE TO EACH OTHER is clearly apparent.

That is not the end of the very very strange definition  and appraisal of value and trust. I mean on top of that even though they are all acutely aware of the observable instances of wrong doing (LISTED IN THE INITIAL POST)  they still feel that EACH OTHER are also THE MOST TRUSTWORTHY AND SHOULD BE ON DT. Imagine that?? so not only do they think that although they are observably low functioning  they also produce the most valuable posts, they think that although they are guilty of all the observable financially motivated wrong doing in the initial post WHICH IS THERE IN BLACK AND WHITE (ALTHOUGH NUTILDAH SEEMS TO BE BOASTING THAT IS NOTHING ) that makes them the most trustworthy in EACH OTHERS OPINIONS) well you would expect that right? I mean what is wrong with you?  morons who gets destroyed in every debate are the ones who make the most valuable posts YEP THAT MAKES PERFECT SENSE, and those that scam, lie, try to discredit whistle blowers with trust abuse, employ clear double standards  are the ones that are most  trust worthy YEP THAT MAKES PERFECT SENSE ALSO.

Then the ONLY people that have any chance of standing against them due to having grasped enough merit via UNDENIABLY GOOD POSTS over the years, a group of people that on the WHOLE (although none are our cup of tea really since most have criticized the true legend unjustly for his direct and honest approach to scammers, liars and their supporters) present posts that do not fall apart under the slightest scrutiny and seem to be based upon some solid reasoning and logic. Well guess what the most ardent scammers, liars and their supporters ALL SEEM TO believe they should be excluded from the trust system?  Oh really, what a coincidence.

That is almost laughable but wait there is more, these observable bunch of retarded scammers and scam supporters MOST ALL  seem to have creamed off the highest paying (in btc) sig spots. There are a handful of these spots on the board THE BOARD WITH 100,000'S OF ACTIVE  members and yet this SAME HANDFUL OF PEOPLE seem to have creamed of the majority of all of these top paying spots??  what you say, well you would expect to see a bunch of dumbo scammers and liars and their supporters be paid the most to continue posting their political drivel to ensure that there is NEVER A FAIR AND TRANSPARENT SET OF RULES THAT ENSURE EACH MEMBER IS TREATED EQUALLY.  Of course that is exactly what you would expect when systems of control are this poorly thought out and implemented. That is what you would expect anywhere where a small circle of individuals centralize and concentrate power in their own hands. THIS IS THE ANTI SATOSHI systems of control operating under your very noses.

Did theymos do this on purpose. NO. We have started to believe he did not. He does seem to want a fair and transparent board where each member is given a fair chance and treated equally but sadly every time he comes to meta board a listens to people like lauda worm tongue and his bunch of conspiring scum bags he gets pushed to change things for THEIR benefit. The rise of the threshold of merit to 250 cycled merits was RETARDED it concentrated power to a few people that were already abusing the system and favoring each other. The true legend spotted this immediately but was jumped upon by this bunch of scum who tried all that they could to get him banned.

Wake up theymos, you are trying to improve a system built upon a festering heap of racid shit. You are hoping it will become MORE fair and decentralized as it grows. This is not essentially going to happen where they can power up their acolytes and alts with merit allowing only those in such large proportions into system controllers any rotation or other weak sauce attempts will do NOTHING.

Flick the merit requirement down to 100 from 250 and use activity as a far stronger weighting. You can not replace nuked abusing accounts of 1500 activity like you can accounts showered in merit for starting some shit stats or poll or thread. Decouple merit from rank after snr.  These are very simple alterations to REALLY decentralize the power here.

Of course you would expect a group of pals given all the merit to give out on the basis of THEIR OPINIONS of whom deserve it most would have all of merit. I would expect that also. You would also expect those with crumbs or merit to seek favor from those handing out the merits based on their opinions only. This is what you would expect if you don't place some strict definition and criteria for allocating merit. Imagine all merits given to faux rebuttals and bullshit that got debunked were deleted ...that would be kinda useful. Political points would be a better name merit, or perhaps anti-merit?

Nutildah " the observable instances of gross financially motivated wrongdoing and scamming/scammer supporting, double standards  in the initial post = NOTHING "  stop going on about nothing will you please.

This is SO BORING - whenever you demonstrate we are scamming lying scum double standards scum, you keep demonstrating the SAME THING over and over again THAT WE ARE SCAMMING LYING SCUM DOUBLE STANDARDS SCUM.  Please stop presenting the same thing about us. Tell people we are trustworthy and valuable for a change. It is boring to keep hearing the truth about ourselves.

Thenewnobody345234 - I talk like tman, I wear the same sig as Tman and Lauda, I protect Tman and Lauda's trust abuse and scamming and lying, actions, I include Tman and lauda on DT (or did until lauda was removed)  I may not actually be tman or lauda although I joined around the same era too but you should view my posts are unbiased and neutral.

Also I Thenewnobody345234 am as dumb as Tman because I consider a pajeet being above us all (including myself) being some kind insult to the pajeet and not myself. LOL

Get these scumbags out of here. They make the rest of you look worse. We didn't think that was even possible.


