Removal of signature before end of the campaign shouldn't cause disqualification

[lienfaye]

Its in the rules, so if you read the rules before participating in the campaign and still decided to join then you agree and understand what it means.

Its really unfair but thats how it is, if you want to get your rewards then might as well finish the campaign and refrain from joining to other project if you really want your hard work be paid off.

Or try joining in campaign that pays in btc, every week you'll get what you deserve and you're free to join any other campaign that pays higher.

[shoreno]

Its in the rules, so if you read the rules before participating in the campaign and still decided to join then you agree and understand what it means.

unless if he rush to apply and didnt read the rules carefully  . ive seen alot of participants doing this practice and they end up complaining at the middle of the campaign  .

Its really unfair

no its not . rules are there to make the campaign fair but if someone disagrees with it then the campaign havent any obligations with them  .

Or try joining in campaign that pays in btc, every week you'll get what you deserve and you're free to join any other campaign that pays higher.

btc campaigns are infact more stricter and btc campaigns are also limited now   . you cant expect to be accepted easily and managers dont like jumping from one campaign to the other .

[matchi2011]

Its in the rules, so if you read the rules before participating in the campaign and still decided to join then you agree and understand what it means.

Its really unfair but thats how it is, if you want to get your rewards then might as well finish the campaign and refrain from joining to other project if you really want your hard work be paid off.

Or try joining in campaign that pays in btc, every week you'll get what you deserve and you're free to join any other campaign that pays higher.

That's it, rules cover everything and before you participate that rule already been attached to particular campaigns, you need to comply or else you'll be wasting your time and effort from those previous days/weeks of your participations, it's best to find campaigns that you really support as you can be patients to wait till it finish the campaign period, else, better to join campaigns that paid btc in a weekly basis.

[Weng simok]

Before participating in the signature campaign, of course there are certain rules that have been made by the bounty manager so that each participant must obey them until the campaign is over, but there are some managers / bounties who really provide convenience for participants who have long joined, in fact, can remove the signature at the time of the bounty still running and the manager will lock their stake with certain requirements.

[Lanatsa]

There is a same rule in all of signature campaigns
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"

In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.

Rules is rules and you should follow it.If you do have plans on leaving out on a campaign to find another one then better not to join at all because you would
just simply waste up your effort from the start since you wont get any stakes if you do leave.

These are common rules that bounty had,so its up to you if you plan to switch or not but if you do see that leaving out for another new worthy project to promote on then your choice.

[cabron]

Try to talk to the bounty manager if he can give you an exception lol

But then normally when they say it on the rules you wouldn't get an exception, you just have to finish the campaign and wait til the 20th week. But would you really try to join a campaign that will last 20 weeks?  Must be very promising project if I do that.

[TheUltraElite]

Before participating in the signature campaign, of course there are certain rules that have been made by the bounty manager so that each participant must obey them until the campaign is over, but there are some managers / bounties who really provide convenience for participants who have long joined, in fact, can remove the signature at the time of the bounty still running and the manager will lock their stake with certain requirements.

Simple way to prevent these is to stop participating in these altcoin based shittoken bounty campaigns. I am surprised that people in this forum actually try to make new accounts everyday in order to get into these shittoken bounties and then complain about the tokens not rising in price.

The idea of "second to bitcoin" is a delusion. You all need to stop believing into that false promise that this new token will become the second bitcoin and so on.

Boycott all altcoin Bounties and stop participating in those. If this can be done on a large scale then they can be forced to pay bitcoin for payment which in turn would be good for all you bounty hunters.

[Oceat]

Rules are rules, once they agreed on it and wear the signature they should have to follow it.
I'd rather find suitable rules if the manager doesn't want to give credit to my previous effort just because i want to stop or join another campaign.
Anyway, i don't like wasting efforts for 10 to 20 weeks without any credits/payments it's just like you are working for them freely.

[fourpiece]

There is a same rule in all of signature campaigns
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"

In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.

they should ask the bounty manager first if they are already allowed to remove thier signature and join in other bounty campaign. And besides it is on the rules that every participant should not remove the signature till the end of the campaign.

[joniboini]

If any of you guys still expect that a team of a project will treat you fairly, then you should stop it. They run a business, in an industry with no clear rules, where everyone can simply disappear and stop working after they raised some money and tell their investors that they are no longer able to pursue their goals.

Don't join bounties without any escrow with real tokens, or you'll get scammed forever. Even if removal of the signature campaign won't make you lost your stake, you already lost a valuable time if, in the end, you get tokens with no value on it.

[TheUltraElite]

It depends on the bounty, there are some bounty that requires that you informed them in order not to loose stakes,  but I think it's totally unfair for those bounties that will not give stakes either you informed them or not

You are not entitled to your own actions once you have sold your signature to some bounty for a couple of shitcoins. If you want that then go for the bitcoin paying campaign and not the shit spreading bounties in this forum. Besides you all need to stop doing this shittoken bounties because none of them are going to be worth anything and you would very well keep on holding them for years before they get listed on any decent exchange. Frustration at its peak, once you get into the cycle. Better to not participate in them.