@suchmoon WRONG AS USUAL


Hey police that guy just stole my car

suchCOP - STOP BITCHING MOFO that car thief is cool, I know him well.

Hey police there is that same guy selling my car to someone else

suchCOP - ALWAYS BITCHING ABOUT THE SAME THING, leave my car thief pal alone or I may have you arrested.

3rd party by stander? hey suchCOP why not arrest the criminal and get this guy his car back.

SuchCOP - NAH NOT WORTH IT BITCHES GONNA BITCH I know the thief he's cool.  THIS same bitching behavior happened when a different cool friend of mine stole that bitches motorcycle before. There is simply no point listening to his bitching it will never stop right? or do you want to get arrested too?

3rd party bystander - Hmmm



Lauda gave a red scam tag to the true legend because the 2 000 000 000 USD legend (who had previously slayed that scamming piece of shit and his lies many years since past)  said if lauda continued to call him a liar after being asked to present the lie 2x already and would not, then the true legend would encourage others to read laudas post history for themselves to see who was calling who a liar. Lauda said that was blackmail LOLOL and deserving of a scam tag.

That TRUST ABUSE only (we hear) started to come to the true legends attention after the lauda was placed back on DT. That is when we observe the true legends rightful wrath and righteous scathing posts of both the moronic merit system and the moronic decision to convert DT into a cess pool of scammers/scammer supporters and merit cyclers came to pass on the board known as bitcointalk. That was in the first age of bitcoin. In the year of 2018. As foxpup can tell you it never ceased after that point until a fair and transparent system was introduced that treated all members equally.

Many friends of the true legend came and went, taken down by various disgusting miscreants and untrustworthy selfish and greedy scum bags and their unfair power granted by the warden of bitcointalk along his path of experimenting with decentralized control until a viable solution was found. Using gamed metrics and enlisting and corrupting mods along the way with back room deals on the most lucrative sig campaigns. Each time though the friends arose with renewed vigor and stealth. `

Lauda is likely not even the worst since some of its past is not entirely without some merit. It is apparently not entirely satisfying to CH to have had to be SO negative towards Lauda since there has been instances where Lauda has been observed to be both helpful and to a degree repentant. There are likely far worse individuals that have not simply crossed paths with us before.

Having said that regardless of the personal damage a person tries to do you then you should not ignore clear wrongdoing or trust abuse to ANY member. The true legend seemed to have never given 1 shit about merit, trust or any of that contrived bullshit before he was asked to look into a case of what appeared to be bullying of a new member. Also looks to have encountered more trouble by sticking up for legends that seem to have been clearly net positive over the years that were targeted for some complete bullshit copy and paste that was for the GOOD of others and were getting banned. The true legend does not like bullying or small groups of bullies increasing their power via broken systems of control that they are gaining. Suchmoon is a total fucking bully and scumbag and the pharmacist can act like a bully also at times. Crush them down and take away their power. Bullies should never been allowed to grasp power in the first place. The pharmacist was as meek as a lamb when he came here now can turn into a tyrant when he thinks no person is looking.



"whats the point of all this merit, I'm already a legend" well fuck off then and let us cap your merit at 1000. Why not cap all legends at 1000 if there is no advantage to it. How about you loyceV cap it at 1k and all the other DT's?  but then what about

1. your ability to control DT selection
2. your ability to take the best sig spots if they are based on per monthly earned merits of whatever shit the campaign managers are dreaming up to prevent any competition to you guys.
3. your ability to make all these stats all over merit showing you are the most valuable and best posters
4. Your ability to say well my opinion matters more cos look at my higher earned merit score


the worst part is having so much merit to give, this is the carrot of group think and echo chambers , trust abuse is the stick (although theymos fixed it up quite a bit lately but that will not really help if campaign managers are still allowed to use the OLD trust score as an excuse to exclude people from their highly paid sig campaigns)

Anyway back to the fun part of thinking up negative remarks about each other in a semi comedic and childish manner (ours the truth  grounded in observable instances yours bogus and pulled out of your ass).

We are all enjoying it now, seems a shame to ruin the mood with all the UNFAIR AND CORRUPT PAST EVENTS. Let's just enjoy the promos you are all offering.

[LoyceV]

1. LoyceV the rampant stats spewing ROBOVAC refuses to compile a top 20 fans and recipients of DT1 members

I'm sorry, I didn't know I was required to jump when you say so. I'll make you a deal: get me a clear set of requirements, and I'll get you a quotation. After paying my fee, I'll get you your stats.

And because I expect a very long post and boring post, I require 0.00001BTC per word to be paid upfront just for reading your requirements

[TheNewAnon135246]

I consider a pajeet being above us all (including myself) being some kind insult to the pajeet and not myself. LOL

You are the biggest pajeet on Bitcointalk, which is an observable instance. I never said you are above any of us. I have a feeling that's the issue at hand. You're surrounded by successful traders, physical bitcoin collectors and other wealthy people while you're sitting in some shitty shack somewhere in India. Calling yourself (Cryptohunter) wealthy isn't fooling anyone. I understand where the saltyness is coming from but your behaviour is getting boring. I'm considering to put you back on my ignore list.