More or less if you are not following the bounty rules you should not be entitled to any prize. So your line of though it flawed.

[arpon11]

There is a same rule in all of signature campaigns
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"

In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes an effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.

The right thing to do is to "owned no man his wages" The people promoting bounties has spent time and thinking in other to be able to post quality posts that bring icos or any projects into public domain and it is common sense to reward them and not deny them for changing to another project they think will reward them midway.
I have participated in about four bounties and experienced this treatment. We also hard about a campaign that runs here last month (anyone) and the developer refused to pay those that participated in the campaign and removed their signature.

[vanmoreno]

very appropriate if you do not receive a gift because all the consequences and rules are clear on the gift of the site you are following, if you remove the signature, you can notify the management of the gift you are following by telegram or other communication

[sunsilk]

very appropriate if you do not receive a gift because all the consequences and rules are clear on the gift of the site you are following, if you remove the signature, you can notify the management of the gift you are following by telegram or other communication

Gift? you mean to say that it's the bounty or reward correct? understand the importance of knowing the rules of the bounty that you are about to join. And if you joined without understanding the rules of the bounty, it's your problem.

Even notifying them won't help unless it's stated that they have the right to do so whenever a participant removed their signature. Pleading them won't especially if they are strict with their rules.

[slaman29]

Put yourselves in the shoes of the campaign manager. Would you like it if the guys carrying your signature switched to your signature when you were counting, and then switched off when you weren't? Rules are simple and most people know how to follow them. Why is it so important for a few people to ask for exceptions?

[dunfida]

very appropriate if you do not receive a gift because all the consequences and rules are clear on the gift of the site you are following, if you remove the signature, you can notify the management of the gift you are following by telegram or other communication

Gift? you mean to say that it's the bounty or reward correct? understand the importance of knowing the rules of the bounty that you are about to join. And if you joined without understanding the rules of the bounty, it's your problem.

Even notifying them won't help unless it's stated that they have the right to do so whenever a participant removed their signature. Pleading them won't especially if they are strict with their rules.

Rules should really be strictly followed and its been stated before the campaign start.If its been said to equip signature until the end the campaign then you should follow it.

Decision would vary with the manager if he would consider out to count stakes for those who leave and plan to join other campaigns but most of the time the dont really grant such request.

[janggernaut]

Put yourselves in the shoes of the campaign manager. Would you like it if the guys carrying your signature switched to your signature when you were counting, and then switched off when you weren't? Rules are simple and most people know how to follow them. Why is it so important for a few people to ask for exceptions?

You can also put yourself in bounty hunter's side. Will you accept if all of your stakes before (many weeks) got removed only because you changed or joined on other bounty? Sometimes there was no rules like that and it just implemented after ICO ends, which isn't fair.

You can say that because you are being paid with bitcoin on your campaign now, can you remove that and join on bounty altcoin campaign now?
I know the feel because i've used join on altcoin campaign too before.

[superving]

Put yourselves in the shoes of the campaign manager. Would you like it if the guys carrying your signature switched to your signature when you were counting, and then switched off when you weren't? Rules are simple and most people know how to follow them. Why is it so important for a few people to ask for exceptions?

You can also put yourself in bounty hunter's side. Will you accept if all of your stakes before (many weeks) got removed only because you changed or joined on other bounty? Sometimes there was no rules like that and it just implemented after ICO ends, which isn't fair.

You can say that because you are being paid with bitcoin on your campaign now, can you remove that and join on bounty altcoin campaign now?
I know the feel because i've used join on altcoin campaign too before.

Bounty managers  should do thier job when the campaign has ended not that it will take 2 weeks before they update the spreadsheet and when they see a hunter removes the signature they will disqualify it and remove all his stakes which is not right.

[posi]

There is a same rule in all of signature campaigns
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"

In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes an effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.

The right thing to do is to "owned no man his wages" The people promoting bounties has spent time and thinking in other to be able to post quality posts that bring icos or any projects into public domain and it is common sense to reward them and not deny them for changing to another project they think will reward them midway.
I have participated in about four bounties and experienced this treatment. We also hard about a campaign that runs here last month (anyone) and the developer refused to pay those that participated in the campaign and removed their signature.

The part of owing no man no wages which was not practices by some bounty campaign manager cause a bounty participant remove sign code or move to another simply show the level incompetent of bounty manager which does such and I will advise people not participate in future bounty or campaign posted by such manager.

I love this statement (The right thing to do is to "owed no man his wages" )
 

[sunsilk]

-snip-

Rules should really be strictly followed and its been stated before the campaign start.If its been said to equip signature until the end the campaign then you should follow it.

Bounty hunters who have been jumping from one bounty to another bounty thinks of it as unfair rule. But they have to respect the rules of that bounty and if they don't like it, very simple and the answer is by not joining from the start.

Decision would vary with the manager if he would consider out to count stakes for those who leave and plan to join other campaigns but most of the time the dont really grant such request.

Yes, I've said this too if the manager is very considerate they are lucky if they found a manager that has that attitude.